题名

Globalization and Varieties of Modernity

并列篇名

全球化與多樣化的現代性

DOI

10.7015/JEAS.201209.0391

作者

娑菲珥‧沃爾比(Sylvia Walby)

关键词

現代性 ; 階級 ; 性別 ; 就業 ; 社會福利 ; modernity ; class ; gender ; employment ; welfare

期刊名称

歐美研究

卷期/出版年月

42卷3期(2012 / 09 / 01)

页次

391 - 417

内容语文

英文

中文摘要

全球化進程正以錯綜複雜的方式重新形塑著不平等。由於社會發展之路徑依賴的本質,及現代性的多樣化,導致全球化對於各社會型態有著不等的衝擊。各種多樣化的現代性,包含新自由主義與社會民主主義,皆涉及多種型態之性別政權與資本主義。在階級議題之外再納入性別不平等的考量,將改變我們檢視不平等的本質及其不斷改變的型態。本文使用OECD成員國的資料,探討在就業與社會福利供給中,各種型態的性別與階級不平等彼此對應的程度。本研究發現兩者有顯著差異,進而導出這樣的結論:要概念化並分析多樣化的現代性時,必須包含性別層面,而不該假設可將其簡化為階級議題。

英文摘要

Global processes are restructuring inequalities in complex ways. Globalization has uneven impacts on social formations as a consequence of the path dependent nature of societal development and variations in the forms of modernity. The multiple varieties of modernity, including neoliberalism and social democracy, involve diverse forms of gender regime as well as diverse forms of capitalism. Including gender inequalities in addition to class alters how we see the nature and changing patterns of inequalities. The paper investigates the extent to which variations in the form of gender and class inequalities in employment and in welfare provision map onto each other, using data from OECD countries. Significant points of divergence are found, leading to the conclusion that conceptualisation and analysis of varieties of modernity should include a gender dimension and not presume that this is reducible to class.

主题分类 人文學 > 人文學綜合
社會科學 > 社會科學綜合
参考文献
  1. OECD. (2011). OECD family database. Retrieved August 3, 2012, from http://www.oecd.org/els/familiesandchildren/oecdfamilydatabase.htm.http://www.oecd.org/els/familiesandchildren/oecdfamilydatabase.htm
  2. Arrighi, G.(2007).Adam Smith in Beijing: Lineages of the twenty-first Century.London:Verso.
  3. Arts, W.,Gelissen, J.(2002).Three worlds of welfare capitalism or more? A state-of-the-art report.Journal of European Social Policy,12(2),137-158.
  4. Bauman, Z.(2000).Liquid modernity.Cambridge, UK:Polity.
  5. Beck, U.(1992).Risk society: Towards a new modernity.London:Sage.
  6. Beck, U.,Beck-Gernsheim, E.(2002).Individualization: Institutionalized individualism and its social and political consequences.London:Sage.
  7. Capra, F.(1997).The web of life: A new synthesis of mind and matter.London:Flamingo.
  8. Castles, F.(Ed.)(1993).Families of nations: Patterns of public policy in Western democracies.Aldershot, UK:Dartmouth.
  9. Chase-Dunn, C.(1998).Global formation: Structures of the world-economy (2nd ed.).Oxford, UK:Blackwell.
  10. Crouch, C.(1993).Industrial relations and European state traditions.Oxford, UK:Clarendon.
  11. Daly, M.,Rake, K.(2003).Gender and the welfare state: Care, work and welfare in Europe and the USA.Cambridge, UK:Polity.
  12. Durkheim, E.(1984).The division of labour in society.Basingstoke, UK:Macmillan.
  13. Ebbinghaus, B.(Ed.),Manow, P.(Ed.)(2001).Comparing welfare capitalism: Social policy and political economy in Europe, Japan and the USA.London:Routledge.
  14. Eisenstadt, S.(Ed.)(2002).Multiple modernities.New Brunswick, UK:Transaction.
  15. Esping-Andersen, G.(1999).Social foundations of postindustrial economies.Oxford, UK:Oxford University Press.
  16. Esping-Andersen, G.(1997).Hybrid or unique? The Japanese welfare state between Europe and America.Journal of European Social Policy,7(3),179-189.
  17. Esping-Andersen, G.(2003).Why no socialism anywhere? A reply to Alex Hicks and Lane Kenworthy.Socio-Economic Review,1(1),63-70.
  18. Esping-Andersen, G.(1990).The three worlds of welfare capitalism.Cambridge, UK:Polity.
  19. Estevez-Abe, M.(2006).Gendering the varieties of capitalism: A study of occupational segregation by sex in advanced industrial societies.World Politics,59(1),142-175.
  20. Estevez-Abe, M.(2005).Gender bias in skills and social policies: The varieties of capitalism perspective on sex segregation.Social Politics,12(2),180-215.
  21. Flora, P.(Ed.),Heidenheimer, A.(Ed.)(1981).The development of welfare states in Europe and America.London:Transaction.
  22. Giddens, A.(1991).Modernity and self-identity: Self and society in the late modern age.Cambridge, UK:Polity.
  23. Gottfried, H.(2003).Temp(t)ing bodies: Shaping gender at work in Japan.Sociology,37(2),257-276.
  24. Gottfried, H.(2000).Compromising positions: Emergent neo-Fordism and embedded gender contracts.British Journal of Sociology,51(2),235-259.
  25. Hall, P.(Ed.),Soskice, D.(Ed.)(2001).Varieties of capitalism: The institutional foundations of comparative advantage.Oxford, UK:Oxford University Press.
  26. Hanké, B.(Ed.)(2009).Debating varieties of capitalism: A reader.Oxford, UK:Oxford University Press.
  27. Hanké, B.(Ed.),Rhodes, M.(Ed.),Thatcher, M.(Ed.)(2007).Beyond varieties of capitalism: Conflict, contradiction, and complementarities in the European economy.Oxford, UK:Oxford University Press.
  28. Hartmann, H.(1976).Capitalism, patriarchy and job segregation by sex.Signs,1(3),137-169.
  29. Hicks, A.,Kenworthy, L.(2003).Varieties of welfare capitalism.Socio-Economic Review,1(1),27-61.
  30. Hobson, B.(Ed.)(2000).Gender and citizenship in transition.London:Macmillan.
  31. Hollingsworth, J. R.(Ed.),Boyer, R.(Ed.)(1997).Contemporary capitalism: The embeddedness of institutions.Cambridge, UK:Cambridge University Press.
  32. Huber, E.,Stephens, J. D.(2001).Development and crisis of the welfare state: Parties and policies in global markets.Chicago:Chicago University Press.
  33. Jenson, J.(1997).Who cares? Gender and welfare regimes.Social Politics,4(2),182-187.
  34. Jones, C.(Ed.)(1993).New perspectives on the welfare state in Europe.London:Routledge.
  35. Korpi, W.(2000).Faces of inequality: Gender, class, and patterns of inequalities in different types of welfare states.Social Politics,7(2),127-191.
  36. Korpi, W.(1983).The democratic class struggle.London:Routledge and Kegan Paul.
  37. Korpi, W.(2003).Welfare-state regress in Western Europe: Politics, institutions, globalization, and Europeanization.Annual Review of Sociology,29,589-609.
  38. Lash, S.,Urry, J.(1987).The end of organized capitalism.Cambridge, UK:Polity.
  39. Leibfried, S.(Ed.),Pierson, P.(Ed.)(1995).European social policy: Between fragmentation and integration.Washington, DC:Brookings.
  40. Lewis, J.(2002).Gender and welfare state change.European Societies,4(4),331-357.
  41. Lewis, J.(1992).Gender and the development of welfare regimes.Journal of European Social Policy,2(3),159-173.
  42. Mandel, H.(2010).Winners and losers: The consequences of welfare state policies for gender wage inequality.European Sociological Review,28(2),241-262.
  43. Maturana, H.,Varela, F.(1980).Autopoeisis and cognition: The realization of the living.Dordrecht, the Netherlands:Reidel.
  44. Milanovic, B.(2005).Worlds apart: Measuring international and global inequality.Princeton, NJ:Princeton University Press.
  45. Nakagawa, Y.(1979).Japan the welfare super-power.Journal of Japanese Studies,5(1),5-51.
  46. O''Connor, J.,Orloff, A. S.,Shaver, S.(1999).States, markets, families: Gender, liberalism and social policy in Australia, Canada, Great Britain and the United States.Cambridge, UK:Cambridge University Press.
  47. OECD(2007).OECD factbook 2007: Economic, environmental and social statistics.Paris:Author.
  48. OECD(1997).OECD employment outlook.Paris:Author.
  49. OECD(2006).OECD factbook 2006: Economic, environmental and social statistics.Paris:Author.
  50. OECD(2004).OECD employment outlook.Paris:Author.
  51. OECD(1994).OECD employment outlook.Paris:Author.
  52. Ong, A.(2006).Neoliberalism as exception: Mutations in citizenship and sovereignty.Durham, NC:Duke University Press.
  53. Orloff, A. S.(1993).Gender and the social rights of citizenship: The comparative analysis of gender relations and welfare states.American Sociological Review,58(3),303-328.
  54. Osawa, M.(2011).Social security in contemporary Japan.Abingdon, UK:Routledge.
  55. Piore, M.,Sabel, C.(1984).The second industrial divide: Possibilities for prosperity.New York:Basic Books.
  56. Robinson, W. I.(2001).Social theory and globalization: The rise of a transnational state.Theory and Society,30(2),157-200.
  57. Sainsbury, D.(1996).Gender, equality and welfare states.Cambridge, UK:Cambridge University Press.
  58. Sainsbury, D.(Ed.)(1994).Gendering welfare states.London:Sage.
  59. Schmidt, V.(2006).Multiple modernities or varieties of modernity?.Current Sociology,54(1),77-97.
  60. Schmidt, V.(Ed.)(2007).Modernity at the beginning of the 21st century.Cambridge, UK:Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
  61. Schmitter, P.(1974).Still the century of corporatism?.The Review of Politics,36(1),85-131.
  62. Simmel, G.(1955).Conflict: The web of group affiliations.Glencoe, IL:Free Press.
  63. Streeck, W.(1992).Social institutions and economic Performance: Studies of industrial relations in advanced capitalist economies.London:Sage.
  64. Streeck, W.(Ed.),Yamamura, K.(Ed.)(2002).The origins of nonliberal capitalism: Germany and Japan in comparison.Ithaca, NY:Cornell University Press.
  65. Tepe, M.,Gottschall, K.,Kittel, B.(2010).A structural fit between states and markets? Public administration regimes and market economy models in the OECD.Socio-Economic Review,8(4),653-684.
  66. Thelen, K.(2004).How institutions evolve: The political economy of skills in Germany, Britain, the United States, and Japan.Cambridge, UK:Cambridge University Press.
  67. Urry, J.(2003).Global complexity.Cambridge, UK:Polity.
  68. Vogel, E.(1973).Japan as number one: Lessons for America.Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press.
  69. Walby, S.(1986).Patriarchy at work.Cambridge, UK:Polity.
  70. Walby, S.(2007).Complexity theory, systems theory, and multiple intersecting social inequalities.Philosophy of the Social Sciences,37(4),449-470.
  71. Walby, S.(2009).Globalization and inequalities: Complexity and contested modernities.London:Sage.
  72. Walby, S.(Ed.),Gottfried, H.(Ed.),Gottschall, K.(Ed.),Osawa, M.(Ed.)(2007).Gendering the knowledge economy: Comparative perspectives.London:Palgrave.
  73. Wallerstein, I.(1974).The modern world-system.New York:Academic Press.
  74. Whitley, R.(2000).Divergent capitalisms: The social structuring and change of business systems.Oxford, UK:Oxford University Press.
  75. Wilensky, H.(2002).Rich democracies: Political economy, public policy, and performance.Berkeley, CA:University of California Press.
被引用次数
  1. (2014)。從在地到全球:伊甸推動身心障礙福利的實踐。社區發展季刊,148,136-145。