题名

為詩人辯護:再論「窮而後工」說在宋代的理論反響

并列篇名

The Defence of Poetry: The Reaction and Development of the Discourse That Poetry Can Make People Misfortune On Song Dynasty

DOI

10.6238/SIS.202303_(45-1).02

作者

鍾曉峰(ZHONG, XIAO-FENG)

关键词

詩能窮人 ; 窮而後工 ; 詩能達人 ; 窮而不悔 ; 宋詩學 ; Shi Neng Qiong Ren(詩能窮人) ; Shi Qiong Er Hou Gong(窮而後工) ; Shi Neng Da Ren(詩能達人) ; Qiong Er Bu Hui(窮而不悔) ; Poetry of Song Dynasty

期刊名称

中國學術年刊

卷期/出版年月

45_1期(2023 / 03 / 01)

页次

33 - 59

内容语文

繁體中文;英文

中文摘要

唐人對於詩人多窮的現象開始有更深刻的認識,認為詩人之窮來自於造物者的懲罰,「窮」與詩人有著不解之緣。至北宋歐陽修提出「窮而後工」說,不僅化解詩人與造物之間的對立關係,同時也肯定窮困有助於詩藝之提升。此說一出,影響深遠,促使宋人更為全面深刻地審視「窮」與「工」的關係,進而思考「窮」與詩人創作、作品評價之間的相互脈絡。在此理論反思背景中,「詩能達人」與「窮而不悔」之說也相繼出現,或認為詩可使作者通達,或強調無怨無悔地以詩固窮。上述論點之間的反響與發展,逐漸形成一個彼此對話,自成系統的詩學理論,也是「為詩人辯護」的歷程。

英文摘要

Most poets were interesting to discuss the relationship between poetry and poverty on Tang and Song Dynasty. Poets of the Tang Dynasty began to believe that writing poetry would make people poor. This is the important theory of 'Shi neng qiong ren' (詩能窮人). One of the reasons is that the outstanding poet played the role of Creator overstepped the Creator's authority and is finally condemned to live in eternal suffering. Another of the reasons is that the poet was overly focused on writing poetry and failed in society. Anyway, the misfortune of the poet is thought to be a destiny. Until Ouyang Xiu(歐陽修)proposed 'Qiong er hou gong' (窮而後工) on Northern Song Dynasty and this theory has only begun to get revised. It emphasized that poverty leads to perfect works. This proposition puts the value of literary creation back to the creating itself. At the same time, poets of the Song Dynasty thought that the poets didn't not regret even facing poverty. Some even thought that poetry creation can bring success. And it can be named 'Qiong er bu hui' (窮而不悔) and 'Shi neng da ren' (詩能達人). These three ideas had both a diachronic development and a theoretical debate. In this article I defined it as Shi-Qiong discourse. It is a systematic theory of poetics that focused on the relationship of poet's self-evaluation and creation of poetry. Researchers discussed one of these issues in isolation but ignored the theoretical relevance for a long time. Now we should re-examine the theoretical value of Shi-Qiong discourse.

主题分类 人文學 > 人文學綜合
人文學 > 歷史學
人文學 > 語言學
人文學 > 中國文學
参考文献
  1. 陳英傑, YING-CHIEH(2016)。論白居易詩歌的「自我批評」。淡江中文學報,35,205-242。
    連結:
  2. 鞏本棟, BEN-DONG(2007)。「詩窮而後工」的歷史考察。中央大學人文學報,31,121-144。
    連結:
  3. 鍾曉峰, XIAO-FENG(2017)。以窮為亨——楊萬里的詩窮論及詩學精神。清華中文學報,17,173-219。
    連結:
  4. (宋)洪邁, MAI,孔凡禮(點校), FAN-LI(2005).容齋隨筆.北京=Beijing:中華書局=Zhonghua Book Company.
  5. (宋)范仲淹, ZHONG-YAN,李勇先(校點), YONG-XIAN,王蓉貴(校點), RONG-GUI(2007).范仲淹全集.成都=Chengdu:四川大學出版社=Sichuan University Press.
  6. (宋)秦觀, GUAN,徐培均(箋注), PEI-JUN(1994).淮海集箋注.上海=Shanghai:上海古籍出版社=Shanghai Ancient Books Publishing House.
  7. (宋)張耒, LEI,李逸安(點校), YI-AN,孫通海(點校), TONG-HAI,傅信(點校), XIN(1990).張耒集.北京=Beijing:中華書局=Zhonghua Book Company.
  8. (宋)張邦基, BANG-JI,孔凡禮(點校), FAN-LI(2002).墨莊漫錄.北京=Beijing:中華書局=Zhonghua Book Company.
  9. (宋)梅堯臣, YAO-CHEN,朱東潤(校注), DONG-RUN(1980).梅堯臣集編年校注.上海=Shanghai:上海古籍出版社=Shanghai Ancient Books Publishing House.
  10. (宋)陸游, YOU,錢仲聯(校注), ZHONG-LIAN(2008).劍南詩稿校注.上海=Shanghai:上海古籍出版社=Shanghai Ancient Books Publishing House.
  11. (宋)楊萬里, WAN-LI,辛更儒(箋校), GENG-RU(2007).楊萬里集箋校.北京=Beijing:中華書局=Zhonghua Book Company.
  12. (宋)劉克莊, KE-ZHUANG,辛更儒(箋校), GENG-RU(2011).劉克莊集箋校.北京=Beijing:中華書局=Zhonghua Book Company.
  13. (宋)樓鑰, YUE,顧大朋(點校), DA-PENG(2010).樓鑰集.杭州=Hangzhou:浙江古籍出版社=Zhejiang Ancient Books Publishing House.
  14. (宋)歐陽修, XIU,李逸安(點校), YI-AN(2001).歐陽修全集.北京=Beijing:中華書局=Zhonghua Book Company.
  15. (宋)蘇軾, SHI,(清)王文誥(輯注), WEN-GAO,孔凡禮(點校), FAN-LI(2009).蘇軾詩集.北京=Beijing:中華書局=Zhonghua Book Company.
  16. (宋)蘇軾, SHI,孔凡禮(點校), FAN-LI(2008).蘇軾文集.北京=Beijing:中華書局=Zhonghua Book Company.
  17. (唐)白居易, JU-YI,朱金城(箋注), JIN-CHENG(2003).白居易集箋校.上海=Shanghai:上海古籍出版社=Shanghai Ancient Books Publishing House.
  18. (唐)白居易, JU-YI,謝思煒(校注), SI-WEI(2006).白居易詩集校注.北京=Beijing:中華書局=Zhonghua Book Company.
  19. (唐)杜甫, FU,(清)仇兆鰲(注), ZHAO-AO(1999).杜詩詳註.北京=Beijing:中華書局=Zhonghua Book Company.
  20. (唐)陸龜蒙, GUI-MENG,宋景昌(點校), JING-CHANG,王立群(點校), LI-QUN(1996).甫里先生文集.開封=Kaifeng:河南大學出版社=Henan University Press.
  21. (唐)韓愈, YU,馬其昶(校注), QI-CHANG(1998).韓昌黎文集校注.上海=Shanghai:上海古籍出版社=Shanghai Ancient Books Publishing House.
  22. (清)何文煥(輯), WEN-HUAN(2001).歷代詩話.北京=Beijing:中華書局=Zhonghua Book Company.
  23. (清)董誥(編), GAO,孫映逵(點校), YING-KUI(2002).全唐文.太原=Taiyuan:山西教育出版社=Shanxi Education Press.
  24. 王宏芹, HONG-QIN(2018).晚年陸游的日常生活與詩歌創作——幾個側面的研究.成都=Chengdu:四川大學出版社=Sichuan University Press.
  25. 北京大學古文獻研究所(編)=PEKING UNIVERSITY CHINESE ANCIENT BOOK RESEARCH CENTER(1992).全宋詩.北京=Beijing:北京大學出版社=Peking University Press.
  26. 伍曉蔓, XIAO-MAN(2011)。從居富到處窮:北宋尚富詩學淺論。第六屆宋代文學國際研討會論文集,成都=Chengdu:
  27. 宇文所安, STEPHEN,陳引馳(譯), YIN-CHI,陳磊(譯), LEI(2006).中國中世紀的終結:中唐文學文化論集.北京=Beijing:生活•讀書•新知三聯書店=SDX Joint Publishing Company.
  28. 吳承學, CHENG-XUE(2011).中國古代文體學研究.北京=Beijing:人民出版社=People's Publishing House.
  29. 李咏吟, YONG-YIN(2017)。為詩辯護:錫得尼與雪萊基於希臘的詩學理想。浙江學刊,2017(3),152-161。
  30. 周裕鍇, YU-KAI(2007).宋代詩學通論.上海=Shanghai:上海古籍出版社=Shanghai Ancient Books Publishing House.
  31. 胡曉明, XIAO-MING(1993).中國詩學之精神.南昌=Nanchang:江西人民出版社=Jiangxi People’s publishing House.
  32. 張健, JIAN(1978)。「詩窮而後工」說之探究。幼獅學誌,15(1),1-55。
  33. 梁庚堯, GENG-YAO(1991)。南宋的貧士與貧宦。臺大歷史學報,16
  34. 曾棗莊(編), ZAO-ZHUANG,劉琳(編), LIN(2006).全宋文.上海=Shanghai:上海辭書出版社=Shanghai Lexicographical Publishing House.
  35. 葉燁, YE(2008).北宋文人的經濟生活.南昌=Nanchang:百花洲文藝出版社=Baihuazhou Literature and Art Press.
  36. 管琴, QIN(2016)。宋代窮而後工論之異說考。文藝研究,2016(12),73-82。
  37. 劉子健, ZI-JIAN(2002).中國轉向內在——兩宋之際的文化內向.南京=Nanjing:江蘇人民出版社=Jiangsu People's Publishing House.
  38. 錢鍾書, ZHONG-SHU(2007).管錐編.北京=Beijing:生活•讀書•新知三聯書店=SDX Joint Publishing Company.
  39. 錫德尼,錢學熙(譯), XUE-XI(1998).為詩辯護.北京=Beijing:人民文學出版社=People's Literature Publishing House.