國民小學教師實用智能評量研究

A Study on Appraisal of Elementary School Teachers' Practical Intelligence

10.7060/KNUJ.200412.0075

李新民(Hsing-Ming Lee)；陳密桃(Mi-Tao Chen)；莊鳳茹(Feng-Ju Chuang)

國小教師 ； 實用智能 ； 情境判斷測驗 ； elementary school teachers ； practical intelligence ； situational judgment test

高雄師大學報

17期（2004 / 12 / 01）

75 - 96

繁體中文

本研究旨在參考情境判斷測驗形式，自編「國小教師實用智能量表」來評量國小教師的實用智能。研究者以分層隨機取樣378位高雄地區國小教師，接受「國小教師實用智能量表」施測。蒐集所得實證資料以項目分析、 Cronbach's α、單題與總分相關、探索性及驗證性因素分析等統計方法來分析處理。根據驗證性因素分析結果，實證資料尚且支持國小教師實用智能的假設模式，兩者適配良好，初步發現實用智能的因素結構包括環境適應、塑造、選擇三構面。一般而言，國小教師在實用智能的三構面中，以適應環境的實用智能表現較佳。而多變量變異數分析結果顯示影響國小教師實用智能最主要的背景變項是服務年資以及取得師資的背景，服務年資較久以及師範校院培育的國小教師之實用智能較佳。根據研究發現，研究者建議：1．國小可運用「國小教師實用智能量表」去甄選人才，從而建立實用智能取向的人力資源管理制度。2．國小教師可根據「國小教師實用智能量表」內容作為提升自己實務能力之參考。3．師資培育機構可規劃實用智能課程，實施實用智能教學以培育具備實用智能的國小教師。

The main purpose of this study was to construct a Elementary School Teachers Practical Intelligence Scale (ESTPIS) for appraisal of elementary school teachers practical intelligence (PI) by using situational judgment test (SJT). The study employed a stratified random sampling method and selected totally 378 elementary school teachers in the Kaohsiung area, Taiwan. Each elementary school teacher was administered ESTPIS appraising practical intelligence. Through statistical methods such as item analysis, Cronbach's α, item-total correlation, exploratory factors analysis and confirmatory factor analysis, we analyzed all the information we got. By utilizing second order confirmatory factor analysis to examine the hypothesized model, we found that goodness of fit is acceptable. The factor structure of PI includes dimensions of environmental adaptation, selection and shaping. In general, elementary school teachers' PI of environmental adaptation showed optimum, and environmental selection, shaping in proper order. According to MANOVA, teachers' teaching experience and qualification as an elementary school education teacher resulted in significant differences in their practical intelligence. Based on the above resultants, this study had provided some suggestions for elementary schools' teachers human management, teachers' PI development, and PI course planning of teachers educational institution.

1. Chan, D.,Schmitt, N.(1998).Video-based versus paper-and-pencil method of assessment in Situational judgment test: Subgroup differences in test performance and face validity perceptions.Journal of Applied Psychology,82,143-159.
2. Frederiksen, N.,R. J. Sternberg,R. K, Wagner (Eds.)(1986).Practical intelligence: Nature and origins of competence in the everyday world.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
3. Gottfreclson, L. S.(2002).Dissecting practical intelligence theory: Its claims and evidence.Intelligence,30,1-55.
4. Gottfredson, L. S.(2001).Book review on Practical Intelligence in Everyday Life.Intelligence,29,363-365.
5. Herrick, M. J.(2001).University of Mininesota.
6. Kaufman, A. S.,R. J. Sternberg (Ed.)(2000).Handbook of intelligence.Cambridge:Cambridge University press.
7. Krejcie, R. V.,Morgan, P. W.(1970).Determing sample size for research activities.Educational and Psychological Measurement,30,607-610.
8. Sternberg, R. J.(2001).Reply to the book review on Practical Intelligence in Everyday Life.Intelligence,30,117-118.
9. Sternberg, R. J.(1985).Beyond IQ: A triarchic theory of human intelligence.Cambridge:Cambridge University press.
10. Sternberg, R. J.(1996).Successful intelligence: How practical and creative intelligence determine success in life.NY:Simon & Schuster.
11. Sternberg, R. J.,Forsythe, G. B.,Hedlund, J.,Horvath, J. A.,Wagner, R. K.,Williams, W. M.,Snook, S.,Grigorenko, E. L.(2000).Practical intelligence in everyday life.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
12. Sternberg, R. J.,Horvath, J. A.(1999).Tacit knowledge in professional practice.Mahwah, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
13. Sternberg, R. J.,Wagner, R. K.(1993).The g-ocentric view of intelligence and job performance is wrong.Current Directions in Psychological Science,2,1-4.
14. Sternberg, R. J.,Wagner, R. K.,Williams, W. M.,Horvath, J. A.(1995).Testing common sense.American Psychologists,50,912-927.
15. Taub, G. E.(1998).University of Florida.
16. Tomala, G.,Weinland, T.(1991).Social studies: Connecticut`s teacher assessment center exercisesSocial studies: Connecticut`s teacher assessment center exercises,ERIC Document Reproduction Service.
17. Wagner, R. K.,Sternberg, R. J.(1985).Practical intelligence in real-world pursuits: The role of tacit knowledge.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,49,436-458.
18. Wagner, R. K.,Sujan, H.,Sujan, M.,Rashotte, C. A.,Sternberg, R. J.,J. A. Horvath(Eds.)(1999).Tacit knowledge in professional practice.Mahwah, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
19. 李新民、陳密桃(2003)。成功智能的理論建構及其對教育實務的啟示。高雄師大學報，15，245-259。
20. 孫菁璣(2003)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。國立花蓮師範學院輔導碩士班碩士論文。
21. 闕美華(2000)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。彰化師範大學教育研究所碩士論文。
22. 羅麗萍(2003)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。彰化師範大學美術學系在職進修專班碩士論文。

1. 陳鳳玉、陳密桃、李新民(2005)。評量幼兒實用智能的視訊化情境判斷量表之建構。測驗學刊，52(2)，61-93。
2. 陳密桃、李新民(2006)。實用智能、緣分信念與心理健康、工作表現之相關：以幼兒教師爲例。中華心理學刊，48(2)，183-202。
3. 陳密桃、李新民(2007)。實用智能、目標導向、自我效能對工作表現之影響探析：以幼兒教師為例。教育學刊，28，63-99。
4. 陳密桃、李新民(2007)。台灣地區國小教師的實用智能、緣分信念、內團體偏私與心理健康、工作表現之潛在關聯。教育學刊，29，37-72。
5. 陳密桃、李新民(2007)。幼兒園園長實用智能的因素結構及其與個人表現之關係。教育心理學報，38(3)，227-250。
6. 陳密桃、李新民(2007)。運用情境訪談法評量幼兒教師的實用智能。中華心理學刊，49(2)，159-183。
7. 黃秀霜、陳密桃、李新民(2007)。台灣地區國民小學教師實用智能、情緒智能與專業表現之相關研究。教育心理學報，39(2)，295-316。
8. 李新民(2009)。國中生正向情緒創造對實用智能、美德行為的影響。高雄師大學報：教育與社會科學類，27，83-112。
9. (2010)。實用智能之意涵及其在教學上的啓示。教育研究，18，1-11。