歐盟作為規範性權力：以國際刑事法秩序之建立為例

EU as a Normative Power-Examining Its Contribution to International Criminal Justice

10.7015/JEAS.201309_43(3).0002

吳建輝(Chien-Huei Wu)

羅馬規約 ； 國際刑事法院 ； 規範性權力 ； 傳教原則 ； 不移交協定 ； Rome Statute ； International Criminal Court ； normative power ； missionary principle ； Non-Surrender Agreement

歐美研究

43卷3期（2013 / 09 / 01）

537 - 593

繁體中文

本文從歐盟條約所楬櫫之歐盟對外行動所應追求之目標以及應遵循之原則，並藉由歐盟係一規範性權力之角度，討論歐盟在國際刑事法秩序建立過程中所扮演之角色。本文回顧歐盟在此議題權限之取得，以及自前南法庭、盧安達法庭及羅馬規約之批准過程中的歐盟角色，並探討歐盟如何藉由共同立場之整合及藉由單一發聲，確保其國際代表之單一性。本文認為歐盟在國際刑事法秩序之形塑過程中，扮演關鍵性角色。由於刑事法秩序之高度規範與倫理色彩，此貢獻具體體現了歐盟對外行動之目標與原則之實踐，並強化「歐盟作為規範性權力」之角色認同。

In accordance with the objectives and principles of EU external actions as enshrined in the TEU, and from the perspective of ”the EU as a normative power,” this article examines the EU's role in pursuing international criminal justice. This article investigates the evolution of the EU's judicial practices and home affairs, and police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters. This article then traces the EU's contributions to the effective functioning of the ICTY and ICTR, and the universality and integrity of the ICC. It then explores the EU's response to US efforts to conclude non-surrender agreements with third countries. This article concludes that the EU has played a significant role in establishing international criminal justice systems, which underlines the importance of the objectives and principles guiding the EU's external actions and strengthens the EU's normative image.

1. 甘逸驊(2007)。歐盟「柔性強權」身分認同的建構與批判。問題與研究，46(4)，1-25。
   連結：
2. 吳建輝(2013)。歐盟作為全球環境行為者：以其在氣候變化綱要公約之參與為例。歐美研究，43(1)，27-87。
   連結：
3. Deitelhoff, N. (2008). Deliberating CFSP: European foreign policy and the International Criminal Court (RECON Online Working Paper 2008/10). Retrieved June 25, 2013, from http://www.reconproject.eu/main.php/RECON_wp_0810.pdf?fileitem=5456226
4. Antoniadis, A.,Bekou, O.(2007).The European Union and the International Criminal Court: An awkward symbiosis in interesting times.International Criminal Law Review,7(4),621-655.
5. Bull, H.(1982).Civilian power Europe: A contradiction in terms?.Journal of Common Market Studies,21(2),149-170.
6. Cardwell, P. J.(Ed.)(2011).EU external relations law and policy in the post-Lisbon era.The Hague, the Netherlands:TMC Asser Press.
7. Eriksen, E. O.(2006).The EU-A cosmopolitan polity?.Journal of European Public Policy,13(2),252-269.
8. Fairlie, M.(2004).The marriage of common and continental law at the ICTY and its progeny, due process deficit.International Criminal Law Review,4(3),243-319.
9. General Secretariat of the Council(2010).The European Union and the International Criminal Court.Brussels, Belgium:European Union.
10. Jørgensen, K. E.(Ed.)(2009).The European Union and international organizations.London:Routledge.
11. Lerch, M.,Schwellnus, G.(2006).Normative by nature? The role of coherence in justifying the EU's external human rights policy.Journal of European Public Policy,13(2),304-321.
12. Manners, I.(2002).Normative power Europe: A contradiction in terms?.Journal of Common Market Studies,40(2),235-258.
13. Manners, I.(2006).Normative power Europe reconsidered: Beyond the crossroads.Journal of European Public Policy,13(2),182-199.
14. Massari, M.(2005).Do all roads lead to Brussels? Analysis of the different Trajectories of Croatia, Serbia-Montenegro and Bosnia-Herzegovina.Cambridge Review of International Affairs,18(2),259-273.
15. Mayne, R.(Ed.)(1972).Europe tomorrow: Sixteen Europeans look ahead.London:Fontana.
16. Meunier, S.,Nicolaïdis, K.(2006).The European Union as a conflicted trade power.Journal of European Public Policy,13(6),906-925.
17. Peskin, V.,Boduszyński, M. P.(2003).International justice and domestic politics: Post-Tudjman Croatia and the international criminal tribunal for the former Yugoslavia.Europe-Asia Studies,55(7),1117-1142.
18. Ryngaert, C.(Ed.)(2009).The effectiveness of international criminal justice.Antwerp, Belgium:Intersentia.
19. Scheipers, S.,Sicurelli, D.(2008).Empowering Africa: Normative power in EU-Africa relations.Journal of European Public Policy,15(4),607-623.
20. Scheipers, S.,Sicurelli, D.(2007).Normative power Europe: A credible utopia?.Journal of Common Market Studies,45(2),435-457.
21. Schimmelfennig, F.(2004).EU political accession conditionality after the 2004 enlargement: Consistency and effectiveness.Journal of European Public Policy,15(6),918-937.
22. Sjursen, H.(2006).The EU as a "normative" power: How can this be?.Journal of European Public Policy,13(2),235-251.
23. Tan, C. J., Jr.(2003).The proliferation of bilateral non-surrender agreements among non-ratifiers of the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court.American University International Law Review,19(5),1115-1180.
24. van Sliedregt, E.(2012).Individual criminal responsibility in international law.Oxford, UK:Oxford University Press.
25. 洪德欽編(2006)。歐洲聯盟人權保障。臺北=Taipei:中央研究院歐美研究所=Institute of European and American Studies, Academia Sinica。
26. 楊雲驊(2010)。國際刑事法院羅馬規約下檢察官的地位與職權。檢察新論，8，33-48。
27. 鄧衍森(1997)。歐洲共同體對外權能。貿易調查專刊，2，45-61。
28. 蘇宏達編(2011)。歐洲聯盟的歷史發展與理論辯論。臺北=Taipei:國立臺灣大學出版中心=National Taiwan University Press。

1. 陳宏志,何念修(2022)。私法關係下的公共利益與隱私保護：解析運動禁藥管制的行蹤報告制度。中華體育季刊，36(1)，83-92。
2. 賴昀辰(2021)。檢視容克執委會的規範性權力作為：以環境政策為例。政治科學論叢，87，39-91。
3. 吳建輝(2014)。歐盟作為規則產生者：以其在能源憲章公約之參與為例。歐美研究，44(3)，239-304。
4. (2017)。里斯本條約後歐盟逮捕令跨國合作之發展。軍法專刊，63(2)，112-131。
5. (2022)。數位經濟時代之信任服務——論多層次傳銷管理法電子文件規範。政大法學評論，171，147-208。