台灣地區所得空間公平性變遷之研究

The Study of the Changes of Spatial Equity of Income in Taiwan

10.6404/JP.200312.0047

鄒克萬(Ko-Wan Tsou)；黃書偉(Shu-Wei Huang)

所得變遷 ； 空間分析 ； 擴張理論 ； the changes of income ； spatial analysis ； diffusion theory

規劃學報

30期（2003 / 12 / 01）

47 - 57

繁體中文

所得常被用來代表一個地區經濟發展的成就，然而所得的高低與分配受到人力的移轉、資金的流動及空間發展政策的影響，因此不同的空間區位將會造成所得之差異。為探討區域所得之變化與差異，本文從「空間」的觀點來探討台灣地區各鄉鎮市所得之變遷情況，以作為未來空間發展策略擬定之參考。 由實證研究中，本文將台灣地區之所得變遷狀況劃分為六個同質影響區，並分別就各分區建構所得變遷空間擴張模型，探討各分區內之都市規模、都市化程度、教育程度、工商業勞動力比及公部門財政支出等五個所得影響變數在空間座標上的影響情形，最後進行模型配適度、效率及公平等方面之檢核，確認模型對於所得空間變遷之推估與分析，能夠有效率且公平的掌握，符合空間實際變化之狀況。

Income has been an apparent representative index of economic development in a region. However, human resources, capital flow and spatial policy affect the level and distribution of income. Thus, different location will make divergences in income. In order to comprehend the changes and divergences in regional income, we probe into the changes and divergences of the level and distribution of income based on the spatial view that is a unit is based on a town. Firstly, six homo-coverage came out as the result of the changes of income in Taiwan. Then, according to the spatial diffusion models of income changes in each coverage, we confer the spatial changes of five variables, that is urban size, urbanization, education, labor force and government expenditure. Consequently, test of goodness-of-fit, efficiency and fairness have been done to confirm the spatial changes of income of our models. Finally, we compute and analyze the changes of income to master the spatial policy of income in Taiwan.

1. 鄒克萬、張曜麟、張秀玲(2002)。整合空間統計技術之土地大量估價方法之研究。都市與計劃，29(3)，395-420。
   連結：
2. Bernstein, J.(1999).Demand Shifts and Low Wage Workers.Eastern Economic. Journal,25(2),191-208.
3. Coleman, M. T.(1992).Movements in the Earning-Schooling Relationship 1940~88.The Journal of Human Resources,28(3),661-680.
4. Ellis M.,Odland, J.,J P Jones,E Casetti(Eds)(1992).Applications of the Expansion Model.London:Routledge.
5. Forbes, K. J.(1998).Skill Classification Does Matter: Estimating the Relationship Between Trade Flows and Wage Inequality.The Journal of International Trade & Economic Development,10(2),175-209.
6. Fotheringham A. S.,Charlton M. E.,Brunsdon, C.(1998).Geographically Weighted Regression: A Natural Evolution of the Expansion Method for Spatial Data Analysis.Environment and Planning A,30,1905-1927.
7. Fotheringham A. S.,Pitts T.C.(1995).Directional Variation in Distance Decay.Environment and Planning A,127,715-729.
8. Hare, D.,West, L.A.(1999).Spatial Patterns in China`s Rural Industrial Growth and Prospects for the Alleviation of Regional Income Inequality.Journal of Comparative Economics,27,475-497.
9. Hu, D.(2002).Trade, rural-urban migration, and regional income disparity in developing countries: a spatial general equilibrium model inspired by the case of China.Regional Science and Urban Economics,32,311-338.
10. Liu, Ying Nian Wu,Jun S.(1999).Parameter Expansion for Data Augmentation.Journal of the American Statistical Association,94,1264-1275.
11. Mur, J.(1999).Testing for Spatial Autocorrelation: Moving Average versus Autoregressive Process.Environment and Planning A,31,1371-1382.
12. Zhang J.,Kristensen, G.(1995).A Gravity Model with Variable Coefficients: The EEC Trade with Third Countries.Geographical Analysis,27,307-320.
13. 蔡春燕(2003)。國立中正大學社會福利系。
14. 謝銘智(2000)。國立成功大學都市計劃研究所。

1. 賴進貴、紀玉臨、周孟嫻(2012)。臺灣區域所得探索式時空動態分析，1999-2008年。地理學報，67，1-30。
2. 鄭皓騰、鄒克萬、楊宗名、郭幸福(2013)。應用空間特徵價格模型評估高速鐵路對土地價格影響之時空特性─以臺灣高鐵為例。建築與規劃學報，14(1)，47-66。