全尺寸二層樓雙核心自復位斜撐構架與夾型挫屈束制斜撐構架之耐震試驗與非線性動力歷時分析

Seismic Tests and Nonlinear Time History Analyses of Full-Scale Two-Story Steel Frames with DC-SCBs and SBRBs

10.6849/SE.201706_32(2).0002

周中哲(Chung-Che Chou)；蕭佳宏(Chia-Hung Hsiao)；陳澤邦(Ze-Bang Chen)；鍾秉庭(Ping-Ting Chung)；范廷海(Dinh-Hai Pham)

雙核心自復位斜撐 ； 夾型挫屈束制斜撐 ； 二層樓鋼構架試驗 ； Dual-core self-centering brace (DC-SCB) ； Sandwiched buckling-restrained brace (SBRB) ； Tests of two-story steel braced frames

結構工程

32卷2期（2017 / 06 / 01）

35 - 64

繁體中文

雙核心自復位斜撐是利用斜撐中的兩組拉力構件束制斜撐中的三組鋼受壓構件，並利用第一核心構件與外層構件之相對位移進行摩擦消能，使斜撐受軸拉與軸壓下提供自復位及消能能力，即在大變形下具有回到零殘餘變形的能力；夾型挫屈束制斜撐則是利用兩組獨立分離的圍束構件以栓接方式束制斜撐中的核心構件，使得斜撐受壓不會挫屈而產生飽滿的遲滯消能。本研究主要目的為比較雙核心自復位斜撐與夾型挫屈束制斜撐安裝在相同梁柱構架下的影響，因此設計三組三層樓鋼造斜撐構架，分別為雙核心自復位斜撐構架(Dual-Core Self-Centering Braced Frame, DC-SCBF)、特殊混合斜撐構架(Special Mixed Braced Frame, SMBF)及夾型挫屈束制斜撐構架(Sandwiched Buckling-Restrained Braced Frame, SBRBF)，其中特殊混合斜撐構架之斜撐由雙核心自復位斜撐和夾型挫屈束制斜撐分別配置於不同樓層，目的是結合兩種不同力學行為的斜撐於單一構架中進行抗震。本研究以非線性側推及動力歷時分析三組斜撐構架在20組強地動地震紀錄下的反應，並於實驗室進行三組全尺寸二層樓鋼造斜撐構架試驗，目的為檢驗三組斜撐構架的側向勁度、能量消散、殘餘變位、累積韌性、等效阻尼比及耐震性能等抗震行為。

Traditional seismic resisting systems in a large earthquake can experience significant damage and residual drifts due to energy dissipation of some structural members, which leads to difficult or expensive to repair after earthquakes. A steel dual-core self-centering brace (DC-SCB), which utilizes three steel bracing members, two friction devices, and two sets of tensioning elements that are in a parallel arrangement for doubling its axial deformation, has been proposed and validated to provide both the energy dissipation and self-centering properties to seismic resisting systems. A prototype three-story steel dual-core self-centering braced frame (DC-SCBF) was designed, and its full-scale one-bay DC-SCBF was tested to validate the system response. The DC-SCB was then replaced by the sandwiched buckling-restrained brace (SBRB) in a full-scale two-story frame, so the seismic performance of the DC-SCBF and the special mixed braced frame (SMBF) that has both the DC-SCB and SBRB in a frame could be evaluated. The full-scale two-story DC-SCBF, SMBF and BRBF subassembly specimen performed well up to an interstory drift of 2% after multiple tests. Nonlinear time history analyses were also performed on the prototype braced frames to obtain seismic demands.

1. 鋼結構極限設計法規範及解說(2010)，內政部營建署，臺灣。
2. AISC(2010).Seismic provisions for structural steel buildings.Chicago, IL:American Institute of Steel Construction.
3. AISC=American Institute of Steel Construction(2010).Manual of steel construction load and resistance factor design.Chicago, IL:
4. ASCE Standard. (2010). “Minimum Design Loads for Building and Other Structures.” American Society of Civil Engineers.
5. Chou, C-C,Chen, Y-C(2015).Development of Steel Dual-Core Self-Centering Braces: Quasi-Static Cyclic Tests and Finite Element Analyses.Earthquake Spectra,31(1),247-272.
6. Chou, C-C,Chen, Y-C,Pham, D-H,Truong, V-M(2014).Steel Braced Frames with Dual-Core SCBs and Sandwiched BRBs: Mechanics, Modeling and Seismic Demands.Engineering Structures,72,26-40.
7. Chou, C-C,Chung, P-T.(2014).Development of Cross-Anchored Dual-Core Self-Centering Braces for Seismic Resistance.J. Constructional Steel Research,101,19-32.
8. Chou, C-C,Chung, P-T,Cheng, Y-T.(2016).Experimental Evaluation of Large-Scale Dual-Core Self-Centering Braces and Sandwiched Buckling-Restrained Braces.Engineering Structures,116,12-25.
9. Chou, C-C,Wu, T-H,Beato, Ovalle R-A,Chung, P-T,Chen, Y-H.(2016).Seismic Design and Tests of a Full-Scale One-Story One-Bay Steel Frame with a Dual-Core Self-Centering Brace.Engineering Structures,111,435-450.
10. Fahnestock, L.A.,Sause, R.,Ricles, J.(2003).Analytical and experimental studies on buckling restraint braced composite frames.roc. Int. Workshop on Steel and Concrete Composite Construction,Taiwan:
11. FEMA-273(1997).NEHRP Gguidelines for Seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings.Washington, D.C.:Building Seismic Safety Council, FEMA.
12. Filiatrault, A.,Tremblay, R.,Kar, R.(2000).Seismic evaluation of friction spring seismic damper.Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE,126,491-499.
13. Sabelli, R,Mahin, S.,Chang, C.(2003).Seismic Demands on Steel Braced Frame Buildings with Buckling-restrained Braces.Engineering Structures,25,655-666.
14. Sheliang, W.,Xindong, Z.,Wang, S.,Junqiang, Z.(2004).The seismic response analysis of isolation structure with shape memory alloy re-centering dampers.Proc. 10th JSSI Symp. On Performance of Response Controlled Buildings,Yokohama, Japan:
15. Tremblay, R.,Lacerte, M.,Christopoulos, C.(2008).Seismic Response of Multistory Buildings with Self-Centering Energy Dissipative Steel Braces.J. Structural Engineering,134,108-120.
16. Tsai, K-C,Lin, B-Z(2003).,Center for Earthquake Engineering Research National Taiwan University.
17. Uang, C-M,Kiggins, S(2003).Reducing residual drift of buckling-restrained braced frames.Workshop on Steel and Concrete Composite Construction,Taiwan:
18. 周中哲,吳宗翰,陳澤邦,陳映全,Beato, Alexis Rafael Ovalle,鍾秉庭(2015)。創新鋼造雙核心自復位斜撐抗震構架於臺灣的發展 : 由斜撐至實尺寸構架實驗驗證。鋼結構工程，55，54-76。
19. 周中哲,陳昇陽(2010)。可更換核心板之挫屈束制消能支撐耐震試驗及有限元素分析。結構工程，25(1)，43-70。
20. 周中哲,陳映全(2012)。預力雙核心自復位斜撐發展與耐震實驗。結構工程，27(3)，108-126。
21. 周中哲,陳映全,范庭海,鍾秉庭,張武明(2014)。鋼造雙核心自復位斜撐實驗分析與韌性斜撐構架之動力歷時行為。結構工程，29(3)，81-104。
22. 周中哲,劉佳豪(2011)。挫屈束制消能斜撐構架接合板耐震設計及試驗分析。結構工程，26(4)，91-100。
23. 周中哲,劉佳豪(2012)。可更換核心板之挫屈束制消能斜撐實尺寸構架耐震試驗：單與雙接合板設計及驗證。結構工程，27(2)，95-114。
24. 周中哲,鍾秉庭(2014)。交錨型雙核心自復位斜撐發展驗證：耐震試驗及有限元素分析。結構工程，29(2)，81-103。
25. 周中哲,鍾秉庭,鄭宇岑(2016)。全尺寸雙核心自復位斜撐及夾型挫屈束制斜撐耐震試驗。結構工程，31(1)，93-111。
26. 陳正誠(2000)。韌性同心斜撐構架與韌性斜撐構材之耐震行為與設計。結構工程，25(1)，53-78。
27. 陳澤邦(2015)。國立臺灣大學土木工程系。
28. 蔡克銓,賴俊維(2002)。鋼骨消能支撐構架之耐震研究。結構工程，17(2)，3-32。
29. 蕭佳宏(2015)。國立臺灣大學土木工程系。

1. 鍾秉庭,劉佳豪,陳俊翰,張盈智,周中哲(2020)。鋼造夾型挫屈束制斜撐於高層建物設計實驗及應用。土木水利，47(6)，52-58。