歐盟國際私法之發展與其對國際法秩序之影響：以歐盟於盧加諾公約與海牙國際私法會議之參與為例

Development of European Private International Law and Its Influence on the International Legal Order-Examples of EU Participation in the Lugano Convention and the Hague Conference on Private International Law

10.7015/JEAS.201409_44(3).0003

許耀明(Yao-Ming Hsu)

歐盟國際私法 ； 里斯本條約 ； 盧加諾公約 ； 海牙國際私法會議 ； 內外權限對應原則 ； European Private International Law ； Lisbon Treaty ； Lugano Convention ； Hague Conference on Private International Law (HCCH) ； Principle of ＂foro internoforo externo＂

歐美研究

44卷3期（2014 / 09 / 01）

359 - 414

繁體中文

歐盟五十年來之發展，透過經濟整合，逐步邁向其他整合，其中關於民事司法合作部分，已經有長足之進展。從歐盟成員國間之國際條約，到透過歐盟條約與歐盟運作條約授權所為之規則與指令，歐盟國際私法已經在民商事管轄權與其判決承認與執行、契約與非契約準據法，以及身分法上相關管轄權與準據法整合，為全世界提供了良善之整合示範。此等整合成果，對於國際私法之發展將有何實際影響？本文透過歐盟與鄰近國家之盧加諾公約以及歐盟在海牙國際私法會議之參與，說明前述歐盟國際私法之整合成果，已然透過國際公約逐步影響其他國際間之國際私法秩序。而在歐盟法制上，此等整合與對外締約權限之問題，亦有其歐盟制度法上之意義。

Economic integration and cooperation in the European Union has advanced remarkably since the 1950s, especially in the domain of civil judicial matters. From international treaties to the regulations and directives authorized by Treaty of the European Union and Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, European Private International Law has developed significantly in the domains of civil and commercial jurisdiction, in the mutual recognition of judgments and mutual enforcement, in the clarification of the applicable law for contractual and non-contractual obligations, and in the clarification of jurisdiction and harmonization of applicable law in family matters. These developments demonstrate something of the possibilities of harmonization in private international law globally. How have these European developments influenced other countries? This article attempts to provide an answer by considering the examples of the Lugano Convention between the European Union and other European countries, and the participation of the European Union in the Hague Conference on Private International Law. The principles and regulations of European Private International Law have deeply influenced other counties, and contested issues of competence between the European Union and its Members States have attracted research into the meaning of European Institutional Law.

1. 許耀明(2006)。「家」的解構與重構：從法國、德國、比利時與歐盟層次新近法制談「異性婚姻」外之其他共同生活關係。東海大學法學研究，25，75-119。
   連結：
2. CVRIA. (2011). Brussels and Lugano Conventions Regulation 44/2001: Table of cases. Retrieved from http://curia.europa.eu/common/recdoc/convention/en/tableau/2011.htm
3. International Court of Justice. (2011). Jurisdiction and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters (Belgium v. Switzerland). Retrieved from http://www.icj-cij.org/docket/files/145/ 16456.pdf
4. Europa. (2014). Judicial cooperation in civil matters. Retrieved from http://europa.eu/legislation_summaries/justice_freedom_security/judicial_cooperation_in_civil_matters/index_en.htm
5. European Commission. (2011). Proposal for a Council Regulation on jurisdiction, applicable law and the recognition and enforcement of decisions in matters of matrimonial property regimes (COM [2011] 126/final). Retrieved from http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2011:0126:FIN:en:PDF
6. International Court of Justice. (2009). Application, jurisdiction and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters (Belgium v. Switzerland). Retrieved from http://www.icj-cij.org/docket/files/145/15763.pdf
7. HCCH. (2005). Note drawn up by the Secretary General of the Hague Conference on private international law—Examination by the European Community of existing Hague conventions. Retrieved from http://www.hcch.net/upload/wop/genaff_note-ec.pdf
8. HCCH. (2007). Protocol on the law applicable to maintenance obligations. Retrieved from http://www.hcch.net/upload/conventions/txt39en.pdf
9. European Commission. (2006). Green paper on improving the efficiency of the enforcement of judgments in the European Union: The attachment of bank accounts (COM [2006] 618/final). Retrieved from http://europa.eu/legislation_summaries/justice_freedom_security/judicial_cooperation_in_civil_matters/l16021_en.htm
10. HCCH. (1951-2014). Conventions listing. http://www.hcch.net/ index_en.php?act=conventions.listing
11. European Commission. (2011). Proposal for a Council Regulation on jurisdiction, applicable law and the recognition and enforcement of decisions regarding the property consequences of registered partnerships (COM [2011] 127/final). Retrieved from http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2011:0127:FIN:en:PDF
12. European Commission. (2013). Civil Justice: Civil status documents. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/justice/civil/family-matters/civil-status/index_en.htm
13. HCCH. (2014). Home. Retrieved from http://www.hcch.net/index_en.php
14. HCCH. (2005). Convention of 30 June 2005 on Choice of Court Agreements. Retrieved from http://www.hcch.net/index_en.php?act=conventions.text&cid=98
15. Europa. (2009). The Hague Programme: 10 priorities for the next five years. Retrieved from http://europa.eu/legislation_summaries/human_rights/fundamental_rights_within_european_union/l16002_en.htm
16. HCCH. (1995). Statute of the Hague Conference on private international law. Retrieved from http://www.hcch.net/upload/conventions/txt01en.pdf
17. Ancel, B.(Ed.),Audit, B.(Ed.)(2005).Le droit international privé: Esprit et méthodes-Mélanges en l'honneur de Paul Lagarde.Paris:Dalloz.
18. Ancel, B.,Audit, B.,Beigner, B.,Bernard, A.,Bonneau, T.,Brenner, C.(2006).L'Union européenne, la démocratie et l'État de droit: Lettre ouverte au président de la République.La Semaine Jurid-ique Edition Générale,50,act. 586.
19. Ancel, J.-P.(Ed.),Basedow, J.(Ed.)(2008).Vers de nouveaux équilibres entre ordres juridiques-Liber amicorum Hélène Gaudemet-Tallon.Paris:Dalloz.
20. Badiali, G.(1986).Le droit international privé des Communautés européennes.Recueil des Cours de l'Académie du Droit International,191,9-182.
21. Basedow, J.(2000).The communitarisation of the conflict of laws under the Treaty of Amsterdam.Common Market Law Review,37,687-708.
22. Bogdan, M.(2006).Concise introduction to EU private international law.Amsterdam:Europa Law.
23. Borrás, A.(2005).Le droit international privé communautaire: réalités, problèmes et perspectives d'avenir.Recueil des Cours de l'Académie du Droit International,317,313-536.
24. Brousse, I. B.(2010).Le Traité de Lisbonne et le droit international privé.Journal du Droit International,137,3-34.
25. Burgorgue-larsen, L.(2006).A propos de la notion de compétence partagée-Du particularisme de l'analyse en droit communautaire.Revue Générale du Droit International Public,110(2),373-390.
26. Chalmers, D.,Davies, G.,Monti, G.(2010).European Union Law: Cases and materials.Cambridge, UK:Cambridge University Press.
27. Craig, P.,de Búrca, G.(2008).EU Law: Text, cases and materials.Oxford, UK:Oxford University Press.
28. de Schutter, O.(Ed.),Nihoul, P.(Ed.)(2004).Une constitution pour l'Europe-Réflexions sur les transformations du droit de l'Union européenne.Bruxelles, Belgium:Lacier.
29. Dickinson, A.(2008).The Rome II Regulation: A commentary.Oxford, UK:Oxford University Press.
30. Dutta, A.(2009).Succession and wills in the conflict of laws on the eve of Europeanization.Rabels Zeitschrift für ausländisches und internationals Privatrecht,73(3),547-606.
31. Fallon, M.(Ed.),Lagarde, P.(Ed.),Poillot- Peruzzetto, S.(Ed.)(2009).La matière civile et commerciale, socle d'un code européen de droit international privé?.Paris:Dalloz.
32. Faure, M.(Ed.),van der Walt, A.(Ed.)(2010).Globalization and private law: The way forward.Cheltenham, UK:Edward Elgar.
33. Fiorini, A.(2008).Rome III-Choice of law in divorce: Is the Europeanization of family law going too far?.International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family,22(2),178-205.
34. Fiorini, A.(2010).Harmonizing the law applicable to divorce and legal separation-Enhanced cooperation as the way forward?.International & Comparative Law Quarterly,59(4),1143-1158.
35. Fiorini, A.(2008).The evolution of European private international law.International & Comparative Law Quarterly,57(4),969-984.
36. Francq, S.(2009).Le règlement "Rome I" sur la loi applicable aux obligations contractuelles-De Quelques Changements.Journal du Droit International,2009(1),41-69.
37. Fuchs, A.(Ed.),Muir-Watt, H.(Ed.),Pataut, E.(Ed.)(2004).Les conflits de lois et le système juridique communautaire.Paris:Dalloz.
38. Gaudemet-Tallon, H.(2004).Compétence et exécution des jugements en Europe.Paris:LGDJ.
39. Harris, J.(2009).Mandatory rules and public policy under the Rome I Regulation.Rome I Regulation: The law applicable to contractual obligations in Europe,Munich, Germany:
40. Heiss, H.(2009).Party Autonomy.Rome I Regulation: The law applicable to contractual obligations in Europe,Munich, Germany:
41. Hess, B.,Pfeiffer, T.,Schlosser, P.(2009).The Brussels I Regulation (EC) No. 44/2001-The Heidelberg report on the application of regulation Brussels I.Munich, Germany:C. H. Beck.
42. Heuzé, V.(2008).D'Amsterdam à Lisbonne, l'Etat de droit à l'épreuve des compétences communautaires en matière de conflits de lois.La Semaine Juridique Edition Générale,30,I 116.
43. Heuzé, V.(2007).L'honneur des professeurs de droit-Explication d'une lettre ouverte sur l'Union européenne, la démocratie et l'État de droit.La Semaine Juridique Edition Générale,10,I 116.
44. Hsu, Y.-M.(2013).Conflict of laws in matters concerning matrimonial property-Perspectives from European Union's Rome IV regulation proposal, Chinese and Taiwanese new code of private international law.Journal of Marmara Law Faculty,19(3),259-276.
45. Idot, L.(2011).La divorce international, première utilisation du mécanisme des coopérations renforcées.Europe,2
46. Kohler, C.(1999).Interrogations sur les sources du droit international privé Européen après le traité d'Amsterdam.Revue Critique de Droit International Privé,88(1),3-30.
47. Kuipers, J.-J.(2009).Party Autonomy in the Brussels I Regulation and Rome I Regulation and the European Court of Justice.German Law Journal,10(11),1505-1525.
48. Lamont, R.(2009).Evaluating European values-The EU's approach to European private international law.Journal of Private International Law,5(2),371-381.
49. Lardeux, G.(2008).La révision du règlement Bruxelles II bis-Perspectives communautaires sur les désunions internationales.Le Dalloz,12(7329),795-801.
50. Leroyer, A.-M.(Ed.),Jeuland, E.(Ed.)(2004).Quelle cohérence pour l'espace judiciaire européen?.Paris:LGDJ.
51. Magnus, U.(2009).Article 4 Rome I Regulation: The applicable law in the absence of choice.Rome I Regulation-The law applicable to contractual obligations to Europe,Munich, Germany:
52. Möstl, M.(2010).Preconditions and limits of mutual recognition.Common Market Law Review,47(2),405-436.
53. Pontier, J. A.,Burg, E.(2004).EU principles on jurisdiction and recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters.Hague, the Netherlands:T.M.C. Asser Press.
54. Salord, M.(2011).L'Europe divorce! L'adoption d'une coopération renforcée partant sur la loi applicable au divorce.Actualité Juridique Famille,2011(2),97-101.
55. Šarčević, P.(Ed.),Bonomi, A.(Ed.),Volken, P.(Ed.)(2009).Yearbook of Private International Law.Munich, Germany:Selllier European Law.
56. Sarcevic, P.(Ed.),Volken, P.(Ed.)(2003).Yearbook of Private International Law.Munich, Germany:Selllier European Law.
57. Šarčević, P.(Ed.),Volken, P.(Ed.)(2002).Yearbook of Private International Law.Munich, Germany:Selllier European Law.
58. Šarčević, P.(Ed.),Volken, P.(Ed.),Bonomi, A.(Ed.)(2007).Yearbook of Private International Law.Munich, Germany:Selllier European Law.
59. Šarčević, P.,Volken, P.(2004).Yearbook of Private International Law.Munich, Germany:Selllier European Law.
60. Schulz, A.(2007).The accession of the European Community to the Hague Conference on private international law.International & Comparative Law Quarterly,56(4),939-949.
61. Sieberson, S. C.(2008).Dividing lines between the European Union and its member states: The impact of the Treaty of Lisbon.Hague, the Netherlands:T.M.C. Asser Press.
62. Stone, P.(2006).EU private international law: Harmonization of laws.Cheltenham, UK:Edward Elgar.
63. Twigg-Flesner, C.(Ed.)(2010).The Cambridge companion to the European Union private law.Cambridge, UK:Cambridge University Press.
64. Viangalli, F.(2004).La théorie des conflits de lois et le droit communautaire.Aix-en-provence, France:Presses Universitaires d'Aix-Marseille.
65. Wilderspin, M.,Rouchaud-Joët, A.-M.(2004).La compétence externe de la Communauté européenne en droit international privé.Revue Critique de Droit International Privé,93(1),1-48.
66. 王志文(2009)。羅馬第二規則評析─非契約之債法律適用之統一化。中華國際法與超國界法評論，5(2)，201-263。
67. 張台麟(2008)。歐盟高峰會通過「里斯本條約」之背景與意涵。歐盟統合與里斯本條約，臺北=Taipei:
68. 許耀明(2009)。國際私法新議題與歐盟國際私法。臺北=Taipei:元照=Angle。
69. 許耀明(2012)。兩岸新國際私法典中關於離婚準據法之規定與省思─兼論歐盟羅馬規則Ⅲ。月旦民商法雜誌，35，89-109。
70. 許耀明(2007)。歐盟國際私法最新發展─簡評 2007 歐盟關於非契約債務準據法 864/2007 號規則 （羅馬規則 II）。台灣國際法季刊，4(4)，7-47。
71. 許耀明(2014)。繼承準據法：歐盟 650/2012 號規則對於兩岸國際私法之啟示。月旦財經法雜誌，34，167-187。
72. 許耀明(2004)。歐盟統一國際私法之發展：以「管轄權規則與契約準據法公約」為例。月旦法學雜誌，110，93-110。
73. 許耀明(2008)。2005 海牙合意管轄公約述評。玄奘法律學報，10，37-74。
74. 陳自強(2010)。歐洲契約法發展之最新動向。月旦法學雜誌，182，117-143。

1. 宋俊賢(2017)。英國脫歐對於其在布魯塞爾I民商事管轄與判決執行法體系的影響。臺灣國際法季刊，14(1)，47-68。
2. (2017)。國際公法與國際私法之交錯適用─私法公法化與公法私法化。月旦法學雜誌，269，23-37。
3. (2020)。國際私法的回顧與展望─2010年涉外民事法律適用法修正後之實證觀察。月旦法學雜誌，300，205-212。
4. (2022)。國際民事訴訟法上契約弱勢當事人之保護管轄。興大法學，31，207-271。