地震高風險地區不同年齡族群下對災害知覺與個人社經屬性變數關係－以臺南市永康區為例

Discussion in Differences between Seismic Risk Perception and Personal and Social-economic Variables of Age Groups in the High Seismic Hazard Area: A Case study in Yongkang District City of Tainan

鄭皓騰(Hao-Teng Cheng)；趙子元(Tzu-Yuan Chao)；周芸(Yun Chou)

地震災害風險知覺 ； 個人社經屬性變數 ； 風險溝通 ； Seismic risk perception ； Personal and socio-economic variables ； Risk communication

規劃學報

37卷1期（2019 / 12 / 01）

29 - 43

繁體中文

在各國地震災害頻傳的情況下，政府災前預防行為的推行配合民眾落實成為減少未來災害發生造成嚴重損失的重要關鍵，如何與民眾進行溝通執行地震預防政策的過程中，地震災害風險知覺之研究即成為擬定風險溝通策略下的參考基礎，亦為來各國長久研究的核心所在。隨著國外相關研究逐漸成熟，提出不同個人社經屬性對於地震風險知覺與其相關變數有所差異，其中年齡又被視為最具關鍵且影響決策行為的重要因素之一。年齡對於都市規劃的影響雖為近期所著重的課題，但目前於此議題上卻尚未成為深入探討之標的，國內研究探討地震災害風險之研究更為少數。爰此，本研究將運用年齡進行分類下（包含青壯年、中年與高齡者），分別探討各年齡族群間地震災害風險知覺與個人社經屬性變數之關係，以地震高風險地區臺南市永康區為實證地區，並結合國外既有研究成果進行討論，解析不同年齡族群對於地震風險知覺的差異性。根據本文研究成果指出：其一，各別年齡族群對不同的地震災害風險知覺具差異性；其二，個人社經屬性對地震風險知覺的關係性上於對個別年齡族群上並非存在一致性，有別於過去國外研究所歸納之成果；其三，地震災害風險知覺與住宅補強行為的關係性上僅高齡族群具統計顯著性。藉由本文之研究成果，可做為未來執行住宅結構補強行為政策推動與溝通之參考。

The implementation of seismic risk reduction mitigation policies by governments and residences plays a critical role in reducing earthquake losses when the global frequency of high magnitude earthquakes increasing in recent years. The study on seismic risk perception is the importance of long-term issues, contributing to develop strategies for effective risk communication in the process of implementing earthquake disaster mitigation policies. Global research in this topic developed maturely shows the unique relationships between seismic risk perception and various personal and social-economic variables. In these serial research results, ＂Age＂ is seemed as one of the most influential variables in risk perception and mitigation behavior and is also the key topic in recent urban planning research. However, the association of each age group and risk perception expresses its disappointment with the lack of discussion, and domestic research shows restricted results in seismic risk perception. In sum, this study focuses on discussing the relationships between seismic risk perception and personal and social-economic variables in each age group with a Case study in Yongkang District City of Tainan. According to the research results, three main findings are shown as follow: (1) differences in risk perception among each age group are shown; (2) the relationships between seismic risk perception and personal and social-economic variables, differing from the past research findings, are inconsistent in each age group; (3) the statistically significant relationship between seismic risk perception and residential structural reinforcement is only shown in the Elderly. The results in this study could be referred as the implementation and propaganda of seismic mitigation policies.

1. 周士雄,施鴻志(2000)。環境風險管理決策中之公眾認知探討－以地震災害減緩措施為例。都市與計劃，27(3)，363-380。
   連結：
2. 周桂田(2007)。新興風險治理典範之芻議。政治與社會哲學評論，22，179-233。
   連結：
3. 洪鴻智,陳一杰,簡長毅(2008)。土地使用變遷之地震風險分析－以新竹市為例。都市與計劃，35(4)，361-380。
   連結：
4. 曹建宇,張長義(2008)。地震災害經驗與調適行為之比較研究－以臺南縣白河，臺中縣東勢居民為例。華岡地理學報，21，52-75。
   連結：
5. Ainuddin, S.,Mukhtar U.,Ainuddin, S.(2014).Public Perception about Enforcement of Building Codes as Risk Reduction Strategy for Seismic Safety in Quetta, Balochistan.International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction,9,99-106.
6. Arlikatti, S.,Lindel, M. K.,Prater, C. S.(2007).Perceived Stakeholder Role Relationships and Adoption of Seismic Hazard Adjustments.International Journal of Mass Emergencies, & Disasters,25(3),218-256.
7. Armaş, I.(2008).Social Vulnerability and Seismic Risk Perception. Case Study: The Historic Center of the Bucharest Municipality/Romania.Natural Hazards,47(3),397-410.
8. Armaş, I.,Avram, E.(2008).Patterns and Trends in the Perception of Seismic Risk. Case study: Bucharest Municipality/Romania.Natural Hazards,44(1),147-161.
9. Basolo, V.,Steinberg, L. J.,Burby, R. J.,Levine, J.,Cruz, A. M.,Huang, C.(2008).The Effects of Confidence in Government and Information on Perceived and Actual Preparedness for Disasters.Environment and Behavior,41(3),338-364.
10. Becker, J. S.,Paton, D.,Johnston, D. M.,Ronan, K. R.(2012).A Model of Household Preparedness for Earthquakes: How Individuals Make Meaning of Earthquake Information and How this Influences Preparedness.Natural hazards,64(1),107-137.
11. Bradford, R. A.,O'sullivan, J. J.,Van der Craats, I. M.,Krywkow, J.,Rotko, P.,Aaltonen, J.,Bonaiuto, M.,De Dominicis, S.,Waylen, K.,Schelfaut, K.(2012).Risk perception–issues for flood management in Europe.Natural Hazards and Earth System Science,12(7),2299-2309.
12. Collins, A. E.(2013).Applications of the Disaster Risk Reduction Approach to Migration Influenced by Environmental Change.Environmental Science & Policy,27,S112-S125.
13. Farley, J. E.,Barlow, H. D.,Finkelstein, M. S.,Riley, L.(1993).Earthquake Hysteria, Before and After: A Survey and Follow-up on Public Response to the Browning Forecast.International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters,11(3),305-321.
14. Heller, K.,Alexander, D. B.,Gatz, M.,Knight, B. G.,Rose, T.(2005).Social and Personal Factors as Predictors of Earthquake Preparation: The Role of Support Provision, Network Discussion, Negative Affect, Age, and Education.Journal of Applied Social Psychology,35(2),399-422.
15. Hertwig, R.,Barron, G.,Weber, E. U.,Erev, I.(2004).Decisions from Experience and the Effect of Rare Events in Risky Choice.Psychological Science,15(8),534-539.
16. Ho, M. C.,Shaw, D.,Lin, S.,Chiu, Y. C.(2008).How Do Disaster Characteristics Influence Risk Perception?.Risk Analysis,28(3),635-643.
17. Keller, C.,Siegrist, M.,Gutscher, H.(2006).The Role of the Affect and Availability Heuristics in Risk Communication.Risk Analysis,26(3),631-639.
18. Kiecolt, K. J.,Nigg, J. M.(1982).Mobility and Perceptions of a Hazardous Environment.Environment and Behavior,14(2),131-154.
19. Lindell, M. K.,Arlikatti, S.,Prater, C. S.(2009).Why People Do What They Do to Protect against Earthquake Risk: Perceptions of Hazard Adjustment Attributes.Risk Analysis,29(8),1072-1088.
20. Lindell, M. K.,Perry, R. W.(2000).Household Adjustment to Earthquake Hazard: A Review of Research.Environment, & behavior,32(4),461-501.
21. Lindell, M. K.,Prater, C. S.(2000).Household Adoption of Seismic Hazard Adjustments: A Comparison of Residents in Two States.International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters,18(2),317-338.
22. Lindell, M. K.,Tierney, K. J.,Perry, R. W.(2001).Facing the Unexpected: Disaster Preparedness, & Response in the United States.Washington, D.C.:Joseph Henry Press.
23. Mileti, D. S.,Darlington, J. D.(1997).The Role of Searching in Shaping Reactions to Earthquake Risk Information.Social Problems,44(1),89-103.
24. Neumayer, E.,Plümper, T.,Barthel, F.(2014).The Political Economy of Natural Disaster Damage.Global Environmental Change,24,8-19.
25. Pan, A.(2012).A Study on Residents’ Risk Perception in Abrupt Geological Hazard.Journal of Risk Analysis and Crisis Response,2(1),44-55.
26. Paradise, T. R.(2006).Perception of Seismic Risk in a Muslim City.The Journal of North African Studies,11(3),243-262.
27. Paton, D.,Bajek, R.,Okada, N.,McIvor, D.(2010).Predicting Community Earthquake Preparedness: A Cross-Cultural Comparison of Japan and New Zealand.Natural Hazards,54(3),765-781.
28. Paul, B. K.,Bhuiyan, R. H.(2010).Urban Earthquake Hazard: Perceived Seismic Risk and Preparedness in Dhaka City, Bangladesh.Disasters,34(2),337-359.
29. Perry, R. W.,Lindell, M. K.(2008).Volcanic Risk Perception and Adjustment in a Multi-Hazard environment.Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research,172(3&4),170-178.
30. Renn, O.(2017).Risk governance: Coping With Uncertainty in a Complex World.Abingdon-on-Thames, England:Routledge.
31. Russell, L. A.,Goltz, J. D.,Bourque, L. B.(1995).Preparedness and Hazard Mitigation Actions Before and After Two Earthquakes.Environment and Behavior,27(6),744-770.
32. Rüstemli, A.,Karanci, A. N.(1999).Correlates of Earthquake Cognitions and Preparedness Behavior in a Victimized Population.The Journal of Social Psychology,139(1),91-101.
33. Slovic, P.(1987).Perception of Risk.Science,236(4799),280-285.
34. Solberg, C.,Rossetto, T.,Joffe, H.(2010).The Social Psychology of Seismic Hazard Adjustment: Re-evaluating the International Literature.Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences,10(8),1663-1677.
35. Spiekermann, R.,Kienberger, S.,Norton, J.,Briones, F.,Weichselgartner, J.(2015).The Disaster-Knowledge Matrix-Reframing and Evaluating the Knowledge Challenges in Disaster Risk Reduction.International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction,13,96-108.
36. Spittal, M. J.,McClure, J.,Siegert, R. J.,Walkey, F. H.(2008).Predictors of Two Types of Earthquake Preparation: Survival Activities and Mitigation Activities.Environment and Behavior,40(6),798-817.
37. Taylan, A.(2015).Factors Influencing Homeowners’ Seismic Risk Mitigation Behavior: A Case Study in Zeytinburnu District of Istanbul.International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction,13,414-426.
38. Terpstra, T.(2011).Emotions, Trust and Perceived Risk: Affective and Cognitive Routes to Flood Preparedness Behavior.Risk Analysis,31(10),1658-1675.
39. Thistlethwaite, J.,Henstra, D.,Brown, C.,Scott, D.(2018).How Flood Experience and Risk Perception Influences Protective Actions,and Behaviours among Canadian Homeowners.Environmental management,61(2),197-208.
40. Uitto, J. I.(1998).The Geography of Disaster Vulnerability in Megacities: A Theoretical Framework.Applied geography,18(1),7-16.
41. White, P.,Pelling, M.,Sen, K.,Seddon, D.,Russell, S.,Few, R.(2005).Disaster risk reduction: A development concern.London, England:DfID.
42. Zhu, D.,Xie, X.,Gan, Y.(2011).Information Source and Valence: How Information Credibility Influences Earthquake Risk Perception.Journal of environmental psychology,31(2),129-136.
43. 袁國寧(2007)。現代社會風險倫理之探析－臺灣颱風、洪水災害風險管理觀點。政治與社會哲學評論，10(2)，47-78。
44. 郭彥廉,林彥伶,蕭代基(2015)。運用家戶震災預防行為與意願模型擬定風險溝通策略。中華防災學刊，7(1)，73-80。

1. 賴政豪,張祐誠,張念婷,洪齊隆,吳麗芬,平野綾香(2022)。正面的教育力量：921地震教育園區參觀者正負情緒、風險知覺、慾望與行為意圖關係之研究。島嶼觀光研究，14(2)，44-68。
2. 楊惠萱,李香潔(2021)。影響臺灣人減災整備行為因子之探討。調查研究-方法與應用，47，45-93。