「心中的一把火」：論民主轉型中的惡與不正義

"Anger Fires Up the Heart": On Evil and Injustice in the Transition to Democracy

10.7015/JEAS.202312_53(4).0003

陳瑤華(Jau-Hwa Chen)

惡 ； 不正義 ； 民主轉型 ； 鄂蘭 ； 史珂拉 ； evil ； injustice ； transition to democracy ； Arendt ； Shklar

歐美研究

53卷4期（2023 / 12 / 01）

599 - 638

繁體中文;英文

本文折衷鄂蘭及史珂拉的論述，探討民主轉型過程中所涉及的惡與不正義，以及受害者不正義的感受。不正義的感受不僅來自於過去發生的人權侵害所造成的嚴重傷害，也來自對於惡的不理解及不正義感受的忽視，讓有罪不罰的文化更加根深蒂固。審判及懲罰加害者雖然必要，但它們並不足以解決邪惡根源的問題。本文認為關鍵在於面對不同層次的不正義概念，需要區隔第一序與第二序的不正義，並檢討惡與不正義的因素以建立預防措施，才是達成民主轉型目標的重要步驟。

Based on an eclectic discourse on Arendt and Shklar, this paper explores political evils and injustices involved in the process of democratic transition, as well as the feelings of victims of injustice. Feelings of injustice arise from past violations of human rights, an inability to comprehend evil, and social ignorance, or disregard, of perceptions of injustice, all of which contributes to a culture of impunity. Trials and punishments of the guilty are necessary, but not sufficient, to address the problem of evil. This article argues that the key to doing so is found in facing the concept of injustice at different levels. It is necessary to distinguish between first order and second order injustices, and to review those factors responsible for inflicting injustice to establish preventive measures. This is an important step to fully realizing a democratic transformation.

1. 石忠山 (2018)。〈沈默時代的道德辯護：雅斯培論國家行動的罪與責〉，《政治與社會哲學評論》，66: 43-101。(Shih, C.-S. [2018]. Moral defense in the era of silence: Karl Jaspers on guilt and responsibility for state action. A Journal for Philosophical Study of Public Affairs, 66: 43-101.) https://doi.org/10.6523/SOCIETAS.201809_(66).002
   連結：
2. Arendt, H. (2004). Philosophy and politics. Social Research: An International Quarterly, 71, 3: 427-454. https://doi.org/10.1353/sor.2004.0054
   連結：
3. Ascheim, S. E. (1997). Nazism, culture and The Origins of Totalitarianism: Hannah Arendt and the discourse of evil. New German Critique, 70: 117-139. https://doi.org/10.2307/488501
   連結：
4. Bernstein, R. (2008). Are Arendt’s reflections on evil still relevant? The Review of Politics, 70, 1: 64-76. https://doi.org/10.1017/S003467050800017X
   連結：
5. Braun, R. (1994). The Holocaust and problems of historical representation. History and Theory, 33, 2: 172-197. https://doi.org/10.2307/2505383
   連結：
6. Dolan, F. M. (2006). Arendt on philosophy and politics. In D. Villa (Ed.), The Cambridge companion to Hannah Arendt (pp. 261-276). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CCOL0521641985.014
   連結：
7. Earl, H. (2012). A judge, a prosecutor, and a mass murderer: Court-room dynamics in the SS-Einsatzgruppen trial. In K. C. Priemel & A. Stiller (Eds.), Reassessing the Nuremberg Military Tribunals: Transitional justice, trial narratives, and historiography (pp. 47-73). Berghahn Books. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780857455321-006
   連結：
8. Schaap, A. (2001). Guilty subjects and political responsibility: Arendt, Jaspers and the resonance of the “German question” in politics of reconciliation. Political Studies, 49, 4: 749-766. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.00340
   連結：
9. Shklar, J. N. (1990). The faces of injustice. Yale University Press. https://doi.org/10.12987/9780300161496
   連結：
10. Sikkink, K., & Walling, C. B. (2007). The impact of human rights trials in Latin America. Journal of Peace Research, 44, 4: 427-445. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022343307078953
    連結：
11. Twiss, S. B. (2010). Can a perpetrator write a testimonio? Moral lessons from the dark side. The Journal of Religious Ethics, 38, 1: 5-42. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9795.2009.00413.x
    連結：
12. Young-Bruehl, E. (1982). Reflections on Hannah Arendt’s The Life of the Mind. Political Theory, 10, 2: 277-305. https://doi.org/10.1177/0090591782010002008
    連結：
13. Zillmer, E. A., Harrower, M., Ritzler, B. A., & Archer, R. P. (2013). The quest for the Nazi personality: A psychological investigation of Nazi war criminals. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315827391
    連結：
14. 台灣人權促進會 (2011年10月7日)。〈船過水無痕？國慶枉斷魂！～從江國慶案看臺灣的轉型不正義〉。https://www.tahr.org.tw/activity/307 (Taiwan Association for Human Rights. [2011, October 7]. Nothing left after the case? The National Day is in vain: Taiwan’s transformational impropriety as seen from the Chiang Kuo-Ching case.)
15. 李建良 (2007)。〈轉型不正義？──初論德國法院與歐洲人權法院「柏林圍牆射殺案」相關裁判〉，《月旦法學雜誌》，148: 5-32。 (Lee, C.-L. [2007]. Transitional injustice?: A preliminary discussion of the German courts and the European court of human rights’ verdicts in the Berlin Wall shooting cases. The Taiwan Law Review, 148: 5-32.)
16. 李慧生 (2019)。〈一碗等不到爸爸回家吃的魷魚糜〉(黃秀如訪)。陳瑤華 (編)，《尋找一株未命名的玫瑰——記憶、白色恐怖與酷刑》，頁264-279。國家人權博物館。(Lee, H.-S. [2019]. A bowl of squid rice gruel which my father could never come home to eat [S.-R. Huang, Interviewer]. In J.-H. Chen (Ed.), Search of an unnamed rose: Memory, White Terror and torture [pp. 264-279]. National Human Rights Museum.)
17. 阿Ken (2015年10月8日)。〈江國慶40冥誕……江媽媽：陳肇敏已老，自己也老了，希望檢察長別讓該案無疾而終〉，《關鍵評論》。https://www.thenewslens.com (Ken. [2015, October 8]. Chiang Kuo-Ching’s 40th birthday: Chiang’s mother: Chen Chao-Min is old, so is me, and I hope the attorney general won’t let the case go unresolved. The News Lens.)
18. 柏楊 (1996)。《柏楊回憶錄》(周碧瑟訪)。遠流。(Bo, Y. [1996]. Memoirs of Bo Yang [P. Chou, Interviewer]. Yuan-Liou.)
19. 陳武鎮 (2012)。《陳武鎮畫集》。國家人權博物館籌備處。(Chen, W.-J. [2012]. Chen Wu-Jen collection. Preparatory Office of the National Human Rights Museum.)
20. 陳景通、陳泰源、衛德全、鄒秀連、邱景耀、邱文華、劉登科、劉志清、陳顯宗、陳惠珠、徐文贊、李麗月、謝義雄、鄭勳哲、邱明昌、向整坤、林昌運、林秀峰、林森岷……戴文子 (2014)。《重生與愛：桃園縣人權歷史口述文集》(曹欽榮、陳銘城、楊淑媛、潘忠政訪)。桃園縣政府文化局。(Chen, C.-T., Chen, T.-Y., Wei, T.-C., Tsou, H.-L., Chiu, C.-Y., Chiu, W.-H., Liu, T.-K., Liu, C.-C., Chen, H.-T., Chen, H.-C., Hsu, W.-T., Li, L.-Y., Hsieh, Y.-H., Cheng, H.-C., Chiu, M.-C., Hsiang, C.-K., Lin, C.-Y., Lin, H.-F., Lin, S.-M., ... Tai, W.-T. [2014]. Rebirth and love: An oral history of human rights in Taoyuan County [C.-J. Tsao, M.-C. Chen, S.-Y. Yang, & C.-C. Pan, Interviewers]. Department of Cultural Affairs, Taoyuan.)
21. 程琬瑜 (編) (2015)。《冤獄求生與揚名──歐陽劍華與張常美的生命故事》。國家人權博物館。(Chen, W.-Y. [Ed.]. [2015]. Surviving injustice and becoming famous: The life story of Ouyang Jianhua and Zhang Changmei. National Human Rights Museum.)
22. 漢娜．鄂蘭 (2007)。《心智生命》(蘇友貞譯)。立緒文化。(原著1977年出版) (Arendt, H. [2007]. The life of the mind [Y.-C. Su, Trans.]. New Century. [Original work published 1977] )
23. 漢娜．鄂蘭 (2013)。《艾希曼耶路撒冷大審紀實：平凡的邪惡》(施奕如譯)。玉山社。(原著1963年出版) (Arendt, H. [2013]. Eichmann in Jerusalem: A report on the banality of evil [Y.-R. Shi, Trans.]. Taiwan Interminds. [Original work published 1963] )
24. 漢娜．鄂蘭 (2008)。《漢娜．鄂蘭：責任與判斷》(蔡佩君譯)。左岸文化。(原著2003年出版) (Arendt, H. [2008]. Hannah Arendt: Responsibility and judgment [P.-C. Tsai, Trans.]. River Garche. [Original work published 2003] )
25. 監察院 (2016年12月8日)。《調查報告》(093國調0002字號)。https://www.cy.gov.tw/CyBsBoxContent.aspx?n=133&s=65 (Control Yuan. [2016, December 8]. Investigation report [national decree no. 093-0002].)
26. 薛化元、楊秀菁、蘇瑞鏘 (2015)。《戰後臺灣人權發展史1945-2000》。稻鄉。(Hsueh, H.-Y., Yang, H.-C., & Su, R.-C. [2015]. The history of human rights in post-war Taiwan 1945-2000. Daw Shang.)
27. 謝孟穎 (2019年10月19日)。〈退休教師畫下白色恐怖最戰慄刑求，大腿內側剃刀「剝皮」，被害者最不願回憶「屎尿盡出」活地獄〉，《風傳媒》。https://www.storm.mg/article/1848470?mode=whole (Hsieh, M.-Y. [2019, October 19]. Retired teacher draws scary torture, inner thigh razor “skinning,” victims’ horrific memories of “pissing and peeing” in living hell. The Storm Media.)
28. 謝聰敏 (2007)。《談景美軍法看守所》。前衛。(Hsieh, R. [2007]. On Jingmei Military Justice Detention Center. Avanguard.)
29. 蘇瑞鏘 (2014)。《白色恐怖在臺灣──戰後臺灣政治案件之處置》。稻鄉。(Su, R.-C. [2014]. White Terror in Taiwan: Postwar Taiwan’s political case handling. Daw Shang.)
30. Arendt, H. (1981). The life of the mind. Harcourt Brace & Company.
31. Arendt, H. (1994). Eichmann in Jerusalem: A report on the banality of evil. Penguin Books.
32. Arendt, H. (2000). The portable Hannah Arendt. Penguin Books.
33. Arendt, H. (2005a). Essays in understanding 1930-1954. Schocken Books.
34. Arendt, H. (2005b). The promise of politics. Schocken Books.
35. Bernstein, R. (2002). Radical evil. Polity.
36. Hannah Arendt Edition. (2019, February 25). Organisierte schuld / Organized guilt and universal responsibility. The German Re-search Foundation. https://hannah-arendt-edition.net/texts/03/text?id=ae3499277&type=edrem&lang=de
37. Jaspers, K. (1946). Die Schuldfrage. Lambert Schneider.
38. Kerr, R., & Mobekk, E. (2007). Peace and justice: Seeking accountability after war. Polity Press.
39. Merrills, J. G., & Robertson, A. H. (2001). Human rights in Europe. Manchester University Press.
40. Sereny, G. (1983). Into that darkness: An examination of conscience. Vintage.
41. Shklar, J. N. (1986). Legalism: Law, morals, and political trials. Harvard University Press.