题名

WTO特殊與差別待遇條款的談判:歐洲聯盟的策略與影響

并列篇名

Negotiations on WTO Special and Differential Clauses-EU Strategies and Impacts

DOI

10.7015/JEAS.201103.0221

作者

周旭華(Hsu-Hua Chou)

关键词

世界貿易組織 ; 歐洲聯盟 ; 特殊與差別待遇 ; 杜哈發展議程 ; 開發中國家 ; World Trade Organization (WTO) ; European Union (EU) ; Special and Differential (S&D) treatment ; Doha Development Agenda (DDA) ; developing countries

期刊名称

歐美研究

卷期/出版年月

41卷1期(2011 / 03 / 01)

页次

221 - 280

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

歐洲聯盟(EU)在世界貿易組織(WTO)杜哈發展議程下,致力影響與「發展」攸關之「特殊與差別待遇」(S&D)條款談判。EU的整體策略脈絡,係在不挑戰WTO建制核心規範的前提下,增進本身於WTO下之利益。在策略運作上,EU採漸進方式,逐步呈現並強化「目的∕手段」及「S&D差異化」等二項主要論述,藉以重新界定EU在WTO建制下所須承擔的S&D義務,期能限縮其義務範圍及程度,並為其S&D立場與相關作為,建立正當性基礎。此外,EU亦提出若干雙邊及單邊措施,以助推進其S&D主張。EU之策略作為,對開發中國家有關S&D之論述,及此議題未來談判方向,皆可能產生影響。

英文摘要

Developing countries once had high expectations of the negotiations on Special and Differential (S&D) treatment under the Doha Development Agenda (DDA) of the World Trade Organization (WTO). The achievements realized have turned out to be more limited than they had hoped. The European Union (EU), employing comprehensive and active strategies, has impacted S&D negotiations. The EU's overall negotiation strategy regarding S&D has been that of maximizing its interests under the WTO without challenging the WTO regime itself, particularly the regime's basic norms such as ”development.” Tactically, the EU has taken a step-by-step approach to consolidate its ”ends/means” and ”S&D differentiation” arguments, so that it can legitimately redefine and minimize its S&D obligations under the WTO regime. It seems that EU's strategic behavior on S&D has decelerated the progress of S&D negotiations under the DDA, and may establish a framework for future negotiations on related topics.

主题分类 人文學 > 人文學綜合
社會科學 > 社會科學綜合
参考文献
  1. 林彩瑜(2002)。開發中國家與WTO「特殊且差異之待遇」條款。台大法學論叢,31(1),289-336。
    連結:
  2. Subhan, M. (2007). What will India gain from the FTA with the EU? Retrieved October 20, 2009, from http://www.neurope.eu/articles/What-will-India-gain-from-the-FTA-with-the-EU-/75943.php
  3. European Commission. (n.d.f). EU agriculture and the WTO. Retrieved October 20, 2009, from http://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/external/wto/newround/full.pdf
  4. GATT. (1979). Differentiation and more favourable treatment reciprocity and fuller participation of developing countries, Decision by Contracting Parties of the GATT, 28 November 1979 (L/4903). Retrieved from http://www.wto.org/english/docs_e/legal_e/enabling 1979_e.htm
  5. Raghavan, C. (1993, October 16). GATT working parties on Lome di-vided. Sunsonline. Retrieved October 20, 2009, from http://www.sunsonline.org/trade/process/during/10060093.htm
  6. WTO. (1999). Proposal for a framework agreement on special and differential treatment—Cmmunication from Cuba, Dominican Republic, Honduras, India, Indonesia (WT/GC/W/442). Geneva, Switzerland: WTO.WTO. (1999). Proposal for a framework agreement on special and differential treatment—Cmmunication from Cuba, Dominican Republic, Honduras, India, Indonesia (WT/GC/W/442). Geneva, Switzerland: WTO.,未出版
  7. WTO. (2002). Submission for the committee on trade and development special session on special and differential treatment-communication from the European Communities (TN/CTD/W/13). Geneva, Switzerland: WTO.WTO. (2002). Submission for the committee on trade and development special session on special and differential treatment-communication from the European Communities (TN/CTD/W/13). Geneva, Switzerland: WTO.,未出版
  8. European Commission. (2005). Conditional revised services offer from the EC and its member states. Retrieved November 30, 2008, from http://ec.europa.eu/trade/issues/sectoral/services/wto_nego/ index_en.htm
  9. WTO. (2002). The WTO work programme on special differrential treatment and some EU ideas for the way forwad-communication from the European Communities (TN/CTD/W/20). Geneva, Switzerland: WTO.WTO. (2002). The WTO work programme on special differrential treatment and some EU ideas for the way forwad-communication from the European Communities (TN/CTD/W/20). Geneva, Switzerland: WTO.,未出版
  10. WTO. (1999). Proposals regarding the GATS agreement in terms of paragraph 9(a)(i) of the Geneva ministerial declaration - Communication from India (WT/GC/W/224). Geneva, Switzer-land: WTO.WTO. (1999). Proposals regarding the GATS agreement in terms of paragraph 9(a)(i) of the Geneva ministerial declaration - Communication from India (WT/GC/W/224). Geneva, Switzer-land: WTO.,未出版
  11. WTO. (2001). Implementation of special and differential treatment pro-visions in WTO agreements and decisions (WT/COMTD/ W/77/Rev.1). Geneva, Switzerland: WTO.WTO. (2001). Implementation of special and differential treatment pro-visions in WTO agreements and decisions (WT/COMTD/ W/77/Rev.1). Geneva, Switzerland: WTO.,未出版
  12. WTO. (2003). Communication from the European Communities and its members states-conditional initial offer (TN/S/O/EEC). Geneva, Switzerland: WTO.WTO. (2003). Communication from the European Communities and its members states-conditional initial offer (TN/S/O/EEC). Geneva, Switzerland: WTO.,未出版
  13. European Commission. (n.d.c). Generalised system of preferences. Re-trieved October 20, 2009, from http://ec.europa.eu/trade/issues/global/gsp/index_en.htm
  14. Maes, M. (2007). The EU approach to FTA talks with ASEAN, India, Korea. Third World Network. Retrieved October 20, 2009, from http://www.twnside.org.sg/title2/twninfo490c.htm
  15. WTO. (1999). EC approach to services - Communication from the European Communities (WT/GC/W/189). Geneva, Switzerland: WTO.WTO. (1999). EC approach to services - Communication from the European Communities (WT/GC/W/189). Geneva, Switzerland: WTO.,未出版
  16. European Commission. (n.d.a). Development policies. Retrieved October 20, 2009, from http://ec.europa.eu/development/policiesgen_en.cfm
  17. Gambini, G. (2008). International trade of the European Union in 2007. Eurostat. Retrieved from http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/cache/ITY_OFFPUB/KS-SF-08-092-EN.PDF
  18. WTO. (1999). Proposal for a framework agreement on special and differential treatment - Cmmunication from Cuba, Dominican Republic, Honduras, India, Indonesia (WT/GC/W/442). Geneva, Switzerland: WTO.WTO. (1999). Proposal for a framework agreement on special and differential treatment - Cmmunication from Cuba, Dominican Republic, Honduras, India, Indonesia (WT/GC/W/442). Geneva, Switzerland: WTO.,未出版
  19. WTO. (2001). Guidelines and procedures for the negotiations on trade in services (S/L/93). Geneva, Switzerland: WTO.WTO. (2001). Guidelines and procedures for the negotiations on trade in services (S/L/93). Geneva, Switzerland: WTO.,未出版
  20. European Commission. (n.d.h). Countries: India. Retrieved October 20, 2009, from http://ec.europa.eu/trade/creating-opportunities/bilateral-relations/countries/india/index_en.htm
  21. WTO. (2001). Doha WTO ministerial 2001: Ministerial declaration (WT/MIN[01]/DEC/1). Geneva, Switzerland: WTO.WTO. (2001). Doha WTO ministerial 2001: Ministerial declaration (WT/MIN[01]/DEC/1). Geneva, Switzerland: WTO.,未出版
  22. European Commission. (2008). EU trade commissioner Peter Mandelson's Geneva Blog-21-29 July 2008. Retrieved November 30, 2008, from http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/2008/july/tradoc_139956. pdf
  23. WTO. (2003). Note on the the meetings of the committee on Trade and developmentof of 7 and 18 October 2002 (TN/CTD/M/7). Geneva, Switzerland: WTO.WTO. (2003). Note on the the meetings of the committee on Trade and developmentof of 7 and 18 October 2002 (TN/CTD/M/7). Geneva, Switzerland: WTO.,未出版
  24. WTO. (2002). Non-mandatory special and differential treatment provisions in WTO agreements and decisions-note by the secre-tariat-addendum (WT/COMTD/W/77/Rev.1/Add.3). Geneva, Switzerland: WTO.WTO. (2002). Non-mandatory special and differential treatment provisions in WTO agreements and decisions-note by the secre-tariat-addendum (WT/COMTD/W/77/Rev.1/Add.3). Geneva, Switzerland: WTO.,未出版
  25. India, EU may wrap up FTA next year: Nath. (2007, November 30). The Hindubusiness Line. Retrieved October 20, 2009, from http://www.thehindubusinessline.com/2007/11/30/stories/2007113051591000.htm
  26. WTO. (2002). The WTO work programme on special differrential treatment-communication from the European Communities (TN/CTD/W/26). Geneva, Switzerland: WTO.WTO. (2002). The WTO work programme on special differrential treatment-communication from the European Communities (TN/CTD/W/26). Geneva, Switzerland: WTO.,未出版
  27. European Commission. (n.d.g). Regions: Africa, Caribbean, Pacific. Retrieved October 20, 2009, from http://ec.europa.eu/trade/creating-opportunities/bilateral-relations/regions/africa-caribbean-pacific/index_en.htm
  28. European Commission. (n.d.d). Overview of ACP-EC-Partnership Agreement. The Cotonou Agreement. Retrieved October 20, 2009, from http://ec.europa.eu/development/geographical/cotonouintro_en.cfm?CFID=1959679&CFTOKEN=23873060&jsessionid=2430e14d46316d7711a2
  29. WTO. (2001). Doha WTO ministerial 2001: Decision on implemen-tation-related issues and concerns (WT/MIN[01]/17). Geneva, Switzerland: WTO.WTO. (2001). Doha WTO ministerial 2001: Decision on implemen-tation-related issues and concerns (WT/MIN[01]/17). Geneva, Switzerland: WTO.,未出版
  30. Raghavan, C. (2006). Review of current WTO situation. TWN Info Service on WTO and Trade Issues. Retrieved October 20, 2009, from http://www.twnside.org.sg/title2/twninfo460.htm
  31. European Commission. (n.d.e). Wider agenda: Development. Retrieved October 20, 2009, from http://ec.europa.eu/trade/wider-agenda/development/index_en.htm
  32. European Commission. (n.d.b). Development: Economic partnerships. Retrieved October 20, 2009, from http://ec.europa.eu/trade/wider-agenda/development/economic-partnerships/index_en.htm
  33. Babarinde, O.,Faber, G.(2004).From Lomé to Cotonou: Business as usual?.European Foreign Affairs Review,9(1),27-47.
  34. Bermann, G.(ed.),Mavroidis, P.(ed.)(2007).WTO law and developing countries.Cambridge, UK:Cambridge University Press.
  35. Blandford, D.,Josling, T.(2006).IPC Discussion PaperIPC Discussion Paper,未出版
  36. Chang, S. W.(2007).WTO for trade and development post-Doha.Journal of International Economic Law,10(3),553-570.
  37. Cottier, T.(2006).From progressive liberalization to progressive regu-lation in WTO law.Journal of International Economic Law,9(4),779-821.
  38. Dur, A.,Zimmermann, H.(2007).The EU in international trade negotiations.Journal of Common Market Studies,45(4),771-787.
  39. European Commission(2003).Communication from the commission to the council and to the European parliament-reviving the DDA negotiations-the EU perspective.Brussels, Belgium:Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
  40. European Commission(2006).Global Europe: Competing in the world.Brussels, Belgium:Office for Of-ficial Publications of the European Communities.
  41. GATT(1994).Panel ReportPanel Report,未出版
  42. Hoekman, B.,Kostecki, M.(2001).The political economy of the world trading system: The WTO and beyond.Oxford, UK:Oxford University Press.
  43. Hoekman, B.,Mavroidis, P. C.(2007).The World Trade Organization: Law, economics, and politics.Oxford, UK:Routledge.
  44. Hoekman, B.,Michalopoulos, C.,Winters, L. A.(2003).World Bank Policy Research Working PaperWorld Bank Policy Research Working Paper,Washington, DC:The World Bank.
  45. Keck, A.,Low, P..WTO Staff Working PaperWTO Staff Working Paper,未出版
  46. Kennedy, D.(ed.),Southwick, J.(ed.)(2002).The political economy of international trade law.Cambridge, UK:Cambridge University Press.
  47. Keohane, R.(1989).International institutions and state power.Boulder, CO:Westview Press.
  48. Keohane, R.,Nye, J.(2001).Power and interdependence.New York:Longman.
  49. Krasner, S. D.(ed.)(1983).International regimes.Ithaca, NY:Cornell University Press.
  50. Lo, C. F.(2006).From S&D treatment to S&D agreement under the WTO: Developing a friendlier global governance of trade for developing countries.Asian Journal of WTO and International Health Law and Policy,1(1),33-52.
  51. Meunier, S.(2007).Managing globalization? The EU in international trade negotiation.Journal of Common Market Studies,45(4),905-926.
  52. Odell, J.(ed.)(2006).Negotiating trade: Developing countries in the WTO and NAFTA.Cambridge, UK:Cambridge University Press.
  53. OECD(2006).,Paris:OECD.
  54. Onguglo, B.(2005).Development issues in the WTO in the post-July package period: Myth or reality?.Penang, Malaysia:Third World Network.
  55. Oxfam International,TWN Africa(2007).,未出版
  56. Prévost, D.(2005)."Operationalising" special and differential treatment of developing countries under the SPS Agreement.South Africa Yearbook of International Law,30,82-111.
  57. Sutherland, P.,Bhagwati, J.,Botchwey, K.,FitzGerald, N.,Hamada, K.,Jackson, J.(2004).The future of the WTO.Geneva, Switzerland:WTO.
  58. Wendt, A.(1992).Anarchy is what states make of it: The social con-struction of power politics.International Organization,46(2),391-425.
  59. WTO(1997).Panel ReportPanel Report,Geneva, Switzerland:WTO.
  60. WTO(1997).Appellate Body ReportAppellate Body Report,Geneva, Switzerland:WTO.
  61. 李貴英(2008)。世界貿易組織與歐洲聯盟。台北=Taipei:元照=Angle。
  62. 李貴英(2004)。歐洲共同體對開發中國家之優惠待遇—法律規範與經濟發展。歐美研究,34(4),675-735。
  63. 洪德欽(2002)。WTO法律與政策專題研究。台北=Taipei:學林文化=Sharing。
被引用次数
  1. (2024)。制度遺緒對大洋洲國家加入WTO的影響。遠景基金會季刊,25(2),127-192。