胡震《周易衍義》的宗程立場析論

Analysis on Zhouyiyanyi about the Hu Zhen's standpointin traced back to Cheng Yi

10.6239/BOC.201812_(64).02

楊自平(Yang, Tzu-ping)

胡震 ； 元代 ； 易學 ； 周易衍義 ； 程頤 ； Hu Zhen ； Yuan Dynasty ； Classic of Changes studies ； Zhouyiyanyi ； Cheng Yi

國文學報

64期（2018 / 12 / 01）

29 - 54

繁體中文

胡震為元代《易》學家，著有《周易衍義》。《衍義》為衍義體論著，透過纂集眾說兼及己意詮解《易》經傳，透過引史衍義，發揮《易》修身經世之理。胡震雖不廢朱子象占之說並廣採宋儒《易》說，但整體而言歸宗程子，致力闡發伊川義理。伊川《易》學以明體為主，胡震進一步將明體與達用並論，不僅重視常道，亦強調識時務的重要，並透過引史衍義，將伊川義理大幅擴展，就此而言實有羽翼伊川《易》學之功。在元代《易》學以纂註體為主的學術風尚，《衍義》在義理闡發及引史衍義上獨樹一幟；在以宗朱為主流的元代，胡震特別宗程，亦顯得特出。透過胡震《易》學可見出元代《易》學的另番面貌，亦見出元代學者對程、朱《易》學的承繼與開展之功。

Hu Zhen was an important scholar of Yijing in the Yuan Dynasty, and he wrote Zhouyiyanyi. Zhouyiyanyi is the work of meaning creations style. In this book, it collected annotation, explained Yijing by himself, and carried forward the meaning of Yijing in humanistic pragmatism. Hu Zhen followed Cheng, and he quoted Cheng's studying extensively. Therefore, he didn't abolish Zhu Xi's statement that about Divination. He also adopted the Yijing studying by the scholar in the Song Dynasty, and explained the Yijing. He elucidated the meaning of the Guayaoci by historical event, and added remarks about specialized knowledge of Yijing. Hu Zhen showed the ambition that he wanted to inherit the Confucianism, and differentiated between orthodoxy and heresy. He elucidated to make practical use of truth of Confucianism by Yijing, and it was very especial on The Yijing study in the Yuan Dynasty. On the hermenutus and deriving, he was inherited but also developed. In the Yuan Dynasty, many people followed Zhu Xi's Yijing study. Hu Zhen was very especial that he followed Cheng Yi's Yijing study. We can find a new appearance by Hu Zhen's Yijing study, and find the scholar in the Yuan Dynasty how to elucidate Cheng and Zhu's meaning. It's Hu Zhen's contribution in the Yuan Dynasty.

1. 黃忠天, Zhongtian(2004)。《伊川易傳》對宋代史事派易學之影響。高雄師大學報，16，201-218。
   連結：
2. (1983).影印文淵閣四庫全書.臺北=Taipei:臺灣商務印書館=The Commercial Press,Ltd..
3. (1983).二程集.臺北=Taipei:漢京文化事業有限公司=Hanjing Culture Company.
4. (1983).二程集.臺北=Taipei:漢京文化事業有限公司=Hanjing Culture Company.
5. (1983).影印文淵閣四庫全書.臺北=Taipei:臺灣商務印書館=The Commercial Press,Ltd..
6. (1983).二程集.臺北=Taipei:漢京文化事業有限公司=Hanjing Culture Company.
7. (1983).影印文淵閣四庫全書.臺北=Taipei:臺灣商務印書館=The Commercial Press,Ltd..
8. （宋）朱熹, Xi,朱傑人（編）, Jieren,王鐵（校點）, Tie(2002).朱子全書.上海=Shanghai:上海古籍出版社=Shanghai Ancient Books Publishing House.
9. （宋）朱熹, Xi,朱傑人（編）, Jieren,劉永翔（校點）, Yongxiang,朱幼文（校點）, Youwen(2002).朱子全書.上海=Shanghai:上海古籍出版社=Shanghai Ancient Books Publishing House.
10. （清）永瑢, Rong(1995).四庫全書總目.北京=Beijing:中華書局=Zhonghua Book Company.
11. （清）邵遠平, Yuanping(1984).元史類編.臺北=Taipei:文海出版社=Wen Hai Press Company.
12. （清）黃宗羲, Zongxi(1999).黃宗羲全集.杭州=Zhejiang:浙江古籍出版社=Zhejiang Ancient Books Publishing House.
13. （清）黄虞稷, Yuji(1990).千頃堂書目.上海=Shanghai:上海古籍出版社=Shanghai Ancient Books Publishing House.
14. 向鴻全, Hongquan(2005)。桃園=Taoyuan，國立中央大學中國文學研究所=National Central University Department of Chinese Literature。
15. 朱人求, Renqiu(2008)。衍義體：經典詮釋的新模式──以《大學衍義》為中心。哲學動態，20(4)，65-70。
16. 朱人求, Renqiu,王玲莉, Lingli(2011)。衍義體在東亞世界的影響及其衰落。社會科學戰線，2011(3)，19-22。
17. 徐玉梅, Yumei(1988)。臺北=Taipei，東吳大學中國文學研究所=Soochow University Department of Chinese Literature。
18. 黃忠天, Zhongtian(2007)。史事宗易學研究方法析論。周易研究，2007(5)，39-52。
19. 謝輝, Hui(2015)。《周易衍義》與義理易學在元代的發展。元代文獻與文化研究，北京=Beijing: