英文摘要
|
The purpose of this study is to explore the policy tools used in funeral management regulations, and to analyze the types of current policy tools and their effects when the government formulates funeral management policies with the new institutionalism as a research approach. According to the framework of this research, firstly, in the section of "Funeral Market Regulation", the funeral management regulations are analyzed by "regulatory policy tools"; Explore the types and strengths of policy tools used by funeral management regulations. In the part of multivariate evaluation, this research uses the intentional sampling method and through 2 focus group interviews to find out the policy issues arising from the failure of the three major system governance mechanisms of the funeral industry; finally, it proposes policy tool recommendations. In our country's funeral management has undergone many changes, and we should start from the analysis of policy tools in order to truly understand the characteristics of funeral policies. Bailey proposes appropriate policy tools to solve the problems caused by the failure of the mechanism.
|
参考文献
|
-
洪鴻智(2000)。公共選擇與環境風險設施管制政策工具的選擇。都市與計劃,27(1),47-63。
連結:
-
張四明(2020)。臺灣 2020 年新冠肺炎防疫大作戰之啟示:政策工具觀點分析。文官制度季刊,12(4),1-32。
連結:
-
謝卓君(2017)。從政策工具選擇省思臺灣高等教育治理。教育研究集刊,63(3),41-75。
連結:
-
Bolognesi, Thomas,Brochet., Antoine,Renou, Yvan(2021).Assessing socio-technical resistance to public policy instruments: Insights from water performance indicators in the Grenoble area (France).Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space,39(7),1407-1435.
-
Dye, T. R.(2013).Understanding public policy.Oxford:Pearson Education.
-
Hall, P.,Taylor, R. C. R.(1996).Political Science and the Three New Institutionalisms.Political Studies,44,936-957.
-
Howlett, M.(2011).Designing public policies: Principles and instruments.Oxford:Oxford University Press.
-
Howlett, M.(2009).Governance Modes, Policy Regimes and Operational Plans: A Multi-Level Nested Model of Policy Instrument Choice and Policy Design.Policy Sciences,42(1),73-89.
-
Howlett, M.,Ramesh, M.(2003).Studying Public Policy: Policy Cycles And Policy Subsystems.Oxford:Oxford University Press.
-
Lai, W. C. L.(1997).Property rights justifications for planning and a theory of zoning.Progress in Planning,48,161-246.
-
Linder, S.H.,Peters, B.G.(1992).The study of policy instruments.Policy Currents,2(2),1-7.
-
Peters, B. Guy,Frans, K.M.,van Nispen(1998).Public Policy Instruments: Evaluating the Instrument of Public Administration.London:Edward Elgar.
-
Weimer, David L.,Vining, Aidan R.(2011).Policy Analysis: Concepts and Practice.London:Pearson Education.
-
丘昌泰(2018).公共政策─基礎篇.高雄市:巨流.
-
何景榮(譯),Lane, Jan-Erik,Ersson, Svante(2002).新制度主義政治學.台北縣:韋伯文化國際出版社.
-
柯三吉(2019).政策執行與公共治理.臺北市:五南.
-
孫本初(2005).公共管理.高雄市:巨流.
-
孫本初(2013).新公共管理.臺北市:一品文化出版社.
-
馬湘萍(2021)。從政策工具理論探析臺灣市場治理導向下高等教育政策工具之運用。臺灣教育評論月刊,10(11),170-194。
-
張世賢(2015).政策論證.臺北市:五南.
-
張世賢(編)(2005).公共政策分析.臺北市:五南.
-
張世賢,陳恆鈞(2001).公共政策:政府與市場的觀念.臺北市:商鼎文化.
-
陳恆鈞(譯),Lester, James P.,Stewart, Joseph, Jr.(2001).公共政策─演進研究途徑.臺北市:學富文化事業有限公司.
-
陳恆鈞(譯),蔣麗君(譯),韓家瑩(譯),侯淑嫣(譯),周劭彥(譯),Weimer, David L.,Vining, Aidan R.(2004).最新政策分析:概念與實踐.臺北縣:韋伯文化國際出版社.
-
曾小軍,蘇美權(2016)。自費生出國留學仲介監管的政策工具選擇:基於政策文本的內容分析。教育行政論壇,8(1),133-145。
-
劉瑞華(譯),North, Douglass Cecil(2016).經濟史的結構與變遷.臺北市:聯經.
-
鄭玉波(2011).法學緒論.臺北市:三民書局.
-
龐詩(譯),Howlett, M.,Ramesh, M.(2006).公共政策研究:政策循環與政策子系統.北京:生活、讀書、新知三聯書店.
-
羅清俊(2020).公共政策─現象觀察與實務操作.新北市:揚智文化.
-
羅清俊(譯),陳志瑋(譯),Dye, Thomas R.(2010).公共政策新論.臺北縣:韋伯文化國際出版社.
|