题名

新公共管理改革的弔詭與非意圖結果

并列篇名

The Paradoxes and Unintended Consequences of New Public Management Reform

DOI

10.6635/cpar.2015.21(4).05

作者

張世杰(Shih-Jye Chang)；陳炳宏(Ping-Hung Chen)

关键词

新公共管理 ； 行政改革 ； 公共政策的弔詭 ； 非意圖結果 ； new public management ； administrative reform ； public policy paradox ； unintended consequence

期刊名称

中國行政評論

卷期/出版年月

21卷4期（2015 / 12 / 01）

页次

113 - 149

内容语文

繁體中文
中文摘要

本論文企圖從政策的非意圖結果之研究角度，來探討近三十年來新公共管理改革所可能產生的弔詭現象。弔詭現象的存在代表著公共政策體系必須同時滿足相互衝突的價值目標，以及顯示出公共政策規劃與執行過程時常會招致非意圖結果。本論文將結合Robert K. Merton的「有目的行動之非預期結果」觀點和公共管理政策變遷之歷史制度論分析途徑，來探討這些弔詭現象產生的可能原因，並期望對公共管理政策體系的深層結構和潛在價值衝突之緊張關係，能促進更深入之理解。
英文摘要

Adopting a lens of unintended policy consequences, this article attempts to explore the paradoxical phenomena New Public Management (NPM) Reform has produced over nearly three decades. These paradoxical phenomena represent contradicting value and goals which public policy system should satisfy simultaneously, and also indicate that public policy planning and implantation often give rise to unintended consequences. This article will try to combine Robert K. Merton’s perspective of ＂unanticipated consequences of purposive action＂ and a historical institutionalist approach to public management policy change to explore the possible causal explanations of theses paradoxical phenomena. In this way, it will help to enhance profound understanding of the deep structures and hidden value conflicts in public management policy system.
主题分类 社會科學 > 社會科學綜合
社會科學 > 社會學
社會科學 > 管理學
参考文献
  1. 李長晏、林煥笙(2009)。中央與地方協力夥伴關係之分析—以台中縣潭子段旱溪整治工程為例。公共行政學報，31，49-100。
    連結：
  2. 施能傑(2008)。政府業務終結的分析架構。公共行政學報，28，85-113。
    連結：
  3. 柯三吉、衛民、黃國宬、李有容(2013)。從後新公共管理觀點論析我國區域治理與行政法人：一個台灣地區的實證研究。國家與社會，14，173-222。
    連結：
  4. 孫煒、蕭全政(2013)。全球化潮流下台灣公私部門組合型態的制度性安排。政治科學論叢，58，109-138。
    連結：
  5. 曾冠球(2010)。「問題廠商」還是「問題政府」？電子化政府公私合夥協力困境之個案分析。公共行政學報，34，77-121。
    連結：
  6. 蘇偉業(2005)。香港公營部門「資源增值計畫」的實踐：對新公共管理改革的批判性分析。台灣政治學刊，9(1)，83-117。
    連結：
  7. 蘇偉業(2009)。公共部門事前定向績效管理：反思與回應。公共行政學報，30，105-130。
    連結：
  8. Merton, Robert K. 1936. "The Unanticipated Consequences of Purposive Social Action." American Sociological Review, 1(6): 894-904
  9. Weber, Max. 1946. From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology. edited and translated by H. H. Gerth and C. Wright Mills. New York: Free Press
  10. Simon, Herbert A. 1946. "The Proverbs of Administration." Public Administration Review, 6(1): 53-67
  11. Weber, Max. 1930. The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism. translated by Talcott Parsons. London: Allen & Unwin
  12. 6, Perri,Leat, Diana,Seltzer, Kimberly,Stoker, Gerry(2002).Towards Holistic Governance: The New Reform Agenda.Basingstoke, Hampshire:Plagrave.
  13. Agranoff, Robert,McGuire, Michael(2003).Collaborative Public Management: New Strategies for Local Governments.Washington, D.C.:Georgetown University Press.
  14. Andriopoulos, Constantine,Lewis, Marianne W.(2009).Exploitation-Exploration Tensions and organizational Ambidexterity: Managing Paradoxes of Innovation.Organization Science,20(4),696-717.
  15. Aucoin, Peter(1990).Administrative Reform in Public Management: Paradigms, Principles, Paradoxes and Pendulums.Governance,3(2),115-137.
  16. Barzelay, Michael(2003).The Process Dynamics of Public Management Policy Change.International public management journal,6(3),251-402.
  17. Barzelay, Michael(2001).The New Public Management: Improving Research and Policy Dialogue.Berkeley, CA:University of California Press.
  18. Barzelay, Michael,Gallego, Raquel(2010).The Comparative Historical Analysis of Public Management Policy Cycles in France, Italy, and Spain: Symposium Introduction.Governance,23(2),209-223.
  19. Barzelay, Michael,Gallego, Raquel(2006).From 'New Institutionalism' to 'Institutional Processualism': Advancing Knowledge about Public Management Policy Change.Governance,19(4),531-557.
  20. Benson, David,Jordan, Andrew(2011).What Have We Learned from Policy Transfer Research? Dolowitz and Marsh Revisited.Political Studies Review,9(3),366-378.
  21. Breiner, Peter(1996).Max Weber & Democratic Politics.Ithaca, N.Y.:Cornell University Press.
  22. Bresser-Pereira, Luiz Carlos(2004).Democracy and Public Management Reform: Buildingthe Republican State.Oxford:Oxford University Press.
  23. Caiden, Gerald E.(1991).Administrative Reform Comes of Age.New York:W. de Gruyter.
  24. Cameron, Kim S.(1986).Effectiveness As Paradox: Consensus and Conflict in Conceptions of Organizational Effectiveness.Management Science,32(5),539-553.
  25. Chen, Ming-Jer(2008).Reconceptualizing the Competition Cooperation Relationship: A Transparadox Perspective.Journal of Management Inquiry,17(4),288-304.
  26. Christensen, Tom(ed.),Lægreid, Per(ed.)(2011).The Ashgate Research Companion to New Public Management.Burlington, VT:Ashgate.
  27. Christensen, Tom(ed.),Lægreid, Per(ed.)(2006).Autonomy and Regulation: Coping with Agencies in Modern State.Cheltenham:Edward Elgar.
  28. Christensen, Tom(ed.),Lægreid, Per(ed.)(2002).New Public Management: The Transformation of Ideas and Practices.Aldershot:Ashgate.
  29. Christensen, Tom(ed.),Lægreid, Per(ed.)(2007).Transcending New Public Management: Transformation of Public Sector Reforms.Aldershot:Ashgate.
  30. Clark, Jon(ed.)(1990).Robert K. Merton: Consensus and Controversy.Basingstoke, Hants:The Falmer Press.
  31. Clegg, Steward R.,Vieira da Cunha, João,Pina e Cunha, Miguel(2002).Management Paradoxes: A relational View.Human Relations,55(5),483-503.
  32. Coleman, James S.(1986).Social Theory, Social Research, and a Theory of Action.American Journal of Sociology,91(6),1309-35.
  33. Common, Richard(2001).Public Management and Policy Transfer in Southeast Asia.Burlington, VT:Ashgate.
  34. de Vries, Jouke(2010).Is New Public Management Really Dead?.OECD Journal on Budgeting,2010(1),1-5.
  35. Denison, Daniel R.,Hooijberg, Robert,Quinn, Robert E.(1995).Paradox and Performance; Toward a Theory of Behavioral Complexity in Managerial Leadership.Organization Science,6(5),524-540.
  36. DiMaggio, Paul J.,Powell, Walter W.(1983).The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields.American Sociological Review,48(2),147-60.
  37. Dodd, Lawrence C.(ed.),Jillson, Calvin(ed.)(1994).The Dynamics of American Politics.Boulder, Colorado:Westview Press.
  38. Dodge, Jennifer(2010).Tensions in Deliberative Practice: A View from Civil Society.Critical Policy Studies,4(4),384-404.
  39. Dunleavy, Patrick,Hood, Christopher(1994).From Old Public Administration to New Public Management.Public Money and Management,14(3),9-16.
  40. Dunleavy, Patrick,Margetts, Helen,Bastow, Simon,Tinkler, Jane(2006).New Public Management is Dead-Long Live Digital-Era Governance.Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory,16(3),467-494.
  41. Elster, Jon(1989).Nuts and Bolts for the Social Sciences.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
  42. Frederickson, H. George(1996).Comparing the Reinventing Government Movement with the New Public Administration.Public Administration Review,56(3),263-270.
  43. Goldfinch, Shaun F.(ed.),Wallis, Joe L.(ed.)(2009).International Handbook of Public Management Reform.Cheltenham:Edward Elgar.
  44. Gutting, Gary(ed.)(1980).Paradigm & Revolution.Notre Dame, Indiana:University of Notre Dame Press.
  45. Hall, Peter A.,Taylor, Rosemary C. R.(1996).Political Science and the Three New Institutionalism.Political Studies,44(5),936-957.
  46. Harmon, Michael M.(1995).Responsibility as Paradox: A Critique of Rational Discourse on Government.Newbury Park, CA:Sage.
  47. Hedström, Peter(ed.),Swedberg, Richard(ed.)(1998).Social Mechanisms: An Analytical Approach to Social Theory.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
  48. Hesse, Joachim J.(ed.)(2003).Paradoxes in Public sector Reform: An International Comparison.Berlin:Berlin.
  49. Hood, Christopher(1991).A Public Management for All Season?.Public Administration,69(1),3-19.
  50. Hood, Christopher(1994).Explaining Economic Policy Reversals.Buckingham:Open University Press.
  51. Hood, Christopher(1998).The Art of the State: Culture, Rhetoric, and Public Management.Oxford:Clarendon Press.
  52. Hood, Christopher,Peters, B. Guy(2004).The Middle Aging of New Public Management: Into the Age of Paradox?.Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory,14(3),267-82.
  53. Hughes, Owen E.(2003).Public Management and Administration: An Introduction, 3rd edition.Basingstoke, Hampshire:Palgrave Macmillan.
  54. Innes, Judith E.,Booher, David E.(2010).Planning with Complexity: An Introduction to Collaborative Rationality for Public Policy.New York:Routledge.
  55. James, Oliver(2003).The Executive Agency revolution in Whitehall: Public Interest Versus Bureau-Shaping Perspectives.Basingstoke, Hampshire:Palgrave Macmillan.
  56. Jos, Philip H.,Tompkins, Mark E.(2004).The Accountability Paradox in an Age of Reinvention: The Perennial Problem of Preserving Character and Judgment.Administration & Society,36(3),255-281.
  57. Jun, Jong S.,Rivera, Mario A.(1997).The Paradox of Transforming Public Administration: Modernity Versus Postmodernity Arguments.American Behavioral Scientist,41(1),132-147.
  58. Kaboolian, Linda(1998).The New Public Management: Challenging the Boundaries of the Management vs. Administration Debate.Public Administration Review,58(3),189-193.
  59. Kets de Vries, Manfred. F. R.(1980).Organizational Paradoxes: Clinical Approaches to Management.London:Tavistock.
  60. Kingdon, John W.(1984).Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies.Boston:Little, Brown and Company.
  61. Koot, Willem(ed.),Sabelis, Ida(ed.),Ybema, Sierk(ed.)(1996).Contradictions in Context: Puzzling over Paradoxes in Contemporary Organizations.Amsterdam:VU University Press.
  62. Kuhn, Thomas(1970).The Structure of Scientific Revolutions.Chicago:University of Chicago Press.
  63. Kushner, Saville(ed.),Norris, Nigel(ed.)(2007).Dilemmas of Engagement: Evaluation and the New Public Management.Oxford:JAI Press.
  64. Lane, Jan-Erik(2000).The Public Sector: Concepts, Models and Approaches, 3rd edition.London:Sage.
  65. Lewis, Marianne W.(2000).Exploring Paradox: Toward a More Comprehensive Guide.Academy of Management Review,25(4),760-776.
  66. Lewis, Marianne W.,Dehler, Gordon E.(2000).Learning through Paradox: A Pedagogical Strategy for Exploring Contradictions and Complexity.Journal of Management Education,24(6),708-725.
  67. Lewis, Marianne W.,Kelemen, Mihaela L.(2002).Multiparadigm Inquiry: Exploring Organizational Pluralism and Paradox.Human Relations,55(2),251-275.
  68. Lynn, Laurence E., Jr.(2006).Public Management: Old and New.New York:Routledge.
  69. March, James G.(1981).Footnotes to Organizational Change.Administrative Science Quarterly,26(4),563-577.
  70. Margetts, Hellen,6, Perri,Hood, Christopher(2010).Paradoxes of Modernization: Unintended Consequences of Public Policy Reform.Oxford:Oxford University Press.
  71. McLaughlin, Kathleen(ed.),Osborne, Stephen P.(ed.),Ferlie, Ewan(ed.)(2002).The New Public Management: Current Trends and Future Prospects.London:Routledge.
  72. Merton, Robert K.(1968).Social Theory and Social Structure.New York:The Free Press.
  73. Minogue, Martin(ed.),Polidano, Charles(ed.),Hulme, David(ed.)(1998).Beyond the New Public Management: Changing Ideas and Practices in Government.Cheltenham:Edward Elgar.
  74. Morgan, Gareth(1986).Images of Organization.Thousand Oaks, California:Sage Publications.
  75. North, Douglas C.(1990).Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance.New York:Cambridge University Press.
  76. Peters, B. Guy(ed.),Savoie, Donald J.(ed.)(1998).Taking Stock: Assessing Public Sector Reforms.Buffalo:McGill-Queen's University Press.
  77. Pierson, Paul(2004).Politics in Times: History, Institutions, and Social Analysis.Princeton, New Jersey:Princeton University Press.
  78. Pollitt, Christopher,Bouckaert, Geert(2004).Public Management Reform: A Comparative Analysis, 2nd edition.New York:Oxford University Press.
  79. Pollitt, Christopher,Bouckaert, Geert(2011).Public Management Reform: A Comparative Analysis - New Public Management, Governance, and the Neo-Weberian State, 3rd edition.Oxford:Oxford University Press.
  80. Poole, Marshall S.,Van de Ven, Andrew H.(1989).Using Paradox to Build Management and Organization Theories.Academy of Management Review,14(4),562-578.
  81. Quinn, Robert E.(1988).Beyond Rational Management: Mastering the Paradoxes and Competing Demands of High Performance.San Francisco:Jossey-Bass Publishers.
  82. Quinn, Robert E.(ed.),Cameron, Kim S.(ed.)(1988).Paradox and Transformation: Toward a Theory of Change in Organization and Management.Cambridge, MA.:Ballinger.
  83. Rapaport, Anatol(1967).Escape from Paradox.Scientific American,217,50-56.
  84. Reed, Michael I.(1997).In Praise of Duality and Dualism: Rethinking Agency and Structure in Organizational Analysis.Organization Studies,18(1),21-42.
  85. Schick, Allen(1998).Why Most Developing Countries Should Not Try New Zealand Reforms.The World Bank Research Observer,13(1),123-131.
  86. Skowronek, Stephen(1995).Order and Change.Polity,28(1),91-96.
  87. Smith, Peter(1993).Outcome-related Performance Indicators and Organizational Control in the Public Sector.British Journal of Management,4,135-51.
  88. Smith, Peter(1995).On the Unintended Consequences of Publishing Performance Data in the Public Sector.International Journal of Public Administration,18(2),277-310.
  89. Smith, Wendt,Lewis, Marianne W.(2011).Toward a Theory of Paradox: A Dynamic Equilibrium Model of Organizing.Academy of Management Review,36(2),381-403.
  90. Sørensen, Eva(ed.),Torfing, Jacob(ed.)(2007).Theories of Democratic Network Governance.Basingstoke:Palgrave Macmillan.
  91. Stoker, Gerry(2006).Public Value Management: A New Narrative for Networked Governance?.American Review of Public Administration,36(1),41-57.
  92. Stone, Deborah(2012).Policy Paradox: The Art of Political Decision Making.New York:W.W. Norton & Company, Inc..
  93. Symonds, Michael,Pudsey, Jason(2008).The Concept of `Paradox' in the Work of Max Weber.Sociology,42(2),223-241.
  94. Talbot, Colin(2005).The Paradoxical Primate.Exeter:Imprint Academic.
  95. Taylor-Bianco, Amy,Schermerhorn, John, Jr.(2006).Self-regulation, Strategic Leadership and Paradox in Organizational Change.Journal of Organizational Change Management,19(4),457-470.
  96. Turner, Bryan(1996).For Weber: Essay on the Sociology of Fate, 2nd edition.London:Sage.
  97. Tushman, Michael L.,O'Reilly, Charles A.(1996).Ambidextrous Organizations: Managing Evolutionary and Revolutionary Change.California Management Review,38(4),8-30.
  98. van Thiel, Sandra,Leeuw, Frans L.(2002).The Performance Paradox in the Public Sector.Public Performance& Management Review,25(3),267-281.
  99. Vangen, Siv,Winchester, Nik(2014).Managing Cultural Diversity in Collaborations: A Focus on Management Tensions.Public Management Review,16(5),686-707.
  100. Wallis, Joe L.,Dollery, Brian E.(1999).Market Failure, Government Failure, Leadership and Public Policy.London:Macmillan.
  101. Walsh, Kieron(1995).Public Services and Market Mechanisms.London:Macmillan.
  102. Westenholz , Ann(1993).Paradoxical Thinking and Change in the Frames.Organization Studies,14(1),37-58.
  103. Wildavsky, Aaron(1979).Speaking Truth to Power: The Art and Craft of Policy Analysis.Boston:Little, Brown and Company.
  104. Wildavsky, Aaron(1973).If Planning Is Everything, Maybe It's Nothing.Policy Science,4(2),127-153.
  105. Wright, Vincent(1997).The Paradoxes of Administrative Reform.Public Management and Administrative Reform in Western Europe,Cheltenham:
  106. 丘昌泰(2010)。公共管理。台北:智勝文化。
  107. 吳瓊恩(2011)。行政學。台北:三民書局。
  108. 林嘉誠(2005)。基準法制定與政府改造。考銓季刊，41，1-12。
  109. 林鐘沂(2001)。行政學。台北:三民書局。
  110. 孫本初(2010)。公共管理。台北:智勝文化。
  111. 張世杰(2011)。新公共管理的公務倫理意涵與實踐反省：傅柯的治理理性觀點。空大行政學報，21，75-127。
  112. 張世杰(2009)。書評：第二代治理網絡的研究—一些理論觀點的省思。台灣民主季刊，6(4)，253-64。
  113. 張四明、胡龍騰(2013)。後新公共管理時期政府績效管理的公共價值意涵。公共治理季刊，1(1)，73-83。
  114. 張潤書(2009)。行政學。台北:三民書局。
  115. 許立一(2002)。新公共管理的省思：以黑堡觀點為基礎。公共行政學報，6，29-65。
  116. 郭耀昌編(2010)。公共治理與地方事務IV。新竹:玄奘大學公共事務管理學系。
  117. 陳敦源、張世杰(2010)。公私協力夥伴關係的弔詭。文官制度季刊，2(3)，17-71。
  118. 陳暉淵(2008)。公共組織績效指標建構之困境。T & D飛訊，72，1-19。
print cancel