题名

有線電視系統經營區擴大是否增加跨區競爭的可能?

并列篇名

Can the Adjustment of Cable Television Franchise Areas Increase the Intensity of Competition?

DOI

10.30385/JRTS.200906_(30).0003

作者

曾國峰(Kuo-Feng Tseng)

关键词

有線電視系統 ; 產業競爭 ; 經營區劃分 ; 賽局理論 ; cable television ; franchise area ; competition ; game theory

期刊名称

廣播與電視

卷期/出版年月

30期(2009 / 06 / 01)

页次

99 - 135

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

台灣有線電視系統大多是一區一家獨占,少部分是一區兩家競爭,因此主管機關計劃將目前有線電視系統的51個經營區,逐年合併以增加經濟規模,讓業者願意互跨市場,消費者可以有更多選擇。本研究透過深度訪談10位有線電視獨立與集團系統,結果發現幾乎所有業者均不同意在九年執照到期前,改變現有的經營區大小,主要原因是擔心將衝擊目前有線電視的競爭平衡,影響收視戶數與財務營收計劃,而由於過高的管線沈沒投資成本,除了人口比較密集的都會地區外,未來也不會考慮跨入其他業者的經營區域。因此,分區擴大後並不會增加新的家數,MSOs集團反而會更進一步併購獨立業者,形成更大的壟斷系統,主管機關應該思考既有第二條電話線纜的MOD電信加值服務,如果能夠獲得相對的節目頻道內容,才可能是未來有線電視直接的競爭對手。

英文摘要

Because most of the cable systems are monopoly in Taiwan, the National Communications Commission (NCC) is going to expand the scale of franchise areas to increase intensity of the competition among systems. This research interviewed ten managers of the independent and conglomerate cable systems. It found that most of the cable systems did not agree to adjust the current franchise areas, even the conglomerate in the short time, because they were afraid of new entrants competing with the limited subscribers. Since, this policy may make more merger & acquisition and create bigger cable conglomerates, instead of competition. Therefore, the future competition of cable television systems will come from the multimedia value added services of the existing telephone providers, if those telecommunications can have enough programming contents to compete with the cable conglomerates.

主题分类 社會科學 > 傳播學
参考文献
  1. 張美玲、王國樑(2004)。有線電視系統業者經營效率之探討。管理評論,23(4),45-64。
    連結:
  2. 戴伯芬(2007)。無法執法與有法放任:台灣線電視產業的制度論分析(1983-2000)。人文及社會科學集刊,19(2),169-201。
    連結:
  3. Baldwin, T.,Ono, C.,Shrikhande, S.(1991).Program exclusivity and competition in the cable TV industry.Journal of Media Economics,4(3),29-43.
  4. Barrett, M.(1996).Strategic behavior and competition in cable TV: Evidence from tow overbuilt markets.The Journal of Media Economics,9(2),43-62.
  5. Barrett, M.(1995).Direct competition in cable TV delivery: A case study of Paragould, Arkansas.The Journal of Media Economics,8(3),77-93.
  6. Beard, T.,Saba, R.,Ford, G.,Hill R.(2005).Fragmented duopoly: A conceptual and empirical investigation.Journal of Business,78(6),2377-2396.
  7. Beil, R.,Dazzio, T.,Ekelund, R.,Jackson, J.(1993).Competition and the price of municipal cable services: An empirical study.Journal of Regulatory Economics,6,401-415.
  8. Brenner, D.(1991).Was cable TV a monopoly.Federal Communications Law Journal,42(3),365-411.
  9. Chen, D.,Waterman, D.(2007).Vertical ownership, program network carriage, and tier positioning in cable television: An empirical study.Review of Industrial Organization,30(3),227-251.
  10. Chen, P.(2002).Who owns cable television? Media ownership concentration in Taiwan.Journal of Media Economics,15(1),41-55.
  11. Chipty, T.(2001).Vertical integration, market foreclosure, and consumer welfare in the cable television industry.American Economic Review,91(3),428-453.
  12. Chipty, T.,Snyder, C.(1999).The role of firm size in bilateral bargaining: A study of the cable television industry.Review of Economics & Statistics,81(2),326-340.
  13. Crawford, G.,Shum, M.(2007).Monopoly quality degradation and regulation in cable television.Journal of Law & Economics,50(2),181-219.
  14. Emmons, W.,Prager, R.(1997).The effects of market structure and ownership on prices and service offerings in the U.S. cable TV industry.RAND Journal of Economics,28(4),732-750.
  15. Foley, M.(1992).Economic factors underlying telephone company efforts to enter home video distribution.Journal of Media Economics.
  16. Hazlett, T.(1990).Duopolistic competition in cable TV: Implications for public policy.Yale Journal on Regulation,7,65-119.
  17. Hazlett, T.(1987).The policy of exclusive franchising in cable TV.Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media,31(1),1-20.
  18. Hazlett, T.,Ford, G.(2001).The fallacy of regulatory symmetry: An economic analysis of the level playing field in cable TV.Business and Politics,3(1),21-46.
  19. Jayaratne, J.(1996).A note on the implementation of cable TV rate caps.Review of Industrial Organization,11(6),825-840.
  20. Li, S.(2004).Market competition and the media performance of Taiwan's cable television industry.Journal of Media Economics,17(4),279-294.
  21. Li, S.,Liu, Y.,Chen, C.(2007).Market competition and media performance: Reexamining the media performance of the cable television industry in Taiwan.Journal of Media Economics,20(3),189-210.
  22. Noam, E.,Noam, E. (Ed.)(1985).Video Media Competition: Regulation, Economics, and Technology.Columbia University Press.
  23. Savage, S.,Wirth, M.(2005).Price, programming and potential competition in US cable television markets.Journal of Regulatory Economics,27(1),25-46.
  24. Smiley, A.(1986).Direct competition among cable TV systems (BAG Discussion Paper No. 86-9).
  25. Waterman, D.(1997).Vertical integration and program access in the cable television industry.Federal Communications Law Journal,47,511-534.
  26. Zupan, M.(1989).The efficacy of franchise bidding schemes in the case of cable television: Some systematic evidence.Journal of Law and Economics,32,401-456.
  27. 王郁琦、張欣玲(1999)。有線電視新進業者的競爭管制-法規與政策分析。理論與政榮,51,89-111。
  28. 江耀國(1999)。一九九八年美國有線電視新市場-從結構管制的觀點分析。月旦法學,47,133-150。
  29. 吳大任、彭建強(1998)。有線電視產業之區域市場結構均衡及福利分析。公平交易季刊,6(3),37-50。
  30. 施俊吉、陳炳宏、劉孔中(2001)。有線廣播電視經營區重新調整之可行性分析。行政院新聞局委託研究計畫。
  31. 黃書禮(1991)。台灣地區有線電視分區之研究。新聞局委託中興大學都市計劃研究所。
被引用次数
  1. 王維菁(2012)。著作權與台灣影視產業的政治經濟分析:著作權法、影視產業與市場控制史。新聞學研究,111,129-197。
  2. (2013)。臺灣有線電視產業成本特性與壟斷力之探討。公平交易季刊,21(1),153-194。
  3. (2015)。有線電視擴大經營範圍政策之競爭效果研究。公平交易季刊,23(3),129-150。