题名

歐洲聯盟碳均衡系統與世界貿易組織多邊貿易規則相容性之研究:以邊境稅調整措施為例

并列篇名

The European Union's Carbon Equalization System and Its Compatibility with the World Trade Organization's Multilateral Trade Rules-The Case of Border Tax Adjustments

DOI

10.7015/JEAS.201306_43(2).0002

作者

李貴英(Catherine Li)

关键词

氣候變遷 ; 碳均衡系統 ; 碳洩漏 ; 邊境稅調整 ; 排放交易系統 ; climate change ; carbon equalization system ; carbon leakage ; border tax adjustments ; Emission Trading System

期刊名称

歐美研究

卷期/出版年月

43卷2期(2013 / 06 / 01)

页次

305 - 352

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

由於國際間欠缺強而有力的國際協定以有效對抗氣候變遷的衝擊,若干國家遂自行採取單邊政策措施。歐盟的碳排放交易系統即為一例,其方案設定在歐盟碳排放量的限制。然而其他國家卻未必致力於降低溫室氣體排放,相形之下,歐盟所實施的方案可能導致歐盟能源密集產業,相較於其他國家不受類似限制之產業,處於競爭劣勢。為了解決碳洩漏與競爭力的問題,歐盟採取碳均衡系統以利公平競爭,包括實施邊境稅調整之措施。而該等措施是否符合世界貿易組織多邊貿易協定之規範,乃是本文探討之重點。

英文摘要

In the absence of any robust international agreements to combat climate change, some countries and organizations have undertaken unilateral policies and measures. One such example is the European Union's emissions trading system-a program that sets limits on the quantities of authorized carbon emissions within the EU. This system places the EU's energy-intensive industries at a competitive disadvantage with respect to foreign firms not so constrained. In order to address carbon emissions and competitiveness through climate change policies, the European Union proposed leveling the playing field by implementing the Carbon Equalization System, including border tax adjustments. This paper examines whether those measures are compatible with multilateral trade agreements under the World Trade Organization.

主题分类 人文學 > 人文學綜合
社會科學 > 社會科學綜合
参考文献
  1. 施文真(2005)。氣候變遷國際管制體系與關稅暨貿易總協定/世界貿易組織之關係:以京都機制為主要探討對象。臺大法學論叢,34(4),179-228。
    連結:
  2. Hollinger, P. (2009, September 10). Sarkozy calls for carbon tax on imports. Financial Times. Retrieved February 14, 2012, from http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/a5fb6084-9e32-11de-b0aa-00144feabdc0.html#axzz1mLlBvjK8
  3. Pauwelyn, J. (2009). Testimony before the subcommittee on Trade of the House Committee on ways and means. Retrieved February 18, 2012, from http://www.docstoc.com/docs/9842017/Statement-of-Joost-Pauwelyn
  4. Sarkozy renews pressure for CO2 border tax. (2009, September 14). EurActive. Retrieved March 10, 2012, from http://www.euractiv.com/climate-change/sarkozy-renews-pressure-co2-border-tax/article-185387
  5. WTO Secretariat. (1997). Taxes and charges for environmental purposes—Border tax adjustment (WTO Doc. WT/CTE/W/47). Geneva:Author.WTO Secretariat. (1997). Taxes and charges for environmental purposes—Border tax adjustment (WTO Doc. WT/CTE/W/47). Geneva:Author.,未出版
  6. Baron, R., & ECON-Energy. (1997). Economic/fiscal instruments: Competitiveness issues related to carbon/energy taxation (Annex I Expert Group on the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change Working Paper No. 14). Paris: OECD/IEA.
  7. Pauwelyn, J. (2007). U.S. federal climate policy and competitiveness concerns: The limits and options of international trade law (Nicholas Institute for Environmental Policy Solutions Working Paper No. 07-02). Durham, NC: Duke University.
  8. De Melo, J., & Mathys, N. A. (2010). Trade and climate change: the challenges ahead (Document de travail Série Politiques de développement P14). Clermont-Ferrand, France: Fondation pour les études et recherches sur le développement international.
  9. Klepper, G., & Peterson, S. M. (2004). The EU emissions trading scheme. Allowance prices, trade flows, competitiveness effects (FEEM Working Paper No. 49.04). Retrieved February 14, 2012, from http://ssrn.com/abstract=525342
  10. Ahner, N.(2009).EUI Working PaperEUI Working Paper,Badia Fiesolana, Italy:European University Institute.
  11. Bagwell, K.,Staiger, R. W.(2001).Domestic policies, national sovereignty and international economic institutions.Quarterly Journal of Economics,116(2),519-562.
  12. Bagwell, K.,Staiger, R. W.(2001).The WTO as a mechanism for securing market access property rights: Implications for global labor and environmental issues.Journal of Economic Perspectives,15(3),69-88.
  13. Barthold, T. A.(1994).Issues in the design of environmental excise taxes.Journal of Economic Perspectives,8(1),133-151.
  14. Charnovitz, S.(2003).Trade and climate: Potential conflicts and synergies.Beyond Kyoto: Advancing the international effort against climate change,Arlington, VA:
  15. Chimni, B. S.(2002).WTO and environment: Legitimisation of unilateral trade sanctions.Economic and Political Weekly,37(2),133-139.
  16. Copeland, B. R.,Taylor, M. S.(2004).Trade, growth, and the environment.Journal of Economic Literature,42(1),7-71.
  17. Cosbey, A.(2008).Border carbon adjustment.Trade and Climate Change Seminar,Copenhagen, Denmark:
  18. Cosbey, A.,Tarasofsky, R.(2007).Climate change, competitiveness and trade.London:Chatham House.
  19. De Cendra, J.(2006).Can emissions trading schemes be coupled with border tax adjustments?: An analysis vis-à-vis WTO law.Review of European Community and International Environmental Law,15(2),131-145.
  20. Delbeke, J.(Ed.)(2006).EU energy law, Volume IV: EU environmental law. The EU greenhouse gas emissions trading scheme.Leuven, the Netherlands:Claeys & Casteels.
  21. Delbeke, J.(Ed.)(2006).EU energy law, Volume IV: EU environmental law. The EU greenhouse gas emissions trading scheme.Leuven, the Netherlands:Claeys & Casteels.
  22. Demaret, P.,Stewardson, R.(1994).Border tax adjustments under GATT and EC Law and general implications for environmental taxes.Journal of World Trade,28(4),5-65.
  23. Dhar, B.,Das, K.(2009).The European Union's proposed carbon equalization system: Can it be WTO compatible.New Delhi, India:RIS.
  24. Ellerman, A. D.(Ed.),Buchner, B. K.(Ed.),Carraro, C.(Ed.)(2007).Allocation in the European emissions trading scheme: Rights, rents and fairness.Cambridge, UK:Cambridge University Press.
  25. European Union(2009).Directive 2009/29/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2009 amending Directive 2003/87/EC so as to improve and extend the greenhouse gas emission allowance trading scheme of the Community.Official Journal of the European Union,2009(L140),63-87.
  26. European Union(2003).Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 October 2003 establishing a scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading within the Community and amending Council Directive 96/61/EC.Official Journal of the European Union,2003(L275),32-46.
  27. Fischer, C.,Fox, A.(2009).Comparing policies to combat emissions leakage: Border tax adjustments versus rebates.Washington, DC:RFF.
  28. Frankel, J.(2008).Options for addressing the leakage/ competitiveness issue in climate change policy proposals.Conference on Climate Change, Trade and Competitiveness: Is a Collision Inevitable?,Washington, DC:
  29. Frankel, J.(2009).Environmental effects of international trade.Boston, MA:Harvard University.
  30. GATT(1970).GATT Working Party ReportGATT Working Party Report,Geneva:GATT.
  31. Goh, G.(2004).The World Trade Organization, Kyoto and energy tax adjustments at the border.Journal of World Trade,38(3),395-423.
  32. Gueye, K.(2009).Gueye, K. (2009). Scoping paper on climate change mitigation policies and measures in select OECD countries: Trade and Development implications in developing countriesGueye, K. (2009). Scoping paper on climate change mitigation policies and measures in select OECD countries: Trade and Development implications in developing countries,未出版
  33. Hoel, M.(1994).Efficient climate policy in the presence of free riders.Journal of Environmental Economics and Management,27(3),259-274.
  34. Hoel, M.(1996).Should a carbon tax be differentiated across sectors.Journal of Public Economics,59(1),17-32.
  35. Hoerner, A. J.,Muller, F.(1996).,未出版
  36. Holzer, K.(2010).Proposals on carbon-related border adjustments: Prospects for WTO compliance.Carbon and Climate Law Review,2010(1),51-64.
  37. Houser, T.,Bradley, R.,Childs, B.,Werksman, J.,Heilmayr, R.(2008).Leveling the carbon playing field: International competition and U.S. climate policy design.Washington, DC:Peterson Institute for International Economics.
  38. Hufbauer, G. C.,Charnovitz, S.,Kim, J.(2009).Global warming and the world trading system.Washington, DC:Peterson Institute for International Economics.
  39. Ismer, R.,Neuhoff, K.(2007).Border tax adjustment: A feasible way to support stringent emission trading.European Journal of Law and Economics,24(2),137-164.
  40. Kang, S.(2010).Carbon border tax adjustment from WTO point of view.Society of International Economic Law (SIEL), Second Biennial Global Conference,Spain:
  41. Lodefalk, M.,Storey, M.(2005).Climate measures and WTO rules on subsidies.Journal of World Trade,39(1),23-44.
  42. M. Faure(Ed.),M. Peeters(Ed.)(2008).Climate change and European emissions trading: lessons for theory and practice.Cheltenham, UK:Edward Elgar.
  43. Mæstad, O.(1998).On the efficiency of green trade policy.Environmental and Resource Economics,11(1),1-18.
  44. Neuhoff, K.(Ed.),Matthes, F.(Ed.)(2008).The role of auctioning for emissions trading.Cambridge, UK:Climate Strategies.
  45. Potts, J.(2008).The legality of PPMs under the GATT: Challenges and opportunities for sustainable trade policy.Manitoba, Canada:International Institute for Sustainable Development.
  46. Quick, R.(2008)."Border tax adjustments" in the context of emissions trading: Climate protection or "naked" protectionism?.Global Trade and Customs Journal,3(5),163-175.
  47. Reinaud, J.(2009).,London:Chatham House.
  48. Reinaud, J.(2008).Climate policy and carbon leakage: Impacts of the European emissions trading scheme on aluminium.Paris:OECD/IEA..
  49. Sheldon, I.,McCorriston, S.(2011).Climate policy, carbon leakage, and competitiveness: how might border tax adjustments help?.Agricultural & Applied Economics Association's 2011 AAEA & NAREA Joint Annual Meeting,Pittsburg, Pennsylvania:
  50. Veel, P. E.(2009).Carbon tariffs and the WTO: An evaluation of feasible policies.Journal of International Economic Law,12(3),749-800.
  51. Werksman, J.(1999).Greenhouse gas emissions trading and the WTO.Review of European Community and International Environmental Law,8(3),251-264.
  52. WTO/UNEP(2009).Trade and climate change.Geneva:WTO Secretariat.
  53. Zane, S. N.(2011).Leveling the playing field: The international legality of carbon tariffs in the EU.Boston College International and Comparative Law Review,34(1),199-225.
  54. Zhu, Z.,Lee, E.,Kim, S.(2011).A discussion on the legitimacy of carbon tariffs under the WTO.International Proceedings of Economics Development and Research,10,221-225.
  55. 施文真(2012)。能源稅與碳稅之邊境稅調整措施─以GATT/WTO之合致性為主要討論對象。貿易政策論叢,17,157-220。
  56. 施文真(2010)。關稅暨貿易總協定/世界貿易組織之邊境稅調整規範:兼論對能源稅與碳稅設計之啟示。第九屆國際經貿法學發展學術研討會論文集,臺北=Taipei:
  57. 施文真(2008)。由交易單位之法律性質重新檢視排放權交易制度與WTO 之關係。政大法學評論,105,121-215。
  58. 施文真(2009)。關稅暨貿易總協定/世界貿易組織之邊境稅調整規範─兼論對能源稅與碳稅設計之啟示。臺灣科技法律與政策論叢,6(2),1-96。
  59. 許耀明(2007)。氣候變化綱要公約/京都議定書、美歐不同立場和WTO 補貼暨平衡措施協定之互動。中華國際法與超國界法評論,3(1),73-120。
被引用次数
  1. 李玫憲、王啟明(2014)。歐盟氣候治理中的責任分享問題—利益與規範的整合性分析。國家發展研究,13(2),77-114。