歐洲治理危機：「利益」與「認同」的落差

The EU Governance Crisis: Gap between Interest and Identity in the EU

10.7015/JEAS.202106_51(2).0002

卓忠宏(Chung-Hung Cho)

歐盟治理 ； 新功能主義 ； 新新功能主義 ； 新制度主義 ； 實用建構主義 ； EU governance ； neo-functionalism ； neo neo-functionalism ； new institution ； pragmatic constructivism

歐美研究

51卷2期（2021 / 06 / 01）

219 - 266

繁體中文

本文以2009年至2019年這十年來歐洲統合發展的危機，試圖提供一個理論解釋的基礎。首先剖析統合理論新功能主義，及其引用新制度主義與建構主義的概念對新功能理論的修正與詮釋。其次以歐洲債務危機、移民難民處理、族群分離運動三個事件做為案例檢驗，梳理出歐盟治理危機的三項落差：承諾與執行的落差、政治菁英與公眾意見的落差、歐洲認同與國家認同的落差；第三，就修正後新功能主義與案例結合，分析造成歐盟治理危機的原因。最後，就新功能主義修正對利益分配、認同分歧等現象總結意見。

This paper attempts to provide a theoretical basis for the EU crisis on the development of integration in the past decade (2009 to 2019). First, it analyzes neo-functionalist integration theory, and the revision and amendment thereof, with reference to the concepts of new institutionalism and constructivism. Second, three main gaps are apparent in multiple EU crises-between commitment and implementation, between elite and public opinion, and between a European and national identities. Third, arguments are offered on the factors which caused the EU crisis on the basis of the theory of amended neo-functionalism. The final part concludes the EU crisis had its origins in the divergence between interest distribution and identification.

1. 曾怡仁 (2004)。〈區域主義研究與國際關係理論〉，《全球政治評論》，8: 25-47。(Dzeng, Y.-R. [2004]. The relationship between regionalism and international relations theories. Review of Global Politics, 8: 25-47.) https://doi.org/10.29899/JRM.200410.0002
   連結：
2. 黃偉峰 (2001)。〈歐盟整合模式與兩岸主權爭議之解析〉，《歐美研究》，31, 1: 129-173。(Huang, W.-F. [2001]. European inte- gration models and cross-strait sovereignty disputes. EurAmerica, 31, 1: 129-173.) https://doi.org/10.7015/JEAS.200103.0129
   連結：
3. 衛民 (2016)。〈重探哈斯「新功能主義」及其在歐洲統合演進上的意涵〉，《問題與研究》，55, 1: 69-90。(Wei, M. [2016]. The re-exploration of the evolution of Hass’s new functionalism and European integration. Wenti Yu Yanjiu, 55, 1: 69-90.) https://doi.org/10.30390/ISC.201603_55(1).0003
   連結：
4. 盧倩儀 (2011b)。〈菁英－公民的『歐洲化』斷層〉，《問題與研究》，50, 2: 35-73。(Lu, C.-Y. [2011b]. The gap of Europeanization between elites and citizens. Wenti Yu Yanjiu, 50, 2: 35-73.) https://doi.org/10.30390/ISC.201106_50(2).0002
   連結：
5. 賴昀辰 (2018)。〈歐洲整合理論的新發展：後功能主義對傳統整合理論之挑戰〉，《政治科學論叢》，78: 137-177。(Lai, Y.-C. [2018]. Recent developments in integration theory: Challenges of Post-Functionalism to traditional integration theories. Taiwanese Journal of Political Science, 78: 137-178.) https://doi.org/10.6166/TJPS.201812_(78).0005
   連結：
6. 諶悠文、尹德瀚 (2015年1月23日)。〈歐洲量化寬鬆規模逾1.1兆歐元〉，《中國時報》。https://www.chinatimes.com/ (Gian, Y.-W., & Yi, D.-H. [2015, January 23]. The scale of European QE exceeds 1.1 trillion euros. Chinatimes.)
   連結：
7. 藍玉春 (2009)。〈從建構主義探討形塑中的歐洲認同〉，《全球政治評論》，25: 81-116。(Lan, Y.-C. [2009]. Analysis on the emerging European identity: A constructivist approach. Review of Global Politics, 25: 81-116.) https://doi.org/10.29899/JRM. 200901.0003
   連結：
8. Barth, F. (Ed.). (1969). Ethnic groups and boundaries: The social organization of cultural difference. Waveland Press.
   連結：
9. Börzel, T. A. (2005). Mind the gap! European integration between level and scope. Journal of European Public Policy, 12, 2: 217-236. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501760500043860
   連結：
10. Börzel, T. A. (2016). From EU governance of crisis to crisis of EU governance: Regulatory failure, redistributive conflict, and eurosceptic publics. Journal of Common Market Studies, 54: 8-31. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12431
    連結：
11. Brubaker, R. (2009). Ethnicity, race, and nationalism. Annual Review of Sociology, 35: 21-42. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-070308-115916
    連結：
12. Davis Cross, M. K. (2012). Identity politics and European integration. Comparative Politics, 44, 2: 229-246. https://doi.org/10.5129/ 001041512798838012
    連結：
13. de Búrca, G. (2005). Rethinking law in neofunctionalist theory. Journal of European Public Policy, 12, 2: 310-326. https://doi.org/ 10.1080/13501760500044082
    連結：
14. Farrell, H., & Héritier, A. (2005). A rationalist-institutionalist explanation of endogenous regional integration. Journal of European Public Policy, 12, 2: 273-290. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501760 500044017
    連結：
15. Hall, P. A., & Taylor, R. C. R. (1996). Political science and the three new institutionalisms. Political Studies, 44, 5: 936-957. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.1996.tb00343.x
    連結：
16. Hooghe, L. & Marks, G. (2006). The neofunctionalists were (almost) right: Politicization and European integration. In C. Crouch & W. Streeck (Eds.), The diversity of democracy: Corporatism, social order and political conflict (pp. 205-222). Edward Elgar. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781847202895.00017
    連結：
17. Hooghe, L., & Marks, G. (2009). A postfunctionalist theory of European integration: From permissive consensus to constraining dissensus. British Journal of Political Science, 39, 1: 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123408000409
    連結：
18. Hooghe, L., Marks, G., & Wilson, C. J. (2002). Does left/right structure party positions on European integration? Comparative Political Studies, 35, 8: 965-989. https://doi.org/10.1177/001041402236310
    連結：
19. Krasner, S. D. (1984). Approaches to the state: Alternative conceptions and historical dynamics. Comparative Politics, 16, 2: 223-246. https://doi.org/10.2307/421608
    連結：
20. Mattli, W. (2005). Ernst Haas’s evolving thinking on comparative regional integration: Of virtues and infelicities. Journal of European Public Policy, 12, 2: 327-348. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501760500044157
    連結：
21. Moravcsik, A. (1993). Preferences and power in the European community: A liberal intergovernmentalist approach. Journal of Common Market Studies, 31, 4: 473-524. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5965.1993.tb00477.x
    連結：
22. Moravcsik, A. (2005). The European constitutional compromise and the neofunctionalist legacy. Journal of European Public Policy, 12, 2: 349-386. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501760500044215
    連結：
23. Pierson, P. (2000). Increasing returns, path dependence, and the study of politics. American Political Science Review, 94, 2: 251-267. https://doi.org/10.2307/2586011
    連結：
24. Risse, T. (2005). Neofuntionalism, European identity and the puzzles of European integration. Journal of European Public Policy, 12, 2: 291-309. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501760500044033
    連結：
25. Rosamond, B. (2005). The uniting of Europe and the foundation of EU studies: Revisiting the neofunctionalism of Ernst B. Haas. Journal of European Public Policy, 12, 2: 237-254. http://doi.org/ 10.1080/13501760500043928
    連結：
26. Schmitter, P. C. (1970). A revised theory of regional integration. International Organization, 24, 4: 836-868. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300017549
    連結：
27. Schmitter, P. C. (2000). Federalism and the Euro-polity. Journal of Democracy, 11, 1: 40-47. http://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2000.0025
    連結：
28. Schmitter, P. C. (2005). Ernst B. Haas and the legacy of neofunctionalism. Journal of European Public Policy, 12, 2: 255-272. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501760500043951
    連結：
29. Statham, P., & Trenz, H. (2015). Understanding the mechanisms of EU politicization: Lessons from the Eurozone crisis. Comparative Euro pean Politics, 13, 3: 287-306. https://doi.org/10.1057/cep.2013.30
    連結：
30. 朱景鵬 (編) (2013)。《歐洲聯盟的公共治理：政策與案例分析》。臺大出版中心。(Chu, C.-P. [Ed.]. [2013]. Public governance in the EU. National Taiwan University Press.)
31. 沈旭暉 (2017年5月15日)。〈法國大選的全球啟示：當「全球派vs本土派」取代「左vs右」〉，《信報財經新聞》。https://www1.hkej.com/dailynews/commentary/article/1563488/ (Shen, S.-H. [2017, May 15]. The global revelation of the French election: When the “global vs. local” replaced “left vs. right.” Hong Kong Economic Journal.)
32. 卓忠宏 (2016)。〈移民與安全：歐盟移民政策分析〉，《全球政治評論》，56: 47-73。(Cho, C.-H. [2016]. Immigration and security: An analysis of the EU’s immigration policies. Review of Global Politics, 56: 47-73.)
33. 卓忠宏 (2017)。〈多元文化主義與族群認同：西班牙案例研究〉，洪泉湖 (編)，《當代歐洲民族運動：從蘇格蘭獨立公投到克里米亞危機》，頁157-180。聯經。(Cho, C.-H. [2017]. Multiculturalism and ethnic identity: The case of Spain. In C.-H. Hung (Ed.), Modern European national movements: From Scottish independent referendum to the Crimea crises [pp. 157-180]. Linking.)
34. 卓忠宏 (2020)。〈論英國脫歐公投後歐洲的「合」與「分」：直布羅陀與加泰隆尼亞兩案例研究〉，李貴英、吳志成 (編)，《英國脫歐與歐洲轉型》，頁63-80。臺大出版中心。(Cho, C.-H. [2020]. “Integration” and “separatism” after the Brexit: Cases study of Gibraltar and Catalonia. In C. Li & Z.-C. Wu [Eds.], Brexit and the transformation of Europe [pp. 63-80]. National Taiwan University Press.)
35. 施正鋒 (2004)。《台灣客家族群政治與政策》。翰蘆。(Shih, C.-F. [2004]. Taiwan Hakka ethic: Politics and policy. Hanlu.)
36. 郎偉芳 (2011)。《歐洲主權債務危機分析：概述、因應措施及影響》。https://ws.ndc.gov.tw/Download.ashx?u=LzAwMS9hZG1pbmlz dHJhdG9yLzEwL3JlbGZpbGUvNTg2OC83NTQ3LzAwMTY5M TFfNi5wZGY%3D&n=MDQt5q2Q5rSy5Li75qyK5YK15YuZ5Y2x5qmf5YiG5p6Q77ya5qaC6L%2Bw44CB5Zug5oeJ5o6q5pa95Y%2BK5b2x6Z%2B%2FLnBkZg%3D%3D&icon=..pdf (Lang, W.-F. [2011]. Analysis of European sovereign debt crisis: Overview, measures and impact.)
37. 彭德明 (2005)。〈東亞共同通貨區可行性初探—兼論東亞地區的經濟與金融合作〉，《中央銀行季刊》，27, 4: 55-82。(Pong, D.-M. [2005]. The possibility of common currency area in East Asia. Central Bank Journal, 27, 4: 55-82.)
38. 黃榮源 (2013)。〈歐盟公共治理體系的建構與轉型〉，朱景鵬 (編)，《歐洲聯盟的公共治理-政策與案例分析》，頁3-60。臺大出版中心。(Huang, R.-Y. [2013]. The formation and transformation of EU’s public governance system. In C.-P. Chu [Ed.], Public governance in the EU [pp. 3-60]. National Taiwan University Press.)
39. 鄭端耀 (2001)。〈國際關係「社會建構主義理論」評析〉，《美歐季刊》，15, 2: 199-229。(Cheng, T.-Y. [2001]. An analysis of social constructivism in international relations. America & Europe Querterly, 15, 2: 199-229.)
40. 盧倩儀 (2011a)。〈整合理論與歐盟條約修改之研究——以歐盟憲法條約爲例 (2000-2005)〉，蘇宏達 (編)，《歐洲聯盟的歷史發展與理論辯論》，頁205-271。臺大出版中心。(Lu, C.-Y. [2011a]. Integration theory and treaty reform in the EU: The cases of crafting the constitutional treaty and the treaty of Lisbon [pp. 205-271]. In H.-D. Su [Ed.], The European Union and integra-tion theory since 1950. National Taiwan University Press.)
41. 蘇宏達 (2001)。〈以「憲政主權建造」概念解釋歐洲統合之發展〉，《歐美研究》，31, 4: 629-687。(Su, H.-D. [2001]. The European integration movement: A constitutional sovereignty building process. EurAmerica, 31, 4: 629-687.)
42. 蘇宏達 (編) (2011)。《歐洲聯盟的歷史發展與理論辯論》。臺大出版中心。(Su, H.-D. [Ed.]. [2011]. The European Union and integration theory since 1950. National Taiwan University Press.)
43. Barbière, C. (2015, September 10). Juncker defies EU countries with distribution plan for 160,000 refugees. EURACTIV. http://www. euractiv.com/
44. Bercetche, J. (2018, March 15). Italy elections: Here’s what the next government could look like. https://www.cnbc.com/2018/03/15/Italy-elections-heres-what-the-next-government-could-look-like.html
45. Ciaglia, S. C., Fuest, C., & Heinemann, F. (2018). What a feeling?! How to promote ‘European identity.’ https://www.econpol.eu/
46. Erlanger, S., & Bennhold, K. (2018, June 26). EU reaches deal on migration at summit, but details sketchy. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/Europe and right-wing nationalism: A country-by-country guide. (2019, November 13). BBC News. https://www.bbc.com/
47. European Council. (2015). Special meeting of the European Council, 23 April 2015. http://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/
48. European Parliament. (2012). Table on the ratification process of amendment of art.136 TFEU, ESM Treaty and Fiscal Compact. http://www.europarl.europa.eu/webnp/webdav/site/myjahiasite/ users/fboschi/public/art.%20136%20ESM%20fiscal%20compact %20ratprocess.pdf
49. Ferreira, M. (2010). Risk politicization strategies in EU migration and asylum policies. Journal of Global Analysis, 1, 2: 153-184.
50. Haas, E. B. (1958). The uniting of Europe: Political, social, and economic forces, 1950-1957. Standford University Press.
51. Haas, E. B. (1964). Beyond the nation-state: Functionalism and international organization. Stanford University Press.
52. Haas, E. B. (2004). The uniting of Europe: Political, social and economic forces, 1950-1957 (3rd ed.). University of Notre Dame Press.
53. Hettne, B. (1999). Globalization and new regionalism: The second great transformation. In B. Hettne, A. Inotai, & O. Sunkel (Eds.), Globalization and new regionalism (pp. 1-24). St Martin’s Press.
54. Hoffmann, S. (1966). Obstinate or obsolete? The fate of the nation-state and the case of western Europe. Daedalus, 95, 3: 862-915.
55. Hooghe, L., & Marks, G. (2001). Multi-level governance and European integration. Rowman & Littlefield.
56. Hurrell, A. (1995). Regionalism in theoretical perspective. In L. Fawcett & A. Hurrell (Eds.), Regionalism in world politics: Regional organization and international order (pp. 37-73). Oxford University Press.
57. Jesse, N. G., & Williams, K. P. (2005). Identity and institutions: Conflict reduction in divided societies. State University of New York Press.
58. Keohane, R. O., & Hoffmann, S. (Eds.). (1991). The new European community: Decisionmaking and institutional change. Westview Press.
59. Lindberg, L. N. (1963). The political dynamics of European economic integration. Stanford University Press.
60. Lindberg, L. N., & Scheingold, S. A. (1970). Europe’s would-be polity: Patterns of change in the European Community. Prentice-Hall.
61. Mckay, D. (1999). Federalism and European Union: A political economy perspective. Oxford University Press.
62. Mitrany, D. (1943). A working peace system: An argument for the functional development of international organization. Oxford University Press.
63. Mitrany, D. (1975). The functional theory of politics. London School of Economics and Political Science.
64. Mutimer, D. (1994). Theories of political integration. In H. J. Michelmann & P. Soldatos (Eds.), European integration: Theories and approaches (pp. 15-42). University Press of America.
65. Randow, J. (2017, December 22). When will the ECB pull its trillions from the markets? Bloomberg. https://www.bloomberg.com/graphics/2017-ecb-monetary-stimulus-exit-tracker/
66. Regan, A. (2013, November 18). The ‘one size fits all’ approach risks intensifying Europe’s north-south divide. http://pubman.mpdl. mpg.de/pubman/item/escidoc:1877675:2/component/escidoc:877673/mpifg_on13_1911.pdf
67. Schmitter, P. C. (2004). Neo-neofuntionalism. In A. Winer & T. Diez (Eds.), European integration theory (pp. 45-74). Oxford University Press.
68. Wallace, H. (1996). Politics and policy in the EU: The challenge of the governance. In H. Wallace & W. Wallace (Eds.), Policy-making in the European Union (3rd ed., pp. 3-36). Oxford University Press.
69. Wolf, M. (2012, February 15). Much too much ado about Greece. Financial Times. http://www.ft.com/