《明儒學案•浙中王門學案》中錢緒山與王龍溪思想之述評

A Reflection on the Thoughts of Ch'ien Hsü-shan and Wang Lung-hsi in Ming Confucian Scholars' Dispute

10.29653/LS.200112.0003

高瑋謙(Wei-Chen Kao)

錢緒山 ； 王龍溪 ； 黃宗羲 ； 誠意 ； 正心 ； 歸寂 ； 四句教 ； 四無 ； 四有 ； Ch'ien Hsü-shan ； Wang Lung-hsi ； Huang Zong-si ； making wills sincere ； rectifing minds ； back to still ； Four Sentences Teaching ； Four Being ； Four Nothingness

鵝湖學誌

27期（2001 / 12 / 01）

63 - 104

繁體中文

本文就著黃宗羲在《明儒學案•浙中王門學案》中對於緒山、龍溪二人思想之纂述，進行檢討並提出批評，主要是希望能還原緒山、龍溪二人思想之本來面貌。黃宗羲認爲：緒山與龍漢親炙陽明最久，習聞其過重之言，故盛言「見在良知」，於師門宗旨不能無毫釐之差，反以江右王門「歸寂」之學，爲陽明之的傳。此說實不甚的當也。其實，江右王門「歸寂」之說，於陽明主張良知「即寂即感」、「通貫未發已發」之旨，並未能有相應之把握；而浙中王門之強調「見在良知」，雖或可能引發流弊，然畢竟與陽明主張「心即理」、「體用一原」之旨若合符節也。故吾人以爲浙中王門如緒山、龍溪者，方是陽明之的傳也。而緒山資性沉毅，謹守陽明之教而無失，可說是王門中之狷者；龍溪資性明朗，於陽明之教多有調適而上遂之發揮，可說是王門中之狂者也。緒山強調後天誠意之功夫，龍溪強調先天正心之功夫，兩者皆是陽明「致良知」教下所必然涵攝者也。

This article tries to offer a reflection and critique of the thoughts of Ch'ien Hsü-shan and Wang Lung-hsi, as presented in Huang Zong-si's Ming Confucian Scholars' Dispute, with the aim to restore the original thoughts of the two scholars. Huang thinks that Ch'ien Hsü-shan and Wang Lung-hsi, Wang Yang-ming's long-term disciples, were used to hearing Wang's solemn language and therefore propounded ”xian-zai liang-zhi” (the existential conscience). To Huang, their thoughts deviated from the doctrine of their mentor. Instead, Huang upholds Jiang-yo Wang School's ”gui-ji” (back to still) doctrine as the true successor of Wang's thoughts. The author thinks nothing is farther from the truth. In reality, however, Jiang-Yo Wang School's ”gui-ji” doctrine does not necessarily correspond to Wang's idea of liang-chih as ”ji-ji-ji-gan” (still is feeling) and ”tong-guang-wei-fa-i-fa” (to connect the happend and the non-happend). Although Zhe-Zhong Wang School's doctrine of ”xian-zai liang-zhi” may trigger some faults, it corresponds better to Wang's idea of ”his-ji-li” (mind is reason) and ”ti-yong-i-yuan” (substance and function are from same fountainhead). Therefore, the author thinks in Zhe-Zhong Wang School, scholars such as Ch'ien Hsü-shan and Wang Lung-hsi are the real heirs of Wang's thoughts. Reticent and persistent in nature, Ch'ien Hsü-shan stuck to Wang Yang-ming's teachings and may be considered as more reserved among Wang's disciples. Outgoing and cheerful in personality, Wang Lung-hsi adapted Wang's Yang-ming's teachings and may be considered as more presuming among Wang's disciples. Ch'ien Hsü-shan emphasizes posteriori cheng-i. while Wang Lung-hsi stresses the importance of priori zheng-xin (rectifing minds). Both are natural consequences of Wang Yang-ming's doctrine of ”zhiliang-chi” (doing conscience).

1. 明王龍溪(1970)。王龍溪全集（第二冊）。
2. 明王龍溪(1970)。王龍溪全集（第三冊）。
3. 明王龍溪(1970)。王龍溪全集（第一冊）。
4. 明黃宗羲(1987)。明儒學案（上）。
5. 清張廷玉(1966)。明史。
6. 王財貴(1991)。王龍溪良知四無說析論。
7. 牟宗三(1984)。從陸象山到劉蕺山。
8. 牟宗三(1985)。圓善論。
9. 唐君毅(1984)。中國哲學原論（第三冊）。
10. 陳榮捷(1988)。王陽明傳習錄詳註集評（中卷）。
11. 陳榮捷(1988)。王陽明傳習錄詳註集評〈下卷〉。
12. 陳榮捷(1988)。王陽明傳習錄詳註集評（上卷）。
13. 彭高翔。王龍溪先生年譜。中國文哲研究通訊，7(4)，99。
14. 錢緒山(1976)。王陽明年譜。

1. 陳志強(2016)。知見空言－羅念菴論「學者」之過。漢學研究，34(4)，99-130。
2. 廖又生、李明書(2011)。儒學「誠意」、「致知」的道德修養義理：以錢緒山之論述為生命安頓的依據。亞東學報，31，227-240。