题名

人權宣言?人權法典?-「歐洲聯盟基本權利憲章」之分析

并列篇名

Declaration of Rights? Bill of Rights? - Analysis of the 〞Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union〞

作者

廖福特(Fort Fu-Te Liao)

关键词

基本權利憲章 ; 歐洲聯盟 ; 歐洲共同體 ; 歐洲理事會 ; 歐洲人權公約 ; Charter of Fundamental Rights ; European Union ; European Community ; Council of Europe ; European Social Charter ; European Convention on Human Rights

期刊名称

歐美研究

卷期/出版年月

31卷4期(2001 / 12 / 01)

页次

689 - 751

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

本文分析「歐洲聯盟基本權利憲章」之相關議題。首先,本文對歐洲聯盟與人權保障作歷史縱軸之回顧。其次,本文探討「歐洲聯盟基本權利憲章」的制定原因、方式及其內容等。再者,本文分析「歐洲聯盟基本權利憲章」之未來發展可能性及衝擊。第四,本文探究人權議題在歐洲區域橫軸之互動,即歐洲聯盟與歐洲理事會兩者間可能之協調及解決方案。本文認為「歐洲聯盟基本權利憲章」之制定有其歷史意義,但是以一部人權文件而言,最重要的是提升人權的實質保障,因而最根本的問題是未來「歐洲聯盟基本權利憲章」是否會有條約之地位,如果此方面沒有突破,那麼「歐洲聯盟基本權利憲章」可能只是另一個美麗的宣言,這些議題是未來歐盟高峰會議應審慎考量的。

英文摘要

This essay's analysis focuses on relevant issues of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union. First, it reviews the EU and human rights protection from historical and legal perspectives. Second, this essay examines the background and text of the Charter. Third, it anticipates the future development and impact of the Charter. Finally, this essay considers conflict and co-ordination between the Council of Europe and the European Union in the field of human rights protection. This essay argues that the Charter has its own historical significance. It also emphasizes the idea that the utmost concern of a human rights document is whether it truly offers protection. If it is merely a human rights declaration, the Charter will not be very meaningful. Therefore, the most significant issue is the future status of the Charter, which will be determined by the European Council.

主题分类 人文學 > 人文學綜合
社會科學 > 社會科學綜合
参考文献
  1. 王玉葉 Wang, Lydia Yu-Yeb(2000)。歐洲聯盟之輔助原則 The Principle of Subsidiarity in the European Union。歐美研究 EurAmerica,30(2)
    連結:
  2. 黃偉峰 Huang, David W. F.(2001)。歐洲整合模式與兩岸主權爭議之解析 European Integration Models and Cross-Strait Sovereignty Disputes。歐美研究 EurAmerica,31(1)
    連結:
  3. (1999).Human Rights Reference Handbook.Amsterdam:Netherlands Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
  4. (1998)。歐洲聯盟:理論與政策。台北市:中央研究院歐美研究所。
  5. Archer, Clive(1994).Organizing Europe: The Institution of Integration.London:Edward Arnold.
  6. Beddard, Ralph(1980).Human Rights and Europe.London:Sweet & Maxwell.
  7. Betten, Lammy, Grief, Nicholas(1998).EU Law and Human Rights.London:Longman.
  8. Canor, Iris(2000).Primus Inter Pares. Who Is the Ultimate Guardian of Fundamental Rights in Europe?.European Law Review,25(1)
  9. Commission on the Legal Nature of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union(2000).Communication from the Commission on the Legal Nature of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union.Brussels:European Commission.
  10. Craig, Paul, De Burca, Grainne(1998).EU Law: Text, Cases, and Materials.Oxford:Oxford University.
  11. De Burca, Grainne(2001).The Drafting of the European Union Charter of Fundamental Rights.European Law Review,26(4)
  12. De Witte, B.(1999).The EU and Human Rights.Oxford:Oxford University.
  13. European Commission(1990).Communication on Community accession to the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, No. 19.Brussels:European Commission.
  14. European Commission(1993).Working Document, Accession of the Community to the European Convention on Human Rights and the Community Legal Order.Brussels:European Commission.
  15. European Commission(2000).Communication on the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union.Brussels:European Commission.
  16. European Court of Justice(1996).Opinion 2/ 94, Accession by the Community to the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms.
  17. European Parliament(1989).Resolution Adopting the Declaration of Fundamental Rights and Freedoms.
  18. European Parliament(1999).What Form of Constitution for the European Union?.Brussels:European Parliament.
  19. European Parliament(1999).Resolution on the Establishment of the Charter of Fundamental Rights.
  20. European Parliament(2000).Resolution on the Drafting of a European Union Charter of Fundamental Rights.
  21. European Parliament(1994).Resolution on Community's Accession to European Convention on Human Rights.
  22. European Parliament(1994).Resolution on the Constitution of the European Union.
  23. European University Institute(2000).A Basic Treaty for the European Union: A study of the Reorganisation of the Treaties.
  24. Expert Group on Fundamental Rights(1999).Affirming Fundamental Rights in the European Union: Time to Act.Brussels:Expert Group on Fundamental Rights.
  25. Foreign & Commonwealth Office(2001).Human Rights Foreign & Commonwealth Office Annual Report 2000.London:Foreign & Commonwealth Office.
  26. Fredman, Sandra, McCrudden, Christopher, Freedland, Mark(2000).An E. U. Charter of Fundamental Rights.Public Law
  27. Kakouris, Constantinos N.(1993).The Judicial Protection of Individual Rights in the European Communities.Hastings International and Comparative Law Review,16
  28. Lenaerts, Koea(1991).Fundamental Rights to be Included in a Community Catalogue.European Law Review,16(5)
  29. Lenaerts, Koen, De Smijter, Eddy(2001).A 'Bill of Rights' for the European Union.Common Market Law Review,38
  30. Liisberg, Jonas Bering(2001).Does the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights Threaten the Supremacy of Community Law? Article 53 of the Charter: A Fountain of Law or Just an Inkblot?.Cambridge, MA:Harvard Law School.
  31. Mengozzi, Paolo(2000).The Protection of Individual Rights and the Court of First Instance of the European Communities.Fordham International Law Journal,23
  32. Ministry of Foreign Affairs(2001).The Intergovernmental Conference to Amend the Treaties: Italy's Position.Rome:Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
  33. Ministry of Foreign Affairs(2000).Human Rights and Finland's Foreign Policy.Helsinki:Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
  34. Ministry of Foreign Affairs(2000).Fifth Report by the Government of the Federal Republic of Germany on Human Rights Policy in Its Foreign Relations.Berlin:Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
  35. O''Keeffe, D.(1996).Judicial Protection of the Individual by the European Court of Justice.Fordham International Law Journal,19
  36. Piris, Jean-Claude(2000).Does the European Union Have a Constitution? Does It Need One?.Cambridge, MA:Harvard Law School.
  37. Weiler, J. H. H.(1996).The Jurisprudence of Human Rights in the European Union: Integration and Disintegration, Values and Processes.Cambridge, MA:Harvard Law School.
  38. Weiler, J. H. H.(1999).The Constitution of Europe.Cambridge:Cambridge University.
  39. Weiler, J. H. H.(2000).Editorial: Does the European Union Truly Need a Charter of Rights?.European Law Journal,6(2)
  40. 王玉葉 Wang, Lydia Yu-Yeb(1998)。歐洲聯盟:理論與政策。台北:中央研究院歐美研究所。
  41. 王泰銓 Wang, Dominique T. C.(1996)。歐洲共同體法之性質 Nature of the European Community Law。國立臺灣大學法學論叢 National Taiwan University Law Journal,25(3)
  42. 王泰銓 Wang, Dominique T. C.(2000)。歐洲事業法(二)歐洲競爭規範。台北市:五南出版社。
  43. 王泰銓 Wang, Dominique T. C.(1997)。歐洲共同體法總論。台北:三民書局。
  44. 王泰銓 Wang, Dominique T. C.、 潘建彰(1997)。論歐洲共同體條約之補充原則。萬國法律 FT Law Review,93
  45. 何之邁 Ho, Ji-Ming(1999)。歐洲共同體競爭法論。台北市:何之邁。
  46. 李孟玢 LEE, MENG-BIN(1998)。歐洲聯盟:理論與政策。台北市:中央研究院歐美研究所。
  47. 周德旺(1994)。歐洲共同體法直接效力研究。美歐月刊 America & Europe Monthly,9(10)
  48. 張亞中 Chang, Ya-Chung(1998)。歐洲統合:政府間主義與超國家主義的互動。台北:揚智。
  49. 陳麗娟 Chen, Li-Chuan(1998)。歐洲共同體經濟法。台北市:五南出版社。
  50. 陳麗娟 Chen, Li-Chuan(1998)。歐洲共同體法導論。台北市:五南出版社。
  51. 黃立 Hwang, Li(1991)。歐洲共同體法上之企業結合管制。政大法學評論 Chengchi Law Review,44
  52. 廖福特 Liao, Fort Fu-Te(2000)。歐盟與歐洲人權公約。月旦法學 The Taiwan Law Review,62
  53. 廖福特 Liao, Fort Fu-Te(1999)。歐洲人權公約。新世紀智庫論壇,8
被引用次数
  1. 洪德欽(2004)。歐盟對外貿易與發展協定之人權條款—規定與實踐。歐美研究,34(1),143-202。
  2. 洪德欽(2007)。歐盟憲法之法理分析。歐美研究,37(2),255-321。
  3. 洪德欽(2017)。英國脫歐對其多元法律體系之影響。臺大法學論叢,46(S),1017-1114。
  4. 廖福特(2004)。從人權宣言邁向人權法典—「歐洲聯盟基本權利憲章」之實踐。歐美研究,34(1),9-49。
  5. 蘇宏達(2004)。從制度主義解析歐洲聯盟憲法條約草案。政治科學論叢,20,167-208。
  6. 蘇弈玹,王服清(2020)。歐盟基本權利憲章效力之探討。台灣國際法學刊,17(1),73-101。
  7. (2002)。社會福利與人權。社區發展季刊,99,348-355。
  8. (2004)。菲尼斯對於「同性婚姻」之道德論辯及其權利語言之探討。政大法學評論,77,1-54。
  9. (2016)。歐盟被遺忘權的概念發展—以歐盟法院Google Spain v. AEPD判決分析為中心。憲政時代,41(4),473-516。