捷克入盟前環境政策之歐洲化學習過程

Europeanization and EU Enlargement - Czech Republic Environmental Policy

10.7015/JEAS.201106.0643

楊三億(San-Yi Yang)

歐洲化 ； 捷克 ； 環境政策 ； 社會學習 ； 經驗學習 ； Europeanization ； Czech Republic ； Environmental Policy ； Social Learning ； Lesson Drawing

歐美研究

41卷2期（2011 / 06 / 01）

643 - 672

繁體中文

歐洲化是理解新會員國加入歐盟的一個重要途徑，本研究指出，歐盟第五次擴張之發生與歐洲化過程息息相關，隨入盟與歐洲化過程逐步強化，新會員國的成本效益考量將逐步受到弱化，因此能夠支持歐盟與會員國法令一致性。本研究還指出，歐洲化動力來源主要由歐盟與新會員國兩方發動，歐盟透過法令與擴張過程之正當性產生政策共鳴以創造友善學習環境；新會員國內部經驗學習模式則成為另一種動力來源，透過內部政策調整需求、知識社群與規則交互使用可行性管道交互影響下完成學習過程，觀察捷克環境政策可看見此兩種模式相互推引的歐洲化過程。

Policy adaptation of new members of European Union occupied a focal point in the European political development after the end of the Cold War, particularly during the eastward enlargement of the EU. The author argues that there is a strong correlation between EU enlargement and policy adaptation in the context of Europeanization. Drawing on learning theory, an explanation of policy adaptation is offered on the basis of two different sub-theories: the social learning theory model, which emphasizes the legitimacy of rules and process; and the lesson-drawing model, which focuses on Policy Dissatisfaction, epistemic communities, and transferability of rules. The environmental policy of Czech Republic provides evidence for applicability of the learning process hypothesis of European values and norms.

1. United Nations Economic Commission for Europe. (1993). Declara-tion. Retrieved July 23, 2009, from http://www.unece.org/env/efe/history%20of%20EfE/Luzern.E.pdf
2. European Union. (2003). Treaty concerning the accession of the Czech Republic (annex I). Retrieved September 12, 2009, from http://www.europarl.europa.eu/enlargement_new/treaty/doc_en/aa00023en03.doc
3. European Union. (2000). Directive 2000/60/EC. Retrieved July 22 2009, from http://europa.eu/legislation_summaries/agriculture/environment/l28002b_en.htm
4. European environment information and observation network. (1999). EIONET. Retrieved July 23, 2009, from http://eionet.europa.eu/
5. European Commission. (1991). Nitrate Directive 91 676 EEC. Re-trieved September 14, 2009, from http://ec.europa.eu/environment/water/water-nitrates/index_en.html
6. Baun, M.,Durr, J.,Marek, D.,Saradin, P.(2006).The Europeanization of Czech politics: The political parties and the EU referendum.Journal of Common Market Studies,44(2),249-280.
7. Carter, F.,Turnock, D.(2002).Environmental problem of East Central Europe.London:Routledge.
8. Checkel, J. T.(1999).Norms, institutions, and national identity in contemporary Europe.International Studies Quarterly,43(1),83-114.
9. Checkel, J. T.(2001).Why comply? Social learning and European identity change.International Organization,55(3),553-588.
10. Cohen, M.,Sproull, L.(1996).Organizational learning.Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.
11. Cowles, M. G.,Caporaso, J.,Risse, T.(2001).Transforming Europe: Europeanization and domestic change.Ithaca, NY:Cornell Uni-versity Press.
12. Devaux, S.(2006).Old networks, new roles? The role of environ-mental think tanks in the Czech Republic.Perspectives on Euro-pean Politics and Society,7(2),221-235.
13. Dolowitz, D.,Marsh, D.(2000).Learning from abroad: The role of policy transfer in contemporary policy-making.Governance,13(1),5-24.
14. Engelbrekt, K.(2002).Multiple asymmetries: The European Union's Neo-Byzantine approach to Eastern enlargement.International Politics,39(1),37-52.
15. European Commission(1998).Regular report 1998 on Czech Republic's progress toward accession.Brussels, Belgium:European Commission.
16. European Commission(1999).Regular report 1999 on Czech Republic's progress toward accession.Brussels, Belgium:European Commission.
17. European Commission(2003).2003 Regular report on Czech Repub-lic's progress toward accession.Brussels, Belgium:European Commission.
18. European Commission(1995).Preparation of the associated countries of Central and Eastern Europe for integration into the internal market of the union-white paper.Brussels, Belgium:European Commission.
19. European Commission(2001).2001 Regular report on Czech Republic's progress toward accession.Brussels, Belgium:European Commission.
20. European Commission(2000).Regular report 2000 on Czech Republic's progress toward accession.Brussels, Belgium:European Commission.
21. European Commission(2002).2002 Regular report on Czech Republic's progress toward accession.Brussels, Belgium:European Commission.
22. European Commission(2003).2003 Comprehensive monitoring report on the Czech Republic's preparations for membership..Brussels, Belgium:European Commission.
23. European Union(2001).Directive 2001/81/EC of the European Par-liament and of the Council on national emission ceilings for cer-tain atmospheric pollutants.Brussels, Belgium:European Union.
24. Fagan, A.(2004).Environment and democracy in the Czech Republic: The environmental movement in the transition process.Chelten-ham, UK:Edward Elgar.
25. Frank, T. M.(1990).The power of legitimacy among nations.New York:Oxford University.
26. Gorton, M.,Lowe, P.,Zellei, A.(2005).Pre-accession Europeani-zation: The strategic realignment of the environmental policy systems of Lithuania, Poland and Slovakia towards agricultural pollution in preparation for EU membership.European Society for Rural Sociology,45(3),202-223.
27. Grabbe, H.(2001).How does Europeanization affect CEE governance? Conditionality, diffusion and diversity.Journal of European Public Policy,8(6),1013-1031.
28. Gunter, T. L.(2002).Banking on the environment: Multilateral de-velopment banks and their environmental performance in Central and Eastern Europe.Cambridge, MA:MIT Press.
29. Helco, H.(1974).Modern social politics in Britain and Sweden: From relief to income maintenance.New Haven, CT:Yale University Press.
30. Horak, M.(2001).Environmental policy reform in the post-communist Czech Republic: The case of air pollution.Europe-Asia Studies,53(2),313-327.
31. Hoverter, T.,Hoverter, M.(2002).The economics of the environ-ment: Accession of the Czech Republic to the European Union.Seton Hall Journal of Diplomacy and International Relations,3(1),53-67.
32. Knill, C.(2001).The Europeanization of national administrations: Patterns of institutional change and persistence.Cambridge, UK:Cambridge University Press.
33. Kružíková, E.(2004).EU accession and legal change: Accomplish-ments and challenges in the Czech case.Environmental Politics,13(1),99-113.
34. Levy, J. S.(1994).Learning and foreign policy: Sweeping a conceptual minefield.International Organization,48(2),279-312.
35. Lippert, B.,Umbach, G.,Wessels, W.(2001).Europeanization of CEE executives: EU membership negotiation as a shaping power.Journal of European Public Policy,8(6),980-1012.
36. Manning, N.(1998).Patterns of environmental movements in Eastern Europe.Environmental Politics,7(2),100-133.
37. Ministry of Environmental of the Czech Republic(2001).State envi-ronmental policy.Prague, Czech Republic:Ministry of Environmental of the Czech Republic.
38. Ministry of Environmental of the Czech Republic(1999).State environmental policy.Prague, Czech Republic:Ministry of Environmental of the Czech Republic.
39. Pinto, A. C.(ed.),Teixeira, N. S.(ed.)(2002).Southern Europe and the making of the European Union 1945-1980.New York:Columbia University Press.
40. Radaelli, C.(2000).Whither Europeanization? Concept stretching and substantive change.European Integration Online Papers,4(8),1-25.
41. Schimmelfennig, F.(ed.),Sedel-meier, U.(ed.)(2005).The Europeanization of Central and Eastern Europe.London:Cornell University Press.
42. Schimmelfenning, F.(ed.),Sedelmeier, U.(ed.)(2005).The Europeaiza-tion of Central and Eastern Europe.London:Cornell University Press.
43. Smith, S.,Remington, T. F.(2001).The politics of institutional choice: The formation of the Russian state duma..Princeton, NJ:Princeton University Press.
44. Toshkov, D.(2008).Embracing European law: Compliance with EU directives in Central and Eastern Europe.European Union Politics,9(3),379-402.
45. 陳恆鈞(2003)。政策學習概念及其對政府組織之意涵。研習論壇，28，20-29。
46. 楊三億(2005)。歐盟東擴及其對波蘭衝擊：政治經濟面向之分析。全球政治評論，11，79-110。

1. 楊三億(2014)。歐盟對烏克蘭政策之外溢效果。問題與研究，53(1)，1-34。
2. 趙育杰,張家銘(2022)。依賴中的互賴關係：歐盟與維謝格拉德集團的整合。遠景基金會季刊，23(4)，53-111。
3. (2024)。為什麼不中立了？從關鍵時刻、地緣政治與決策模式分析瑞典與芬蘭中立政策調整。問題與研究，63(1)，55-101。