訓詁與義理之關係的詮釋學考察

An Hermeneutical Investigation of the Relationship Between Word-exegesis and Thought-understanding

邱黃海(Chiu, Hwang-hai)

Ast的詮釋學循環 ； 戴震的三階段說 ； 訓詁與義理相互依存說 ； 孟子的詮釋學思想 ； Ast's Conception of the Hermeneutical Circle ； Dai-chen's Three-Stage-Theory ； The Principle of Letting-Contexts-determine-Understanding ； The Hermeneutics of Mencius

鵝湖學誌

66期（2021 / 06 / 01）

83 - 128

繁體中文

本文的目的是透過經典詮釋學的觀點來處理中國哲學史上的訓詁與義理的關係問題。首先，分析惠棟、戴震對這個問題的見解。其次透過孟子對解經方法的論述以闡發其詮釋學思想，並因此看清訓詁與義理的關係問題，究其實，是「判斷字義與讀懂文句的關係」與「讀懂文句與理解義理的關係」兩問題；同時，也看清「文、辭、志」的詮釋學關係問題不僅可如Ast那樣從「部分與整體的關係」，更應從「名實關係」的角度，來考論。第三，透過具體的古典文獻的詮釋活動以照亮「文、辭、志」之間的兩種詮釋學循環；這個成果，一方面，廓清「訓詁明則義理明」一說所引起的迷霧，一方面，補足孟子詮釋學思想的不足。

The article makes an effort to solve the problem of the relationship between word-exegesis and thought-understanding within the historical context of Chinese philosophy by mostly relying upon the standpoint of Friedrich Ast's hermeneutics. The investigation begins by analyzing Hui-Dong and Dai-chen's ideas regarding the problem. Secondly, it proceeds by relating how Mencius expressed his hermeneutical thoughts. In particular, we see that the problem contains two tasks to be solved, namely, ＂the relationship between word-exegesis and sentence-comprehension＂ and ＂the relationship between sentence-comprehension and thought-understanding＂. Furthermore, the investigation shows that the problem should not only be treated under the hermeneutical perspective of the parts-and-the whole-relationship as Ast did, but more fundamentally under the perspective of the concept-reality-relationship. Thirdly, the author offers an illustration of how the difficulty of interpreting Hanfeitzu's concept of ＂Hsing-Ming-Tsan-Tong＂, and together with it, the semantic determination of the word ＂Tsan＂, may be overcome, which, together with Mencius' hermeneutical thoughts, sheds light on the relationship between word-exegesis, sentence comprehension and thought understanding. In light of the relationship between these three parts we establish a twofold hermeneutical circle which in turn allows the confusion caused by Dai-Chen's slogan, ＂The thought of a text can only be understood when words are correctly construed＂, to be cleared, and the hermeneutics of Mencius to be compensated.

1. Friedrich Ast: Grundlinien der Grammatik, Hermeneutik und Kritik, Landshut, 1808
2. 朱守亮(1992).韓非子釋評.臺北:五南圖書公司.
3. 朱熹(1984).四書章句集註.臺北:鵝湖出版社.
4. 岑溢成(1992).詩補傳與戴震解經方法.臺北:文津出版社.
5. 邱黃海(2007)。中央大學哲學研究所。
6. 張覺(1996).譯注韓非子.臺北:臺北古籍出版社.
7. 陳奇猷(1974).韓非子集釋.臺北:河洛圖書出版社.
8. 陳啟天(1979).韓非子校釋.臺北:臺灣商務印書館.
9. 惠楝(1965).五經古義.臺北:臺灣商務印書館.
10. 蔣秋華(2004).乾嘉學者的治經方法.臺北:中央研究院中國文哲研究所.
11. 戴震(1980).戴震集.臺北:里仁書局.