復古與開新－論鍾嶸《詩品》於詩歌風格「清」之開展定位

Vintage and Innovation: Discussion on how Zhong Rong's "Shipin" unfolds and defines the poetic style "Qing"

10.6238/SIS.202309_(45-2).04

沈芳如(SHEN, FANG-JU)

清 ； 詩品 ； 陶潛 ； 六朝 ； 文學批評 ； Qing ； Shipin ； Tao Qian ； Six Dynasties ； literary criticism

中國學術年刊

45_2期（2023 / 09 / 01）

97 - 122

繁體中文;英文

本文旨在探論鍾嶸《詩品》之「清」具有何許樣態與定位，相對於成熟論述之明清古典詩學，又存在何許異同甚且啟發。蓋明清古典詩學之「清」，論述重心乃著力避免因明澈輕揚而來之淺弱枯寂；或以「清厚」為詩之極致，或以田園詩人陶潛為「清」之宗範。而《詩品》雖從未刻意論述「清」，亦未曾表露高度評價；全書卻頻繁以「清」論詩，表露對於「清」之理想期待，甚且以陶詩之「清」啟引後世。值得注意者，《詩品》理想之「清」乃異於後世開展，中品陶潛之「清」始近之。是故《詩品》之「清」乃存在復古與開新之雙重面向，復古面向進一步啟引開新風格不致淺弱枯寂。透過《詩品》可見古典詩學「清」之初期樣態與評價，更得進一步廓清《詩品》於「清」之開展定位及獨有價值。

This article aims to explore the interpretation and positioning of the "Qing" in Zhong Rong's "Poetry" for this aesthetic style; and the similarities and differences between this interpretation and positioning compared with later generations, especially the classical poetics of the Ming and Qing Dynasties. The"Qing" of Ming and Qing classical poetics focuses on not only elucidating the clear and light style, but also avoiding the shallow and dullness caused by the clear and light style; it either takes "clear and thick" as the ultimate poetry, or uses the pastoral poet Tao Qian is the patriarch of "Qing". However, although "Shi Pin" never deliberately discussed "Qing", nor did it express a high evaluation; the whole book frequently uses "Qing" to discuss poetry, expressing ideal expectations for "Qing", and even using "Qing" in Tao's poems as inspiration Hereafter. It is worth noting that the ideal "Qing" in "Shipin" is different from the development of later generations, and the "Qing" of Tao Qian in the middle grade is the closest. Therefore, the "Qing" in "Poetry" has the dual aspects of retro and innovation, and the retro aspect further affects the innovative style so that it will not be weak and dull. Through "Poetry", we can see the initial state and evaluation of classical poetics "Qing", and further clarify the development orientation and unique value of "Shipin" in "Qing".

1. （宋）陳思（編）, SI,崔爾平（校注）, ER-PING(2013).書苑菁華校注.上海=Shanghai:上海辭書出版社=Shanghai Lexicographical Publishing House.
2. （明）許學夷, XUE-YI(1987).詩源辯體.北京=Beijing:人民文學出版社=People's Literature Publishing House.
3. （明）謝榛, ZHEN,宛平（校點）, PING(1998).四溟詩話.北京=Beijing:人民文學出版社=People's Literature Publishing House.
4. （唐）弘法大師,王利器（校注）, LI-QI(1991).文鏡秘府論校注.臺北=Taipei:貫雅文化=Guanya Wenhua.
5. （晉）陸機, JI,（南朝梁）鍾嶸, RONG,楊明（譯注）, MING(2019).文賦詩品譯注.上海=Shanghai:上海古籍出版社=Shanghai Ancient Books Publishing House.
6. （梁）沈約, YUE(1993).宋書.臺北=Taipei:鼎文書局=Tingwen Publisher CO., LTD..
7. （梁）劉勰, XIE,詹鍈（義證）, YING(1989).文心雕龍義證.上海=Shanghai:上海古籍出版社=Shanghai Ancient Books Publishing.
8. （梁）蕭子顯, ZI-XIAN(2017).南齊書.北京=Beijing:中華書局=Zhonghua Book Company.
9. （梁）鍾嶸, RONG,王叔岷（箋證）, SHU-MIN(2004).鍾嶸詩品箋證稿.臺北=Taipei:中研院文哲所=Academia Sinica.
10. （梁）鍾嶸, RONG,呂德申（校釋）, DE-SHEN(2000).鍾嶸詩品校釋.北京=Beijing:北京大學出版社=Peking University Press.
11. （梁）鍾嶸, RONG,曹旭（注）, XU(2011).詩品集注.上海=Shanghai:上海古籍出版社=Shanghai Ancient Books Publishing House.
12. （梁）鍾嶸, RONG,許文雨（疏）, WEN-YU(1983).鍾嶸詩品講疏.成都=Chengdu:成都古籍書店=Chengdu Ancient Books Store.
13. （梁）鍾嶸, RONG,陳延傑（注）, YAN-JIE(2001).詩品注.北京=Beijing:人民文學出版社=People's Literature Publishing House.
14. （清）方東樹, DONG-SHU,汪紹楹（校點）, SHAO-YING(2006).昭昧詹言.北京=Beijing:人民文學出版社=People's Literature Publishing House.
15. （清）何文煥（編）, WEN-HUAN,（清）丁福保（編）, FU-BAO(2003).歷代詩話統編.北京=Beijing:北京圖書館出版社=Beijing Library Press.
16. （清）沈德潛, DE-QIAN(1996).古詩源箋注.臺北=Taipei:華正書局=Hua Zheng Book Co., Ltd..
17. （清）沈德潛, DE-QIAN(2005).說詩晬語.北京=Beijing:人民文學出版社=People's Literature Publishing House.
18. 丁朝虹, ZHAO-HONG(2019).「淡」之思——中國審美理想的生成與嬗變.北京=Beijing:作家出版社=The Writers Publishing House Co., Ltd..
19. 小野澤精一（編）, KIYOSHI,福永光司（編）, KOUJI,山井涌（編）, CHON,李慶（譯）, QING(2007).氣的思想—中國自然觀與人的觀念的發展.上海=Shanghai:上海人民出版社=Shanghai Renmin Chubanshe.
20. 王小虎, XIAO-HU(2020).先秦氣論思想.北京=Beijing:中國社會科學出版社=China Social Sciences Press.
21. 王運熙, YUN-XI,楊明, MING(1989).魏晉南北朝文學批評史.上海=Shanghai:上海古籍出版社=Shanghai Ancient Books Publishing House.
22. 四庫未收書輯刊編纂委員會=SI KU WEI SHOU SHU JI KAN BIAN ZUAN WEI YUAN HUI(1998).四庫未收書輯刊.北京=Beijing:北京出版社=Beijing Publishing House.
23. 四庫全書存目叢書編纂委員會=SI KU QUAN SHU CUN MU CONG SHU BIAN ZUAN WEI YUAN HUI(1997).四庫全書存目叢書.臺南=Tainan:莊嚴文化事業=Solemn Culture Business Co., Ltd..
24. 何莊, ZHUANG(2007)。論魏晉南北朝的文論之"清"——兼及陶淵明的品第。中國人民大學學報，2007(2)，120-126。
25. 余培林, PEI-LIN(1993).詩經正詁.臺北=Taipei:三民書局=San Min Book Co., Ltd..
26. 吳文治（編）, WEN-ZHI(2006).遼金元詩話全編.南京=Nanjing:鳳凰出版社=Phoenix Publishing House Co., Ltd..
27. 吳文治（編）, WEN-ZHI(2006).明詩話全編.南京=Nanjing:鳳凰出版社=Phoenix Publishing House Co., Ltd..
28. 吳文治（編）, WEN-ZHI(2006).明詩話全編.南京=Nanjing:鳳凰出版社=Phoenix Publishing House Co., Ltd..
29. 吳文治（編）, WEN-ZHI(2006).明詩話全編.南京=Nanjing:鳳凰出版社=Phoenix Publishing House Co., Ltd..
30. 李建松, JIAN-SONG(2012)。鍾嶸《詩品》以「清」論詩探析。長江大學學報（社會科學版），35(7)，5-7。
31. 孟慶雷, QING-LEI(2014).鍾嶸詩品的概念內涵與文化底蘊.北京=Beijing:中國社會科學出版社=China Social Sciences Press.
32. 金耀民, YAO-MIN(2014)。怨與清：鍾嶸「滋味」論詩的文學史意義。北方論叢，2014(2)，12-15。
33. 姜曉雲, XIAO-YUN(2000)。「清」與「怨」的歷史傳承與鍾嶸《詩品》。文藝理論研究，2000(3)，62-66。
34. 胡艷娜, YAN-NA(2010)。論鍾嶸《詩品》中的「清」。語文學刊，2010(7)，30-31。
35. 清代詩文集彙編編纂委員會=QING DAI SHI WEN JI HUI BIAN BIAN ZUAN WEI YUAN HUI(2010).清代詩文集彙編.上海=Shanghai:上海古籍出版社=Shanghai Ancient Books Publishing House.
36. 逯欽立, QIN-LI(1998).先秦漢魏晉南北朝詩.北京=Beijing:中華書局=Zhonghua Book Company.
37. 新文豐編輯部（編）=XIN WEN FENG BIAN JI BU(1997).叢書集成三編.臺北=Taipei:新文豐=Shin Wen Feng Print Co..
38. 劉師培, SHI-PEI(1959).南北學派不同論.臺北=Taipei:國民出版社=National Publishing House.
39. 蔣寅, YIN(2000)。古典詩學中「清」的概念。中國社會科學，2000(1)，146-157。
40. 蔡鎮楚（編）, ZHEN-CHU(2004).中國詩話珍本叢書.北京=Beijing:北京圖書館出版社=Beijing Library Press.
41. 韓經太, JING-TAI(2017).清淡美論辯析.南昌=Nanchang:百花洲文藝出版社=Baihuazhou Literature Press.
42. 續修四庫全書編委會=XU XIU SI KU QUAN SHU BIAN WEI HUI(2002).續修四庫全書.上海=Shanghai:上海古籍出版社=Shanghai Ancient Books Publishing House.
43. 續修四庫全書編委會=XU XUI SI KU QUAN SHU BIAN WEI HUI(2002).續修四庫全書.上海=Shanghai:上海古籍出版社=Shanghai Ancient Books Publishing House.
44. 龔斌, BIN(1999).陶淵明集校箋.上海=Shanghai:上海古籍出版社=Shanghai Ancient Books Publishing House.