题名

非生物生態系服務於地質公園價值評估之應用：以利吉惡地地質公園為例

并列篇名

The application of abiotic ecosystem services in geoparks assessment: A case study in Lichi Badland Geopark

DOI

10.6234/JGR.202305_(77).0005

作者

紀權窅(Chuan-Yao Chi)

关键词

地質公園 ； 非生物生態系服務 ； 地質多樣性 ； 利吉惡地 ； 文化資產保存法 ； geoparks ； abiotic ecosystem services ； geodiversity ； Lichi badland ； Cultural Heritage Preservation Act

期刊名称

地理研究

卷期/出版年月

77期（2023 / 05 / 01）

页次

103 - 133

内容语文

繁體中文;英文
中文摘要

地質公園自2016年《文化資產保存法》修法後正式納入自然資產中的自然地景項目，至今已有9個地區公告為縣定或直轄市定的地質公園。然而根據法規的指定基準，地質公園僅提到須具備科學的重要性，而立法理由又期待能達到對社區生態、生活、生產的效益，科學價值與對社會發展的效益之間缺乏關鍵的連結，因而使地質公園的價值論述出現重視科學以及重視社區參與的兩種觀點。非生物生態系服務做為以科學的基礎來評估地質多樣性對於人類社會效益的方法，是近年來地質保育研究中時常被提及的概念，也有許多應用在地質公園與地質景點評估的案例。本研究嘗試以非生物生態系服務來進行利吉惡地地質公園的價值評估，在調節服務、支持服務、供給服務、文化服務與知識服務等面向歸納出17項的效益，其中以文化服務及知識服務最為顯著。透過非生物生態系服務與法規地質公園指定基準與預期效益比對，知識服務詳細闡述了指定基準的科學背景要件，而其他四項服務則指出了地質多樣性與社區之生態、生活、生產之間的關聯，也因此在空間分布上更貼近社區。本研究認為非生物生態系服務提供更全面的觀點來看待地質公園的地質公園保育價值，值得再以其他地質公園為案例來進行評估，以了解其在不同環境背景下的適用性，亦可做為未來法規修訂或制定指引時的依據。
英文摘要

Geoparks were legally included into the natural landscape of Natural Heritage after the amending of Taiwan's "Cultural Heritage Preservation Act" in 2016. Until now there were 9 areas announced as geoparks at county or city level. According to the designation criteria of geoparks in the law, a geopark must only have scientific importance. But the reason of legislation also mentioned the potential benefits for ecology, life, and production to the community. Because of the lack of linkages between scientific values and benefits to social development, discourses about the value of geoparks are largely shaped according two different points of view. One focusses on the scientific value, and the other focusses on the community participation. Abiotic ecosystem services are a method to discuss the benefits of geodiversity on human society based on a scientific assessment. It is frequently mentioned in recent geoconservation studies and it is also applied to the assessment of geoparks and geosites. This study tries to use the abiotic ecosystem services method to assess the value of the Lichi badland geopark. We conclude that 17 items of benefits belong to regulating services, supporting services, provision services, cultural services, and knowledge services. The cultural services and knowledge services are most significant. Comparing the abiotic ecosystem services with the geoparks designation criteria and expected benefits of the law will build upon the scientific background of the knowledge services in more detail. The other four services point out the linkage between geodiversity and ecology, life, and production of the community,and that is why their spatial distribution is closer to the community. This study concludes that the abiotic ecosystem services method provides a broader point of view to discuss the geoconservation value in a geopark. It is worth to test this method in other geoparks in order to realize its applicability among different environmental contexts. It is also feasible to use it asa reference when amending the law or regulate the guidelines.
主题分类 人文學 > 地理及區域研究
参考文献
  1. 吳守從, S.T.(2019)。遊憩區生態系統服務功能及其價值探討－以內洞老街、溫泉區為例。島嶼觀光研究，12(2)，1-24。
    連結：
  2. 紀權窅, C.Y.(2021)。地質公園的地質保育：從地質多樣性談起。地理研究，73，1-17。
    連結：
  3. Convention on Biological Diversity (1992). United Nations.
  4. Biq, C.C.(1971).Comparison of mélange tectonic in Taiwan and in othermountain belts: Petrol.Geol. Taiwan,9,79-106.
  5. Brilha, J.(2018).Geoheritage and Geoparks.Geoheritage: Assessment, Protection, and Management
  6. Brilha, J.(2016).Inventory and Quantitative Assessment of Geosites and Geodiversity Sites: a Review.Geoheritage,8,119-134.
  7. Brilha, J.,Gray, M.,Pereira, D.I.,Pereira, P.(2018).Geodiversity: An integrative review as a contribution to the sustainable management of the whole of nature.Environmental Science and Policy,86,19-28.
  8. Brown, C.,Walpole, M.,Simpson, L.,Tierney, M.(2011).Brown, C., Walpole, M., Simpson, L., and Tierney, M. (2011). Chapter 1: Introduction to the UKNational Ecosystem Assessment Technical Report. UNEP-WCMC, Cambridge, 1-10..
  9. Chen, W.S.,Wang, Y.(1988).The Plio-Pleistocene basin developmentin the Coastal Range of Taiwan.Acta Geol. Taiwanica,26,37-56.
  10. Crofts, R.(2019).Linking geoconservation with biodiversity conservation in protected areas.International Journal of Geoheritage and Parks,7,211-217.
  11. Crofts, R.,Gordon, J.E.,Brilha, J.,Gray, M.,Gunn, J.,Larwood, J.,Santucci, V.L.,Tormey, D.,Worboys, G.L.(2020).Guidelines for geoconservation in protected and conserved areas.Gland, Switzerland:IUCN.
  12. Diaz, S.(2015).The IPBES conceptual framework – connecting nature and people (83 co-authors).Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain.,14,1-16.
  13. Eder, W.,Bobrowsky, P.(2017).20 years of promotion of earth sciences through Geoparks and World Heritage Sites.2017 International Geopark Conference in Taiwan
  14. Ernst, W.G.(1977).Olistostromes and included ophiolite debris from theCoastal Range of eastern Taiwan.Mem. Geol. Soc. China,2,97-114.
  15. Gabriel, R.,Moreira, H.,Alencoão, H.,Faria, A.,Wimbledon, E.,Sá, A.(2018).An Emerging Paradigm for the UNESCO Global Geoparks: The Ecosystem’s Health Provision.Geosciences,8,100.
  16. Garcia, M.M.(2019).Ecosystem Services Provided by Geodiversity: Preliminary Assessment and Perspectives for the Sustainable Use of Natural Resources in the Coastal Region of the State of São Paulo, Southeastern Brazil.Geoheritage,11,1257-1266.
  17. Gordon, J. E.(2019).Geoconservation principles and protected area management.International Journal of Geoheritage and Parks,7(4),199-210.
  18. Gordon, J. E.(2018).Geoheritage, Geotourism and the Cultural Landscape: Enhancing the Visitor Experience and Promoting Geoconservation.Geosciences,8,136.
  19. Gordon, J.E.,Barron, H.F.(2012).Valuing geodiversity and geoconservation: developing a more strategic ecosystem approach.Scott. Geographical J.,128,278-297.
  20. Gordon, J.E.,Barron, H.F.(2013).The role of geodiversity in delivering ecosystem services and benefits in Scotland.Scott. J. Geol.,49(1),41-58.
  21. Gray, M.(2019).Geodiversity, geoheritage and geoconservation for society.International Journal of Geoheritage and Parks,7(4),226-236.
  22. Gray, M.(2011).Other nature: geodiversity and geosystem services.Environmental Conservation,38(3),271-274.
  23. Gray, M.(2013).Geodiversity and the ecosystem approach: the contribution of geoscience in delivering integrated environmental management.Proceedings of the Geologists’ Association,124(4),659-673.
  24. Gray, M.(2004).Geodiversity: valuing and conserving abiotic nature.John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
  25. Henriques, M.H.,Brilha, J.(2017).UNESCO Global Geoparks: a strategy towards global understanding and sustainability.Episodes,40(4),349-355.
  26. Ho, C.S.(1977).Mélange in the Neogene framework of Taiwan.Mem.Geol. Soc. China,2,85-96.
  27. Hose, T.A.(1995).Selling the Story of Britain’s Stone.Environ. Interpret,10(2),16-17.
  28. Hsu, K.J.(1968).Principles of mélanges and their bearing on theFranciscan-Knoxville Paradox.Geol. Soc. Am. Bull.,79,1063-1074.
  29. Hsu, T.L.(1976).The Lichimelange in the Coastal Range framework.Bulletin of the Geological Survey of Taiwan,25,87-95.
  30. Hsu, T.L.,Chang, S.C.(1979).Quaternary faulting in Taiwan.Memoir of the Geological Society of China,3,155-165.
  31. Kubalíková, L.(2020).Cultural Ecosystem Services of Geodiversity: A Case Study from Stránskáskála (Brno, Czech Republic).Land,9,105.
  32. Lin, J. C.,Su, S.J.(2019).Geoparks of Taiwan: Their Development and Prospects for a Sustainable Future.Springer.
  33. Liou, J.G.,Suppe, J.,Ernst, W.G.(1977).Conglomerates and pebblymud-stones in the Lichi Mélange, eastern Taiwan.Mem. Geol. Soc.China,2,115-128.
  34. Martini, G.,Zouros, N.,Zhang, J.,Jin, X.,Komoo, I.,Border, M.,Watanabe, M.,Frey, M.L.,Rangnes, K.,Van, T.T.,Melo, J.P.P.,Patzak, M.,Hilario, A.,Nakada, S.,Sá, A.A.(2022).UNESCO Global Geoparks in the “World after”: a multiplegoals roadmap proposal for future discussion.Episodes,45(1),29-35.
  35. McKeever, P.J.,Zouros, N.(2005).Geoparks: Celebrating Earth heritage, sustaining local communities.Episodes,28(4),274-278.
  36. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment(2005).Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Synthesis.Washington, DC:Island Press.
  37. Page, B.M.,Suppe, J.(1981).The Pliocene Lichi Mélange of Taiwan:its plate tectonic and olistostromal origin.Am. J. Sci.,281,193-227.
  38. Pásková, M.,Zelenka, J.,Ogasawara, T.,Zavala, B.,Astete, I.(2021).The ABC Concept—Value Added to the Earth Heritage Interpretation?.Geoheritage,13,38.
  39. Patzak, M.,Eder, W.(1998)."UNESCO GEOPARK"A new Programme - A new UNESCO label.geologicabalcanica,28(3-4),33-35.
  40. Sadry, B.N.(2021).The Scope and Nature of Geotourism in the 21st Century.The geotourism industry in the 21st century : the origin principles, and futuristic approach
  41. Sharples, C.(1995).Geoconservation in forest management-principles and procedures.Tasforests,7,37-50.
  42. Silva, M.L.N.,Nascimento, M.A.L.(2022).Ecosystem Services Assessment of Geosites in the Seridó Aspiring UNESCO Geopark Area, Northeast Brazil.Geoconservation Research,5(1),29-46.
  43. Silva, M.L.N.,Nascimento, M.A.L.(2020).Ecosystem Services and Typology of Urban Geodiversity: Qualitative Assessment in Natal Town, Brazilian Northeast.Geoheritage,12,57.
  44. UNESCO(2015).UNESCO (2015). Statutes of the International Geoscience and Geoparks Programme and Operational Guidelines for UNESCO Global Geoparks..
  45. Urban, J.,RadwanekBąk, B.,Margielewski, W.(2022).Geoheritage Concept in a Context of Abiotic Ecosystem Services (Geosystem Services) — How to Argue the Geoconservation Better?.Geoheritage,14,54.
  46. van Ree, C.C.D.F.,van Beukering, P.J.H.(2016).Geosystem services: A concept in support of sustainable development of the subsurface.Ecosystem Services,20,30-36.
  47. van Ree, C.C.D.F.,van Beukering, P.J.H.,Boekestijn, J.(2017).Geosystem services: A hidden link in ecosystem management.Ecosystem Services,26,58-69.
  48. Watanabe, M.(2018).The Origin and Development of Geoparks: Geological, Geomorphological, and Ecological Aspects.Natural Heritage of Japan
  49. 大江二郎、春天正明、鈴木俊郎（1939）：〈臺灣總督府殖產局縮尺十萬分之一地質圖及說明書〉，13，臺灣總督府殖產局。【Ooe, Z., Haruta, M., Suzuki, T. (1939). Geological map of Taiwan and explanatory text scale 1:100,000, no.13, Taiwan Shokusankyoku.】
  50. 太田猛（1935）：〈東洋一の吊橋〉，《臺灣大觀》，臺南新報社。【Oota, T. (1935). No. 1 suspension bridge in the Oriental area, Encyclopedia of Taiwan, Tainan News Press】
  51. 王源, Y.,陳文山, W.S.(1993).海岸山脈地質圖（南幅）.經濟部中央地質調查所=Central Geological Survey.
  52. 石再添, T.T.,鄧國雄, K.S.,張瑞津, J.C.,石慶德, C.D.,楊貴三, G.S.(1986)。臺灣活斷層的地形學研究。師大地理研究報告，12，1-44。
  53. 立法院國會圖書館（2016）：〈文化資產保存法條文異動及理由〉。(https://lis.ly.gov.tw/lglawc/lawsingle?00561711A50B0000000000000000014000000004000000^02901105071200^00015001001）【Parliamentary Library Legislation Yuan (2016). Article changes and its reasons of Cultural Heritage Preservation Act. (https://lis.ly.gov.tw/lglawc/lawsingle?00561711A50B0000000000000000014000000004000000^02901105071200^00015001001)】
  54. 行政院農業委員會農業試驗所（2012）：〈土壤圖〉，《臺灣土壤資源與農地土地覆蓋圖資瀏覽查詢系統》。https://farmcloud.tari.gov.tw/soa/index.aspx。（2022/6/30 瀏覽）【Taiwan Agriculture Research Institute, Council of Agriculture, Executive Yuan (2012). Soil Map, Inquirysystem of soil resources and farmland cover graphics of Taiwan: https://farmcloud.tari.gov.tw/soa/index.aspx】
  55. 吳孟珊, M.S.(2014)。生態系服務的定義與特性。林業研究專訊，21(5)，54-57。
  56. 吳振揚（2009）：〈香港國家地質公園：全面的環境保育〉，香港地貌岩石保育協會。（2022/6/30 瀏覽）【Ng, Y. (2009). National Hong Kong Geopark: holistic environmental conservation. Association for Geoconservation, Hong Kong. http://www.rocks.org.hk/images/PolicyReview/HK_GeoPark20131019095548.pdf】
  57. 李玉芬, Y.F.,林炯明, J.M.,沈淑敏, S.M.(2009)。臺東焚風的時空特性及其影響。臺灣文獻，60(4)，213-252。
  58. 李光中, K.C.,王鑫, S.,何立德, L.D.,張蘇芝, S.Z.(2010)。社區本位的地質公園規劃架構。台灣林業，36(5)，13-21。
  59. 李寄嵎, J.Y.,林建偉, J.W.(2014)。馬祖地質公園的岩石特性。地質，33(1)，36-39。
  60. 周泰鈞, T.J.(1992)。臺東縣土壤分布概況。臺東縣農業專訊，2，4-6。
  61. 林佳靜, J.J.(2014).卑南大溪的河道變遷傳說：引水英雄都古比斯.臺東:國立臺灣史前文化博物館=National Museum of Prehistory.
  62. 林俊全, J.C.(2022)。臺灣地質公園網絡推動十年回顧。台灣林業，48(1)，9-16。
  63. 林偉雄, Y.H.,林啟文, C.W.,劉彥求, Y.C.,陳柏村, P.T.(2008).五萬分之一臺灣地質圖幅及說明書.經濟部中央地質調查所=Central Geological Survey.
  64. 林啟文, C.W.,陳文山, W.S.,劉彥求, Y.C.,陳柏村, P.T.(2009)。利吉斷層。經濟部中央地質調查所特刊，23，91-98。
  65. 林啟文, C.W.,劉彥求, Y.C.,周稟珊, B.S.,林燕慧, Y.H.(2021)。臺灣活動斷層分布圖。經濟部中央地質調查所彙刊，34，附圖=appendix。
  66. 林韻梅, Y.M.(2012).利吉的青春.臺北:玉山社=Yushan Press.
  67. 河本大地(2011)。ジオツーリズムと地理学発「地域多様性」概念—「ジオ」の視点を持続的地域社会づくりに生かすために—。地学雑誌，120(5)，775-785。
  68. 邱祈榮, C.J.,林俊成, J.C.(2017)。森林生態系服務面面觀。科學發展，529，30-35。
  69. 姜柷山, C.S.,孫民英, M.Y.,林娜鈴, N.L.(2016).臺東南王社區發展史.臺東縣臺東市南王社區發展協會=Association of Nanwan community development, Taitung City, Taitung County.
  70. 施添福, T.F.(2001).臺東縣史─大事篇.臺東:臺東縣政府=Taitung County Government.
  71. 紀權窅, C.Y.(2007)。國立臺灣大學地質科學研究所=Institute of Geosciences, National Taiwan University。
  72. 徐鐵良, T.L.(1956)。臺灣東部海岸山脈地質。臺灣省地質調查所彙刊，8，15-41。
  73. 徐鐵良, T.L.(1954)。臺灣東部海岸山脈地形與近期上升運動。臺灣省地質調查所彙刊，7，9-18。
  74. 國立嘉義大學=National Chiayi University(2011)。,行政院農業委員會林務局=Forestry Bureau, Council of Agriculture, Executive Yuan。
  75. 陳文山, W.S.(1991)。臺灣東部海岸山脈利吉層的成因。經濟部中央地質調查所特刊，5，257-266。
  76. 陳文山, W.S.(1988)。國立臺灣大學地質學研究所=Institute of Geology, National Taiwan University。
  77. 陳文山, W.S.(2014)。一切都是因為造山。地質，33(1)，23-25。
  78. 陳文山, W.S.,吳逸民, Y.M.,葉柏逸, P.Y.,賴奕修, Y.X.,柯明淳, M.C.,柯孝勳, S.S.,林義凱, Y.K.(2018)。臺灣東部碰撞帶孕震構造。經濟部中央地質調查所特刊，33，123-155。
  79. 陳文山, W.S.,林益正, I.C.,顏一勤, I.C.,楊志成, C.C.,紀權窅, C.C.,黃能偉, N.W.,林啟文, C.W.,林偉雄, W.S.,侯進雄, C.S.,劉彥求, Y.C.,林燕慧, Y.H.,石同生, T.S.,盧詩丁, S.T.(2008)。從古地震研究與 GPS 資料探討縱谷斷層的分段意義。經濟部中央地質調查所特刊，20，165-191。
  80. 陳均龍, J.L.,陳郁凱, Y.K.,吳繼倫, J.L.(2003)。海洋生態系服務的價值評估。水試專訊，43，45-48。
  81. 陳彥勳, Y.S.,李盈潔, Y.C.(2020)。農地景觀特徵之生態系統服務功能初探。農林學報，67(4)，233-248。
  82. 陳泰然, T,J.,王子軒, T.S.(2010)。梅雨季臺灣東部地區降雨與局部環流之研究。大氣科學，38(3)，165-184。
  83. 陳國川, K.C.,林聖欽, S.C.(2001).臺東縣史─產業篇.臺東:臺東縣政府=Taitung County Government.
  84. 章明哲（2019）：〈保育類長鬃山羊罕見現身臺東富源山區〉，公視新聞網，2019.12.11 報導。（2022/6/30瀏覽）【Zhang, M.Z. (2019). Protected animal Formosan serow appeared in hills of Fuyuan, Taitung. PTS news web, reported on December 11th, 2019. https://news.pts.org.tw/article/458177】
  85. 彭立沛, L.P.,官美吟, M.Y.(2016)。文化生態系統服務認知對水梯田復育意願之影響：環境傳播行為觀點。傳播與發展學報，33，89-119。
  86. 黃宣衛, S.W.,羅素玫, S.M.(2001).臺東縣史─阿美族篇.臺東:臺東縣政府=Taitung County Government.
  87. 黃家俊, C.C.(2021)。從地質觀點出發的地質多樣性評估—以九份金瓜石水湳洞地質公園為例。地景保育通訊，53，13-18。
  88. 經濟部=Ministry of Economic Affairs(2014)。經濟部（2014）：〈地下水補注地質敏感區劃定計畫書：G0001 濁水溪沖積扇〉。【Ministry of Economic Affairs (2014). Delineation plan of Geologically Sensitive Areas for Groundwater Recharge: G0001 Jhuoshuei River alluvial fan.】。
  89. 經濟部中央地質調查所=Central Geological Survey(2008)。經濟部中央地質調查所（2008）：〈臺東[環境地質圖數值檔 1/25,000]〉。【Central Geological Survey (2008). Tautung [Digital file of environmental geological map, 1:25,000].】。
  90. 經濟部中央地質調查所=Central Geological Survey(2006)。經濟部中央地質調查所（2006b）：〈臺灣灣能源礦產及地下水資源分布圖〉。經濟部中央地質調查所【Central Geological Survey (2006b). Energy and groundwater resources map of Taiwan.】。
  91. 經濟部中央地質調查所=Central Geological Survey(2006)。經濟部中央地質調查所（2006a）：〈臺灣非金屬礦產資源分布圖〉。【Central Geological Survey (2006a). Resources map of nonmetallic minerals of Taiwan.】。
  92. 臺東縣卑南鄉利吉社區發展協會, Beinan township, Taitung county(2019)。,行政院農業委員會林務局=Forestry Bureau, Council of Agriculture, Executive Yuan。
  93. 臺東縣卑南鄉利吉社區發展協會, Beinan township, Taitung county(2020).利吉的故事.
  94. 臺東縣政府=Taitung County Government(2018)。臺東縣政府（2018）：《臺東縣指定「利吉惡地地質公園」縣定自然地景評估報告書》。【Taitung County Government (2018). Evaluation report of county identified natural landscape: Lichi badland geopark.】。
  95. 臺灣大學水工試驗所=Hydrotech Research Institute(2008)。臺灣大學水工試驗所（2008）：〈地下水觀測網執行成效及發展規劃（2/2）附件三臺灣地區地下水觀測網整體計畫〈81~97 年度〉成果彙編〉。經濟部水利署。【Hydrotech Research Institute (2008). Project of ground water monitoring network implement and development (2/2) appendix III. Compilation of results of ground water monitoring network of Taiwan area program (1992-2008). Water Resources Agency, MOEA.】。
  96. 臺灣地形研究室=Laboratory of Taiwan Landforms(2020)。設立台灣地質公園問答。地景保育通訊，50，4-6。
  97. 臺灣總督府官房文書課（1908）：〈卑南大溪赤壁〉，《臺灣寫真帖》。【Secretarial office of government of Taiwan (1908). Pinan River on the East Coast, photo album of Taiwan.】
  98. 劉瑩三, Y.S.(2013).利吉泥岩惡地地質公園環境教育手冊.臺北=Taipei:行政院農業委員會林務局=Forestry Bureau, Council of Agriculture, Executive Yuan.
  99. 劉瑩三, Y.S.(2012).臺灣東部地區地景調查與登錄計畫.行政院農業委員會林務局=Forestry Bureau, Council of Agriculture, Executive Yuan.
  100. 謝小恬, S.T.,王中原, C.Y.,石芝菁, Z.J.,羅尤娟, Y.J.(2022)。臺灣的地景保育之路從點、到線、編織成地質公園網絡。台灣林業，48(1)，5-8。
  101. 蘇淑娟, S.J.,王文誠, W.C.(2013).臺灣地質公園的社區培力.:國立臺灣師範大學=National Taiwan Normal University.
print cancel