PPGIS與傳統民眾參與方式在社區議題討論與居民參與程度上之比較研究：以宜蘭縣龜山島社區為例

A Comparative Study of PPGIS-Based Approach and Traditional Public Participation Approaches on Community Discussions and Participation: The Evaluation of Guishan Island Community in Yilan County

10.6234/JGR.2011.55.05

莊永忠(Yung-Chung Chuang)；廖學誠(Shyue-Cherng Liaw)

公眾參與 ； 公眾參與地理資訊系統 ； 社區規劃 ； 龜山島社區 ； Public Participation ； Public Participation Geographic Information Systems ； Community Planning ； Guishan Community

地理研究

55期（2011 / 11 / 01）

89 - 120

繁體中文

隨著近年民主觀念高漲，民眾參與社區規劃與發展之比例逐年提升，而公眾參與地理資訊系統（public participation geographic information systems, PPGIS）因可結合民眾參與精神與地理資訊技術，且能做為權益關係人與公共事務參與者之溝通論述平台，故在國內外被廣泛使用。然而PPGIS由於技術門檻與電腦硬體建置資本頗高，故相對於其他傳統民眾參與方式之實質效用並不清楚。有鑑於此，本研究以宜蘭縣頭城鎮龜山島社區為例，以社區規劃為主要議題，比較傳統民眾參與方式與PPGIS之議題生成與居民參與效果。研究中利用：（1）口頭參與；（2）參與式紙本製圖（抽象繪製）；（3）參與式紙本製圖（參考地圖與相關文獻繪製）等三種不需使用網路與電腦技術之傳統民眾參與方式；以及（4）配合照片展示之網際網路PPGIS平台進行參與等操作方法進行逐戶個別訪談與群體討論。結果顯示個別訪談與群體討論在居民參與程度上，因社區型態與人為因素影響而各有優劣。而以PPGIS平台搭配地圖、向量圖層與照片進行討論之方式，相對於口頭討論或搭配地圖進行討論等傳統參與方式更能引發參與者之聯想力，並能增加討論之深度與廣度。然而由於不同參與者對四種討論方式之適應性不同，故本研究建議在操作方式選用上應保持彈性，除同時交叉使用多種操作方式進行訪談，並將結果整合於PPGIS平台上，以增加受訪者對環境之感受與對回答問題之敏銳度以外，亦可檢核不同方式所產生之效果差異，此均有助於居民意識之完整呈現。而此研究結果，將可提供政府機關與社區發展相關單位，在未來欲採用PPGIS與其他不同類型方式為意見溝通平台時作為參考之用。

Following the substantial raising of modern democracy consciousness in the last two decades, people's participation in public affairs has become the mainstream of community development, especially by widely using Public Participation Geographic Information Systems (PPGIS). However, due to barriers of PPGIS technique and high cost of computer hardware deployment, so many communities in Taiwan could not get good efforts by applying this tool. In order to compare the real benefits of PPGIS-based approach and traditional public participation approaches and to clearly identify the appropriate real-time platform in different stage of participatory planning process, this study introduced four different approaches: (1) direct oral participation ; (2) handy-drawing participation (without maps); (3) handy-drawing participation (with reference maps); (4) PPGIS platform with photographs into community planning issues of Gueshan Island Community in Yilan County. The results showed that individual interviews and group discussions will lead to completely different conclusions because of the complex human factors. Different approaches were also suitable to encourage maximum public participation during different phases of the planning process. In the very beginning stage, traditional approaches (e.g., direct oral interview and handy-drawing interview) are suitable to present the most realistic viewpoints of residents. Otherwise, PPGIS platform with active maps, interactive visualization, vector layers and photos will bring more imagination and greater depth of discussion. However, due to different participant's adaptability of four approaches, this study recommended that communities should keep flexibility when choosing approaches for discussion. Besides, integrating the results on PPGIS platform would be a better way to negotiate with government and specialist.

1. Kyem, P. A. K.（2000）: , http://www.ncgia.ucsb.edu/varenius/ppgis/papers/kyem.html. （2009/12/10）
2. McCall, M. K.（2006）: . << A bibliography>>, http://ppgis.iapad.org/pdf/pgis_psp_itk_cbnrm_biblio_mccall.pdf（2009/12/09）
3. Abbott, J.,Chambers, R.,Dunn, C.,Harris, T.,Merode, E.,Porter, G.,Townsend, J.,Wernier, D.(1998).Participatory GIS: opportunity or oxymoron?.Notes on Participatory Learning and Action,33,27-34.
4. Al-Kodmany, K.(1999).Using visualization techniques for enhancing public participation in planning and design: process, participation, and evaluation.Landscape and rban Planning,45,37-45.
5. Arnstein, S. R.(1969).A ladder of citizen participation.Journal of the American Institute of Planners,35,216-244.
6. Bird, B.(1995).Eagle Project: remapping Canada from indigenous perspective.Cultural survival Quarterly,1995(Winter),23-24.
7. Conner, D. M.(1997).Public participation: a manual: how to prevent and resolve public controversy.Victoria, BC:Connor Development Services.
8. Craig, W. J.(ed.),Harris, T. M.(ed.),Weiner, D.(ed.)(2002).Community Participation and Geographic Information Systems.
9. Dorcey, A. H. J.,Doney, L.,Rueggeberg, H.(1994).Public involvement in government decision making: choosing the right model: a report of the B.C. Round Table on the environment and the economy.Victoria, B.C.:The Round Table.
10. Fox, J.,Suryanata, K.,Hershock, P.(2005).Mapping power: ironic effects of spatial information technology in mapping communities, ethics values, practice.Honolulu:East-West Center Inc.
11. Geertman, S.(2002).Participatory planning and GIS: APSS to bridge the gap.Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design,29,21-35.
12. Glass, J. J.(1979).Citizen participation in planning: the relationship between objectives and techniques.Journal of the American Planning Association,45,180-189.
13. Harris, T. M.,Weiner, D.(1998).Empowerment, marginalization, and 9 community-integrated GIS.Cartography and Geographic Information System,25(2),67-76.
14. Hassan, M. M.(2005).Arsenic poisoning in Bangladesh: spatial mitigation planning with GIS and public participation.Health Policy,74,247-260.
15. Kingston, R.,Carver, S.,Evans, A.,Turton, I.(2000).Web-based public participation geographical information systems: An aid to local environmental decision-making？.Computers, Environment and Urban Systems,24,109-125.
16. McClure, W.(1997).The rural town: Designing for growth and sustainability.Moscow:Center for Business Development and Research, University of Idaho.
17. 何宗宜、劉政榮(2006)。公眾參與地理資訊系統在我國的發展初探。測繪通報，8，33-37。
18. 林俊強、張長義、蔡博文、李建堂、丁志堅、李玉亭(2005)。運用公眾參與地理資訊系統於原住民族傳統領域之研究：泰雅族司馬庫斯個案。地理學報，41，65-82。
19. 柳林、盧秀山、張祖陸、李萬武(2007)。基於 PPGIS 的城市規劃決策系統研究。山東科技大學學報─自然科學版，26(3)，8-11。
20. 黃玲珠(2004)。台南市，國立成功大學歷史研究所。
21. 蔡博文、鍾明光(2009)。公眾參與地理資訊系統與社區發展。第一屆發展研究年會，台北市:

1. 藍姆路．卡造,鍾明光,盧道杰,趙芝良,董景生,陳品何,徐霈馨(2021)。應用PPGIS於里山地景變遷分析：以吉哈拉艾為例。都市與計劃，48(4)，347-375。
2. 謝炳睿,曾慈慧,丁志堅(2021)。公眾參與地理資訊系統在環境規劃中應用：基隆中濱社區的案例討論。造園景觀學報，25(1)，46-71。