假期效應：不同季節連續假期對臺灣各區域空氣品質影響之研究

The Holiday Effect: Effect of Long Vacations in Different Seasonson Local Air Quality in Taiwan

10.6234/JGR.201805_(68).0002

李崇恩(Chong-En Li)；陳嘉惠(Jia-Hui Chen)；郭乃文(Nae-Wen Kuo)

假期效應 ； 時空分析 ； 空氣污染 ； CO ； PM_(10) ； Holiday Effect ； spatiotemporal analysis ； air polution ； CO ； PM_(10)

地理研究

68期（2018 / 05 / 01）

33 - 48

繁體中文

有別於過去研究強調「都市空氣污染濃度會在假期時降低」（即所謂的：正假期效應），本研究特別指出某些地區在假期時空氣污染濃度反而會升高（即所謂的：逆假期效應）。我們使用行政院環境保護署空氣品質監測資料庫之空氣污染物監測數據，選擇CO、PM_(10)、NO_2和SO_2等空氣污染物作為指標，分析臺灣西部71個空氣品質測站2005年到2014年間每小時污染物監測數據。研究結果表明，逆假期效應具有特定的時空分布特徵。從「臺灣假期效應時空分布圖」可以看到，北部地區的CO和PM_(10)出現正假期效應，而南部地區則出現逆假期效應；另外，儘管臺灣北部和南部在NO_2方面都是正假期效應，但是後者的效應強度卻弱於前者。這些結果表明，連假期間南下返鄉與旅遊的車潮可能會惡化臺灣南部的空氣品質，為了呼吸新鮮空氣而南下的遊客反而會吸到更差的空氣。然而，就SO_2濃度和冷季空品的表現來看，上述正、逆假期效應南北差異的地理界線並不明顯。由於SO_2排放主要與工業活動有關，可能因此不足以做為評估各式假期效應的標的，另外由於冷季時大氣擴散條件不佳，假期效應也才不容易被觀察到。綜上所述，本研究發現連假時大量往南移動的車流，確實影響南部地區空氣品質，而產生所謂的「逆假期效應」，其中CO、PM_(10)正是評估逆假期效應最佳的空氣污染指標，可供未來進一步預測、分析。

While compared with the previous studies that emphasized on the decrease of air pollution concentration in the urban area during holidays (i.e. positive ＂holiday effect＂), the current research aims to determine which locations experience increased levels of air pollution duringholidays (i.e. negative ＂holiday effect＂). Air pollutant concentrations (CO, PM_(10), NO_2, and SO_2) from the Taiwan EPA air quality monitoring database were collected and analyzed in this study. Finally, the hourly data from seventy-one monitoring stations were analyzed between 2005 to 2014. According to the results, the negative ＂holiday effect＂ eventuated in different places and has specific spatial characteristics. Based on the spatial and temporal distribution of data regarding holiday effect indicators in Taiwan, a positive ＂holiday effect＂ was observed in Norhtern Taiwan, consisting of CO and PM_(10), while a negative ＂holiday effect＂ was observed in Southern Taiwan. In addition, although both Northern and Southern Taiwan have positive ＂holiday effect＂ in terms of NO_2, the positive ＂holiday effect＂ of NO_2 in Southern Taiwan was weaker than that in Northern Taiwan. These results indicate that the Southbound holiday migration during long vacations may deteriorate air quality in Southern Taiwan, in contrast to the popular concept of ＂going South to get fresher air＂. However, in terms of SO_2 emissions and cold seasons, the spatial difference between Northern and Southern Taiwan, in terms of the ＂holiday effect＂, was not significant. As SO_2 emissions are mainly associated with industrial activity, it may be an inadequate indicator for assessing the ＂holiday effect＂. Furthermore, as the air diffusion conditions deteriorate during cold seasons, the ＂holiday effect＂ is less likely to be observed. In summary, the indicators of CO and PM_(10) can be used to explain the negative holiday effect and show the spatial difference between Northern and Southern Taiwan. Moreover, the air pollutants resulted from the vehicles that people use during their vacations may increase and will affect the local air quality in the southern areas of Taiwan.

1. 談珮華, P.H.,孫蓁儀, Z.Y.(2014)。人為活動對空氣品質的影響－以高雄都會區的假期效應為例。地理學報，74，1-30。
   連結：
2. Adame, J.A.,Hernández-Ceballos, M.A.,Sorribas, M.,Lozano, A.,De la Morena, B.A.(2014).Weekend-Weekday Effect Assessment for O3, NOx, CO and PM10 in Andalusia, Spain (2003-2008).Aerosol and Air Quality Research,14,1862-1874.
3. Beirle, S.,Platt, U.,Wenig, M.,Wagner, T.(2003).Weekly cycle of NO2 by GOME measurements: a signature of anthropogenic sources.Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics,3,2225-2232.
4. Chou, C.C.K,Lin, C.Y.,Chen, T.K.,Hsu, S.C.,Lung, S.C.,Liu, S.C.,Young, C.Y.(2004).Influence of long-range transport dust particles on local air quality: a case study on asian dust episodes in Taipei during the spring of 2002.Terrestrial, Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences,15(5),881-889.
5. Gour, A.A.,Singh, S.K.,Tyagi, S.K.,Mandal, A.(2013).Weekday/weekend differences in air quality parameters in Delhi, India.International Journal of Research in Engineering and Technology,5(1),69-76.
6. Khoder, M.I.,Hassan, S.K.(2008).Weekday/weekend differences in ambient aerosol level and chemical characteristics of water-soluble components in the city centre.Atmospheric Environment,42(32),7483-7493.
7. Latha, K.M.,Badarinath, K.V.S.(2003).Black carbon aerosols over tropical urban environment- A case study.Atmospheric Research,69,125-133.
8. Marr, L.C.,Harley, R.A.(2002).Spectral analysis of weekday–weekend differences in ambient ozone, nitrogen oxide, and non-methane hydrocarbon time series in California.Atmospheric Environment,36,2327-2335.
9. Miller, G.T.,Spoolman, S.(2009).Environmental Science.MA:Cengage Learning.
10. Morawska, L.,Jayaratne, E.R.,Mengersen, K.,Jamriska, M.,Thomas, S.(2002).Difference in airborne particle and gaseous concentrations in urban air between weekdays and weekends.Atmospheric Environment,36(27),4375-4383.
11. Perkins、 H. C.,黃正義（譯）, Z.Y.(trans.),黃炯昌（譯）, J.C.(trans.)(1991).空氣污染學.臺北市=Taipei:科技圖書股份有限公司=Techbook Publishing Company.
12. Qin, Y.,Tonnesen, G.S.,Wang, Z.(2004).Weekend-weekday differences of ozone, NOx, CO, VOCs, PM10 and the light scatter during ozone season in southern California.Atmospheric Environment,38,3069-3087.
13. Riga-Karandinos, A.N.,Saitanis, C.(2005).Comparative assessment of ambient air quality in two typical Mediterranean coastal cities in Greece.Chemosphere,59,1125-1136.
14. Steinbacher, M.,Dommen, J.,Ordonez, C.,Reimann, S.,Grüebler, F. C.,Staehelin, J.,Prevot, A.S. H.(2005).Volatile organic compounds in the Po basin, Part A: Anthropogenic VOCs.Journal of Atmospheric Chemistry,51,271-291.
15. Tan, P.H.,Chou, C.,Chen, P.Y.,Sun, C.Y.,Wu, B.L.(2010).Observation of a "Holiday Effect": a Case of Chinese New Year in Taiwan.Paper presented at European Geosciences Union General Assembly,Vienna:
16. Tan, P.H.,Chou, C.,Chou, C.K.(2013).Impact of urbanization on the air pollution "holiday effect" in Taiwan.Atmospheric Environment,70,361-375.
17. Tan, P.H.,Chou, C.,Liang, J.Y.(2008).Observation of a "Holiday Effect": a Case of Chinese New Year in Taipei.Conference of Taiwan Climate Change,Taipei:
18. Tan, P.H.,Chou, C.,Liang, J.Y.,Chou, C. C.K.,Shiu, C.J.(2009).Air pollution "holiday effect" resulting from the Chinese New Year.Atmospheric Environment,43(13),2114-2124.
19. Zhang, M.,Wang, X.M.,Chen, J.M.,Cheng, T.T.,Wang, T.,Yang, X.,Gong, Y.G.,Geng, F.H.,Chen, C.H.(2010).Physical characterization of aerosol particles during the Chinese New Year's firework events.Atmospheric Environment,44,5191-5198.
20. 王建文, C.W.(2010)。嘉義縣=Chiayi，國立嘉義大學歷史與地理學研究所=Department of History and Geography, National Chiayi University。
21. 王茲嬅, Z.H.(2010)。嘉義縣=Chiayi，國立嘉義大學歷史與地理學研究所=Department of History and Geography, National Chiayi University。
22. 行政院環境保護署：《空氣品質監測網》。http://taqm.epa.gov.tw/taqm/tw/default.aspx。（2015/10/01瀏覽）【 Environmental Protestion Administration. Taiwan Air Quality Monitoring Network. http://taqm.epa.gov.tw/taqm/tw/default.aspx(accessed 2015/10/01).】
23. 吳清吉, C.J.,于宜強, Y.Q.,許武榮, W.R.,徐光蓉, G.R.,商文義, W.Y.(2003)。冬季臺灣附近氣流場與大氣傳送個案之數值研究。大氣科學，31(1)，29-54。
24. 李小飛, X.F.,張明軍, X.F.,王聖杰, S.J.,趙愛芳, A.F.,馬潛, Q.(2012)。中國空氣污染指數變化特徵及影響因素分析。環境科學，33(6)，1936-1943。
25. 孫蓁儀, Z.Y.(2009)。嘉義縣=Chiayi，國立嘉義大學歷史與地理學研究所=Department of History and Geography, National Chiayi University。
26. 翁叔平, S.P.,郭乃文, N.W.,呂珮雯, P.W.(2013)。高高屏地區細懸浮微粒（PM2.5）污染事件的綜觀環境分析。大氣科學，41(1)，43-64。
27. 高雄市政府環境保護局=Kaohsiung City Government Environmental Protection Bureau(2015)。高雄市政府環境保護局（2015）：〈高雄市空氣污染防制計畫書（104~109 年版）〉。【Kaohsiung City Government Environmental Protection Bureau (2015). Kaohsiung City Air Pollution Control Proposal (2015-2020).】。
28. 張順欽, S.Q.(2002)。亞洲沙塵暴對空氣品質影響與測報。環境保護，25(2)，134-152。
29. 梁大慶, D.Q.,張俊斌, J.B.,柴鈁武, F.W.(2006)。沙塵暴特性之其對臺灣空氣品質影響之分析。中州學報，23，129-142。
30. 郭建斌, J.B.,陳珏, Y.(2009)。北京市空氣污染季節變化規律研究及污染控制建議。生態環境學報，18(3)，952-956。
31. 陳美先=Chen M.X.(2013)。Chiayi，國立嘉義大學歷史與地理學研究所=Department of History and Geography, National Chiayi University。
32. 曾韋勳, W.X.(2012)。Tainan，國立成功大學環境工程學研究所=Department of Environmental Engineering, National Cheng Kung University。
33. 黃清勇, Q.Y.,李坤城, K.C.(1997)。區域空氣擴散數值模式之應用研究。大氣科學，25(4)，511-546。
34. 新北市政府環境保護局=New Taipei City Government Environmental Protection Bureau(2015)。新北市政府環境保護局（2015）：〈新北市空氣污染防制計畫書（104~109 年版）〉。【New Taipei City Government Environmental Protection Bureau (2015). New Taipei City Air Pollution Control Proposal (2015-2020).】。
35. 葉雨松, Y.S.,徐澄清, C.C.(2012)。臺灣地區空氣品質測站介紹。化學，70(4)，345-356。
36. 葉惠中, H.Z.,陳起鳳, Q.F.,李家儂, J.N.,楊之遠, Z.Y.,謝長城, C.C.,郭韋翔, W.X.,江京蓁, J.Z.,洪嘉祥, J.X.(2014)。,未出版
37. 臺中市,境保護局(2015)。臺中市政府環境保護局（2015）：〈高雄市空氣污染防制計畫書（104~109 年版）〉。【Taichung City Government Environmental Protection Bureau (2015). Taichung City Air Pollution Control Proposal (2015-2020).】。
38. 臺北市政府環境保護局=Taipei City Government Environmental Protection Bureau(2015)。臺北市政府環境保護局（2015）：〈高雄市空氣污染防制計畫書（104~109 年版）〉。【Taipei City Government Environmental Protection Bureau (2015). Taipei City Air Pollution Control Proposal (2015-2020).】。
39. 蔡協宏, X.H.(2010)。Kaohsiung，國立中山大學環境工程研究所=Institute of Environmental Engineering, National Sun Yat-sen University。
40. 蔡詠名（2016）：〈高速公路車流量時空熱點分析與運輸特性探討〉。未出版。【Cai, Y.M. (2016). Spatio-Temporal Hotspot Analysis of Traffic Flow on Highway and Its Pattern. Unpublished.】
41. 談珮華, P.H.(2012)。春節與非春節的假期天數及天氣系統對空污假期效應之影響。環境與世界，26，93-127。
42. 談珮華, P.H.,周佳, P.H.,梁靜宜, J.Y.,吳柏霖, B.L.(2008)。臺北都會區的假期效應。大氣科學，36(3)，197-215。
43. 鄭福田, F.T.(2004).空氣品質.臺北市=Taipei:財團法人中興工程科技研究發展基金會=Sinotech Foundation for Research and Development if Engineering Science and Technologies.
44. 蕭玲鳳, L.F.,王自發, Z.F.,劉廣英, G.Y.(2001)。沙塵暴長距離傳送至臺灣之數值模擬研究。華岡理科學報，18，1-20。

1. (2024)。臺灣地區空氣品質與主要空氣汙染物的年循環變化特徵。地理學報，108，57-75。