题名

Dialogue in Philosophical Hermeneutics

并列篇名

哲學詮釋學中的對話

作者

宋維科(Wei-ko Sung)

关键词

Gadamer ; dialogue ; hermeneutics ; Derrida ; Ricoeur ; 高達美 ; 對話 ; 詮釋學 ; 德希達 ; 里柯

期刊名称

歐美研究

卷期/出版年月

31卷2期(2001 / 06 / 01)

页次

231 - 285

内容语文

英文

中文摘要

It is well known that the concept of dialogue plays an indispensable role in Gadamer's philosophical hermeneutics. That is, philosophical hermeneutics is usually characterized by a dialogical structure of interpretation wherein the status of the text is elevated to a personified 〞thou〞 with whom the interpreter is engaged in a conversation. The first half of this work is an investigation of the notion of dialogue in terms of its connection with classical philosophy and Gadamer's critique of methodology in the natural sciences. Yet, from the deconstructive perspective, a tinge of phonocentricism is unmistakable in Gadamer because of his constant emphasis on 〞dialogue.〞 On the other hand, Ricoeur, holding an entirely different perspective toward the dialectic between speaking and writing, also voices his doubt about Gadamer's dialogical model. Thus, beginning with Ricoeur and Derrida, the second half will focus on the validity as well as the limits of the dialogical model.

英文摘要

「對話」的觀念在高達美(Hans-Georg Gadamer)的詮釋學中佔有非常重要的位置。本文主要有兩個重點。首先探討對高達美而言「對話」觀念的成形事實上有多重面向的意義。換言之,除了在重新檢視詮釋學經驗與對自然科學方法論的批判兩方面多所關聯之外,「對話」的理念事實上也有其倫理學及知識論上的特殊意義。然而過分重視「對話」是否反而造成高達美哲學詮釋學思想體系中自我矛盾的產生?同時「對話」觀念的本身也令人聯想起德希達(Jacques Derrida)所謂的語音中心主義(phonocentricism)。因此本文第二部分將援引德希達此一方面的討論及里柯(Paul Ricoeur)間距化(distanciation)的觀念深入審視「對話」的概念。另一方面,由於將「對話」無限上綱化,高達美也可能陷入將此一概念變成僅僅是一個美麗隱喻的危險。

主题分类 人文學 > 人文學綜合
社會科學 > 社會科學綜合
参考文献
  1. (1988).New Dictionary of Theology.Downers Grove, Illinois:Inter-Varsity Press.
  2. (1970).Protestant Biblical Interpretation: A Textbook of Hermeneutics.Grand Rapids:Baker Books.
  3. Ambrosio, Francis J.(1987).Gadamer, Plato, and the Discipline of Dialogue.International Philosophical Quarterly,27(1)
  4. Ambrosio, Francis J.(1997).The Philosophy of Hans-Georg Gadamer.Peru, Illinois:Open Court.
  5. Augustine(1961).Confessions.Harmondsworth:Penguin Books.
  6. Aylesworth, Gary E.(1991).Gadamer and Hermeneutics.New York:Routledge.
  7. Bennington, Geoffrey, Jacques, Derrida(1993).Jacques Derrida.Chicago:University of Chicago Press.
  8. Bernasconi, Robert(1995).The Specter of Relativism: Truth, Dialogue, and Phronesis in Philosophical Hermeneutics.Evanston:Northwestern University Press.
  9. Borch-Jacobsen, Mikkel(1993).The Emotional Tie: Psychoanalysis, Mimesis, and Affect.Stanford:Stanford University Press.
  10. Bruns, Gerald L.(1992).Hermeneutics Ancient and Modern.New Haven:Yale University Press.
  11. Crowell, Steven G.(1990).The Interpretation of Dialogue.Chicago:University of Chicago Press.
  12. Daelemans, Sven, Maranhao, Tullio(1990).The Interpretation of Dialogue.Chicago:University of Chicago Press.
  13. Davey, Nicholas(1993).Hermeneutics, Language and Science: Gadamer's Distinction between Discursive and Propositional Language.Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology,24(3)
  14. Davey, Nicholas(1991).Gadamer and Hermeneutics.New York:Routledge.
  15. De Man, Paul(1986).The Resistance to Theory.Manchester:Manchester University Press.
  16. de Saussure, F.(1959).Course in General Linguistics.New York:McGraw-Hill.
  17. Derrida, Jacques(1989).Dialogue and Deconstruction: The Gadamer-Derrida Encounter.Albany:State University of New York Press.
  18. Derrida, Jacques(1969).The Languages of Criticism and the Sciences of Man: The Structuralist Controversy.Baltimore:Johns Hopkins University Press.
  19. Descartes, Rene(1960).Discourse on Method and Meditations.New York:The Library of Liberal Arts.
  20. DiCenso, James(1990).Hermeneutics and the Disclosure of Truth: A Study in the Work of Heidegger, Gadamer, and Ricoeur.Charlottesville:University Press of Virginia.
  21. Dilthey, Wilhelm(1986).The Hermeneutics Reader: Texts of the German Tradition from the Enlightenment to the Present.Oxford:Blackwell.
  22. Eden, Kathy(1997).Hermeneuticsand the Rhetorical Tradition: Chapters in the Ancient Legacy and Its Humanist Reception.New Haven:Yale University Press.
  23. Froman, Wayne J.(1991).Gadamer and Hermeneutics.New York:Routledge.
  24. Gadamer, H. G.(1975).Truth and Method.New York:Continuum.
  25. Gadamer, Hans-Georg(1989).Dialogue and Deconstruction: The Gadamer-Derrida Encounter.Albany:State University of New York Press.
  26. Gadamer, Hans-Georg(1980).Dialogue and Dialectic: Eight Hermeneutical Studies on Plato.New Haven:Yale University Press.
  27. Gadamer, Hans-Georg(1997).The Philosophy of Hans-Georg Gadamer.Peru, Illinois:Open Court.
  28. Gadamer, Hans-Georg(1981).Reason in the Age of Science.Cambridge:MIT Press.
  29. Gadamer, Hans-Georg(1979).Practical Philosophy as a Model of the Human Sciences.Research in Phenomenology,9
  30. Gadamer, Hans-Georg(1985).Philosophical Apprenticeships.Cambridge:MIT Press.
  31. Gadamer, Hans-Georg(1992).Hans-Georg Gadamer on Education, Poetry, and History: Applied Hermeneutics.Albany:State University of New York Press.
  32. Gadamer, Hans-Georg(1997).The Philosophy of Hans-Georg Gadamer.Peru, Illinois:Open Court.
  33. Gadamer, Hans-Georg(1986).The Idea of the Good in Platonic-Aristotelian Philosophy.New Haven:Yale University Press.
  34. Gadamer, Hans-Georg(1989).Dialogue and Deconstruction: The Gadamer-Derrida Encounter.Albany:State University of New York Press.
  35. Gadamer, Hans-Georg(1989).Dialogue and Deconstruction: The Gadamer-Derrida Encounter.Albany:State University of New York Press.
  36. Gadamer, Hans-Georg(1989).Dialogue and Deconstruction: The Gadamer-Derrida Encounter.Albany:State University of New York Press.
  37. Gower, Barry(1997).Scientific Method: An Historical and Philosophical Introduction.London:Routledge.
  38. Grondin, Jean(1994).Introduction to Philosophical Hermeneutics.New Haven:Yale University Press.
  39. Handelman, Susan(1982).The Slayers of Moses: The Emergence of Rabbinic Interpretation in Modern Literary Theory.Albany:State University of New York Press.
  40. Hintikka, Jaakko(1999).Inquiry as Inquiry: A Logic of Scientific Discovery.Dordrecht:Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  41. Hirsch, E. D.(1967).Validity in Interpretation.New Haven:Yale University Press.
  42. Hoy, David Couzens(1978).The Critical Circle: Literature, History, and Philosophical Hermeneutics.Berkeley:University of California Press.
  43. Hoy, David Couzens(1986).Hermeneutics and Modern Philosophy.Albany:State University of New York Press.
  44. Kepnes, Steven(1992).The Text as Thou: Martin Buber's Dialogical Hermeneutics and Narrative Theology.Bloomington:Indiana University Press.
  45. Kirkland, M. Frank(1977).Gadamer and Ricoeur: The Paradigm of the Text.Graduate Faculty Philosophy Journal,6(1)
  46. Krell, David Farrell(1989).Dialogue and Deconstruction: The Gadamer-Derrida Encounter.Albany:State University of New York Press.
  47. Levi-Strauss, Claude(1990).The Naked Man.Chicago:University of Chicago Press.
  48. Linge, David E.(1976).Philosophical Hermeneutics.Berkeley:University of California Press.
  49. Madison, G. B.(1994).Twentieth-Century Continental Philosophy.London:Routledge.
  50. Manguel, Alberto(1996).A History of Reading.New York:Penguin.
  51. Maranhao, Tullio(1990).The Interpretation of Dialogue.Chicago:University of Chicago Press.
  52. Markova, Ivana(1990).The Dynamics of Dialogue.New York:Harvester Wheatsheaf.
  53. Michelfelder, Diane P., Palmer, Richard E.(1989).Dialogue and Deconstruction: The Gadamer-Derrida Encounter.Albany:State University of New York Press.
  54. Palmer, Richard E.(1969).Hermeneutics: Interpretation Theory in Schleiermacher, Dilthey, Heidegger, and Gadamer.Evanston:Northwestern University Press.
  55. Pellauer, David(1979).Studies in the Philosophy of Paul Ricoeur.Athens:Ohio University Press.
  56. Perelman, Chaim(1982).The Realm of Rhetoric.Notre Dame:University of Notre Dame Press.
  57. Ricoeur, Paul(1973).The Hermeneutical Function of Distanciation.Philosophy Today,17(2)
  58. Ricoeur, Paul(1976).Interpretation Theory: Discourse and the Surplus of Meaning.Fort Worth:The Texas Christian University Press.
  59. Ricoeur, Paul(1981).Hermeneutics and the Human Sciences.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
  60. Risser, James(1997).Hermeneutics and the Voice of the Other: Re-reading Gadamer's Philosophical Hermeneutics.Albany:State University of New York Press.
  61. Risser, James(1989).Dialogue and Deconstruction: The Gadamer-Derrida Encounter.Albany:State University of New York Press.
  62. Rommetveit, Ragner(1990).The Dynamics of Dialogue.New York:Harvester Wheatsheaf.
  63. Seebohm, Thomas M.(1986).'Deconstruction' in the Framework of Traditional Methodical Hermeneutics.Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology,17(3)
  64. Simon, Joseph(1989).Dialogue and Deconstruction: The Gadamer-Derrida Encounter.Albany:State University of New York Press.
  65. Smith, P. Christopher(1991).Gadamer and Hermeneutics.New York:Routledge.
  66. Sullivan, Robert R.(1989).Political Hermeneutics: The Early Thinking of Hans-Georg Gadamer.University Park:Pennsylvania State University Press.
  67. Swearingen, C. Jan(1990).The Interpretation of Dialogue.Chicago:University of Chicago Press.
  68. Tracy, David(1986).The Analogical Imagination.New York:Crossroad.
  69. Turing, Alan(1950).Computing Machinery and Intelligence.Mind,59(236)
  70. Warnke, Georgia(1987).Gadamer: Hermeneutics, Tradition and Reason.Oxford:Polity.
  71. Weinsheimer, J. C.(1985).Gadamer's hermeneutics: A reading of truth and method.New Haven, NJ:Yale University Press.
  72. Zizek, Slavoj(1991).For They Know Not What They Do: Enjoyment as a Political Factor.London:Verso.
  73. 張鼎國 Chang, Ting-Kao(1997)。海德格、高達美與希臘人。哲學雜誌,21
  74. 嚴平(1997)。高達美。台北:東大圖書公司。