英國與里斯本條約的批准：自由政府間主義的分析

The UK and the Ratification of the Treaty of Lisbon-A Liberal Intergovernmentalist Analysis

10.7015/JEAS.201406_44(2).0001

黃琛瑜(Chen-Yu Huang)

里斯本條約 ； 自由政府間主義 ； 英國對歐政策 ； Treaty of Lisbon ； Liberal Intergovernmentalism ； UK's European policy

歐美研究

44卷2期（2014 / 06 / 01）

127 - 161

繁體中文

本文以自由政府間主義為理論架構，探討英國批准里斯本條約的歷程。傳統上，相較於歐盟的其他會員國，英國對歐洲統合通常抱持謹慎疑慮的態度。歐盟經過逾半個世紀的發展，在會員國自願的基礎上，已成為區域整合的重要模式之一。里斯本條約的簽訂為歐盟帶來重大變革，象徵二十一世紀初歐洲統合的重要里程碑。本文旨在探討英國通過里斯本條約的過程及其所面臨的挑戰。另一方面，自由政府間主義經過幾十年的發展，成為歐洲統合理論的一項重要理論學派。自由政府間主義著重於歐盟重大條約的協商、簽署與批准過程，為分析英國批准里斯本條約的歷程提供了適切的理論途徑。因此，本文的雙重目的在於分析英國批准里斯本條約的實證個案，並探求自由政府間主義套用英國個案所呈現的理論妥適性。

This paper examines the process of the UK's ratification of the Treaty of Lisbon using a liberal intergovernmentalist approach. Traditionally, in contrast to other member states of the European Union, the UK has often been hesitant to pursue European integration. And yet, over the past half century, the European Union has become a significant model of voluntary regional integration. The ratification of the Treaty of Lisbon, which brought important changes to the European Union, marked a significant milestone for European integration in the early twenty-first century. This paper aims to explore the process and challenges of the UK's ratification of the Treaty of Lisbon by employing a liberal intergovernmentalist analysis. Such an approach has been developed over several decades and become a major theoretical approach to the study of European integration. Liberal intergovernmentalism, which draws special attention to the processes of negotiating, signing, and ratifying the EU's major treaties, provides a suitable theoretical approach to the analysis of the UK's passage of the Treaty of Lisbon. This paper is, therefore, designed with the dual purpose of examining the empirical case study of the UK's passage of the Treaty of Lisbon, and of examining the theoretical validity of liberal intergovernmentalism against empirical studies.

1. 黃琛瑜(2011)。歐洲化與英國中央政府：布萊爾政府個案研究。歐美研究，41(2)，465-495。
   連結：
2. 盧倩儀(1999)。從歐盟移民政策決策過程談自由派政府間主義。問題與研究，38(3)，19-32。
   連結：
3. 盧倩儀(2010)。整合理論與歐盟條約修改之研究—以歐盟憲法條約與里斯本條約為例。政治科學論叢，46，111-158。
   連結：
4. 蘇宏達(2010)。從自由政府間主義解析里斯本條約的發展過程。問題與研究，49(2)，1-38。
   連結：
5. Cameron, D. (2008). HC Deb (2007-08) 477, col. 939. Retrived from http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200708/cmhansrd/cm080618/debtext/80618-0007.htm
6. BBC News. (2007d, October 19). Commons battle looms on EU Treaty. Retrieved from http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/7052180.stm
7. Blair, T. (1997, June 3). Speech by the Priminister, the RT Honourable Tony Blair MP. Speech to the Party of European Socialist Congress in Malmö, Sweden.
8. BBC News. (2008a, June 18). UK parliament approves EU Treaty. Retrieved from http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/politics/7461918.stm
9. Mitrany, D. (1943). A working peace system: An argument for the functional development of international organization. London:The Royal Institute of International Affairs
10. Nasti, C. (2010). Images of the Lisbon Treaty debate in the British press. A corpus-based approach to metaphor analysis. Retrieved from http://www.fedoa.unina.it/8307/
11. BBC News. (2008b, July 17). UK ratifies the EU Lisbon Treaty. Retrieved from http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/politics/7511281.stm
12. Traynor, I., Watt, N., & Gow, D. (2011, December 9). David Cameron blocks EU treaty with veto, casting Britain adrift in Europe. The Guardian. Retrieved from http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/dec/09/david-cameron-blocks-eu-treaty
13. BBC News. (2003, November 23). European constitution: British red lines. Retrieved from http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/politics/3235898.stm
14. Labour Party. (1997). New Labour because Britain deserves better. Retrieved from http://www.labour-party.org.uk/manifestos/1997/1997-labour-manifesto.shtml
15. Miliband, D. (2008). HC Deb (2007-08) 477, col. 963. Retrived from http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200708/cmhansrd/cm080618/debtext/80618-0007.htm
16. BBC News. (2007a, June 18). Blair sets out EU treaty demands. Retrieved from http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/politics/ 6763121.stm
17. BBC News. (2007c, October 18). No more treaty demands, UK warned. Retrieved from http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/politics/7049250.stm
18. Bonse, E., & Thibaut, M. (2007, September 3). London rüttelt an EU-Reform. Handelsblatt. Retrieved from http://www.handelsblatt.com/politik/international/eu-gipfel-london-ruettelt-an-eu-reform/2856016.html
19. BBC News. (2007b, July 9). Brown reminds EU of “red line.” Retrieved from http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/6283040.stm
20. Brown, G. (2007). HC Deb (2006-07) 465, col. 19. Retrived from http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200607/cmhansrd/cm071022/debtext/71022-0003.htm
21. Brown, G. (2008). HC Deb (2007-08) 477, col. 940. Retrived from http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200708/cmhansrd/cm080618/debtext/80618-0003.htm
22. Richard, L. (2008). HC Deb (2007-08) 702, col. 1034. Retrived from http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld200708/ldhansrd/text/80618-0003.htm#080618112000407
23. Bache, I.,George, S.(2006).Politics in the European Union.Oxford, UK:Oxford University Press.
24. Blair, T.(2010).A journey: My political life.London:Random House.
25. Cabinet Office and the Foreign and Commonwealth Office(2007).Global Europe: Meeting the economic and security challenges.London:Author.
26. Carbone, M.(2009).From Paris to Dublin: Domestic politics and the Treaty of Lisbon.Journal of Contemporary European Research,5(1),43-60.
27. Carbone, M.(Ed.)(2010).National politics and European integration: From the Constitution to the Lisbon Treaty.Cheltenham, UK:Edward Elgar.
28. Craig, P.(2010).The Lisbon Treaty: Law, politics, and treaty reform.Oxford, UK:Oxford University Press.
29. Dinan, D.(2008).Governance and institutional developments: Ending the constitutional impasse.Journal of Common Market Studies,46,71-90.
30. Dougan, M.(2008).The Treaty of Lisbon 2007: Wining minds, not hearts.Common Market Law Review,45(3),617-703.
31. Foreign and Commonwealth Office(2007).The Reform Treaty: The British approach to the European Union intergovernmental conference.London:The Stationary Office.
32. Forster, A.(1998).Britain and the negotiation of the Maastricht Treaty: A critique of liberal intergovernmentalism.Journal of Common Market Studies,36(3),347-368.
33. Forster, A.,Blair, A.(2002).The making of Britain's European foreign policy.London:Longman.
34. Frankel, J.(1988).International relations in a changing world.Oxford, UK:Oxford University Press.
35. Griller, S.(Ed.),Ziller, J.(Ed.)(2008).The Lisbon Treaty: EU Constitutionalism without a constitutional treaty?.Wien, Austria:Springer.
36. Haas, E. B.(1958).The uniting of Europe: Political, social and economic forces 1950-1957.London:Stevens and Sons.
37. Hay, C.(Ed.),Menon, A.(Ed.)(2007).European politics.Oxford, UK:Oxford University Press.
38. Hoffman, S.(1966).Obstinate or obsolete? The fate of the nation-state and the case of Western Europe.Daedalus,95(3),862-915.
39. Hoffman, S.(1982).Reflections on the nation-state in Western European today.Journal of Common Market Studies,21(1),21-37.
40. Kassim, H.(2004).The United Kingdom and the future of Europe: Winning the battle, losing the war.Comparative European Politics,2,261-281.
41. Laursen, F.(Ed.)(2012).The making of the EU's Lisbon Treaty: The role of member states.Oxford, UK:Peter Lang.
42. Laursen, F.(Ed.)(2002).The Amsterdam Treaty: National preference formation, bargaining and outcome.Odense, Denmark:Odense University Press.
43. Lindberg, L. N.(1966).Integration as a source of stress on the European Community system.International Organization,20(2),233-265.
44. Lindberg, L. N.(1963).The political dynamics of European economic integration.Stanford, CA:Stanford University Press.
45. Milward, A. S.(1984).The reconstruction of Western Europe 1945-51.London:Routledge.
46. Milward, A. S.(1992).The European rescue of the nation-state.London:Routledge.
47. Mitrany, D.(1975).The functional theory of politics.London:Martin Robertson.
48. Moravcsik, A.(1993).Preferences and power in the European Community: A liberal intergovernmentalist approach.Journal of Common Market Studies,31(4),473-524.
49. Moravcsik, A.(1991).Negotiating the Single European Act: National interests and conventional statecraft in the European Community.International Organization,45(1),19-56.
50. Moravcsik, A.(1998).The choice for Europe: Social purpose & state power from Messina to Maastricht.Ithaca, NY:Cornell University Press.
51. Ridley, F. F.(1988).There is no British constitution: A dangerous case of the emperors' clothes.Parliamentary Affairs,41(3),340-361.
52. Smith, J.(2005).A missed opportunity? New Labour's European policy 1997-2005.International Affairs,81(4),703-721.
53. Wiener, A.(Ed.),Diez, T.(Ed.)(2009).European integration theory.Oxford, UK:Oxford University Press.
54. Yin, R. K.(2009).Case study research: Design and methods.London:Sage.
55. 趙晨 (2008)。自由政府間主義的生命力：評莫勞夫奇克的《歐洲的選擇》。歐洲研究，2008(2)，136-152。

1. 陳蔚芳(2020)。德國與歐盟共同防務整合：自由政府間主義的分析。政治科學論叢，85，45-90。
2. 甘逸驊(2016)。里斯本條約架構下的歐盟安全政策合作之嘗試。東吳政治學報，34(2)，61-107。
3. 張孟仁(2018)。中國大陸「一帶一路」倡議之效應與歐盟因應之道。國際關係學報，46，63-101。