题名

地方標誌性建築的設計治理：臺鐵花東線車站改建計畫研究

并列篇名

The Design Governance of Local Iconic Architecture: A Study on the Station Reconstruction Plan along the TRA Huadong Railway Line

DOI

10.6234/JGR.202112_(74).0001

作者

高郁婷(Yu-Ting Kao)；王志弘(Chih-Hung Wang)

关键词

公共工程體制 ； 基礎設施 ； 願景政治 ； 地方發展 ； regime of public works ； infrastructure ； politics of vision ； local development

期刊名称

地理研究

卷期/出版年月

74期（2021 / 12 / 01）

页次

1 - 35

内容语文

繁體中文
中文摘要

標誌性建築是意象塑造和認同凝聚的場所，晚近更是地區發展推力。本文以地方鐵路車站案例及設計治理觀點，補充了學界聚焦全球城市和資本力量的標誌性建築文獻。作者以「花東線鐵路整體服務效能提升計畫」車站改建為例，分析次級文獻、從事實地觀察，訪談關鍵人物，探討原以工程為先的臺鐵，如何由建築師為中介而強化美學意識，但各車站執行狀況大異其趣。車站改建計畫鑲嵌於後山觀光發展、公共工程體制、建築專業實作、地方政府策略，以及地方社群培力之間，並以多層次的設計治理來實現，彰顯了公共空間設計的社會性。
英文摘要

Iconic architecture can be a place for image shaping and identity cohesion, and recently it has been a driving force for regional development. Rather than focusing on iconic architectures as the embodiment of global cities and capital power, this paper aims to contribute to relevant discussions through an exploration of the local railway stations located in eastern Taiwan using the perspective of design governance. Through the analysis of secondary documents and on-site observation, as well as in-depth interviews with key persons, we discuss how Taiwan Railways Administration (TRA)'s reconstruction of the railway stations under the ＂Hualien-Taitung Efficiency Improvement＂ Project has demonstrated aesthetic awareness showcasing the architects' intermediary role. This reconstruction is quite distinct from traditional public works related to transportation that usually prioritize engineering techniques and downplay architectural forms. In reality, however, different stations' manifestations of the architects' aesthetics varied and were rather limited. We show that the tourism development of surrounding mountains, the regime of public works, the practices of the architectural profession, local governments' strategies, and local communities' empowerment attempts all shaped the actual formation of the stations. We argue that multiple-level design governance has molded the station reconstruction of Huadong Railway, which also epitomizes the social dimensions of the design of public space.
主题分类 人文學 > 地理及區域研究
参考文献
  1. 王志弘, C.H.,李涵茹, H.R.(2018)。臺北跨河橋梁的景觀化與遊憩化：多重地方意義的疊覆。人文社會學報，18，13-58。
    連結：
  2. 王志弘, C.H.,高郁婷, Y.T(2020)。臺灣鐵道基礎設施的文創轉生。臺灣社會研究季刊，116，151-199。
    連結：
  3. 王志弘, C.H.,黃若慈, J.T.(2019)。基礎設施化的國家建造：臺灣經建計劃體制的形成與轉變。國家發展研究，19(1)，145-188。
    連結：
  4. 江尚書, S.S.,周素卿, S.C.,吳幸玲, H.L.(2010)。都市再發展與新自由主義治理的經驗模式：以臺北車站特定專用區之開發為例。都市與計劃，37(2)，167-191。
    連結：
  5. 劉碧株, P.C.(2016)。日治時期鐵道與港口開發對高雄市區規劃的影響。國史館館刊，47，1-46。
    連結：
  6. 蕭力偉, L.W.(2018)。都市空間發展結構歷程與治理的困局－以高速鐵路苗栗車站特定區為例。中國地理學會會刊，60，25-50。
    連結：
  7. 蕭力偉, L.W.(2018)。游移在發展型國家與新自由主義之間的開發與治理：以高速鐵路桃園車站特定區為例。地理研究，69，155-195。
    連結：
  8. 蕭力偉, L.W.,蘇淑娟, S.J.(2017)。高速鐵路車站特定區空間開發之結構歷程分析：新自由主義都市治理案例研究。地理學報，84，55-88。
    連結：
  9. Balke, J.,Reuber, P.,Wood, G.(2018).Iconic architecture and place-specific neoliberal governmentality: Insights from Hamburg’s Elbe Philharmonic Hall.Urban Studies,55(5),997-1012.
  10. Bourdieu, P.(1984).Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste.London:Routledge.
  11. Carmona, M.(2019).Marketizing the governance of design: Design review in England.Journal of Urban Design,24(4),523-555.
  12. Carmona, M.(2016).Design governance: Theorizing an urban design subfield.Journal of Urban Design,21(6),705-730.
  13. Carmona, M.(2017).The formal and informal tools of design governance.Journal of Urban Design,22(1),1-36.
  14. Carmona, M.,De Magalhães, C.,Natarajan, L.(2017).Design Governance: The CABE Experiment.New York:Routledge.
  15. Carmona, M.,De Magalhães, C.,Natarajan, L.(2018).Design governance the CABE way. Its effectiveness and legitimacy.Journal of Urbanism: International Research on Placemaking and Urban Sustainability,11(1),1-23.
  16. Chen, F.,White, J. T.(2020).Urban design governance in three Chinese ‘pioneer cities.International Planning Studies,26(2),130-148.
  17. Chhotray, V.,Stoker, G.(2009).Governance Theory and Practice: A Cross-disciplinary Approach.New York:Palgrave Macmillan.
  18. Eagleton, T.(1990).The Ideology of the Aesthetic.Oxford:Basil Blackwell.
  19. Farmer, S.(2011).Uneven public transportation development in neoliberalizing Chicago, USA..Environment and Planning A,43(5),1154-1172.
  20. Garrett, M.,Taylor, B.(1999).Reconsidering social equity in public transit.Berkeley Planning Journal,13(1),6-27.
  21. Graham, S.,Marvin, S.(2001).Splintering Urbanism: Networked Infrastructures, Technological Mobilities and the Urban Condition.London:Routledge.
  22. Harvey, D.(1982).The Limits to Capital.Chicago, IL:The University of Chicago Press.
  23. Harvey, P.,Knox, H.(2015).Roads: An Anthropology of Infrastructure and Expertise.Ithaca, NY.:Cornell University Press.
  24. Ho, K.C.(2006).Where do community iconic structures fit in a globalizing city.City,10(1),91-100.
  25. Hoekstra, M.S.(2020).Iconic architecture and middle-class politics of memory in a deindustrialized city.Sociology,54(4),693-710.
  26. Imrie, R.,Street, E.(2009).Regulating design: The practices of architecture, governance and control.Urban Studies,46(12),2507-2518.
  27. Imrie, R.,Street, E.(2011).Architectural Design and Regulation.Chichester, UK:Wiley-Blackwell.
  28. Iwami, T.(2005).The ‘advantage of latecomer’ in abating air-pollution: The East Asian experience.International Journal of Social Economics,32(3),184-202.
  29. Jessop, B.(1997).A neo-Gramscian approach to the regulation of urban regimes: Accumulation strategies, hegemonic projects and governance.Reconstructing Urban Regime Theory: Regulating Urban Politics in a Global Economy,London:
  30. Johnston, R.J.(Ed.),Gregory, D.(Ed.),Pratt, G.(Ed.),Watts, M.(Ed.)(2000).The Dictionary of Human Geography.Oxford:Basil Blackwell.
  31. Jones, P.(2009).Putting architecture in its social place: A cultural political economy of architecture.Urban Studies,46(12),2519-2536.
  32. Kaika, M.(2010).Architecture and crisis re‐inventing the icon, re‐imag(in)ing London and re‐branding the city.Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers NS,35(4),453-474.
  33. Kellett, J.R.(1969).The Impact of Railways on Victorian Cities.London:Routledge.
  34. Nilsen, M.(2008).Railways and the Western European Capitals: Studies of Implementation in London, Paris, Berlin, and Brussels.New York:Palgrave MacMillan.
  35. Patterson, M.(2012).The role of the public institution in iconic architectural development.Urban Studies,49(15),3289-3305.
  36. Perkins, R.,Neumayer, E.(2005).The international diffusion of new technologies: A multitechnology analysis of latecomer advantage and global economic integration.Annals of the Association of American Geographers,95(4),789-808.
  37. Richards J.,MacKenzie, J.M.(1986).The Railway Station: A Social History.Oxford, UK:Oxford University Press.
  38. Robinson, J.(2006).Ordinary Cities: Between Modernity and Development.London:Routledge.
  39. Siemiatycki, M.(2011).Urban transportation public–private partnerships: Drivers of uneven development?.Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space,43(7),1707-1722.
  40. Simone, A.(2010).City Life from Jakarta to Dakar: Movements at the Crossroads.London:Routledge.
  41. Sklair, L.(2011).Iconic architecture and urban, national, and global identities.Cities & Sovereignty: Identity Politics in Urban Spaces,Blooming, IN:
  42. Sklair, L.(2017).The Icon Project: Architecture, Cities, and Capitalist Globalization.New York:Oxford University Press.
  43. Sklair, L.(2006).Iconic architecture and capitalist globalization.City,10(1),21-47.
  44. Sklair, L.(2012).Iconic architecture in globalizing cities.International Critical Thought,2(3),349-361.
  45. Sklair, L.(2010).Iconic architecture and the culture-ideology of consumerism.Theory, Culture & Society,27(5),135-159.
  46. Sklair, L.,Gherardi, L.(2012).Iconic architecture as a hegemonic project of the transnational capitalist class.City,16(1-2),57-73.
  47. Soppelsa, P.(2012).Urban railways, industrial infrastructure, and the Paris cityscape, 1870-1914.Trains, Culture, and Mobility: Riding the Rails,Plymounth, UK:
  48. White, J.T.(2016).Pursuing design excellence: Urban design governance on Toronto’s waterfront.Progress in Planning,110,1-41.
  49. Young, D.M.(2005).The Iron Horse and the Windy City: How Railroads Shaped Chicago.Dekalb, IL:Northern Illinois University Press.
  50. 王峻祺（2019）：〈臺鐵新城際列車「黑白極簡風」曝光！後年投入花東線〉，《自由時報》，11 月 30 日。https://news.ltn.com.tw/news/life/breakingnews/2994393。（2019/12/4 瀏覽）【Wang, J.C. (2019). New Taiwan railway intercity train “black and white minimalist” is exposed! Put into Huadong line in the next year. Liberty Times, November 30. https://news.ltn.com.tw/news/life/breakingnews/2994393. (accessed 2019/12/4).】
  51. 交通部鐵路改建工程局（2011）：〈花東新車站運動，新車站構想圖〉。https://www.rrb.gov.tw/s/NewStation/index.aspx?sid=21&ssid=72。（2019/9/16 瀏覽）【Railway Reconstruction Bureau, MOTC (2011). Huadong new station movement, new station concept map. https://www.rrb.gov.tw/s/NewStation/index.aspx?sid=21&ssid=72. (accessed 2019/9/16).】
  52. 交通部鐵道局（2019）：〈花東線鐵路整體服務效能提升計畫〉。https://www.rb.gov.tw/showpage.php?lmenuid=3&smenuid=83&tmenuid=132&pagetype=0。（2019/9/16 瀏覽）【Railway Bureau, MOTC (2019). Hualien-Taitung Efficiency Improvement Project. https://www.rb.gov.tw/showpage.php?lmenuid=3&smenuid=83&tmenuid=132&pagetype=0. (accessed 2019/9/16).】
  53. 交通部鐵道局（n.d.）：〈新城車站公共藝術〉。https://www.rb.gov.tw/works2_view.php?lmenuid=7&smenuid=88&tmenuid=0&workid=6。（2019/9/16瀏覽）【Railway Bureau, MOTC (n.d.). Xincheng station public art. https://www.rb.gov.tw/works2_view.php?lmenuid=7&smenuid=88&tmenuid=0&workid=6. (accessed 2019/9/16).】
  54. 余小涵（2019）：〈臺鐵提升車站美學—從瑞芳十分著手〉，《中央社》，5 月 31 日。https://www.cna.com.tw/news/ahel/201905310068.aspx。（2019/9/16 瀏覽）【Yu, H.H. (2019). Taiwan railways enhance station aesthetics-Starting from Ruifang. Central News Agency, May 31. https://www.cna.com.tw/news/ahel/201905310068.aspx. (accessed 2019/9/16).】
  55. 李明軒, M.S.(2015)。逆向操作—鳳林翻身「臺灣第一」。天下雜誌，566
  56. 李彩嘉（2019）：〈地方創生在池上：這裡的土很黏，人也很黏〉，《三人紀實》，6 月 6 日。https://www.golocalday.com/2019/06/06/%E3%80%90%E5%B0%88%E6%AC%84%E3%80%91%E5%9C%B0%E6%96%B9%E5%89%B5%E7%94%9F%E5%9C%A8%E6%B1%A0%E4%B8%8A%EF%BC%9A%E9%80%99%E8%A3%A1%E7%9A%84%E5%9C%9F%E5%BE%88%E9%BB%8F%EF%BC%8C%E4%BA%BA%E4%B9%9F%E5%BE%88/。（2019/9/16 瀏覽）【Li, T.C. (2019). The place was born in Chishang: The soil here is very sticky, and the people are very sticky. Three Persons Documentary, June 6.https://www.golocalday.com/2019/06/06/%E3%80%90%E5%B0%88%E6%AC%84%E3%80%91%E5%9C%B0%E6%96%B9%E5%89%B5%E7%94%9F%E5%9C%A8%E6%B1%A0%E4%B8%8A%EF%BC%9A%E9%80%99%E8%A3%A1%E7%9A%84%E5%9C%9F%E5%BE%88%E9%BB%8F%EF%BC%8C%E4%BA%BA%E4%B9%9F%E5%BE%88/. (accessed 2019/9/16).】
  57. 花孟璟（2016）：〈玉里車站變裝—旅英藝術家賣關子〉，《自由時報》，2 月 25 日。https://news.ltn.com.tw/news/local/paper/961734。（2019/9/16 瀏覽）【Hua, M.C. (2016). Transformation at Yuli station—The artist play mystery. Liberty Times, February 25. https://news.ltn.com.tw/news/local/paper/961734. (accessed 2019/9/16).】
  58. 常式建築師事務所=OASIStudio。常式建築師事務所（n.d.）：《富里車站新建接續工程》。宜蘭：常式。【OASIStudio (n.d.). Follow-up Project of the Fuli Station construction. Yilan: OASIStudio.】。
  59. 張匡逸, K.Y.(2018)。小站的地域構築與兩三事。建築師，521，108-112。
  60. 曹悅華（2019）：〈臺鐵要雪恥！美學小組首抓「29 輛觀光列車」開刀〉，《聯合報》，4 月 28 日。https://udn.com/news/story/7934/3781445。（2019/12/4 瀏覽）【Tsao, Y.H. (2019). TRA wants to redeem itself! Aesthetics team first catches “29 sightseeing trains”. United Daily News, April 28. https://udn.com/news/story/7934/3781445. (accessed 2019/12/14).】
  61. 許書銘, S.M.(2010)。花東鐵路整體服務效能提升之研析。中興工程，106，53-62。
  62. 許書銘, S.M.(2011)。花東線鐵路電氣化工程之執行與探討。中興工程，110，103-110。
  63. 陳宇君（2011）：〈玉里車站改建，網友連署復舊〉。《聯合報》，8 月 1 日。【Chen, Y.C. (2011). Netizens signed for the restoration of Yuli station. United Daily News, August 1.】
  64. 傅崐萁（2013）：〈花蓮縣議會第 17 屆第 7 次定期大會施政總報告〉，5 月 6 日。http://www1.hl.gov.tw/workreport/workreport.asp?sel=17_07_1_102_05_06_pm_%B3%C5%B1X%DBm.html。（2019/9/16 瀏覽）【Fu, K.C. (2013). Hualien County Council's 17th 7th regular assembly policy general report. May 6. http://www1.hl.gov.tw/workreport/workreport.asp?sel=17_07_1_102_05_06_pm_%B3%C5%B1X%DBm.html. (accessed 2019/9/16).】
  65. 游士毅, S.Y.,陳則銘, T.M.,許書銘, S.M.(2015)。花東線鐵路軌道切換工程之探討。中興工程，128，55-63。
  66. 馮紹恩（2020）：〈搶救中華民國政府美學大作戰！設計師們這麼看〉。《城市學》。https://city.gvm.com.tw/article/74442。（2021/1/31 瀏覽）【Feng, S.E. (2020). Campaign for rescuing the aesthetics of the Republic of China Government! Designers think so. City. https://city.gvm.com.tw/article/74442. (accessed 2021/1/31).】
  67. 黃小琪（2019）：〈玉里火車站改建未規畫遮雨棚—地方盼增建〉，《客家電視》，5 月 17 日。http://www.hakkatv.org.tw/news/180906。（2019/9/16 瀏覽）【Huang, H.C. (2019). Yuli railway station reconstruction skip canopy—locals want to build one. Hakka TV, May 17. http://www.hakkatv.org.tw/news/180906. (accessed 2019/9/16).】
  68. 黃宣衛, S.W.(2018).共築蓬萊新樂園—一群池上人的故事.臺北市=Taipei:唐山=Tonsan.
  69. 楊文琪（2019）：〈移動美術館來了！國立集集美術館彩繪列車發表〉，《經濟日報》，8 月 20 日。https://udn.com/news/story/7241/3999479。（2019/12/4 瀏覽）【Yang, W.C. (2019). The mobile art gallery is here! Announcement of painted train of National Jiji Art Museum. Economic Daily News, August 20. https://udn.com/news/story/7241/3999479. (accessed 2019/12/4).】
  70. 雷光涵（2019）：〈觀光列車換新裝網友酸：臺鐵美學正常發揮〉，《聯合新聞網》，2 月 22 日。https://udn.com/news/story/7270/3658344。（2019/9/16 瀏覽）【Lei, K.H. (2019). Sightseeing train refurbished. Netizens satire that TRA aesthetics is functioning normally. United Daily News, February 22. https://udn.com/news/story/7270/3658344. (accessed 2019/9/16).】
  71. 廖羿雯（2019）：〈觀光列車大升級！臺鐵斥資近 8 千萬改裝—增設環繞音響、卡拉 OK 室〉，《風傳媒》，2 月 21 日。https://www.storm.mg/article/974573。（2019/9/16 瀏覽）【Liao, I.W. (2019). The sightseeing train has been upgraded! TRA has invested nearly 80 million dollar in refitting-adding surround sound and karaoke rooms. The Storm Media, February 21. https://www.storm.mg/article/974573. (accessed 2019/9/16).】
  72. 熊鵬翥（編）, P.C.(Ed.)(2012).引領未來—花東新車站設計成果專輯.新北市=New Taipei City:交通部鐵路改建工程局=Railway Reconstruction Bureau, MOTC.
  73. 聯合新聞網（2018）：〈中華民國設計美學？網：美醜能吃嗎，CP 值最重要〉，《聯合新聞網》，6 月 6日。https://udn.com/news/story/120911/3183216。（2021/1/30 瀏覽）【United Daily News (2019). The design aesthetics of Republic of China? Functions matter more than beauty. United Daily News, June 6. https://udn.com/news/story/120911/3183216. (accessed 2021/1/30).】
print cancel