觀看與被觀看：台灣真人秀的慾望監控、螢幕機體與偽裝後現代

Watch and be Watched: Desire for Surveillance, Screenborging and Postmodern Fakery in Taiwan's Local Reality TV

10.30385/JRTS.200806_(28).0002

簡妙如(Miao-Ju Jian)

真人實境節目 ； 假真人秀 ； 媒體科技 ； TV搜查線 ； Reality TV ； Taiwan's local reality show ； media technology ； TV Spy

廣播與電視

28期（2008 / 06 / 01）

95 - 124

繁體中文

近年來在國內外引起注意的真人實境節目，在台灣的本土版本中，則呈現出另類的觀看真實與真實被觀看的樂趣。在影像特效、各式敘事想像與眾多耀眼明星所組成的繽紛媒體時代，為何人們反而要觀看起這類強調臨場真實、畫面粗糙、不講究美感與藝術性的真人秀電視？而這類以「觀看真實」為核心的節目形式，又蘊含什麼樣的媒體科技、真實、慾望與主體的相互形塑關係？在全球化的真人實境節目脈絡下，本研究以曾在台灣引發爭議的偷窺真人秀節目，【TV搜查線】（2001-2004，華視）為分析文本。本文指出這個本地真人秀節目，既展現出某種全球化的慾望與監控相互形塑的觀看文化，也展現出更由電視媒體與身體所共構的觀看關係。並且，在台灣特有的「作假真人秀」節目形式下，真實成為一種關於「偽裝」的後現代文化展現。

The global rise of the Reality TV genre has generated a new localized viewing pleasure. People, from all over, are now enjoying not only watching but also being watched on Reality TV. In the fantastic age of media convergence, why does the audience like to watch real but sometimes banal people and images portrayed in reality shows? How do media technology, reality, desire and subject interaction dance together in order to shape one another on the formatting stage of reality shows? The case study of Taiwan's local reality TV, TV Spy (2001-2004, CTV), is a hidden camera based program. It also has what one could call a 'gotcha' format. This paper explores the intertwined nature of the observer being observed relationship in reality shows. This article suggests that global reality TV has created a viewer's desire for surveillance. The format of reality TV generates a more involved audience. The name screenborg has been coined to this effect. It is a co-construction of screen effects and the reactive body of viewers. Furthermore, the special case of Taiwan's local reality show also represents a postmodern visual culture of fakery, adroitly created by an invisible production line in Taiwan's local TV industry.

1. 楊芳枝(2002)。Variety shows: Exploring the genre of the "most local show" in Taiwan。東華人文學報，4，295-330。
   連結：
2. 簡妙如(2008)。全球化的「更真實」狂熱：真人實境節目的心理技術。新聞學研究，94，1-64。
   連結：
3. Abercrombie, N.,Longhurst, B.(1998).Audiences: A Sociological Theory of Performance and Imagination.London:Sage.
4. Andrejevic, M.(2004).Reality TV: The Work of Being Watched.NY & Oxford:Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, INC..
5. Andrejevic, M.(2002).The Kinder, gentler gaze of Big Brother: Reality TV in the era of digital capitalism.New Media and Society,4(2),251-270.
6. Baudrillard, J.,H. Foster (Dd.)(1983).The Anti-Aesthetic.Port Townsend, WA:Bay Press.
7. Biltereyst, D.,S. Holmes,D. Jermyn (Eds.)(2004).Understanding Reality Television.London:Routledge.
8. Bird, S. E.(2003).The Audience in Everyday Life: Living in a Media World.NY & London:Routledge.
9. Biressi, A.,Nunn, H.(2005).Reality TV: Realism and Revelation.London & NY:Wallflower Press.
10. Bondebjerg, I.,A. Jersley (Ed.)(2002).Realism and `Reality` in Film and Media.Copenhagen:Museum Tusculanum Press.
11. Calvert, C.(2000).Voyeur Nation: Media, Privacy, and Peering in Modern Culture.Boulder, CO:Westview Press.
12. Cavender, G.,S. Holmes,D. Jermyn (Eds.)(2004).Understanding Reality Television.London:Routledge.
13. Corner, J.(2002).Performing the Real: Documentary diversions.Television & New Media,3(3),255-269.
14. Couldry, N.(2002).Playing for celebrity: Big brother as ritual event.Television & New Media,3(3),283-293.
15. de Kerckhove, D.(1995).The Skin of Culture: Investigating the New Electronic Reality.Toronto:Somerville House.
16. Dovey, J.(2000).Freakshow: First person media and factual television.London:Pluto.
17. Ekström, M.(2000).Information, storytelling and attractions: TV journalism in three modes of communication.Media, Culture & Society,22,465-492.
18. Escoffery, D. S. (Ed.)(2006).How real is Reality TV? Essays on representation and truth.Jefferson and London:McFarland.
19. Fetveit, A.(1999).Reality TV in the digital era: a paradox in visual culture?.Media, Culture and Society,21(6),787-804.
20. Friedman, J. (Ed.)(2002).Reality squared: Televisual discourse on the real.NJ & London:Rutgers University Press.
21. Haraway, D.(1991).Simians, Cyborgs, and Women: The Reinvention of Nature.NY:Routledge.
22. Heller, D. (ed.)(2007).Makeover television: Realities remodelled.London & NY:I.B. Tauris.
23. Hill, A.(2002).Big Brother: The real audience.Television & New Media,3(3),323-340.
24. Hill, A.(2005).Reality TV: Audience and popular television.London:Routledge.
25. Hill, A.(2007).Restyling factual TV: Audiences and news, documentary and reality genres.London:Routledge.
26. Holmes, S.,Jermyn, D. (Eds.)(2004).Understanding Reality Television.London & NY:Routledge.
27. Jimroglou, K. M.(1999).A camera with a view: JenniCAM, visual representation, and cyborg subjectivity.Information, Communication & Society,2(4),439-453.
28. Jones, J. M.(2003).Show Your Real Face: A Fan Study of the UK Big Brother Transmissions (2000, 2001, 2002). Investigating the Boundaries between Notions of Consumers and Producers of Factual Television.New Media and Society,5(3),400-421.
29. Kilborn, R.(1998).Shaping the real: Democratization and commodification in UK-Factual Broadcasting.European Journal of Communication,13(2),201-218.
30. Livingstone, S.(1999).New media, new audiences?.New Media & Society,1(1),59-66.
31. McGrath, J. E.(2004).Loving Big Brother: Performance, Privacy and Surveillance Space.London:Routledge.
32. McLuhan, M.(1964).Understanding Media: the Extensions of Man.NY:Signet.
33. Murray, S.,Ouellette, L. (Eds.)(2004).Reality TV: Remaking Television Culture.NY & London:New York University Press.
34. Ouellette, L.,Hay, J.(2008).Better living through Reality TV: Television and post-welfare citizenship.MA:Blackwell.
35. Palmer, G.,S. Holmes,D. Jermyn (Eds.)(2004).Understanding Reality Television.London:Routledge.
36. Pecora, Vincent P.(2002).The culture of surveillance.Qualitative Sociology,25(3),345-358.
37. Roscoe, J.(2004).Television: friend or foe Australian documentary?.Media, Cultural & Society,26(2),288-295.
38. Roscoe, J.(2001).Big brother Australia: Performing the `real` twenty-four-seven.International Journal of Cultural Studies,4(4),473-488.
39. Scannell, P.(2002).Big Brother as a television event.Television & New Media,3(3),271-282.
40. Tincknell, E.,Raghuram, P.,S. Holmes,D. Jermyn (Eds.)(2004).Understanding Reality Television.London:Routledge.
41. van Zoonen, L.(2001).Desire and resistance: Big Brother and the recognition of everyday life.Media, Culture and Society,23(1),669-677.
42. Wong, J.(2001).Here`s looking at you: Reality TV, Big Brother, and Foucault.Canadian Journal of Communication,26(4),489-501.
43. 王泰俐(2004)。電視新聞節目「感官主義」之初探研究。新聞學研究，81，1-41。
44. 何軒憶(2003)。真人秀造假？胡瓜爆料，小董也鬆口。聯合報(2003/05/17)。
45. 何軒憶、葉君遠、葉宜欣(2003)。啑？綜藝真人真事，換台又是她：臨時演員一身多用，清一色「貌不驚人」，打罵哭喊劇情離譜，觀眾別太信以爲真。聯合報(2003/11/30)。
46. 財團法人國家政策基金會－國政分析
47. 吳禮強(2003)。幸福原來是假造的？才播一集就被檢舉，男優小展老實說：確實有演出大綱。民生報(2003/09/04)。
48. 吳禮強(2003)。綜藝真實演出代價多少？愛的郵差車馬費五百到五千，最後的晚餐一萬五，綜藝大集合一千五起跳。民生報(2003/02/15)。
49. 呂健忠譯(1998)。反美學。台北:立緒。
50. 李九妹(2003)。妞妞爆料，愛的郵差造假。自由時報(2003/09/17)。
51. 林倖妃、朱梅芳(2003)。麥擱吵啊，幸福委員會停播：閱聽人監督媒體聯盟指「誤導兩性觀念」公開抵制，並推薦「生活智慧王」等五個優良電視節目。中國時報(2003/12/05)。
52. 林惠娸、陳雅汝譯(2003)。偷窺狂國家：媒體、隱私權及現代文化中的偷窺現象。台北:商周。
53. 唐士哲(2002)。「現場直播」的美學觀：一個有關電視形式的個案探討。中華傳播學刊，2，111-143。
54. 媒體識讀教育月刊
55. 陳世昌(2003)。家醜外揚真人季，不打不好看？怕場面太冷，製作單位大字報提示該怎麼做，對罵、哭鬧、打耳光不能少。中國時報(2003/06/01)。
56. 葉君遠(2003)。真人真事難免全武行，小菙、季芹愛的郵差保險千萬。自由時報(2003/02/16)。
57. 葉宜欣(2003)。搜查線＝金雞蛋，華視不想喊卡。聯合報(2003/10/24)。
58. 葉宜欣(2003)。腳本網上見，愛的郵差作戲？網友直指節目造假，製作單位提出反駁。聯合報(2003/09/19)。
59. 廖和敏(2001)。自己扮自己，真人演真事：沒有劇本的電視劇，演員觀眾都抓狂。聯合報(2001/02/09)。
60. 謝豫琦(2006)。國立政治大學新聞學系。
61. 文化研究月報
62. 簡妙如(2005)。真人秀節目心理技術初探。大眾傳播與文化研討會論文集，台中:
63. 蘇詠智(2001)。視覺真人秀，老美看上癮：我要活下去，Copy再Copy。星報(2001/10/17)。

1. 譚佳(2015)。新自由主義式的「邂逅」：《非誠勿擾》與電視真人秀的性別政治。文化研究，20，79-102。
2. (2023)。空間異境：談宗藩執導、田馥甄演唱〈人什麼的最麻煩了〉MV的影像遊戲。靜宜中文學報，24，103-124。