就業成長的達成與社會安全的維繫－荷蘭社會改革的理論爭議和政策意涵

Accomplishment of Job Growth with Social Security Maintenance-Theoretical Disputes and Policy Implications from the Dutch Social Reform

黃志隆(Chih-lung Huang)；張世雄(Shrsyung Carl Chang)

社會改革 ； 社會安全 ； 就業成長 ； 彈性安全 ； 荷蘭奇蹟 ； social reform ； social security ； job growth ； flexicurity ； Dutch miracle

歐美研究

35卷2期（2005 / 06 / 01）

405 - 458

繁體中文

先進工業國家面臨高失業與高福利支出成長的困境。一九八○年代初期，這類問題被稱為「荷蘭病」。在隨後的改革中，荷蘭成功地創造了「荷蘭奇蹟」：就業成長的達成和社會安全的維繫。這段改革的歷程和結果，激發歐、美許多學術和政策的研究，以汲取這項克服後工業社會困境的經驗和教訓。在動態地分析戰後福利國家的結構困境與政策回應後，我們描述和評估荷蘭改革的政策歷程與結果。除檢視主流的統合主義論述，並擴展到管理式自由化、第三條路與後工作社會等挑戰性論述，以深化政治經濟學的理論視野。當前經濟全球化為主的反社會論調，可從荷蘭經驗中得到啟示和省思。

Western advanced industrial states have recently been stumbling over a dilemma resulting from both growing unemployment rates and welfare expenditures. Such a dilemma was once known as 〞Dutch Disease〞 in the 1980s. Following a series of policy reform, a 〞Dutch Miracle〞 has occurred since the 1990s in both job growth and successful redeployment of social security. Meanwhile, policy processes and acquired outcomes in the Netherlands have provoked and stimulated almost a 〞research industry〞 in itself, and have sparked a hope that might shed some light on the way to go beyond this current post-industrial dilemma. This paper provides an analytic-dynamic framework in dissecting structural predicaments and policy responses generated from the so-called post-war Keynesian welfare state. The dominant corporatist explanation is critically scrutinized on the one hand, and managed liberalization, the third way critique, and post-work society thesis are on the other examined. A socio-cultural analysis will be advanced in order to deepen theoretical insights that are cloaked by political- economical language. While remaining trapped in issues surrounding economic globalization, including market priority and the displacement of the functional needs of social security, the lessons of social reform from the Netherlands could be profound and refreshing to contemporary ears.

1. 張世雄(2002)。穿過福利的哲學和意識型態的迷宮：理解費茲派崔克的福利理論。社會政策與社會工作學刊，6(2)，269-281。
   連結：
2. Baccaro, L.(2003).What is alive and what is dead in the theory of corporatism.British Journal of Industrial Relations,41(3),683-706.
3. Becker, U.(2000).Welfare state development and employment in the Netherlands in comparative perspective.Journal of European Social Policy,10(3),219-239.
4. Becker, U.(2001).A 'Dutch Model`: employment growth by cor-poratist consensus and wage restraint? A critical account of an idyllic view.New Political Economy,6(1),19-43.
5. Clayton, R.,Pontusson, J.(1998).Welfare-state retrenchment revisited: Entitlement cuts, public sector restructuring, and inegalitarian trends in advanced capitalist Societies.World Politics,51,67-98.
6. Cox, R. H.(2001).The social construction of an imperative: Why welfare reform happened in Denmark and the Netherlands but not in Germany.World Politics,53,463-98.
7. Daly, M.,R. Sykes,B. Palier,P. Prior(2001).Globalization and the Bismarckian welfare states.Globalization and European welfare states: Challenges and change,79-102.
8. Delsen, L.,de Jong, E.(1998).The German and Dutch economies: Who follows whom?
9. Esping-Andersen, G.(1996).Welfare states in transition
10. Esping-Andersen, G.(1985).Politics against markets: the social democratic road to power
11. Goodin, R. E.(2001).Work and welfare: Towards a Post-productivist welfare regime.British Journal of Political Science,31,13-39.
12. Gorter, C.,G. Esping-Andersen,M. Regini(2000).The Dutch miracle?.Why deregulate labour market?,178-203.
13. Green-Pedersen, C.(2001).Welfare-State retrenchment in Denmark and the Netherlands, 1982-1998: The role of party competition and party consensus.Comparative Political Studies,34(9),963-985.
14. Green-Pedersen, C.(2001).The puzzle of Dutch welfare state retrenchment: The importance of Dutch politics.West European Politics,24(3),135-150.
15. Green-Pedersen, C.,van Kersbergen, K.,Hemerijck, A.(2001).Neo-Liberalism, the 'third way` or what? Recent social democratic welfare policies in Denmark and the Netherlands.Journal of European Public Policy,8(2),307-325.
16. Hall, P.,Soskice, D.(2001).Varieties of capitalism: The institutional foundations of comparative advantage
17. Hassel, A.(2003).The politics of social pacts.British Journal of Industrial Relations,41(4),707-726.
18. Hemerijck, A.,Schludi, M.,F. W. Scharpf,V. A. Schmidt(2000).Sequences of policy failures and effective policy reponses.Welfare and work in the open economy,125-228.
19. Hemerijck, A.,Unger, B.,Visser, J.,F. W. Scharpf,V. A. Schmidt(2000).How small countries negotiate change twenty-five years of policy adjustment in Austria, the Netherlands, and Belgium.Welfare and work in the open economy,175-263.
20. Keman, H.(2003).Explaining miracles: Third ways and work and welfare.West European Politics,26(2),115-135.
21. Merkel, W.,A. Giddens(2001).The third ways of social democracy.The global third way debate.
22. Pierson, P.(1996).The new politics of the welfare state.World Politics,48,143-179.
23. Rhodes, M.,M. Rhodes,Y. Meny(1998).Globalization, labour markets and welfare states: A future of "competitive corporatism"?.The future of European welfare: A new social contract,178-203.
24. Rhodes, M.,P. Pierson(2001).The political economy of social pacts: 'Competitive Corporatism` and European welfare reform.The new politics of the welfare state,165-196.
25. Scharpf, F. W.,F. W. Scharpf,V. A. Schmidt(2000).Economic changes, vulnerabilities, and institutional capabilities.Welfare and work in the open economy,19-124.
26. Schmitter, P. C.(1974).Still the century of corporatism?.Review of Politics,36,36-131.
27. Schmitter, P. C.(1989).Corporatism is dead! Long live corporatism!.Government and Opposition,24,54-72.
28. Soskice, D.,Hancke, B.,Trumbull, G.,Wren, A.,L. Delsen,E. de Jong(1998).Wage bargaining, labour markets and macroeconomic performance in Germany and the Netherlands.The German and Dutch economies: Who follows whom?,39-51.
29. Spies, H.,van Berkel, R.,I. L¢demel,H. Trickey(2001).Workfare in the Netherlands-young unemployed people and the Jobseeker`s Employment Act.An offer you can't refuse'-Workfare in international perspective,105-132.
30. Spithoven, A. H. G. M.(2002).The third way: the Dutch experience.Economy and Society,31(3),333-368.
31. Swank, D.(1998).Funding the welfare state: globalization and the taxation of business in advanced market economies.Political Studies,46(4),671-692.
32. van der Veen, R.,Trommel, W.(1999).Managed liberalization of the Dutch welfare state: A review and analysis of the reform of the Dutch social security system, 1985-1998.Governance,12(3),289-310.
33. van Oorschot, W.(2004).Balancing work and welfare: Activiation and flexicurity policies in the Netherlands, 1980-2000.International Journal of Social Welfare,13,15-27.
34. Paper presented at "The Activating Welfare States: New Ways of Fighting Poverty and Social Exclusion in Europe."
35. Visser, J.(2002).The first part-time economy in the world: A model to be followed?.Journal of European Social Policy,12(1),23-42.
36. Visser, J.(1998).Two cheers for corporatism, one for the market industrial relations, wage moderation and job growth in the Netherlands.British Journal of Industrial Relations,36(2),269-292.
37. Visser, J.,Hemerijck, A.(1997).A Dutch miracle: Job growth, welfare reform and corporatism in the Netherlands
38. Wilensky, H. L.,Lebeaux, C. N.(1958).Industrial society and social welfare
39. 吉登斯、鄭戈(2000)。第三條道路：社會民主主義的復興
40. 周育仁(1993)。政治與經濟之關係：台灣經驗與其理論意涵
41. 張世雄(2001)。社會救助、新貧窮問題與多層次－多面向分析。社區發展季刊，95，55-71。
42. 藍於琛(2004)。台北，國立政治大學政治學研究所博士論文。
43. 羅益強、史仕培、陳雅慧(2002)。借鏡荷蘭

1. 黃志隆(2008)。荷蘭與丹麥彈性安全策略的探討：制度主義的生命歷程政策研究途逕。社會政策與社會工作學刊，12(1)，91-144。
2. 李健鴻(2007)。台灣勞動立法之政策變革：彈性安全觀點的分析。政大勞動學報，21，91-127。
3. (2009)。我國親職假改革方案的探討：理論觀點的檢視。靜宜人文社會學報，3(2)，1-30。