题名

歐盟決策系統中遊說活動結構、程序及影響力之研析

并列篇名

Lobbying Activities in the EU Decision-Making Process: Structure, Process and Influence

DOI

10.7015/JEAS.202106_51(2).0003

作者

朱景鵬(Chin-Peng Chu)

关键词

歐盟決策 ; 遊說理論 ; 多層級治理 ; 透明化註冊 ; EU decision-making ; lobbying theory ; multi-level governance ; code of conduct ; transparency register

期刊名称

歐美研究

卷期/出版年月

51卷2期(2021 / 06 / 01)

页次

267 - 310

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

歐盟係一個具有民主傳統的組織,不僅具有獨立的法律人格,其獨特(sui generis)的法律秩序使得其民主性格不僅來自於會員國的傳統,民主決策的政治體系也有別於一般的國際組織。遊說即是一項在歐盟立法過程中,是否具備民主、透明與課責精神的指標。本文旨在以文獻及內容分析法探析歐盟三個主要決策體系執委會、歐洲議會,及部長理事會的多層級治理結構下,遊說活動的影響因素。研究議題包括:一、歐盟遊說法制健全化之進程、問題及遊說理論;二、歐盟多層級治理結構決策體系,及遊說行為在決策體系中的活動程序、形式與規範;三、進行遊說活動行為相關實務經驗統計之分析。研究發現歐盟的遊說活動超國家制度與國家利益兼容的雙重設計之影響甚大,部長理事會的決策模式與政府間合作型態,仍是遊說活動全面透明化的一道有形障礙。

英文摘要

The European Union is an organization with a democratic tradition, not only with an independent legal personality, but also with a sui generis legal order that makes its democratic character which derived from the traditions of the Member States on the one hand and with a political system of democratic decision-making that is different from the usual international organization on the other hand. Lobbying is an indicator of democracy, transparency and accountability in the EU legislative process. The aim of this paper is to use a literature and content analysis approach to explore the influencing factors of lobbying under the multi-level governance structure of the Commission, the European Parliament, and the Council of Ministers, the three main decision-making bodies in the EU. The research topics include: 1) The process, problems and theories of lobbying in the EU; 2) The decision-making system of the EU multi-level governance structure, and the procedures, forms and norms of lobbying activities in the decision-making system; 3) The analysis of practical experience related to lobbying activities. This study found that lobbying in the EU is heavily influenced by the dual design of a supranational system compatible with national interests, and that the decision-making model of the Council of Ministers and the intergovernmental cooperation model remain a tangible barrier to full transparency in lobbying.

主题分类 人文學 > 人文學綜合
社會科學 > 社會科學綜合
参考文献
  1. Charrad, K. (2011). Lobbying the European Union. University of Münster.
    連結:
  2. Milbrath, L. W. (1960). Lobbying as a communications process. Public Opinion Quarterly, 24, 1: 32-53.
    連結:
  3. Ribot, J., & Peluso, N. (2003). A theory of access. Rural Sociology, 68: 153-181. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1549-0831.2003.tb00133.x
    連結:
  4. Saurman, E. (2016). Improving access: Modifying Penchansky and Thomas’s theory of access. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy, 21, 1: 36-39. https://doi.org/10.1177/1355819615600001
    連結:
  5. Social Platform. (n.d.). Our members. https://www.socialplatform.org/our-members
    連結:
  6. Streeck, W., & Schmitter, P. (1991). From national corporatism to transnational pluralism: Organized interests in the single European market. Politics and Society, 19, 2: 133-164. https://doi.org/10.1177/003232929101900202
    連結:
  7. 外交部 (2016)。《荷蘭—歐盟經貿觀察第21期》。駐荷蘭臺北代表處網頁。http://www.roc-taiwan.org/nl/post/2440.html (Ministry of Foreign Affairs. [2016]. Netherland-EU Economic Observer No. 21. Taipei Representative Office in the Netherlands official website.)
  8. 朱景鵬 (編) (2013)。《歐盟公共治理:政策與案例》。臺大出版中心。(Chu, C. P. [Ed.]. [2013]. Public governance in the EU. National Taiwan University Press.)
  9. 朱景鵬、Eißel, D. (2013)。〈歐盟治理理論發展與模式〉,《公共治理季刊》,1, 4: 18-33。(Chu, C. P., & Eißel, D. [2013]. EU governance in theoretical perspective and developmental characteristics. Public Governance Quarterly, 1, 4: 18-33.)
  10. 洪德欽 (2015)。〈歐洲法的淵源〉,洪德欽、陳淳文 (編),《歐盟法之基礎原則與實務發展 (上)》,頁1-55。臺大出版中心。(Horng, D. C. [2015]. Origins of European Union Law. In D. C. Horng & C. W. Chen [Eds.], The EU Law: Principles and practices II [pp. 1-55]. National Taiwan University Press.)
  11. 張磊 (2018)。〈歐洲議會決策中的遊說集團:內涵、特點及影響〉。《國際論壇》,20, 4: 22-29。(Zhang, L. [2018]. Lobbying groups in decision-making of the European Parliament: Connotation, characteristics and influence. International Forum, 20, 4: 22-29.)
  12. Association of Government Relations Professionals. (n.d.). What is lobbying? http://grprofessionals.org/about-lobbying/what-is-lobbying
  13. Bouwen, P. (2002a). A comparative study of business lobbying in the European Parliament (The European Commission and the Council of Ministers, MPIfG Discussion Paper 02/7). Max-Planck-Institut für Gesellschaftsforschung.
  14. Bouwen, P. (2002b). Corporate lobbying in the European Union: The logic of access. Journal of European Public Policy, 9, 3: 365-390.
  15. Brandsma, G. J. (2013). Bending the rules: Arrangements for sharing technical and political information between the EU institutions [Special Issue]. European Integration Online Papers, 1, 17: 1-22.
  16. Chambers, A. (2016). The lobbying of the EU–How to achieve greater transparency. Civitas.
  17. Charrad, K. (2007). Lobbying the European Union. Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität Münster.
  18. Christiansen, T. (2011). The European Union after the Lisbon Treaty: An elusive “institutional balance”? In A. Biondi & P. Eeckhout (Eds.), European Union law after the Treaty of Lisbon (pp. 226-245). Oxford University Press.
  19. Chu, C. P., & Eißel, D. (2013). Better regulation through governance in the European Union. Asia-Pacific Journal of EU Studies, 11, 1: 109-133.
  20. Coen, D., & Richardson, J. (2009). Lobbying the European Union: Institutions, cctors and issues. Oxford University Press.
  21. Council of Europe. (2009). Lobbying in a democratic society (European code of good conduct on lobbying, Parliamentary Assembly, Doc. 11937, 05 June 2009.) http://assembly.coe.int/nw/xml/XRef/Xref-XML2HTML-EN.asp?fileid=12205&lang=en
  22. Council of Ministers. (2006). Council decision of 28 June 1999 laying down the procedures for the exerciser of implementing powers conferred on the Commission. Official Journal of the European Union, L184/23. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:31999D0468&from=en
  23. Council of the European Union. (2018). List of Council preparatory bodies (Brussels, 13 Dec. 2018 [OR. En] 15131/18). https://www.consilium.europa.eu/media/37507/st15131-en18.pdf
  24. Dinan, W., & Wesselius, E. (2010). Brussels: A lobbying paradise. In H. Burley, W. W. Dinan, K. Haar, O. Hoedeman, & E. Wesselius (Eds.), Bursting the Brussels bubble: The battle to expose corporate lobbying at the heart of the EU (pp. 23-32). ALTER EU.
  25. Dionigi, M. K. (2019). Lobbying in the European Parliament: Who tips the scales? In D. Dialer & M. Richter (Eds.), Lobbying in the European Union: Strategies, dynamics and trends (pp. 133-146). Springer Verlag.
  26. Dondi, M. (2014). Interessensvertretung beim Rat der Eu-ropäischen Union. In D. Dialer & M. Richter (Eds.), Lobbying in der Europäischen Union: Zwischen Professionalisierung und Regulierung (pp. 91-111). Springer Verlag.
  27. Eising, R., & Kohler-Koch, B. (2005). Interessenpolitik. In R. Eising & B. Kohler-Koch (Eds.), Interessenpolitik in Europa (pp. 11-19). Nomos.
  28. European Commission. (1993). An open and structured dialogue between the Commission and special interest groups: Commission of the European Communities. Official Journal of the European Communities, C63/2. https://op.europa.eu/en/
  29. European Commission. (2001). European governance: A White Paper (COM [2001] 428final, Brussel, 25.7.2001). https://eur-lex.europa. eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52001DC0428&from =EN
  30. European Commission. (2006). Green Paper–European transparency initiative (Brussels, 3.5.2006, COM [2006] 194 final). https://op. europa.eu/en/
  31. European Commission. (2008). European transparency initiative–A framework for relations with interest representatives (Brussels, 27.5.2008, COM [2008] 323 final). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex%3A52008DC0323
  32. European Commission. (2011). Commission to the European Parliament, the Councils and the European Economic and Social Committee on fighting corruption in the EU (COM [2011] 308 final). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=:52011DC 0308
  33. European Commission. (2014). Implementing and delegated acts. https://ec.europa.eu/info/law/law-making-process/adopting-eu-law/implementing-and-delegated-acts_en
  34. European Commission. (2019). Better regulation principles: At the heart of the EU’s decision-making process. https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/IP_19_2117
  35. European Network Against Racism. (n.d.). European Network Against Racism official website. https://www.enar-eu.org/
  36. European Parliament. (2003). Lobbying in the European Union: Cur-rent rules and practices (directorate-general for research working paper, constitutional affairs series, AFCO104EN, 04-2003). https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/etudes/join/2003/329438/DG-4-AFCO_ET(2003)329438_EN.pdf
  37. European Parliament. (2007). Lobbying in the European Union (policy department C, citizen’s rights and constitutional affairs, Nov. 2007, PE393.266). http://www.eurosfaire.prd.fr/7pc/doc/121146 9722_lobbying_eu.pdf
  38. European Parliament. (2016). At a glance—Regulation of lobbying across the EU (Dec. 2016). https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/ATAG/2016/595830/EPRS_ATA(2016)595830_EN.pdf
  39. European Parliament. (2018). Transparency register: Who is lobbying the EU? https://www.europarl.europa.eu/news/en/headlines/eu-affairs/20180108STO91215/transparency-register-who-is-lobbying- the-eu-infographic
  40. European Parliament & European Commission. (2018). Annual report on the operations of transparency register 2018. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/at-your-service/files/transparency/en-annual-report-on-the-operations-of-the-transparency-register-2018.pdf
  41. Fenn, T., Floyd, P., Da Costa, S., & Collins, H. (2016). Analysis of responses to the open public consultation on the proposal for a mandatory transparency register (final report, risk & policy analysts, July 2016). https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/info/files/summary-report-public-consultation-transparency-register.pdf
  42. Goehring, R. (2002). Interest representation and legitimacy in the European Union: The new quest for civil society formation. In A. Warleigh & J. Fairbrass (Eds.), Influence and interests in the European Union: The new politics of persuasion and advocacy (pp. 118-138). Routledge.
  43. Greenwood, J. (2004). The search for input legitimacy through organized civil society in the EU. Transnational Associations, 2: 145-156.
  44. Greenwood, J. (2019). Interest representation in the EU: An open and structured dialogue? In D. Dialer & M. Richter (Eds.), Lobbying in the European Union: Strategies, dynamics and trends (pp. 21-31). Springer Verlag.
  45. Griesser, P. (2014). Lobbying im Mehrebenensystem der EU: Licht und Schatten. In D. Dialer & M. Richter (Eds.), Lobbying in der Europäischen Union (pp. 59-69). Springer Verlag.
  46. Jasmontaite, L. (2010). The current lobbying regulation in the European Union and its future development. http://arno.uvt.nl/ show.cgi?fid=131795
  47. Jenkins, M. (2017, January 16). Defining lobbyists and regulating lobbying in Europe. Transparency International, Anti-Corruption Helpdesk. https://knowledgehub.transparency.org/assets/uploads/helpdesk/Defining_lobbyists_and_regulating_lobbying_in_Europe_2016.pdf
  48. Joos, K. (2011). Lobbying in the new Europe: Successful representation of interests after the Treaty of Lisbon. Wiley.
  49. Laboutková, Š., & Žák, M. (2016). Transparency of lobbying: A theoretical approach. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/312026905_Transparency_of_Lobbying_a_Theoretical_Approach
  50. LobbyFacts. (n.d.). Today’s data. https://lobbyfacts.eu/
  51. Masselink, T. (n.d.). Effective interest representation in the EU. Clingendael Institute. http://www.kenniscentrumvlaamsesteden.be/overhetkenniscentrum/Documents/Jaarverslag%202015/Vorming _Effective%20interest%20representation%20in%20the%20EU_ 2015.pdf
  52. Mazey, S., & Richardson, J. (1993). Lobbying in the European Community. Oxford University Press.
  53. Mazey, S., & Richardson, J. (2001). Interest groups and EU policy-making: Organizational logic and venue shopping. In J. Richardson (Ed.), European Union: Power and policy making (pp. 217-238). Routledge.
  54. Means, J. (2016). Lobbying the European Parliament: Identifying changing trends post-treaty of Lisbon (University Honors Theses, Paper 273). https://doi.org/10.15760/honors.240
  55. Michalowitz, I. (2002). Beyond corporatism and pluralism: Towards a new theoretical framework. In A. Warleigh & J. Fairbrass (Eds.), Influence and interests in the European Union: The new politics of persuasion and advocacy (pp. 35-53). Routledge.
  56. Nesterovych, V. (2015). EU standards for the regulation of lobbying. Humanistic Scientific Fascicles Human Rights, 18, 18: 97-107.
  57. Nielsen, N. (2019, April 5). Lobby register transparency talks collapse. EUobserver. https://euobserver.com/institutional/144599
  58. Nørgaard, R. W., Nedergaard, P., & Blom-Hansen, J. (2019). Lobbying in the EU comitology system. In D. Dialer & M. Richter (Eds.), Lobbying in the European Union: Strategies, dynamics and trends (pp. 149-164). Springer Verlag.
  59. Richter, F. (2019). The companies spending the most on EU lobbying. Statista. https://www.statista.com/chart/17837/companies-spending-the-most-on-eu-lobbying/
  60. Salgado, R. S. (2019). Theoretical implications of EU funding of advocacy activities. In D. Dialer & M. Richter (Eds.), Lobbying in the European Union: Strategies, dynamics and trends (pp. 81-92). Springer Verlag.
  61. Sudbery, I. (2003). Bridging the legitimacy gap in the EU: Can civil society help to bring the union closer to its citizens? Collegium, 26: 75-95.
  62. Transparency International. (2015). Lobbying in Europe: Hidden influence, privileged access. https://www.transparency.org/en/publications/lobbying-in-europe
  63. Transparency Register. (n.d.). Transparency and the EU. European Commission & European Parliament. https://ec.europa.eu/transparencyregister/public/homePage.do
  64. Vătăman, D. (2012). Decision making process in the European Union after entry into force of the Treaty of Lisbon. Law Review, 2, 1: 1-11.
  65. Ząbkowicz, A. (2015). Governing economic interests by the European Commission. Ekonomia i Prawo, 14, 1: 95-111. https://doi.org/10.12775/EiP.2015.007
  66. Zibold, F. (2013). Lobbying the EU institutions. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/bibliotheque/briefing/2013/130558/LDM_BRI(2013)130558_REV1_EN.pdf
被引用次数
  1. 李貴英(2022)。歐洲聯盟強化外資控管之新架構:外國補貼併購交易之審查新制。問題與研究,61(1),1-42。