應用空間統計於桃園地區土地利用變遷因素分析

Application of Spatial Statistics to Analyze Land Use Change Factors in the Taoyuan Area

10.6234/JGR.2017.67.06

張文菘(Wun-Song Jhang)；陳嘉惠(Jia-Huei Chen)；張國楨(Kuo-Chen Chang)

桃園 ； 土地利用變遷 ； 空間效應 ； 地理加權迴歸 ； Taoyuan ； landuse change ； spatial effects ； geographically weighted regression

地理研究

67期（2017 / 11 / 01）

137 - 161

繁體中文

工業區開發與交通建設吸引大量人口移入，使桃園市近年發展迅速，並帶動土地利用變遷。受歷史、政治脈絡影響，呈現北桃園、南中壢的雙元發展特性。然而過往土地利用變遷研究多忽略地理分布現象所具有的空間特性，使模式推導產生偏誤，對此空間統計方法的創新有助於處理此類空間效應問題。本研究目的在於瞭解桃園地區建成地變遷的分布型態與影響因素，並檢視空間效應的影響。先以空間自相關指標偵測建成地變遷的空間型態；進一步利用地理加權迴歸探討建成地變遷之影響因素，以及空間異質性的作用效力。研究結果顯示，桃園地區於1995-2006 年間建成地大量增加，在中壢平鎮市區外圍、桃園市區外圍、龜山公西地區發展最快。由局部迴歸係數得知，人口密度變遷與三級產業員工成長在桃園區北區、蘆竹、龜山、大園等地對建成地變遷有較高的影響性；二級產業員工成長的效應侷限於沿海地區；原工業用地比例於桃園區、八德區負向效應最大；與交流道距離僅在林口、中壢、內壢、大湳等特定交流道周邊有較高影響性；與火車站距離、原農業用地比例、原空置地比例三者在桃園市區、八德市、中壢平鎮市區等核心區域佔關鍵。總體而言，桃園地區建成地變遷因素具有明顯的南北、城鄉差異性。

A large amount of immigration attracted by the development of industrial areas and transportation construction has caused Taoyuan City to develop rapidly, and led to land use changes. Influenced by the historical and political context, there are dual developmental traits of Taoyuan District in the north and Chungli District in the south. However, most past research on land use changes neglected the spatial traits of the phenomena of geographical distribution, causing bias against the derivation of patterns. Innovation in spatial statistics methods has helped handle spatial effect problems. The purpose of this research is to help understand the distribution patterns and the influencing factors of the changes in the built-up areas of Taoyuan district, and examine the influence the spatial effects have had. This study used a spatial autocorrelation index to detect the spatial patterns of the built-up area change; furthermore, we used Geographically Weighted Regression to examine the influencing factors of the changes in the built-up areas, and the effectiveness of spatial heterogeneity. The results of the research show built-up areas dramatically increased in the Taoyuan area from 1995 to 2006. In recent years the districts have developed the fastest in the peri-urban areas of Chulgli-Pingzhen as well as the peri-urban areas of Taoyuan District, and Gongsi, Guishan. We know from the local regression coefficient of Semiparametric Geographically Weighted Regression that, the changes in population density and growth of employees in the tertiary sector in such areas as the northern part of Taoyuan District, Luzhu, Guishan, Dayuan, have had a greater impact on the changes in built-up areas; effects of growth of employees in the secondary sector are confined to coastal districts; the proportion of negative effects is the largest in the original industrial land of Taoyuan District and Bade District; the changes in the build-up areas have had a greater impact on the distance from interchanges-only around specific interchanges, such as Linkou, Chungli, Neili, Danan-; the distance from train stations, the proportion of original agricultural land, and the proportion of original vacant land, these three in such core areas as Taoyuan District, Bade District, Chulgli-Pingzhen District, are crucial to the changes in the built-up areas. Overall, the factors of the changes of built-up areas in Taoyuan area show great differences between the north and south, as well as urban and rural areas.

1. 吳振發、林裕彬(2006)。汐止市土地利用時空間變遷模式。都市與計畫，33(3)，231-259。
   連結：
2. 周天穎、簡甫任、雷祖強(2003)。都市地區土地利用變遷量化分析之研究。台灣土地研究，6(1)，105-130。
   連結：
3. 張國楨、張文菘、曾露儀(2012)。都市土地利用與人口老化對基層醫療資源分布之影響：以台北市為例。地理研究，56，25-40。
   連結：
4. 賴進貴、葉高華、王韋力(2004)。土地利用變遷與空間相依性之探討─以臺北盆地聚落變遷為例。台灣地理資訊學刊，1，29-40。
   連結：
5. Anselin, L.(1988).Spatial econometrics: Methods and models.Dordrecht:Kluwer Academic.
6. Anselin, L.(1995).Local indicator of spatial association - LISA.Geographical Analysis,27(2),93-115.
7. Anselin, L.,Griffith, D. A.(1988).Do spatial effects really matter in regression analysis?.Papers of the Region Science Association,65,11-34.
8. Briassoulis, H.(2000).Analysis of land use change: theoretical and modeling approaches.Regional Research Institute, West Virginia University.
9. Briassoulis, H.(2001).Policy-oriented integrated analysis of land-use change: An analysis of data needs.Environmental Management,27(1),1-11.
10. Brunsdon, C.,Fotheringham, A. S.,Charlton, M.(1999).Some notes on parametric significance tests for geographically weighted regression.Regional Science,36(3),497-524.
11. Casetti, E.(1972).Generating models by the expansion method: Applications to geographical research.Geographical Analysis,4(1),81-91.
12. Cheng, J.,Masser, I.(2003).Urban growth pattern modeling: a case study of Wuhan city, PR China.Landscape and Urban Planning,62,199-217.
13. Clement, F.,Orange, D.,Williams, M.,Mulley, C.,Epprecht, M.(2009).Divers of afforestation in Northern Vietnam: Assessing local variations using geographically.Applied Geography,29,561-576.
14. Cliff, A. D.,Ord, J. K.(1973).Spatial Autocorrelation.London:Pion.
15. Foster, S. A.,Gorr, W. L.(1986).An adaptive filter for estimating spatially-varying parameters: Application to modeling police hours spent in response to calls for service.Management Science,32(7),878-889.
16. Fotheringham, A. S.,Brunsdon, C.,Charlton, M.(2002).Geographically Weighted Regression: the analysis of spatially vary relationships.West Sussex:John Wiley and Sons Ltd..
17. Fotheringham, A. S.,Charlton, M.,Brunsdon, C.(1996).The geography of parameter space: an investigation of spatial non-stationarity.Geographical Information Systems,10(5),605-627.
18. Fotheringham, A. S.,Charlton, M.,Brunsdon, C.(1998).Geographically weighted regression a natural evolution of the expansion method for spatial data analysis.Environment and Planning A,30,1905-1927.
19. Fox, J.,Rindfuss, R. R.,Walsh, S. J.,Mishra, V.(2003).People and the environment: Approaches for linking household and community surveys to remote sensing and GIS.Boston:Kluwer Academic Publishers.
20. Getis, A.,Ord, J. K.(1992).The Analysis of Spatial Association by the Use of Distance Statistic.Geographical Analysis,24,189-206.
21. Goldstein, H.(1987).Multilevel models in education and social research.USA:Oxford University Press.
22. Huang, S.-L.,Wang, S.-H.,Budd, W. W.(2009).Sprawl in Taipei's peri-urban zone: Responses to spatial planning and implications for adapting global environmental change.Landscape and Urban Planning,90,20-32.
23. Kamusoko, C.,Aniya, M.,Adi, B.,Manjoro, M.(2009).Rural sustainability under threat in Zimbabwe -Simulation of future land use/cover changes in the Bindura district based on the Markov-cellular automata model.Applied Geography,29(3),435-447.
24. Lambin, E. F.,Baulies, X.,Bockstael, N.,Fischer, G.,Krug, T.,Leemans, R.,Moran, E. F.,Rindfuss, R. R.,Sato, Y.,Skole, D.,Turner, B. L., II,Vogel, C.(1999).Land-use and land-cover change (LUCC): implementation strategy.IGBP Report,48
25. Ligtenberg, A.,Wachowicz, M.,Bregt, A. K.,Beulens, A.,Kettenis, D. L.(2004).A design and application of a multi-agent system for simulation of multi-actor spatial planning.Environmental Management,72,43-55.
26. Lin, C.-H.,Wen, T.-H.(2011).Using Geographically Weighted Regression (GWR): to explore spatial varying relationship of immature mosquitoes and human densities with the incidence Dengue.Environmental Research and Public Health,8,2798-2815.
27. Long, Y.(2010).Establishing urban growth boundaries using geosimulation for land use control.46th ISOCARP Congress,Nairobi, Kenya:
28. Longley, P. A.,Brooks, S. M.,McDonnell, R.(1998).Geocomputation: A Primer.New York:Wiley.
29. Luo, J.,Wei, Y. H.(2009).Modeling spatial variations of urban growth pattern in Chinese cities: The case of Nanging.Landscape and Urban Planning,91,51-64.
30. Mennis, J.(2006).Mapping the results of geographically weighted regression.The Cartographic Journal,43(2),171-179.
31. Swamy, P. A. V. B.(1970).Efficient inference in a random coefficient regression model.Econometrica,38(2),331-323.
32. Tian G.,Liu, J.,Xie Y.,Yang, Z.,Zhuang, D.,Niu, Z.(2005).Analysis of spatio-temporal dynamic pattern and driving forces of urban land in China in 1990s using TM images and GIS.Cities,22(6),400-410.
33. Tobler, W. R.(1970).A computer model simulation of urban growth in the Detroit region.Economic Geography,46(2),234-240.
34. Veldkamp, A.,Verburg, P. H.,Kok, K.,de Koning, G. H. J.,Priess, J.,Bergsma, A. R.(2001).The need for scale sensitive approaches in spatially explicit land use change modeling.Environmental Modeling and Assessment,6,111-121.
35. Wheeler, D.,Tiefelsdorf, M.(2005).Multicollinearity and correlation among local regression coefficients in geographically weighted regression.Geographical Systems,7,161-187.
36. 丁志堅(2002)。台北=Taipei，國立台灣大學地理環境資源研究所=Department of Geography, National Taiwan University。
37. 白仁德(2000)。台北=Taipei，國立台灣大學建築與城鄉研究所=Graduate Institute of Urban Planning, National Taiwan University。
38. 朱建銘(2000)。台北=Taipei，國立台灣大學地理環境資源研究所=Department of Geography, National Taiwan University。
39. 林雅雯(2012)。台北=Taipei，國立臺灣師範大學地理學系=Department of Geography, National Taiwan Normal University。
40. 唐菁萍(2005)。台北=Taipei，國立台灣師範大學地理系在職進修碩士班=Executive Master of Department of Geography, National Taiwan Normal University。
41. 陳雪玉(2003)。桃園=Taoyuan，國立中央大學歷史研究所=Graduate Institute of History, National Central University。
42. 陳惠玲(2010)。新北=New Taipei，國立臺北大學都市計劃研究所=Graduate Institute of Urban Planning, National Taipei University。
43. 曾繁浩(1995)。台北=Taipei，中國文化大學地學研究所=Graduate School of Earth Science, Chinese Culture University。
44. 鄒克萬、張曜麟(2004)。都市土地使用變遷空間動態模型之研究。地理學報，35，35-51。
45. 劉其輝(2005)。台北=Taipei，國立政治大學地政學系=Department of Land Economics, National Chengchi University。
46. 賴如崧(1987)。台北=Taipei，中國文化大學政治研究所=Department of Political Science, Chinese Culture University。
47. 鍾志章(1979)。台北=Taipei，國立臺灣師範大學地理研究所=Department of Geography, National Taiwan Normal University。
48. 簡志雄(1985)。台北=Taipei，中國文化大學地學研究所=Graduate School of Earth Science, Chinese Culture University。

1. 韓威定,陳崇賢,孔憲法(2020)。探討應用空間統計與景觀格局分析於台南縣歷史圖資之時空分析。航測及遙測學刊，25(2)，87-114。
2. (2024)。文化古城鎮建築物火災潛勢空間辨認－－以鹿港鎮為例。建築學報，127，45-63。