麥肯能與藍騰的平等論證

MacKinnon and Langton's Egalitarian Argument

鄭光明(Kuang-ming Cheng)

奧斯丁 ； 德渥肯 ； 麥肯能 ； 藍騰 ； 在言臣屬 ； John Langshaw Austin ； Ronald Dworkin ； Catharine MacKinnon ； Rae Langton ； illocutionary subordinating

歐美研究

38卷1期（2008 / 03 / 01）

103 - 160

繁體中文

反對色情的女性主義健將麥肯能以及藍騰主張：自由社會的成員不能有色情權利，因為色情刊物不僅會使得婦女遭到「噤聲」的命運，還會使得婦女臣屬於男性，因而侵害了婦女的平等權。藍騰更進而主張：色情刊物不僅會導致婦女臣屬於男性，其本身就是類似於「種族隔離」等歧視言論的「臣屬行為」。麥肯能以及藍騰因此主張：色情不僅侵犯了婦女的言論自由，還侵犯了其平等權，所以當然應該加以禁止。本文擬由語言哲學角度出發，深入探討麥肯能以及藍騰「色情侵犯婦女的平等權」此一主張，期能評判其主張是否能夠成立。

Famous anti-pornography feminists, Catharine MacKinnon and Rae Langton argue that people do not have a right to pornography because pornography subordinates women and silences them by restricting their ability to act in protest against it. Langton emphasizes the act of creating porn. She asserts that pornography not only leads to subordination-it is itself an act of subordination. Therefore, pornography destroys political liberty and equality and should not be allowed. In what follows, I will examine how MacKinnon and Langton attempt to establish that the creation of porn and in so doing denies women equality. I will argue that MacKinnon and Langton fail to show how pornography destroys women's political equality.

1. Austin, J. L.(1962).How to do things with words.Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press.
2. Bierwisch, M.,J. Searle,F. Kiefer,M. Bierwisch (Eds.)(1980).Speech act theory and pragmatics.Dordrecht, the Netherlands:D. Reidel.
3. Burg, W. van der(1991).The slippery slope argument.Ethics,102(1),42-65.
4. Callan, E.,W. Kymlicka,W. Norman (Eds.)(2000).Citizenship in diverse societies.Oxford, UK:Oxford University Press.
5. Campbell, K. (Ed.)(1992).Critical feminism: Argument in the disciplines.Buckingham, UK:Open University Press.
6. Cohen, J.,A. Hamlin,P. Pettit (Eds.)(1989).The good polity: Normative analysis of the state.New York, NY:Basil Blackwell.
7. Cohen, L. J.,K. T. Fann (Ed.)(1964).Symposium on J. L. Austin.London, UK:Routledge & Kegan Paul.
8. Davidson, D.(1984).Inquiries into truth and interpretation.Oxford, UK:Oxford University Press.
9. Dworkin, A.,MacKinnon, C.(1988).Pornography and civil rights: A new day for women`s equality.Minneapolis, MN:Organizing Against Pornography.
10. Dworkin, R.(1993).Women and pornography.New York Review of Books,40,36-42.
11. Dworkin, R.(1985).A matter of principle.Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press.
12. Dworkin, R.,E. Ullmann-Margalit,A. Margalit (Eds.)(1991).Isaiah Berlin: A celebration.London, UK:Hogarth Press.
13. Dworkin, R.,H. LaFollette (Ed.)(1996).Ethics in practice: An anthology.Oxford, UK:Blackwell.
14. Dworkin, R.,N. Warburton (Ed.)(1991).Freedom: An introduction with readings.London, UK:Routledge.
15. Green, L.,R. C. Post (Ed.)(1998).Censorship and silencing: Practices of cultural regulation.Los Angeles, CA:The Getty Research Institute.
16. Langton, R.(1993).Speech acts and unspeakable acts.Philosophy and Public Affairs,22(4),293-330.
17. Lewis, D.(1983).Philosophical Papers.Oxford, UK:Oxford University Press.
18. MacKinnon, B.(2001).Ethics: Theory and contemporary issues.Belmont, CA:Wadsworth.
19. MacKinnon, C.(1987).Feminism unmodified.Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press.
20. MacKinnon, C.(1993).Only words.Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press.
21. MacKinnon, C.,C. Itzin (Ed.)(1992).Pornography: Women, violence and civil liberties.Oxford, UK:Oxford University Press.
22. Mill, J. S.(1859).On liberty.Oxford, UK:Oxford University Press.
23. Searle, J.,A. P. Martinich (Ed.)(1965).The philosophy of language.Oxford, UK:Oxford University Press.
24. Searle, J.,R. E. Grandy,R. Warner (Eds.)(1974).Philosophical grounds of rationality: Intentions, categories, ends.Oxford, UK:Oxford University Press.
25. West, C.(2003).The free speech argument against pornography.Canadian Journal of Philosophy,33(3),391-422.

1. 陳宜中(2009)。色情管制爭議中的言論自由。人文及社會科學集刊，21(3)，389-429。
2. 鄭光明(2009)。不可說的在言噤聲：藍騰的反色情論證。歐美研究，39(1)，169-224。
3. 鄭光明(2011)。「一次決定論」或「全有全無論」？藍騰與格林論臣屬與噤聲。東吳哲學學報，24，47-97。
4. (2024)。言語行為理論是否有助於說明言論自由的保障範圍？對蕭爾－葛林沃特路徑的反思。歐美研究，54(2)，331-386。