海洋空間規劃強調之權益關係人參與：東西吉廊道禁漁協作會議之社會網絡分析

Social Network Analysis of the Dongji-Siji Marine Corridor Collaboration

葉如萍(Ju-Ping Yeh)；陳聖夫(Sheng-Fu Chen)

社會網絡分析 ； 權益關係人參與 ； 海洋空間規劃 ； 東西吉廊道禁漁提案協作會議 ； 澎湖南方四島國家公園 ； Social network analysis ； Stakeholder participation ； Marine spatial planning ； Donji-Siji marine corridor collaborative meeting ； South Penghu Marine National Park

規劃學報

39卷1期（2021 / 06 / 01）

1 - 31

繁體中文

海洋空間規劃透過劃設功能分區以協調與管理各種海域使用行為，係奠基在生態系統下的綜合管理作為，因此非常強調權利關係人，包括政府、非政府組織與所有相關個體，在規劃過程的協作參與。近年來，社會網絡分析方法因得以圖像化權益關係人間的互動關係，而被廣泛應用於分析權益關係人參與公共決策的過程。澎湖南方四島國家公園於2014年公告設立，2017年在「行政院公共政策網路參與平臺」上有民眾提案「澎湖南方四島國家公園東西吉廊道海域劃設為完全禁漁區」，達到60日內完成5000份附議的門檻後成案。接著在約五個月期間，歷經3次協作會議會前、協作會議、3次會後討論、記者會及最後正式回應。此事件所辦理的各項會議共計有29位記名權益關係人／機關，其中有20位同意進行質性問卷調查，依事件性質設計兩種社會網絡，以社會網絡分析方法描繪該協作會議前、後權益關係人間所形成的「意見諮詢網絡」與「行動合作網絡」。透過檢視該社會網絡的緊密強度、分別指認前述兩種網絡中具影響力的參與者，據此探討權益關係人參與海洋空間規劃的角色、過程與其管理議題。

The purpose of Marine Spatial Planning (MSP) is to coordinates and manages various sea use through the establishment of zoning plan. MSP is an integrated planning process based on the ecosystem of the sea area which emphasis a great collaboration between stakeholders, including governments, NGOs, and all relevant individuals. In recent years, Social Network Analysis (SNA) has been widely use to analyze the process by which stakeholder participation in public decision-making because the interaction between stakeholders can be visualized. The South Penhu Marine Park is established in 2014. Three years later, in July 2017, there was a public proposal on the ＂Online participation of public policy＂: ＂Designate a prohibited fishing zone on Dongji-Siji marine corridor of South Penhu Marine Park＂. Within 25 days, the proposal has accomplished the threshold of 5000 seconders and thus was initiated. In the next five months, there were 3 pre-collaborative meetings, the collaborative meeting, 3 post-collaborative meetings, press conference, and a final official response. This research conducted a qualitative survey on all participants of the collaborative meeting. According to the nature of the event, two social networks were designed: ＂opinion consultation network＂ and ＂action cooperation network＂. The SNA method was used to analyses their social relationships ＂before＂ and ＂after＂ the collaborative meeting. As a result, we can describe the intensity of the social networks and identify influential stakeholders, then further to explore the role, process and management issues of stakeholder involvement in MSP.

1. 王中天(2003)。社會資本(Social Capital)：概念、源起、及現況。問題與研究，42(5)，139-163。
   連結：
2. 王光旭(2015)。社會網絡分析在公共行政領域研究的應用。調查研究-方法與應用特刊，34，67-134。
   連結：
3. 王光旭(2013)。社會網絡分析在公共政策權力途徑上應用之初探：以全民健保的重要政策事件為例。行政暨政策學報，57，37-90。
   連結：
4. 蔡毓智(2008)。社會網絡：社會學研究的新取向。思與言：人文與社會科學雜誌，46(1)，1-33。
   連結：
5. Bakker, Y. W.,de Koning, J.,van Tatenhove, J.(2019).Resilience and social capital: The engagement of fisheries communities in marine spatial planning.Marine Policy,99,132-139.
6. Bebbington, A.(1997).Social capital and rural intensification: Local organizations and islands of sustainability in the rural Andes.Geographical Journal,163(2),189-197.
7. Bodin, Ö.,Crona, B. I.(2009).The role of social networks in natural resource governance: What relational patterns make a difference?.Global Environmental Change,19(3),366-374.
8. Bodin, Ö.,Crona, B.,Ernstson, H.(2006).Social networks in natural resource management: What is there to learn from a structural perspective?.Ecology and Society,11(2)
9. Bodin, Ö.,Norberg, J.(2005).Information network topologies for enhanced local adaptive management.Environmental Management,35(2),175-193.
10. Borrini, G.(1996).Collaborative management of protected areas: Tailoring the approach to the context (Issues in Social Policy).Gland, Switzerland:IUCN.
11. Borrini, G.,Farvar, M. T.,Nguinguiri, J. C., Ndangang V. A.(2000).Co-management of natural resources: Organising, negotiating and learning-by-doing.Heidelberg, Germany:Kasparek Verlag.
12. Douvere, F.(2008).The importance of marine spatial planning in advancing ecosystem-based sea use management.Marine policy,32(5),762-771.
13. Ehler, C.,Douvere, F.(2009).Marine spatial planning: A step-by-step approach.Paris, France:Unesco.
14. European Commission(2014).European Commission (2014). Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 July 2014, establishing a framework for Maritime Spatial Planning 2014/89/EU..
15. Freeman, L. C.(1978).Centrality in Social Networks: Conceptual Clarification.Social Networks,1(3),215-239.
16. Freeman, L. C.(2004).The Development of Social Network Analysis.A Study in the Sociology of Science,1(687),159-167.
17. Grafton, R. Q.(2005).Social capital and fisheries governance.Ocean & Coastal Management,48(9/10),753-766.
18. Granovetter, M. S.(1973).The strength of weak ties.American journal of sociology,78(6),1360-1380.
19. Granovetter, M. S.(1985).Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness.American Journal of Sociology,91(3),481-510.
20. Hahn, T.,Olsson, P.,Folke, C.,Johansson, K.(2006).Trust-building, knowledge generation and organizational innovations: The role of a bridging organization for adaptive comanagement of a wetland landscape around Kristianstad, Sweden.Human Ecology,34(4),573-592.
21. Halpern, B. S.,Diamond, J.,Gaines, S.(2012).Near-term priorities for the science, policy and practice of coastal and marine spatial planning (CMSP).Marine Policy,36(1),198-205.
22. Jones, P. J.,Lieberknecht, L. M.,Qiu, W.(2016).Marine spatial planning in reality: Introduction to case studies and discussion of findings.Marine Policy,71,256-264.
23. Knoke, D.,Kuklinski, J. H.(1982).Network analysis.Beverly Hills, CA:Sage.
24. Knoke, D.,Yang, S.(2008).Book: Social network analysis.Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.
25. Krackhardt, D.(1992).The strength of strong ties: The importance of Philos in organizations.Networks in the Knowledge Economy,Brighton, MA:
26. Mandarano, L. A.(2009).Social network analysis of social capital in collaborative planning.Society and Natural Resources,22(3),245-260.
27. Mitchell, J. C.(1969).Social networks in urban situations: Analyses of personal relationships in Central African towns.Manchester, UK:Manchester University Press.
28. Olsen, E.,Fluharty, D.,Hoel, A. H.,Hostens, K.,Maes, F.,Pecceu, E.(2014).Integration at the round table: Marine spatial planning in multi-stakeholder settings.Plos One,9(10),e109964.
29. Pomeroy, R.,Douvere, F.(2008).The engagement of stakeholders in the marine spatial planning process.Marine Policy,32(5),816-822.
30. Provan, K. G.,Kenis, P.(2008).Modes of network governance: Structure, management, and effectiveness.Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory,18(2),229-252.
31. Retzlaff, R.,LeBleu, C.(2018).Marine spatial planning: Exploring the role of planning practice and research.Journal of Planning Literature,33(4),466-491.
32. Santos, C. F.,Agardy, T.,Andrade, F.,Crowder, L. B.,Ehler, C. N.,Orbach, M. K.(2018).Major challenges in developing marine spatial planning.Marine Policy,132
33. Smythe, T. C.(2017).Marine spatial planning as a tool for regional ocean governance: An analysis of the New England ocean planning network.Ocean & Coastal Management,135,11-24.
34. Stamoulis, K. A.,Delevaux, J. M.(2015).Data requirements and tools to operationalize marine spatial planning in the United States.Ocean & Coastal Management,116,214-223.
35. Tichy, N. M.,Tushman, M. L.,Fombrun, C.(1979).Social network analysis for organizations.Academy of Management Review,4(4),507-519.
36. Wasserman, S.,Faust, K.(1994).Social network analysis: Methods and applications.Cambridge, UK:Cambridge university press.
37. Yeh, K.,Luo, J. D.(2001).Are virtual social relationships independent from reality?.Journal of Cyber Culture and Information Society,1(1),33-55.
38. Young, O. R.,Osherenko, G.,Ekstrom, J.(2007).Solving the crisis in ocean governance: Place-based management of marine ecosystems.Environment: science and policy for sustainable development,49(4),20-32.
39. 內政部(2020)，澎湖南方四島國家公園區域內禁止事項，https://www.cpami.gov.tw/最新消息/法規公告/27-國家公園篇/19439-澎湖南方四島國家公園區域內禁止事項.html，2020 年 11 月 5 日。
40. 內政部(2014)。,高雄市:海洋國家公園管理處。
41. 王光旭(2012)。委員會決策參與影響因素之探析—社會鑲嵌的觀點。政策與人力管理，3(2)，75-117。
42. 王光旭,陳敦源(2014)。跨域治理下的政策執行：對政策網絡與理性選擇比較與整合的方法論評估。民主與治理，1(2)，1-34。
43. 自由時報 (2015) ， 南方公園淪紙上保護區 ？ 正義警突請調 ，https://news.ltn.com.tw/news/life/paper/882034，2020 年 7 月 10 日。
44. 自由時報 (2016) ， 南方四島單位傳不合小隊長萌去意，https://news.ltn.com.tw/news/life/breakingnews/1661109，2020 年 7 月 10 日。
45. 行政院公共數位創新空間辦公室 (2017) ，澎湖南方四島案政策履歷 ，http://penghu.o8merm92eic2i5y1qpp6.lh.pdis.nat.gov.tw/，2019 年 12 月 13 日。
46. 邵廣昭,賴昆祺(2011)。台灣海洋保護區的現況與挑戰。海洋事務與政策評論，創刊號，65-90。
47. 海洋國家公園管理處(2019)，行政公告－澄清報載澎湖南方四島擬設自然人文生態景觀區東吉說明會不歡而散，https://www.marine.gov.tw/最新消息/行政公告/2470-澄清報載澎湖南方四島擬設自然人文生態景觀區東吉說明會不歡而散，2019年 11 月 5 日。
48. 海洋國家公園管理處(2016)，公告澎湖南方四島國家公園水域遊憩活動種類、範圍、時間及行為，https://www.cpami.gov.tw/最新消息/法規公告/23-內政部公告/19602-公告澎湖南方四島國家公園水域遊憩活動種類、範圍、時間及行為.html，2020 年 11 月 5 日。
49. 陳世榮（譯）,Hanneman, R. A.,Riddle, M.(2017).社會網絡分析方法：UCINET 的應用.高雄市:巨流圖書.
50. 陳義雄(2017)。海洋國家公園管理處委託研究計畫海洋國家公園管理處委託研究計畫,海洋國家公園管理處。
51. 葉欣誠(2017)。澎湖環境保育與永續發展之實踐。國土及公共治理季刊，5(2)，50-61。
52. 熊瑞梅(1995)。社會網絡的資料蒐集、測量及分析。社會調查與分析：社會科學研究方法檢討與前瞻，台北市:
53. 劉宜君,陳敦源,蕭乃沂,林昭吟(2005)。網絡分析在利害關係人概念之應用：以我國全民健保政策改革為例。台灣社會福利學刊，4(1)，95-130。
54. 澎湖縣政府農漁局(2020)，澎湖縣政府沿近海漁業作業管制相關法令公告，https://www.fa.gov.tw/cht/LawsGov/content.aspx?id=19&chk=844b44a5-d6b9-46ce-80cd-bb32de5dd95c¶m=pn%3D1，2020 年 11 月 5 日。