國中學生電腦模擬單擺建模歷程個案研究

The Case Study of Junior High School Students' Modeling Process with a Computer Simulated Pendulum

10.7060/KNUJST.200812.0001

林振欽(Jen-Chin Lin)；洪振方(Jeng-Fung Hung)

心智模型 ； 科學建模 ； 單擺 ； 電腦模擬 ； 模型 ； Scientific modeling ； mental model ； pendulum ； computer simulation ； model

高雄師大學報：自然科學與科技類

25期（2008 / 12 / 01）

1 - 24

繁體中文

本研究旨在探討國中學生使用電腦模擬單擺建模的歷程，以了解各個階段的建模特性。研究選取四位國中八年級學生進行個案研究。研究基於Justi和Gilbert(2002)的建模架構，修改作為單擺建模分析歷程的原型。研究工具包括抽象和預測變因結果問卷，以及研究者自行發展之電腦模擬單擺軟體，讓學生以電腦模擬進行單擺實驗並由電腦擷取畫面。過程中學生採取放聲思考法，以及接受研究者事後晤談。歸結本研究的結果：(1)個案學生抽象出的變因具有多樣性。(2)預測變因結果與變因解釋，顯示學生具有一些另有概念。(3)建模歷程中個案學生能對預測結果做修正，但不像科學家一樣做周密的思維實驗。(4)在電腦模擬建模的歷程中，個案學生易於檢測變因結果。(5)學生最後能建立正確的模型。(6)歸納學生單擺建模的歷程圖，顯示個案學生建模歷程中實驗變因順序有固定式也有變化的。

This research aims to explore a junior high school students' modeling process with a computer simulated pendulum and to understand students' characteristics of modeling process. The research conducts a case study with four eighth grade junior high school students. The research was based on Justi and Gilbert's (2002) modeling structure, but it was revised as a prototype for experiment analysis. The instruments were composed of the questionnaire of abstracting and predicting variables, as well as the computer simulation pendulum software, which was evaluated in discipline content, media interface and user attitudes. The students conducted a pendulum modeling with a computer simulation experiment and capture the screen of the experiment. The relevant data of research were collected through student thinkings aloud and researcher interviews. The results of this　research were summarized as the following: (1) The students who abstracted the variables were diversity. (2) The students showed alternative concepts of predicting the variables and explaining the results. (3) The students were not as good as scientist, who could reason the results of the experiment during the process of pondering over the experiment, but they could change and revise their prediction. (4) The students in the case study could facilitate tests in the pendulum modeling process with computer simulation. (5) The students could build the correct model. (6) There were reqular changes during the students' modeling processes.

1. 任宗浩(2001)。心智模式動態變化之研究－物理現象的觀察與詮釋。科學教育學刊，9(2)，147-168。
   連結：
2. AAAS(1993).Benchmark for science literacy on disc.New York:Oxford University Press.
3. Acher, A.,Arcà, M.,Sanmartí, N.(2007).Modeling as a Teaching Learning Process for Understanding Materials: A Case Study in Primary Education.Science Education.
4. Clement, J.(2000).Model based learning as a key research area for science education.International Journal of Science Education,22(9),1041-4153.
5. Clement, J.,G. Glover,R. Ronning,C. Reynolds (Eds.)(1989).Learning via Model Construction and Criticism.Handbook of creativity: Assessment theory and research.
6. Coll, R.K.,France, B.,Taylor, I.(2005).The role of models/and analogies in science education: implications from research.International Journal of Science Education,27(2),183-198.
7. Gilbert, J.,Boulter, C.,Elmer, R.,J. Gilbert,C. Boulter (eds.)(2000).Developing Models in Science Education.Dordrecht:Kluwer.
8. Gobert, J.D.,Buckley, B.C.(2000).Introduction to model-based teaching and learning in science education.International Journal of Science Education,22(9),891-895.
9. Greca, I.M.,Moreira, M.A.(2002).Mental, Physical, and Mathematical Models in the Teaching and Learning of Physics.Science Education,85(6),106-121.
10. Hubber, P.(2006).Year 12 Students` Mental Models of the Nature of Light.Research in Science Education,36,419-439.
11. Johnson-Laird, P. N.(1983).Mental models.Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press.
12. Johnson-Laird, P. N.,Byrne, R.(1996).Reasoning by model: the case of multiple quantification.Psychological Review,96(4),658-673.
13. Jonassen, D.(1996).Mindtools for critical thinking.Englewood Clifs, NJ:Prentice-Hall.
14. Justi, R.,Gilbert, J. K.(2002).Modelling, teachers` views on the nature of modelling, and implications for the education of modellers.International Journal of Science Education,24,369-387.
15. What is a Model?
16. Lin, J. C.,Hong, J. F.(2008).The Study of Junior High Students’ Pendulum Modeling Process with Computer Simulation.Kaohsiung City, Taiwan:CASE.
17. Lin, J. Y.(2005).Responses to anomalous data obtained from repeatable experiments in the laboratory.Journal of Research in Science Teaching,44(3),506-528.
18. Lopes, J. B.,Costa, N.(2007).The Evaluation of Modelling Competences: Difficulties and Potentials for the Learning of the Sciences.International Journal of Science Education,2(7),811-851.
19. Louca, L.,Zacharia, Z.C.(2007).The use of computer-based programming environments as computer modeling tools in early science education: The cases of textual and graphical program languages.International Journal of Science Education
20. National Research Council(1996).The national science education standards.Washington, DC:National Academy Press.
21. Norman, D.,D. Gentner,A. Stevens (eds.)(1983).Mental models.Hillsdale, N. J.:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
22. Pendulum
23. Park, S.,Lee, S,Oliver, J. S.,Cramond, B.(2006).Changes in Korean science teachers` perceptions of creativity and science teaching after participating in an overseas professional development program.Journal of Science Teacher Education,17,37-64.
24. Sins, P. H.,Savelsbergh, E. R.,van Joolingen, W. R.(2005).The difficult process of scientific modelling: An analysis of novices` reasoning during computer-based modelling.International Journal of Science Education,27,1695-1721.
25. Stains, M.,Talanquer, V.(2007).Classification of chemical substances using particulate representations of matter: An analysis of student thinking.International Journal of Science Education,29,643-661.
26. Treagust, D. F.,Chittleborough, G.,Mamiala, T. L.(2002).Students` understanding of the role of scientific models in learning science.International Journal of Science Education,24(4),357-368.
27. Van Someren, M. W.,Barnard, Y. F.,Sandberg, J. A. C.(1994).The think aloud method.London:Academic Press.
28. Vosniadou, S.(1994).Capturing and modelling the process of conceptual change.Learning and Instruction,4(1),45-69.
29. Vosniadou, S.,L. Magnani,N. Nersessian(2002).Model-Based Reasoning: Science, Technology, Values.New York:Kluwer Academic Press.
30. Whicker, M. L.,Sigelman, L.(1991).Computer Simulation Applications: An Introduction.London:SAGE.
31. White, B. Y.,Frederiksen, J. R.(1998).Inquiry, modeling, and metacognition.Cognition and instruction,16(1),3-118.
32. White, B. Y.,Frederiksen, J. R.,M. J. Jacobson,R.B. Kozma (Eds.)(2000).Innovations in Science and Mathematics Education.London:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
33. Scientific Inquiry Learning Using Computer Supported Experimentation
34. Zhang, B.,Krajcik, J.,Liu, X.(2006).Expert models and modeling processes associated with a computer modeling tool.Science Education.
35. 吳明珠(2004)。博士論文(博士論文)。台北市，國立臺灣師範大學。
36. 吳國禎(2003)。單擺：運動的基元。物理雙月刊，25(6)，904-910。
37. 林琦焜(2003)。單擺運動。數學傳播，27(2)，32-43。
38. 邱美虹(2007)。模型與建模力之理論架構。第23屆科學教育學術研討會，高雄市:
39. 國中理化地科
40. 教育部(1999)。國民中小學九年一貫課程總綱。台北市:教育部。
41. 教育部(2003)。國民中小學課程綱要：自然與生活科技學習領域。教育部網站（國民中小學九年一貫課程與教學網站）資料。
42. 郭文鐧(2002)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。高雄市，國立高雄師範大學。
43. 黃福坤(2006)。透過物理模擬動畫進行物理教學與學習。物理雙月刊，28(3)，536-544。

1. 崔夢萍、林英傑(2011)。電腦輔助建模學習活動對國小高年級學生溫室效應與全球暖化學習影響之研究。環境教育研究，9(1)，37-74。
2. 林英傑(2011)。電腦輔助建模學習活動對國小高年級學童建模能力之研究。教學科技與媒體，96，22-42。
3. 徐瑛黛,李文瑜(2020)。電腦輔助環境融入科學建模教學對學生模型建立之影響。數位學習科技期刊，12(2)，25-53。