题名

高級文官團制度之聚合趨勢

并列篇名

The Convergence of Senior Civil Service Systems

DOI

10.7015/JEAS.200712.0635

作者

彭錦鵬(Thomas C. P. Peng)

关键词

文官制度 ; 高級文官 ; 高級文官團 ; 經濟合作發展組織 ; 新公共管理 ; civil service ; higher civil service ; senior civil service ; OECD ; New Public Management (NPM)

期刊名称

歐美研究

卷期/出版年月

37卷4期(2007 / 12 / 01)

页次

635 - 679

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

本文旨在探討專屬、明確可辨的高級文官團制度是否正形成聚合的現象。經濟合作發展組織國家從一九七○年代末期之後,先後出現獨特的高級文官制度。本文試圖分析各國高級文官團制度出現的時代背景、出現原因,以及是否各國在發展高級文官團制度上皆有獨特的政治、歷史因素。本文指出,各國高級文官團制度建立的時間點具有密切關聯,而且在制度層面上具有共同的特點和高級文官團的制度邏輯,進而判定這是一種制度的聚合現象。本文並探討在獨特的高級文官制度和傳統的以職涯為基礎的高級文官制度間,是否將形成另一股制度的聚合現象。

英文摘要

Since late 1970's, many OECD countries have established unique, identifiable senior civil service systems. This paper analyzes the international and domestic factors that foster the establishment of a new senior civil system in those countries, exploring the unique political and historical factors of each country. The systemic logic of the new senior civil service regimes is then presented. This paper also discusses the convergence within the new senior civil services between career-based civil service systems and position-based civil services.

主题分类 人文學 > 人文學綜合
社會科學 > 社會科學綜合
参考文献
  1. 彭錦鵬(2003)。英國公部門薪俸制度改革的經驗與檢討。政治科學論叢,18,71-100。
    連結:
  2. Challenges and impending issues for the senior civil service in United Kingdom
  3. The senior civil service in United Kingdom
  4. The senior civil service system in Canada
  5. A cross-jurisdictional scan of practices in senior public service: Implications for New Zealand
  6. Boelens, L.(1999).The Dutch senior public service: A case study.The Netherlands:Office for the Senior Public Service.
  7. The Australian senior executive service: 1984-2004
  8. Public service reform
  9. Cabinet Office(2006).Professional skills for government: An initial analysis.London, UK:Cabinet Office.
  10. Cabinet Office(2004).Senior civil service: Performance management and reward.London, UK:Cabinet Office.
  11. Leadership framework
  12. de Vries, J.,R. A. W. Rhodes,P. Weller (Eds.)(2001).The changing world of top officialss: Mandarins or valets.Buckingham, PA:Open University Press.
  13. Elgie, R.,R. A. W. Rhodes,P. Weller (Eds.)(2001).The changing world of top officials: Mandarins or valets.Buckingham, PA:Open University Press.
  14. Halligan, J.(Ed.)(2003).Civil service systems in Anglo-American countries.Northampton, MA:Edward Elgar.
  15. Hood, C.(1995).Contemporary public management: A new global paradigm?.Public Policy and Administration,10(2),104-117.
  16. Huddleston, M. W.,P. W. Ingraham,D. H. Rosenbloom (Eds.)(1992).The promise and paradox of civil service reform.Pittsburgh, PA:University of Pittsburgh.
  17. "Senior civil service system" in Korea
  18. Lijphart, A.(1968).The politics of accommodation: Pluralism and democracy in the Netherlands.Berkeley, CA:University of California Press.
  19. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development(2002).Highlights of public sector pay and employment trends, PUMA/HRM (2002) 7.Paris, French:Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.
  20. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development(2003).Managing senior management: Senior civil service reform in OECD member countries, GOV/PUMA (2003) 17.Paris, French:Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.
  21. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development(2001).Public sector leadership for the 21st century.Paris, French:Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.
  22. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development(1995).Government in transition: Public management reform in OECD countries.Paris, French:Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.
  23. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development(2004).Trends in human resources management policies in OECD countries: An analysis of the results of the OECD survey on strategic human resources management, GOV/PGC/ HRM (2004) 3.Paris, French:Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.
  24. Pollitt, C.,Bouckaert, G.(2000).Public management reform: A comparative analysis.Oxford, UK:Oxford University Press.
  25. Pollitt, C.,Summa, H.(1997).Trajectories of reform: Public management change in four countries.Public Money and Management,17(1),7-18.
  26. Putseys, L.,Hondeghem, A.(2003).Contractualisation of top civil servants: An international comparative research.Paper presented at the annual meeting of European Group of Public Administration (EGPA),Oeiras, Portugal:
  27. Rhodes, R. A. W.,Weller, P. (Eds.)(2001).The changing world of top officials: Mandarins or valets?.Buckingham, PA:Open University Press.
  28. The spirit of reform: Managing the New Zealand state sector in a time of change
  29. Turner, B.(2005).The statesman`s yearbook 2006: The politics, cultures and economies of the world.New York, NY:Palgrave Macmillan.
  30. U.S. Office of Personnel Management(2006).Guide to senior executive service qualifications.U.S. Office of Personnel Management.
  31. World Bank(1992).Government and development.Washington DC:World Bank.
  32. 余致力(2005)。核心能力建構與培訓制度設計之研究。「強化文官能力-再造政府競爭力學術研討會」論文,台北:
  33. 陳暉淵(2005)。國家治理、競爭力和核心能力:淺論我國高級文官核心能力之建構。「強化文官能力-再造政府競爭力學術研討會」論文,台北:
  34. 彭錦鵬(2005)。全球競爭下的高級文官新制構想。考詮季刊,42,18-43。
  35. 彭錦鵬(1998)。高級文官甄補與培訓之模式。政治科學論叢,9,329-362。
  36. 彭錦鵬(2004)。高級文官制度變革潮流中的荷蘭高級文官團。考詮季刊,37,112-130。
被引用次数
  1. 黃錦堂、林彥超(2015)。公務人員薪俸激勵化之研究─英國、德國與我國之比較法觀察。法令月刊,66(4),13-56。
  2. 彭錦鵬(2016)。文官制度的國際變遷趨勢與我國的改革。文官制度季刊,8(2),1-23。
  3. 施能傑(2009)。考試權獨立機關化定位的新討論—民主責任政治的檢驗。臺灣民主季刊,6(1),135-168。