環境災害重建的後政治民粹主義：臺東縣之個案研究

Post-Political Populism in the Disaster Recovery of Environmental Hazards: Case Study of Taitung County

10.6234/JGR.2015.62.03

王文誠(Wen-Cheng Wang)

環境災害 ； 災後重建 ； 後政治 ； 民粹主義 ； 永續發展 ； Environmental Hazard ； Disaster Recovery ； Post-Political ； Populism ； Sustainable Development

地理研究

62期（2015 / 05 / 01）

55 - 70

繁體中文

為回應對全球環境議題的關懷，本研究就空間治理的脈絡，檢驗自然環境災害過後，重建的「政治性」空間。每當環境災害後，媒體傳播災難畫面，隨即大量的經費投入重建「災區」；沒有太多的土地規劃討論、沒有太多的土地使用適宜性分析、也沒有太多的政策評估、更沒有環境影響評估來探討和審議「重建」對環境的衝擊。這樣的災後重建，某些程度上呈現出一種所謂「後政治」的狀況。對於「抵抗環境災害」採取一致性認同的策略，超越中央地方尺度、超越黨派對立，強調「救災」共識的凝聚與建構。並且，據此動員國家、企業、居民、社區團體及專家學者參與重建。本文受到當下「後政治」學者的啟發，以臺東縣做為災後重建的個案研究，透過現地考察及訪談的田野經驗，就後政治狀況和民粹主義交織的架構，配置在重建過程的計畫與實踐，討論災後重建如何型塑「後政治民粹主義」的特定編排。亦即，由於水泥工程中介所挪用的國家資本；新自由主義在國家動員市場的機制中愈加鞏固；以及，國家透過政策的介入，無論在法令、預算、和土地使用的權力上，提供共識政治的建構。

Under the global concerns on the environmental hazards over the context of spatial governance, this study aims to explore the space of 'the political' in the disaster recovery of environmental hazards. Inspired by the post-political researchers, with consensual representation and the issues of the emergence and consolidation of post-political conditions in political-spatial theory. This study reviews the contemporary 'post-political' Zeitgeist as the theoretical framework to examine the political implications on environmental hazards. Empirical data collected via onsite observation and face-to-face interviews to stakeholders, aim to analyze the post-political choreography after the environmental hazards, to discuss how to shape, in terms of the disaster recovery, a specific arrangement of the 'post-political populism'. They are, firstly, it invokes the state capital as intermediary of cement constructions; secondly neo-liberal government mobilizes consolidation in the market mechanism; and finally, the intervention of state policies by providing the act, the budget, and the power of land-use to form a consensus constitution.

1. 王文誠(2011)。反身性的社區營造：實踐性的地理學想像。都市與計劃，38(1)，1-29。
   連結：
2. 江宜樺(2005)。西方「政治」概念之分析。政治與社會哲學評論，12，1-57。
   連結：
3. 林文一、邱淑宜(2014)。後政治的社區動員與共識建構─一個臺北社區文化建構的案例。地理學報，72，85-109。
   連結：
4. 林偉信、黃力勉（2014 年4 月12 日）：〈金帥飯店沖毀判國賠1310 萬〉，《中國時報》。http://news.chinatimes.com/。（2014/10/25 瀏覽）
5. 臺東縣金峰鄉公所（2013）：〈嘉蘭村歷史沿革〉，《臺東縣金峰鄉公所》。http://www.ttjfng.gov.tw/（2013/08/17 瀏覽）
6. 行政院主計處（ 2014 ）：〈中央政府莫拉克颱風災後重建特別預算〉，《行政院主計處》。http://www.dgbas.gov.tw/。（2014/10/25 瀏覽）
7. Badiou, A.(2005).Being and Event.London:Continuum.
8. Brenner, N.(2001).The limits to scale? Methodological reflections on scalar structuration.Progress in Human Geography,25(4),591-614.
9. Canovan, M.(1999).Trust the people! Populism and the two faces of democracy.Political Studies,47(1),2-16.
10. Coe, N. M.,Jones, A. M.(2010).The Economic Geography of the UK.London:SAGE.
11. Coe, N. M.,Kelly, P. F.,Yeung, H. W.-C.(2007).Economic Geography: A Contemporary Introduction.Oxford:Blackwell.
12. Crouch, C.(2004).Post-democracy.Cambridge, UK:Polity.
13. Flint, C.(2003).Political geography: context and agency in a multiscalar framework.Progress in Human Geography,27(5),627-636.
14. Fukuyama, F.(1992).The End of History and the Last Man.New York:Avon Books.
15. Giddens, A.(2009).The Politics of Climate Change.Cambridge, UK:Polity Press.
16. Gregory, D.(1994).Geographical imaginations.Oxford:Blackwell.
17. Harvey, D.(1990).Between space and time: reflections on the geographical imagination.Annals of the Association of American Geographers,80(3),418-434.
18. Harvey, D.(2006).Spaces of Global Capitalism: towards a Theory of Uneven Geographical Development.London:Verso.
19. Harvey, D.(2003).The New Imperialism.Oxford:Oxford University Press.
20. Harvey, D.(2012).Rebel cities: From the Right to the City to the Urban Revolution.New York:Verso.
21. Harvey, D.(1989).From managerialism to entrepreneurialism: the transformation in urban governance in late capitalism.Geografiska Annaler B,71,3-17.
22. Latour, B.(1996).On actor-network theory: A few clarifications plus more than a few complications.Soziale Welt,47,369-381.
23. MacKinnon, D.,Cumbers, A.,Pike, A.,Birch, K.,McMaster, R.(2009).Evolution in economic geography: institutions, political economy, and adaptation.Economic Geography,85(2),129-150.
24. McFarlane, C.(2004).Geographical imaginations and spaces of political engagement: examples from the Indian alliance.Antipode,36(5),890-916.
25. Mouffe, C.(1999).Deliberative democracy or agonistic pluralism?.Social Research,66(3),745-758.
26. Mouffe, C.(2004).The populist zeitgeist.Government and Opposition,39(4),542-563.
27. Mouffe, C.(1993).The Return of the Political.London:Verso.
28. Mouffe, C.(2005).On the Political.Abingdon:Routledge.
29. Newman, D.,Paasi, A.(1998).Fences and neighbours in the postmodern world: boundary narratives in political geography.Progress in Human Geography,22(2),186-207.
30. Paddison, R.(2009).Some reflections on the limitations to public participation in the post-political city.L'Espace Politique,8
31. Peck, J.,Tickell, A.(2002).Neoliberalizing space.Antipode,34(3),380-404.
32. Pugh, J.(2012).Speaking without voice: participatory planning, acknowledgment, and latent subjectivity in Barbados.Annals of the Association of American Geographers,103(5),1266-1281.
33. Rancière, J.,Rose, Julie(Trans.)(1998).Disagreement: Politics and Philosophy.Minneapolis:University of Minnesota Press.
34. Sayre, N. F.(2005).Ecological and geographical scale: parallels and potential for integration.Progress in Human Geography,29(3),276-290.
35. Smith, N.(1992).Geography, difference and the politics of scale.Postmodernism and the Social Sciences,London:
36. Sparke, M.(2008).Political geography: political geographies of globalization III: resistance.Progress in Human Geography,32(3),423-440.
37. Sparke, M.(2004).Political geography: political geographies of globalization (1) - dominance.Progress in Human Geography,28(6),777-794.
38. Swyngedouw, E.(2009).The Antinomies of the postpolitical city: In search of a democratic politics of environmental production.International Journal of Urban and Regional Research,33(3),601-620.
39. Swyngedouw, E.(2010).Apocalypse Forever? Post-political populism and the spectre of climate change.Theory, Culture & Society,27(2-3),213-232.
40. Swyngedouw, E.(2011).Interrogating post-democratization: Reclaiming egalitarian political spaces.Political Geography,30(7),370-380.
41. Swyngedouw, E.,Heynen, N. C.(2003).Urban political ecology, justice and the politics of scale.Antipode,35(5),898-918.
42. Taylor, P. J.(1999).Places, spaces and Macy's: place-space tensions in the political geography of modernities.Progress in Human Geography,23(1),7-26.
43. Yeung, H. W.-C.(2005).Rethinking relational economic geography.Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers,30(1),37-51.
44. Yin, R. K.(2014).Case study Research: Design and Methods.Los Angeles:SAGE.
45. Žižek, S.(2006).Against populist temptation.Critical Inquiry,32(3),551-574.
46. 王鑫(1989)。地形學。臺北市:聯經出版社。
47. 洪政耀(2013)。博士論文(博士論文)。臺北市，國立臺灣師範大學地理學研究所。
48. 張瑞津(1997)。,臺北市:行政院國家科學委員會。
49. 賴定煌、藍振皓(2013)。區域災害系統之研究：以莫拉克颱風下紅葉村為例。地理教育，39，97-112。

1. 黃瑋倢,洪啟東(2022)。震災衝擊下的世遺景區重建之社經脆弱性：中國大陸九寨溝景區為例。都市與計劃，49(3)，285-316。
2. (2016)。Book Review:Barry,Andrew,"Material Politics: Disputes Along The Pipeline"。地理學報，80，81-86。