The European Union's Open Strategic Autonomy: Strengthening Inward Foreign Direct Investment Controls

歐洲聯盟之開放性戰略自主：朝向強化外人直接投資管制

10.7015/JEAS.202312_53(4).0001

Catherine Li(李貴英)

open strategic autonomy ； FDI Screening Regulation ； proposed Foreign Subsidies Regulation ； mergers and acquisitions ； European Commission ； 開放性戰略自主 ； 外人直接投資審查規則 ； 外國補貼規則草案 ； 併購 ； 歐盟執行委員會

歐美研究

53卷4期（2023 / 12 / 01）

493 - 549

英文;繁體中文

Concerns with geo-strategic and geo-economic competition have driven the European Union to map out several paths to achieve its objectives. The expansion of the EU's regulatory toolbox in the field of foreign direct investment demonstrates a striking change of attitude. Policy actions such as the FDI Screening Regulation, together with the proposed Foreign Subsidies Regulation, mark major milestones in pursuit of EU open strategic autonomy. This article attempts to delineate the concept of open strategic autonomy, followed by an analysis of policy actions in the field of FDI control. It also seeks to identify existing strengths and weaknesses, and upcoming challenges for the EU as it seeks to shape and guarantee open strategic autonomy.

對於地緣戰略與地緣經濟競爭之關切，促使歐洲聯盟尋求若干途徑以實現其目標。歐盟擴大對於外人直接投資之管制顯示其態度之巨幅轉變。而其相關政策行動，包括外人直接投資審查規則與外國補貼規則草案，可彰顯歐盟在追求開放性戰略自主方面之重要里程碑。本文擬論述開放性戰略自主之概念，分析外人直接投資管制方面之政策行動。此外亦探討歐盟塑造與確保其開放性戰略自主之現有優勢，並指出當前之弱點與即將面臨之挑戰。

1. Bian, C. (2021). Foreign direct investment screening and national security: Reducing regulatory hurdles to investors through induced reciprocity. The Journal of World Investment & Trade, 22, 4: 561-595. https://doi.org/10.1163/22119000-12340218
   連結：
2. Cagnin, C., Muench, S., Scapolo, F., Störmer, E., & Vesnic-Alujevic, L. (2021). Shaping and securing the EU’s open strategic autonomy by 2040 and beyond. Publications Office of the European Union. https://doi.org/10.2760/414963
   連結：
3. Chan, Z. T., & Meunier, S. (2022). Behind the screen: Understanding national support for a foreign investment screening mechanism in the European Union. The Review of International Organizations, 17, 3: 513-541. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11558-021-09436-y
   連結：
4. Directorate-General for Trade (European Commission). (2021). Reports from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council: First annual report on the screening of foreign direct investments into the Union and report on the im-plementation of Regulation (EU) 2021/821 setting up a Union regime for the control of exports, brokering, technical assistance, transit and transfer of dual-use items. Publications Office of the European Union. https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2781/90680
   連結：
5. Dohale, S., Bombach, K. M., Brennan, C. T., Latour, R. A., & Urie, A. S. (2020). CFIUS issues final regulations on national security review of foreign investments in the United States under FIRRMA: Broader reach, mandatory filings, and limited exceptions. Journal of Investment Compliance, 21, 2/3: 143-149. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOIC-09-2020-0025
   連結：
6. Esplugues, C. (2018a). Foreign investment, strategic assets and na-tional security. Intersentia. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781780687100
   連結：
7. Esplugues, C. (2018b). Towards a common screening system of foreign direct investment on national interest grounds in the European Union. Culture, Media, and Entertainment Laws, 12, 1: 3-55. https://doi.org/10.20995/CMEL.12.1.1
   連結：
8. Gehrke, T. (2022). EU open strategic autonomy and the trappings of geoeconomics [Special issue]. European Foreign Affairs Review, 27: 61-78. https://doi.org/10.54648/EERR2022012
   連結：
9. Geradin, D., Layne-Farrar, A., & Petit, N. (2012). EU competition law and economics. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/law-ocl/9780199566563.001.0001
   連結：
10. Ghori, U. (2015). Defining Australian national interests in regulating foreign investments. In J. Farrar, M. Hiscock, & V. L. Lo (Eds.), Australia’s trade, investment and security in the Asian century (pp. 135-152). World Scientific. https://doi.org/10.1142/9789814632874_0009
    連結：
11. Jiang, H. (2018). Beaming light on Australia’s national interest test: An empirical study of Chinese investments under it. Asia Pacific Law Review, 26, 1: 14-35. https://doi.org/10.1080/10192557.2018.1496639
    連結：
12. Li, C. (2021). A comparative study of the EU and the US approaches in screening foreign direct investment on security grounds. EurAmerica, 51, 3: 597-651. (李貴英 [2021]。〈歐盟與美國外資安全審查機制之比較研究〉，《歐美研究》，51, 3: 597-651。) https://doi.org/10.7015/JEAS.202109_51(3).0005
    連結：
13. Li, C. (2022). European Union moves toward new framework for strengthening foreign investment control: New screening regime targeting foreign-subsidized merger and acquisition transactions. Wenti Yu Yanjiu, 61, 1: 1-42. (李貴英 [2022]。〈歐洲聯盟強化外資控管之新架構：外國補貼併購交易之審查新制〉，《問題與研究》，61, 1: 1-42。) https://doi.org/10.30390/ISC.202203_61(1).0001
    連結：
14. Meunier, S. (2019). Chinese direct investment in Europe: Economic opportunities and political challenges. In K. Zeng (Ed.), Hand-book on the international political economy of China (pp. 98-112). Edward Elgar. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781786435064.00012
    連結：
15. Meunier, S., & Nicolaidis, K. (2019). The geopoliticization of Europe trade and investment policy. Journal of Common Market Studies, 57, S1: 103-113. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12932
    連結：
16. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. (2003). Foreign direct investment restrictions in OECD countries. OECD Economic Outlook, 2003, 1: 167-173. https://doi.org/10.1787/eco_outlook-v2003-1-38-en
    連結：
17. Pohl, J. H. (2021). Strategic autonomy as a means to counter protectionism. ERA Forum, 22, 2: 183-191. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12027-021-00670-w
    連結：
18. Roberts, A., Moraes, H. C., & Ferguson, V. (2019). Toward a geoeconomic order in international trade and investment. Journal of International Economic Law, 22, 4: 655-676. https://doi.org/10.1093/jiel/jgz036
    連結：
19. United Nations Conference on Trade and Development. (2021). World investment report 2021. https://doi.org/10.18356/9789210054638
    連結：
20. Van den Abeele, E. (2021). Towards a new paradigm in open strategic autonomy? European Trade Union Institute. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3873798
    連結：
21. Wehrlé, F., & Pohl, J. (2016). Investment policies related to national security: A survey of country practices (OECD Working papers on international investment, No. 2016/02). https://doi.org/10.1787/5jlwrrf038nx-en
    連結：
22. Yeh, K.-C., & Lin, C.-H. (2019). The origins of the EU-level FDI screening mechanism: Conflicts of the EU-China industry policies and the challenges. Wenti Yu Yanjiu, 58, 3: 1-50. (葉國俊、林展暉 [2019]。〈歐盟建立外資併購監控機制分析：歐中雙邊爭議與挑戰〉，《問題與研究》，58, 3: 1-50。) https://doi.org/10.30390/ISC.201909_58(3).0001
    連結：
23. Yeh, K.-C., & Lin, Y.-C. (2021). On the origin of EU-level industrial policy: Nationalism or destructive innovation? EurAmerica, 51, 3: 495-556. (葉國俊、林雅淇 [2021]。〈歐盟因應中國大陸競爭威脅的新產業政策倡議：爭議源起與可能作為〉，《歐美研究》，51, 3: 495-556。) https://doi.org/10.7015/JEAS.202109_51(3).0003
    連結：
24. Bacon, K. (2017). European Union law of state aid. Oxford University Press.
25. Barth, C., dos Santos Gonclaves, D.-J., & Käser, A.-C. (2021, April 28). The future of German foreign investment control is here. Part I: More transactions subject to mandatory filing re-quirements. Linklaters. https://www.linklaters.com/en/insights/blogs/foreigninvestmentlinks/2021/april/1-the-future-of-german-foreign-investment-control-is-here
26. Bickenbach, F., & Liu, W.-H. (2018). Chinese direct investment in Europe—Challenges for EU FDI policy. CESifo Forum, 19, 4: 15-22.
27. Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton. (2021, May 19). The European Commission proposes a far-reaching regulation to tackle foreign subsidies. Cleary Gottlieb. https://www.clearygottlieb.com/-/media/files/alert-memos-2021/the-european-commission-proposes-a-far-reaching-regulation-to-tackle-foreign-subsidies.pdf
28. Clifford Chance. (2021, November 8). Netherlands to introduce new cross-sector FDI-regime. https://www.cliffordchance.com/insights/resources/blogs/antitrust-fdi-insights/2021/11/netherlands-to-introduce-new-cross-sector-fdi-regime.html
29. Cotta, P., Huebnar, P. A., & von Wistinghausen, C. (2021). Germany. In M. Levitt (Ed.), Foreign direct investment regimes 2022 (pp. 79-84). Global Legal Groups.
30. Cuninghame, N. (2021, December 14). Foreign direct investment regulation guide. Ashurst. https://www.ashurst.com/en/insights/foreign-direct-investment-regulation-guide/
31. Darnis, J. (2021, April). The European Union between strategic autonomy and technological sovereignty: Impasses and oppor-tunities. Fondation pour la Recherches Stratégique. https://www.frstrategie.org/sites/default/files/documents/publications/recherches-et-documents/2021/102021.pdf
32. de Pree, J., Gornall, H., de Rijke, B., & The, S. (2021, May 19). EU proposes foreign subsidy control to match internal state aid regime. De Brauw. https://www.debrauw.com/articles/eu-proposes-foreign-subsidy-control-to-match-internal-state-aid-regime
33. Dentons. (2021, May 25). European Commission proposal for a regulation to control foreign subsidies: Fortress Europe or political posturing? https://www.dentons.com/en/insights/alerts/2021/may/25/ec-proposal-for-a-regulation-to-control-foreign-subsidies
34. Esplugues, C. (2017). An applied approach to national security: Controlling foreign direct investment on “national security” or related grounds. Journal of Legal Studies (Juridicheski Sbornik), 24: 65-86.
35. European Commission. (2017, September 13). Explanatory memorandum of European Commission proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a framework for screening of foreign direct investments into the European Union. http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2017/0487/COM_COM(2017)0487_EN.pdf
36. European Commission. (2019, November 27). Speech by President-elect von der Leyen in the European Parliament plenary on the occasion of the presentation of her College of Commissioners and their programme. https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/es/speech_19_6408
37. European Commission. (2020a, March 10). Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions: A new industrial strategy for Europe. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52020DC0102
38. European Commission. (2020b, March 26). Guidance to the Mem-ber States concerning foreign direct investment and free move-ment of capital from third countries, and the protection of Europe’s strategic assets, ahead of the application of Regulation (EU) 2019/452 (FDI Screening Regulation). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex:52020XC0326(03)
39. European Commission. (2020c, June 17). White paper on levelling the playing field as regards foreign subsidies. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52020DC0253&from=EN
40. European Commission. (2020d, September 9). Strategic foresight—Charting the course towards a more resilient Europe. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52020DC0493&from=EN
41. European Commission. (2021a, February 18). Commission sets course for an open, sustainable and assertive EU trade policy. https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/ip_21_644
42. European Commission. (2021b, February 18). Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Com-mittee of the Regions: Trade policy review—An open, sustain-able and assertive trade policy. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:52021DC0066&from=EN
43. European Commission. (2021c, May 5). Commission staff working document impact assessment. https://ec.europa.eu/competition/international/overview/impact_assessment_report.pdf
44. European Commission. (2021d, May 5). Communication from the commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. Updating the 2020 new industrial strategy: Building a stronger single market for Europe’s recovery. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=CELEX%3A52021DC0350
45. European Commission. (2021e, May 5). Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on foreign subsidies distorting the internal market. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52021PC0223&from=EN
46. European Commission. (2023, October 13). List of screening mech-anisms notified by Member States. https://circabc.europa.eu/rest/download/7e72cdb4-65d4-4eb1-910b-bed119c45d47
47. European Council. (2020a, September 28). “Strategic autonomy for Europe—the aim of our generation”—Speech by President Charles Michel to the Bruegel think tank. https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/press/press-releases/2020/09/28/l-autonomie-strategique-europeenne-est-l-objectif-de-notre-generation-discours-du-president-charles-michel-au-groupe-de-reflexion-bruegel/
48. European Council. (2020b, October 2). Special meeting of the European Council (1 and 2 October 2020)—Conclusions. https://www.consilium.europa.eu/media/45910/021020-euco-final-conclusions.pdf
49. European Council. (2020c, November 16). Council conclusions on “a recovery advancing the transition towards a more dynamic, resilient and competitive European industry.” https://data.consilium.europa.eu/doc/document/ST-13004-2020-INIT/en/pdf
50. European Court of Auditors. (2020). The EU’s response to China’s state-driven investment strategy. https://www.eca.europa.eu/Lists/ECADocuments/RW20_03/RW_EU_response_to_China_EN.pdf
51. European Parliament and Council of the European Union. (2019, March 21). Regulation (EU) 2019/452 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 March 2019 establishing a framework for the screening of foreign direct investments into the Union. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32019R0452&from=EN
52. European Parliamentary Research Service. (2020, September). On the path to “strategic autonomy”: The EU in an evolving geopolitical environment. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/STUD/2020/652096/EPRS_STU(2020)652096_EN.pdf
53. Faust, S., Kirwitzke, S., & Reckers, P. (2022, February 8). German FDI regulator spoils GlobalWafers’ €4.35 billion Siltronic deal. Hogan Lovells. https://www.engage.hoganlovells.com/knowledgeservices/news/german-fdi-regulator-spoils-globalwafers-435-billion-siltronic-deal
54. Filippitsch, C., Seuster, M., Rahman, I., Melin, Y., & Sauvage, C. (2021, May 26). European Commission sharpens pencil to control foreign subsidies in the EU. ReedSmith. https://www.reedsmith.com/en/perspectives/2021/05/european-commission-sharpens-pencil-to-control-foreign-subsidies-in-the-eu
55. Forchielli, E. (2015, January). Chinese investment in the EU: A challenge to Europe’s economic security. The German Marshall Fund of the United States. https://www.jstor.org/stable/resrep18744
56. Gasparotti, A. (2020, May 4). EU measures against foreign subsidies: A criticism of the upcoming EU legislation and alternative suggestions. Centrum für Europäische Politik. https://www.cep.eu/fileadmin/user_upload/cep.eu/Studien/cepInput_Foreign_Subsidies/cepInput_EU_Measures_Against_Foreign_Subsidies.pdf
57. Gehrke, T. (2021). Threading the trade needle on open strategic autonomy. In N. Helwig (Ed.), Strategic autonomy and the transformation of the EU: New agendas for security, diplomacy, trade and technology (pp. 89-105). Finish Institute of Inter-national Affairs.
58. Greenberg Traurig. (2021, May 17). The European Commission’s proposal for regulating foreign subsidies control. https://www.gtlaw.com/en/insights/2021/5/the-european-commissions-proposal-for-regulating-foreign-subsidies-control
59. Herbert Smith Freehills. (2021, June 21). EU proposal to address foreign subsidies. https://www.herbertsmithfreehills.com/latest-thinking/eu-proposal-to-address-foreign-subsidies
60. Killick, J., Forwood, G., Kuhn, T., & Citron, P. (2021, May 7). The European Commission adopts far-reaching proposals to control foreign subsidies. White & Case. https://www.whitecase.com/publications/alert/european-commission-adopts-far-reaching-proposals-control-foreign-subsidies
61. Koch, M., Rosner, D., & Zelikovitz, J. (2021). Canada. In C. Goldman, M. Koch, & A. Porter (Eds.), Foreign investment regulation review (9th ed., pp. 24-37). Law Business Research. https://thelawreviews.co.uk/title/the-foreign-investment-regulation-review/canada#footnote-032
62. Lumsden, A, (n.d.). The “national interest test” and Australian for-eign investment laws. University of New South Wales, Centre for Law Markets and Regulations. https://clmr.unsw.edu.au/article/market-conduct-regulation/state-capital/the-%E2%80%9Cnational-interest-test%E2%80%9D-and-australian-foreign-investment-laws
63. Mammen, J. K., & Schwartz, D. C. (2019). The expanded role of CFIUS in international business transactions after FIRRMA. International Business Law Journal, 2019, 1: 51-62.
64. Marson, J., & Legorano, G. (2021, November 15). China bought Italian military-drone maker without authorities’ knowledge: Sale illustrates Europe’s weak rules on purchases of sensitive technology. The Wall Street Journal. https://www.wsj.com/articles/china-bought-italian-military-drone-maker-without-authorities-knowledge-11636972513
65. Modrall, J. (2021, May 6). “Anti-subsidy” regulation—A new big stick in the EU regulatory arsenal. Kluwer Competition Law Blog. http://competitionlawblog.kluwercompetitionlaw.com/2021/05/06/anti-subsidy-regulation-a-new-big-stick-in-the-eu-regulatory-arsenal/
66. Moran, T. H. (2017, February 21). CFIUS and national security: Challenges for the United States, opportunities for the European Union. Peterson Institute for International Economics. https://www.piie.com/commentary/speeches-papers/cfius-and-national-security-challenges-united-states-opportunities
67. Norton Rose Fulbright. (2021, May). Foreign investment control in Germany: New challenges for companies. https://www.nortonrosefulbright.com/en/knowledge/publications/e123c3f6/foreign-investment-control-in-germany-new-challenges-for-companies
68. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. (2020, June 30). Investment screening in times of Covid-19—And beyond. https://www.oecd.org/investment/Investment-screening-in-times-of-COVID-19-and-beyond.pdf
69. Paravicini, G. (2017, May 28). Angela Merkel: Europe must take “our fate” into own hands. Politico. https://www.politico.eu/article/angela-merkel-europe-cdu-must-take-its-fate-into-its-own-hands-elections-2017/
70. Röhling, F., Salaschek, U., & von Kalben, J. (2020, July 27). Germany to introduce stricter foreign investment rules—Again. Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer. https://transactions.freshfields.com/post/102g4gi/germany-to-introduce-stricter-foreign-investment-rules-again
71. Shi, Y. (2018). The reform of EU Regulation on FDI: Dynamics, resistance and dilemma. Chinese Journal of European Studies, 36, 1: 114-134. (石岩 [2018]。〈歐盟外資監管改革：動因、阻力及困局〉，《歐洲研究》，36, 1: 114-134。)
72. Tarbert, H. P. (2020). Modernizing CFIUS. George Washington Law Review, 88, 6: 1477-1524.
73. Wang, D. T.-C. (2009). European business law (2): European competition regulations (2nd ed.). Wu-Nan Book. (王泰銓 [2009]。《歐洲事業法 [二]：歐洲競爭規範》(二版)。五南。)
74. Werner, M. J., & Holinde, S. (2022). Foreign investment screening: Germany. Norton Rose Fulbright. https://www.nortonrosefulbright.com/-/media/files/nrf/nrfweb/publications/germany---foreign-investment-screening-october-2022.pdf?revision=c13317fa-11d9-4d84-9e2d-948cddaa1647&revision=5249735758887387904
75. West, M. T., & Luther, P. (2021). USA. In M. Levitt (Ed.), Foreign direct investment regimes 2022 (3rd ed., pp. 189-194). Global Legal Groups.
76. Xueref-Poviac, E. (2021, September 15). Foreign direct investment: An overview of the EU and national case law. Clifford Chance. https://www.cliffordchance.com/content/dam/cliffordchance/briefings/2021/09/foreign_direct_investment_an_overview.pdf
77. Xueref-Poviac, E., Storey, J., Currell, M., & Latour, R. (2021, December 6). The evolving concept of national security. Global Competition Review. https://globalcompetitionreview.com/guide/foreign-direct-investment-regulation-guide/second-edition/article/the-evolving-concept-of-national-security
78. Ye, B. (2018). Appropriateness of the legal basis of the EU’s legislative proposal on establishing a framework for screening foreign direct investments. Chinese Journal of European Studies, 36, 5: 25-42. (葉斌 [2018]。〈歐盟外資安全審查立法草案及其法律基礎的適當性〉，《歐洲研究》，36, 5: 25-42。)