题名

歐洲化對歐洲聯盟平衡生技風險與貿易利益之影響

并列篇名

Impact of Europeanization on the European Union's Effort to Balance Biotechnology-Related Risk and Trade Interests

DOI

10.7015/JEAS.201106.0547

作者

李貴英(Catherine Li)

关键词

歐洲化 ； 基因改造食品 ； 風險評估 ； 預防原則 ； 無基因改造生物區 ； Europeanization ； GM food ； risk assessment ； precautionary principle ； GMO-free zone

期刊名称

歐美研究

卷期/出版年月

41卷2期（2011 / 06 / 01）

页次

547 - 603

内容语文

繁體中文
中文摘要

自一九八○年代以降，歐體∕歐盟對於如何規範與管理GMOs的問題即十分困擾。困擾來自於歐體∕歐盟多層次的本質、GMOs產品橫跨若干政策領域及其對經濟與產業的重要性，以及新型GMOs產品具有不確定性。為此，歐盟建立一套嶄新的法規體系，植基於三大主軸：GMOs產品特別立法、預防原則，與歐洲食品安全機構之設立。此一架構反映出重要的政策變革，與歐洲化的影響。然而，歐盟機構在規範管理生技產品方面，必須考慮到GMOs已非純屬技術問題。如何妥善回應大眾對於生技風險的關切，而非僅就狹隘的經濟考量來規範，對於歐盟決策者與立法者而言，乃是一大挑戰。
英文摘要

The issue of how to regulate and govern GMOs at the EC/EU level has been troublesome since it first appeared in the 1980s. There are several reasons why this has been the case, related to the multi-level nature of the EC/EU; this nature of issue, which cuts across several policy domains; its economic and industrial importance; and uncertainties related to the novel organisms involved. Since the 1980s, the EU has been struggling to arrive at solutions by establishing a new regulatory framework along three lines: specific GMO-legislation, the precautionary principle, and the creation of the European Food Safety Agency. The framework reflects important policy changes and the impact of Europeanization. European institutions regulating biotechnology are faced with the fact that issues related to GMOs are by no means considered purely technical. EU policy and lawmakers are challenged by difficulties associated with responding to public concerns about the risks of biotechnology in ways not confined to narrowly defined economic considerations.
主题分类 人文學 > 人文學綜合
社會科學 > 社會科學綜合
参考文献
  1. 洪德欽(2008)。消費者權利在歐盟基改食品標示之規定與實踐。歐美研究，38(4)，509-578。
    連結：
  2. European Commission. (2004a, January 28). State of play on GMO authorizations under EU law (Memo/04/17). Retrieved September 8, 2009, from http://europa.eu/rapid/pressReleasesAction.do? reference=MEMO/04/17&format=HTML&aged=0&language =EN&guiLanguage=en
  3. WTO. (2008b, February 7). European Communities-Measures af-fecting the approval and marketing of biotech products (WT DS291 40). Retrieved September 8, 2009, from http://www. wto.org/english/tratop_e/dispu_e/cases_e/ds291_e.htm
  4. Sindico, F. (2005). The GMO dispute before the WTO: Legal implica-tions for the trade and environment debate (FEEM Working Pa-per No. 11.05). Retrieved September 10, 2009, from http://www.feem.it/NR/rdonlyres/D6C4B280-88C0-4D0C-A0D9-0F9AEE1EABAB/1432/1105.pdf
  5. Inside U.S. Trade. (2003, November 28). Agriculture groups seek new WTO action against EU on GMO rule. Retrieved September 10, 2009, from http://www.insidetrade.com
  6. WTO. (2007, June 26). European Communities-Measures affecting the approval and marketing of biotech products (WT DS291 35). Retrieved September 8, 2009, from http://www.wto.org/english/ tratop_e/dispu_e/cases_e/ds291_e.htm
  7. European Communities. (2004a, May 17). First written submission by the European Communities. Retrieved September 9, 2009, from http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/2004/june/tradoc_117687.pdf
  8. WTO. (2008d, February 19). European Communities-Measures Af-fecting the Approval and Marketing of Biotech Products (WT DS291 42). Retrieved September 8, 2009, from http:// www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/dispu_e/cases_e/ds291_e.htm
  9. European Commission. (2003, July 23). Recommendation on guide-lines for the development of national strategies and best practices to ensure the co-existence of genetically modified crops with con-ventional and organic farming. Retrieved September 10, 2009, from http://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/publi/reports/coexistence 2/guide_en.pdf
  10. WTO. (2006, September 29). European Communities-Measures af-fecting the approval and marketing of biotech products (WT DS291 R, WT DS292 R, WT DS293 R). Retrieved September 7, 2009, from http://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/dispu_e/ cases_e/ds291_e.htm
  11. EU Council-Environment. (2008, December 4). Council conclusions on genetically modified organisms. Retrieved September 9, 2009, from http://www.consilium.europa.eu/ueDocs/cms_Data/docs/ pressData/en/envir/104509.pdf
  12. Schomberg, W., & Smith, J. (2006, November 22). EU won't appeal WTO ruling on GMO moratorium. Retrieved September 7, 2009, from http://www.planetark.org/dailynewsstory.cfm?newsid= 39102&newsdate=22-Nov-2006
  13. United States. (2004a, April 30). European Communities-Measures affecting the approval and marketing of biotech products (WT/DS291). Retrieved September 7, 2009, from http://www. ustr.gov/webfm_send/182
  14. Lisbon European Council. (2000, March 23-24). European Union's strategic goal for the next decade, presidency conclusions. Re-trieved September 7, 2009, from http://www.europarl.europa. eu/summits/lis1_en.htm
  15. European Commission. (1997, April 30). Green paper on the general principles of food law in the European Union, COM (97) 176 fi-nal. Retrieved September 7, 2009, from http://www.europa. eu.int/comm/dgs/health_consumer/library/pub/pub06_en.pdf
  16. EU fails to lift French, Greek GM crop bans. (2009, February 17). EurActive. Retrieved September 9, 2009, from http://www.euractiv.com/en/environment/eu-fails-lift-french-greek-gm-crop-bans/article-179478
  17. European Commission. (2004b, January 28). Communication to the commission: For an orientation debate on genetically modified organisms and related issues. Retrieved September 8, 2009, from http://europa.eu/rapid/pressReleasesAction.do?reference=IP/04/118&format=HTML&aged=0&language=EN&guiLanguage=en
  18. GM-free Ireland Network. (2008, September 20). Essential facts about genetically modified food and farming. Retrieved Septem-ber 9, 2009, from http://www.gmfreeireland.org/downloads/ GMFI-flyer.pdf
  19. Mandelson, P. (2007, June 14). Biotechnology and the EU. Retrieved September 9, 2009, from http://ec.europa.eu/commission_barroso/ashton/speeches_articles/sppm157_en.htm
  20. Europa. (2006, April 12). Commission proposes practical improve-ments to the way the European GMO legislative framework is implemented. Retrieved September 10, 2009, from http://europa.eu/rapid/pressReleasesAction.do?reference=IP/06/498&format=HTML&aged=0&language=EN&guiLanguage=en
  21. WTO. (1996, April 29). United States-Standards for reformulated and conventional gasoline (WT DS2 AB R). Retrieved September 9, 2009, from http://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/dispu_e/ cases_e/ds2_e.htm
  22. Bridges Trade BioRes. (2004, May 28). EC approves GM canned maize. Retrieved September 7, 2009, from http://ictsd.net/i/ news/biores/9230
  23. United States. (2004b, July 29). European Communities-Measures affecting the approval and marketing of biotech products (WT/DS291). Retrieved September 9, 2009, from http://www.genewatch.org/uploads/f03c6d66a9b354535738483c1c3d49e4/ US_WTO_execsummaryofrebuttalsubmission.pdf
  24. European Food Safety Authority. (2007). EFSA-GMO-Nos UK-2005-17, NL-2005-28, UK-2006-30 and NL-2007-46 in summary of the application for the authorisation of genetically modified 1507xnk603 maize and derived food and feed in accor-dance with regulation (EC) 1829/2003 including authorisation for cultivation in accordance with directive 2001/18/EC. Retrieved September 8, 2009, from http://www.efsa.europa.eu/EFSA/ DocumentSet/gmo_uk_2005_17_en1,0.pdf
  25. European Parliament. (2003, December 4). Report on coexistence be-tween genetically modified crops and conventional and organic crops. Retrieved September 10, 2009, from http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?language=EN&pubRef=-//EP//TEXT+REPORT+A5-2003-0465+0+DOC+XML+V0//EN
  26. Germany joins ranks of anti-GMO countries. (2009, April 15). EurActive. Retrieved September 9, 2009, from http://www. euractiv.com/en/cap/germany-joins-ranks-anti-gmo-countries/article-181267
  27. WTO. (2008c, February 13). European Communities-Measures af-fecting the approval and marketing of biotech products (WT DS291 41). Retrieved September 8, 2009, from http://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/dispu_e/cases_e/ds291_e.htm
  28. Environment News Service. (2006, April 12). EU alters GMO assess-ments to satisfy resistant member states. Retrieved September 9, 2009, from http://www.ens-newswire.com/ens/apr2006/2006- 04-12-04.asp
  29. European Communities. (2004b, June 2). Oral statement by the European Communities at the first meeting of the panel. Re-trieved September 8, 2009, from http://trade.ec.europa.eu/ do-clib/docs/2004/june/tradoc_117788.pdf
  30. European Food Safety Authority. (2006). Opinion of the scientific panel on genetically modified organisms on the post market en-vironmental monitoring (PMEM) of genetically modified plants. Retrieved September 10, 2009, from http://www.efsa.europa.eu/efsa/scientific_opinion/gmo_op_ej319_pmem_en,3.pdf
  31. WTO. (2008a, January 21). European Communities-Measures af-fecting the approval and marketing of biotech products (WT DS291 39). Retrieved September 8, 2009, from http://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/dispu_e/cases_e/ds291_e.htm
  32. Austria proposes GMO "opt-out" clause. (2009, June 25). EurActive. Retrieved September 9, 2009, from http://www.euractiv.com/en/cap/austria-proposes-gmo-opt-clause/article-183467#
  33. Ministers back right to refuse GM crop cultivation. (2009, March 3). EurActive. Retrieved September 9, 2009, from http://www.euractiv.com/en/sustainability/ministers-back-right-refuse-gm-crop-cultivation/article-179882
  34. WTO. (1997, August 18). European Communities: Measures concern-ing meat and meat products (WT DS26, WT DS48). Retrieved September 9, 2009, from http://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/ dispu_e/cases_e/ds26_e.htm
  35. Alemanno, A.(2008).How to get out of the Trans-atlantic regulatory deadlock over GMOs? Time for regulatory cooperation.California-EU Biodiversity and Biosafety Regulatory Cooperation Workshop
  36. Alemanno, A.(2007).Trade in food: Regulatory and judicial ap-proaches in the EC and the WTO.London:Cameron May.
  37. Antonio, J.,Herrera, I.(2007).International law and GMOs: Can the precautionary principles protect biological diversity?.Boletin Mexicano de Derecho Comparado,118,97-136.
  38. Applegate, J. S.(2001).The prometheus principle: Using the precau-tionary principle to harmonize the regulation of genetically modified organisms.Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies,9(1),207-263.
  39. Arcuri, A.(2007).Compliance is a hard nut to crack in the biotech dispute.Bridges Trade BioRes,October, 1,11-13.
  40. Baldwin, R.(Ed.)(1997).Law and uncertainty: Risks and legal processes.London:Kluwer Law International.
  41. Barrett, K.,Raffensperger, C.(2002).From principle to action: Applying the precautionary principle to agricultural biotechnol-ogy.International Journal of Biotechnology,4(1),4-17.
  42. Bermann, G. A.(ed.),Pistor, K.(ed.)(2004).Law and governance in an enlarged European Union: Essays in Euro-pean Law.Oxford, UK:Hart.
  43. Bernauer, T.,Caduff, L.(2006).European food safety: Multilevel governance, re-nationalization, or centralization?.Review Policy of Research,23(1),153-168.
  44. Boisson de Chazournes, L.,Mbengue, M. M.(2004).GMOs and trade: Issues at stake in the EC biotech dispute.Review of Euro-pean Community & International Environmental Law,13(3),289-305.
  45. Boy, L.(2002).La place du principe de précaution dans la Directive UE du mars 2001 relative à la dissémination volontaire d'organismes génétiquement modifiés dans l'environnement.Revue Juridique de l'Environnement,1,5-24.
  46. Brosset, E.(2004).The prior authorisation procedure adopted for the deliberate release into the environment of genetically modified organisms: The complexities of balancing community and na-tional competences..European Law Journal,10(5),555-579.
  47. Chalmers, D.(2005).Risk, anxiety and the European mediation of the politics of life.European Law Review,30(5),649-674.
  48. Cheyne, I.(2006).Risk and precaution in World Trade Organization Law.Journal of World Trade,40(5),837-864.
  49. Cheyne, I.(2007).Taming the precautionary principle in EC Law: Lessons from waste and GMO regulation.Journal for European Environmental & Planning Law,4(6),468-483.
  50. Cheyne, I.(2006).The precautionary principle in EC and WTO Law: Searching for a common understanding.Environmental Law Re-view,8(4),257-277.
  51. Christoforou, T.(2004).The regulation of genetically modified or-ganisms in the EU: The interplay of science law and politics.Common Market Law Review,29(2),637-709.
  52. Clives, J.(2008)。2008年全球生物技術∕轉基因作物商業發展態勢：第一個十三年 [1996-2008]。中國生物工程雜誌，29(2)，1-10。
  53. Committee of the Regions(2006).Opinion on the communication from the commission to the council and the European Parliament report on the implementation of national measures on the coexistence of genetically modified crops with conventional and organic farming..Official Journal,October 3,C57.
  54. De Sadeleer, N.(2003).Safeguard clauses under article 95 of the EC Treaty.Common Market Law Review,40(4),889-915.
  55. De Sadeleer, N.(2002).Environmental principles: From political slo-gans to legal rules.Oxford, UK:Oxford University Press.
  56. De Sadeleer, N.(2006).The precautionary principle in EC health and environmental law.European Law Journal,12(2),139-172.
  57. Dunlop, C.(2000).GMOs and regulatory styles.Environmental Poli-tics,9(2),149-155.
  58. European Commission(2002).Communication from the commission to the council, the European parliament, the economic and social committee and the committee of the regions.Official Journal,February 3,C 55.
  59. European Commission(2000).White paper on food safety.Brussels, Belgium:European Commission.
  60. European Union(2009).Food safety: From the farm to the fork.Brussels, Belgium:European Commission.
  61. Forsman, Z. K.(2004).Community regulation of genetically modified organisms: A difficult relationship between law and science.European Law Journal,10(5),580-594..
  62. Foster, C. E.(2008).Prior approval systems and the substance-Procedure dichotomy under the WTO SPS Agreement.Journal of World Trade,42(6),1203-1217.
  63. Francescon, S.(2001).The new directive 2001/18/EC on the deliber-ate release of genetically modified organisms into the environ-ment: Changes and perspectives.Review of European Commu-nity and International Environmental Law,10(3),309-320.
  64. Gallagher, K. P.(Ed.)(2009).Handbook on trade and the environment.London:Edward Elgar.
  65. Gibson, J.(2006).Consumer protection: Consumer strategies and the European market in genetically modified foods.Northwestern Journal of Technology & Intellectual Property,5(1),176-191.
  66. Gonzalez, C. G.(2007).Genetically modified organisms and justice: The international environmental justice implications of biotech-nology.Georgetown International Environmental Law Review,19(4),583-642.
  67. Guzman, A. T.(2004).Food fears: Health and safety at the WTO.Virginia Journal of International Law,45(1),1-39.
  68. Haimes, Y. Y.(2004).Risk modeling, assessment and management.New York:John Wiley & Sons.
  69. Hilson, C.(2005).Information disclosure and the regulation of traded product risks..Journal of Environmental Law,17(3),305-322.
  70. Holder, J.,Lee, M.(2007).Environmental protection, law and pol-icy.Cambridge, UK:Cambridge University Press.
  71. Kasperson, J. X.,Kasperson, R. E.(2005).The social contours of risk.London:Earthscan.
  72. Korthals, M.(ed.),Coff, C.(ed.),Barling, D.(ed.)Nielsen, T.(ed.)(2008).Ethical traceability and communicating food.Dordrecht, the Netherlands:Springer.
  73. Krapohl, S.(2004).Credible commitment in non-independent regula-tory agencies: A comparative analysis of the European agencies for pharmaceuticals and foodstuffs.European Law Journal,10(5),518-538.
  74. Kysar, D. A.(2004).Preferences for processes: The process product distinction and the regulation of consumer choice.Harvard Law Review,118(2),525-642.
  75. Lafranchi, S.(2005).Surveying the precautionary principle's ongoing global development: The evolution of an emergent environ-mental management tool..Boston College Environmental Affairs Law Review,32(3),679-720.
  76. Leibovitch, E. H.(2008).Food safety regulation in the European Un-ion: Toward an unavoidable centralization of regulatory powers..Texas International Law Journal,43,429-452.
  77. Lofstedt, R. E.,Fischhoff, B.,Fischhoff, I. R.(2002).Precautionary principles: General definitions and specific applications to ge-netically modified organisms.Journal of Policy Analysis and Management,21(3),381-407.
  78. Marden, E.(2003).Risk and regulation: U.S. regulatory policy on ge-netically modified food and agriculture.Boston College Law Re-view,44(3),733-788.
  79. McGrady, B.(2008).Fragmentation of international law or "systemic integration" of treaty regimes: EC-Biotech products and the proper interpretation of article 31(3)(c) of the Vienna conven-tion on the law of treaties.Journal of World Trade,42(4),589-618.
  80. Ostrovsky, A. A.(2007).Up against a wall: Europe's options for regu-lating biotechnology through regulatory anarchy..European Law Journal,13(1),110-134.
  81. Palme, C.(2006).Nationaler Naturschutz und Europäisches Gentechnikrecht.Natur und Recht,28(2),76-79.
  82. Poli, S.(2007).The EC's implementation of the WTO ruling in the biotech dispute.European Law Review,32,705-726.
  83. Prévost, D.(2007).Opening Pandora's box: The panel's findings in the EC-biotech products dispute.Legal Issues of Economic Integration,34(1),67-101.
  84. Rey Garcia, P.(2006).Directive 2001 18 8 on the deliberate release into the environment of GMOs: An overview and the main pro-visions for placing on the market.Journal of European Environ-ment and Planning Law,3(1),3-12.
  85. Scott, J.(2003).European regulation of GMOs and the WTO..Co-lumbia Journal of Economic Law,9(2),213-239.
  86. Shaffer, G.(2008).A structural theory of WTO dispute settlement: Why institutional choice lies at the center of the GMO case.In-ternational Law and Politics,41(1),1-101.
  87. Stirling, A.,Mayer, S.(2000).Precautionary approaches to the ap-praisal of risk: A case study of a genetically modified crop..Inter-national Journal of Occupational and Environmental Health,6(4),342-357.
  88. Strauss, D. M.(2008).Feast or famine: The impact of the WTO deci-sion favoring the U.S. biotechnology industry in the EU ban of genetically modified foods.American Business Law Journal,45(4),775-826.
  89. Tsioumani, E.(2004).Genetically modified organisms in the EU: Pub-lic attitudes and regulatory developments.Review of European Community & International Environmental Law,13(3),279-288.
  90. Van der Meulen, B. M. J.(2007).The EU regulatory approach to GM foods.Kansas Journal of Law & Public Policy,16(3),286-323.
  91. Vincent, K.(2004).Mad cows and eurocrats-Community responses to the BSE crises.European Law Journal,10(5),499-517.
  92. Vogel, D.(ed.),Ansell, C.(ed.)(2006).What's the beef? The contested gov-ernance of European food safety.Cambridge, MA:MIT Press.
  93. Wiener, A.(ed.),Diez, T.(ed.)(2004).European integration theory.Oxford, NY:Oxford University Press.
  94. Wiener, J. B.(2003).Whose precaution after all? A comment on the comparison and evolution of risk regulatory systems.Duke Journal of Comparative & International Law,13(4),207-262.
  95. Winter, G.(2008).Nature protection and the introduction into the environment of genetically modified organisms: Risk analysis in EC multilevel governance.Review of European Community and International Environmental Law,17(2),205-220.
  96. Wirth, D. A.(2006).The transatlantic GMO dispute against the European Communities: Some preliminary thoughts.Boston College Law School Faculty Papers,144,173-208.
  97. Wynne, B.,Winickoff, D.,Jasanoff, S.,Busch, L.,Grove-White, R. B.(2005).Adjudicating the GM food wars: Science, risk and democracy in World Trade Law.Yale Journal of International Law,30,81-123.
  98. 郭華仁(2005)。基改作物的全球現況與我國農作物生物科技政策。生物科技與法律研究通訊，18，21-41。
被引用次数
  1. 楊三億(2014)。歐盟對烏克蘭政策之外溢效果。問題與研究，53(1)，1-34。
  2. (2014)。基因科技應用在生命倫理課程推動之啟示。教育研究月刊，237，112-129。
  3. (2021)。基因編輯技術對歐盟基因改造生物管理之挑戰。交大法學評論，9，111-155。
print cancel