题名

現代科技在教學上之應用與生態教育理念之推動產生的兩難

并列篇名

Modern Technology and the Dilemma of Teaching Ecological Concepts

DOI

10.7015/JEAS.200006.0111

作者

郭實渝(Shih-Yu Kuo)

关键词

現代科技 ; 科技哲學 ; 建構主義 ; 生態永續文化 ; modern technology ; philosophy of technology ; constructivism ; ecologically sustainable culture

期刊名称

歐美研究

卷期/出版年月

30卷2期(2000 / 06 / 01)

页次

111 - 144

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

討論現代科技始終有著正反兩面的爭議。面對科技帶給人們生活上的便利與文明成果,促使全球各國極力發展科技,以增強國家在經濟及科技競爭上的實力;另一方面,科技卻被認為是造成世界上的污染、環境上的惡化等生態問題的原因之一。在教學的應用上,也形成兩面不同的爭論。就教學內容及教學方法兩個面相,目前無法脫離現代科技,對主張以生態為本的教育哲學及所有的教育活動都是環境教育的理論者與教育者而言,形成其推動生態理念及設計教學課 程的兩難情況。瞭解科技的基本概念及特性之後,我們不能將科技由人類生活中抽離出來,只談科技。在教學工作上,教育者不應只以純科學或技術之教導為教學及課程設計導向,強調知識為文化中立的立場。更應該重視人與自然之交互關係,科技與文化、人文環境關係的認識。

英文摘要

There are always two sides to any discussion of the effects of modern technology. On one hand, when technology is applied to teaching and learning activities it provides a better and quicker method of absorbing new information and communicating than do traditional teaching methods. This is especially true for science education and teaching with computers. On the other hand, modern technology is thought to be the main reason for the deterioration of our natural environment. It is therefore the responsibility of educators to convey information to the next generation about what technology can to the environment and how to promote an ecologically sustainable culture. Once educators understand the characteristics of modern technology, they will be better prepared to develop thoughts of ecologically sustainable culture among students. In doing so, educators should pay more attention to establishing relationships between human beings and nature, as well as between technology and culture, rather than focusing on science and technology only.

主题分类 人文學 > 人文學綜合
社會科學 > 社會科學綜合
参考文献
  1. (1996).Education and Technology: Reflections on Computing in Classrooms.San Francisco:Jossey-Bass Publishers.
  2. (1990).Technology and the Future.New York:St. Martin Press.
  3. Bigum, C.(1998).Solutions in search of educational problems: Speaking for computers in schools.Educational Policy,12(5)
  4. Bowers, C. A.(1997).The Culture of Denial: Why the Environmental Movement Needs a Strategy for Reforming Universities and Public Schools.New York:State University of New York Press.
  5. Bowers, C. A.(1988).The Cultural Dimensions of Educational Computing.New York:Teachers College Press.
  6. Bowers, C. A.(1993).Critical Essays on Education, Modernity, and the Recovery of the Ecological Imperative.New York:Teachers College Press.
  7. Bowers, C. A.(1987).Elements of a Post-Liberal Theory of Education.New York:Teachers College Press.
  8. Browner, C. M.(1995).Why Environmental Education?.EPA Journal
  9. Cardenas, K.(1998).Technology in today's classroom.ACADEME
  10. Cooper, D. E.(1995).Philosophy and Technology.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
  11. Cromer, A.(1997).Connected Knowledge: Science, Philosophy, and Education.New York:Oxford University Press.
  12. Disinger, J. F., Monroe, M. C.(1994).Defining Environmental Education.Dubuque, Iowa:Kendall/ Hunt Publishing Company.
  13. Drengson, A.(1995).The Practice of Technology: Exploring Technology, Ecophilosophy, and Spiritual Disciplines for Vital Links.New York:State University of New York Press.
  14. Dwyer, D. C.(1996).Education and Technology.San Francisco:Jossey-Bass Publishers.
  15. Ferre, F.(1995).Philosophy of Technology.Athens & London:The University of Georgia Press.
  16. Gergen, K. J.(1995).Constructivism in Education.Hillsdale, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
  17. Heidegger, M.(1977).Martin Heidegger: Basic Writings.New York:Harper and Row, Publishers, Inc..
  18. Ihde, D.(1991).Instrumental Realism.Bloomington:Indiana University Press.
  19. Ihde, D.(1993).Philosophy of Technology: An Introduction.New York:Paragon House Press.
  20. Marx, L.(1990).Technology and the Future.New York:St. Martin Press.
  21. Matthews, M. R.(1993).Constructivism and Science Education: Some Epistemological Problems.Journal of Science Education and Technology,2(1)
  22. Mitcham, C.(1994).Thinking Through Technology.Chicago:The University of Chicago Press.
  23. Morison, R. S.(1990).Technology and the Future.New York:St. Martin Press.
  24. Ormiston, G. L., Sassower, R.(1989).Narrative Experiments: The Discursive Authority of Science and Technology.Minneapolis:University of Minnesota Press.
  25. Rapp, F.(1989).Philosophy of Technology: Practical, Historical and Other Dimensions.London:Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  26. Sikorski, W.(1993).Modernity and Technology: Harnessing the Earth to the Slavery of Man.Tuscaloosa:The University of Alabama Press.
  27. Simpson, L. C.(1995).Technology, Time, and the Conversations of Modernity.London:Routledge Publisher.
  28. Thornburg, D. D.(1991).Education, Technology, and Paradigms of Change for 21st Century.Starsong Publications.
  29. von Glasersfeld, E.(1995).Constructivism in Education.Hillsdale, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
  30. Weinberg, A. M.(1990).Technology and the Future.New York:St. Martin Press.
  31. 郭實渝 Kuo, Shih-Yu(1997)。當代教育哲學論文集II。台北:中央研究院歐美研究所。
被引用次数
  1. 郭實渝(2010)。杜威哲學與環境教育。哲學與文化,37(2),3-24。
  2. 簡成熙(2003)。創新教學的哲學省思—從分析到後現代。教育研究集刊,49(3),143-171。
  3. 梁福鎮(2015)。當前臺灣生態教育的問題與對策。教育科學期刊,14(2),71-105。
  4. 蕭翊(2020)。C.A. Bowers生態文化教育學之探究。教育科學期刊,19(2),123-137。
  5. 鄒慧美、梁福鎮(2011)。優納斯責任倫理學的教育涵義探究。教育科學期刊,10(2),69-90。
  6. (2003)。應用模糊邏輯探討科技素養課程培育之成效。教育研究月刊,114,38-43。
  7. (2013)。Michel Serres 科技哲學思想在教育上的啟思。教育研究學報,47(1),1-17。
  8. (2021)。融入溼地桌遊對於國中生環境素養之探究。環境教育學刊,19,19-47。