尺度跳躍：自學家庭的教育空間發展與地理過程

Scale Jump: The Spatial Development and Geographic Process of Home school Education

10.6234/JGR.201905_(70).0004

蔡淑真(Shu-Chen Tsai)；李素馨(Su-Hsin Lee)

時空鬆綁 ； 跨國學習 ； 能動性 ； 實驗教育 ； 個案研究 ； Temporal and Spatial Deregulation ； Transnational Learning ； Agency Experimental Education ； Case Study

地理研究

70期（2019 / 05 / 01）

79 - 108

繁體中文

臺灣在2014年通過實驗教育三法，包括學校與非學校型態的實驗教育，以及私人辦校等。這三種新興教育的出現，正是鼓勵創新與實驗的教育改革下的新產物。其中，非學校型態的實驗教育，又稱為在家教育或自學（homeschooling）的方式，將孩童從學校時空中解放出來，成為地理學者關注的焦點。本研究以身為在家教育者的內部觀點（Insider's viewpoint），探討家庭參與建構過程中，教育主體與空間尺度的再結構以及效應。研究對象是自學家庭成員，自主到日本Sudbury Valley School（SVS）民主學校進行兩周的漂流實驗教育。本研究經由個案研究、密集式訪談、參與觀察等研究方法，發現時空鬆綁能強化學童在空間發展上的能動性，而此能動性將凝聚成學童的內在動機。當這種內在動機醞釀至飽和點時，學童身上即會出現本文所謂「尺度跳躍」的表現。此結果填補另類教育空間的地理學術空白，延伸教育地理學一個新興的研究視野。

In 2014, Taiwan adopted a new educational regulation, 3 types of Experimental Education Act, including the school and non-school types of experimental education, and also private schools. The emergence of the mentioned law is simply a new product of the educational reform which encourages both innovation and experimentation. Among others, the non-school type of experimental education, also known as homeschooling, liberates children from the temporal and spatial restrictions of a school and, in the meantime, it becomes the focus of geographers. This study stands from being an insider's viewpoint to explore the re-structure and effects of the educational subject and spatial scale as a family takes part in the process of a schoolkid's learning. The object of the study is a homeschooling family who went on its own to the Sudbury Valley School (SVS) Democratic School in Japan for two weeks to observe and experience the wandered experimental education. This study is based on the research methods such as case study, intensive interview, and participant observation. The results have shown that deregulating the temporal and spatial restrictions of a school can indeed strengthen a schoolkid's agency in facilitating spatial development, and the ability will eventually generate the schoolkid's intrinsic motivation. When such intrinsic motivation reaches a saturation point, a schoolkid performs just demonstrates a so-called ＂scale jump＂. The results make up the geographical academic gap in the alternative education, and broaden the horizon in the emerging research of educational geography.

1. 李素馨, S.H., 解智鈞, C.C.,侯錦雄, J.S.(2007)。蘭嶼兒童之遊戲行爲與環境認知。戶外遊憩研究，20(4)，27-49。
   連結：
2. 陳秀玲, S.L.(2009)。家長面對教育選擇權之機構俗民誌研究。屏東教育大學學報─教育類，33，303-334。
   連結：
3. 謝雨潔, Y.C.(2014)。初探「教育地理學」：教育主體、學習空間及鄰里社群。地理研究，60，87-106。
   連結：
4. Brown, P.,Lauder, H.(1991).Education, Economy and Social Change.International Studies in Sociology of Education,1(1-2),3-23.
5. Gibbons, S.,Machin, S,Silva, O.(2006).The educational impact of parental choice and school competition.Centre Piece,11(3),6-9.
6. Holloway, S.L.,Hubbard, P,Jöns, H.,Pimlott-Wilson, H.(2010).Geographies of education and the significance of children, youth and families.Progress in Human Geography,34(5),583-600.
7. Johnston, R.J.(ed.),Pratt, G.(ed.),Watts, M.(ed.)(2000).The Dictionary of Human Geography.Oxford:Blackwell.
8. Jorgensen, D.L.(1989).Participant observation: A methodology for human studies.Newbury Park, CA:Sage Publications.
9. Kirkpatrick, D.W.(1990).Choice in Schooling: A Case for Tuition Vouchers.Chicago:Loyola University Press.
10. Kraftl, P.(2013).Towards geographies of ‘alternative’ education: a case study of UK home schooling families.Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers,38(3),436-450.
11. Lauder, H.(1991).Education, Democracy and the Economy.British Journal of Sociology of Education,12(4),417-431.
12. Lofland, J.,Lofland, L.H.(1984).Analyzing Scoial Settings: A Guide to Qualitative Observation and Analysis.Belmont, CA:Wadsworth Publishing Company.
13. Patton, M.Q.(1990).Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods.Newbury Park:Sage.
14. Robert, K.Y.(1984).Case Study Research Design and Methods.Sage Publications, Inc..
15. Serres, M.(1991).Le Tiers-Instruit.Paris:Francois Bourin.
16. Taylor, C.(2009).Towards a geography of education.Oxford Review of education,35(5),651-669.
17. Thiem, C.H.(2009).Thinking through education: the geographies of contemporary educational restructuring.Progress in Human Geography,33(2),154-173.
18. Warrington, M.(2005).Mirage in the desert? Access to educational opportunities in an area of social exclusion.Antipode,37(4),796-816.
19. Zoabi, A.Y.(2002).Children's ‘Mental Maps’ and Neighborhood Design of Abu-Nuseir, Jordan.Children an the City Conference
20. 張碧如, B.R.(2007)。教育選擇權與受教權之間的兩難：一位在家教育評鑑委員之訪談研究。屏東教育大學學報：教育類，27，1-30。
21. 張碧如, B.R.(2006).教與學的另類可能－在家教育自主學習之個案研究》.臺北市：五南.【 Chang, B.R. (2006).Alternatives of Teaching and Learning: A Case Study of self-direction in Homeschooling.臺北市=Taipei:五南=Wu-Nan Book Inc.
22. 許宏儒, H.J.(2011)。吟遊者：Michel Serres 的教育思想初探。漂流．陶養與另類教育-臺灣另類教育學會 2007 年度學術研討會論文集，臺北市=Taipei, Taiwan:
23. 陳麗珠, L.J.(2007)。論資源分配與教育機會均等之關係：以國民教育為例。教育研究與發展期刊，3(3)，33-54。
24. 楊巧玲, C.L.(2000)。教育行政的鬆綁與再規範：以在家自行教育為例。教育政策論壇，3(1)，97-116。
25. 鄭玉卿, Y.C.(2002)。西方兒童在家教育之研究─從傳統到現代的變革。臺北市立師範學院學報，33，309-326。
26. 鍾宜興, Y.H.,黃碧智, B.C.(2013)。流動的文化疆界與跨界的心靈─國際教育相關概念的釐清。教育資料與研究，110，1-26。
27. 嚴祥鸞, H.L.(2010).質性研究：理論、方法及本土女性研究實例.臺北市=Taipei:巨流圖書股份有限公司=ChuliuBook Inc..

1. 陳榮政(2021)。我國實驗教育實徵研究之分析與展望。教育研究與發展期刊，17(4)，69-96。
2. (2023)。COVID-19疫情下的在家學習：母親作為代理教育者的視角。臺灣教育社會學研究，23(1)，1-35。