採托架支承配置挫屈束制支撐之新建RC構架設計、試驗與抗震性能分析

Seismic Design and Tests of the Beam-column Joint in a Buckling-Restrained RC Braced Frame

10.6849/SE.201803_33(1).0004

林庭立(Ting-Li Lin)；吳安傑(An-Chien Wu)；王孔君(Kung-Juin Wang)；蔡克銓(Keh-Chyuan Tsai)

挫屈束制支撐 ； 鋼筋混凝土結構 ； 托架 ； 梁柱接頭 ； 非線性動力歷時分析 ； buckling-restrained brace ； reinforced concrete structure ； corbel ； beam-column joint ； nonlinear response history analysis

結構工程

33卷1期（2018 / 03 / 01）

84 - 102

繁體中文

本文針對採Z字形（zigzag）配置挫屈束制支撐（buckling-restrained brace, BRB）於新建鋼筋混凝土（reinforced concrete, RC）構架中的接合介面進行探討，依據現行耐震設計規範提出一棟含BRB之12層樓RC結構設計例。為了解所提接合方式之施工性與耐震性能，擷取設計例中位於10樓的RC梁柱接頭處進行細部設計，並製作含接合板基座及托架之實尺寸梁與柱節點子結構試體進行反覆載重試驗。試驗結果顯示，接頭處之接合板基座及托架未發生明顯損壞，可有效傳遞BRB與RC構架間的力量，並證實所提接合方式之設計與施工方法可供工程實務應用。為更進一步探討整體結構系統受震反應，本研究採用三種地震危害度（SLE, DBE and MCE）共240組含近斷層之地震加速度歷時進行非線性動力歷時分析。分析結果顯示，整體結構系統高模態振動反應並不顯著，三種危害度地震下BRB最大抗層間側力比例平均值分別為23%（SLE）、21%（DBE）及19%（MCE）；DBE及MCE等級地震下，最大層間側位移角則分別為0.0182及0.0232弧度。此外，接合板基座之最大水平向拉力需求可採相鄰兩組BRB可能發展之最大拉力強度水平向合力之70%進行設計。

In this study, the brace connection performance in the new reinforced concrete (RC) frame buildings with buckling-restrained braces (BRBs) arranged in a zigzag configuration is investigated. A 12-story buckling-restrained braced RC building is proposed following the model building codes as a prototype. In order to verify the constructability and the seismic performance of the proposed connection, the beam-column joint at the tenth floor selected as the sub-assemblage specimen was designed and fabricated. The full-scale sub-assemblage, including the BRB gusset bracket and a pair of RC corbels, in the proposed BRB-RCF structural system was tested using cyclic loading procedure. Test results demonstrate that the proposed BRB-to-RC connection details performed very well without failure in the steel gusset bracket or the RC corbels. The design and construction of the sub-assemblage specimen show the feasibility of the proposed system for practical applications. In order to further gain insights into the seismic performance of the BRB-RCF system, nonlinear response history analyses were conducted using a total of 240 (SLE, DBE and MCE) ground accelerations. Analysis results indicate that the mean maximum total BRB shear to base story shear ratios are about 23%, 21% and 19% for SLE, DBE and MCE, respectively. The maximum inter-story drift ratios under the DBE and MCE events are 1.82% and 2.32%, respectively. Analysis results also suggest that the high mode effect is moderate. It is found that the peak demand of the horizontal tension force on the gusset bracket can be estimated by considering 70% of the sum of the horizontal force components computed from the maximum tension strengths of two adjacent BRBs.

1. American Concrete Institute=ACI(2005).Acceptance Criteria for Moment Frames Based on Structural Testing and Commentary (ACI 374.1-05).Farmington Hills, Michigan:ACI.
2. American Concrete Institute=ACI(2011).Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete and Commentary (ACI 318-11).Farmington Hills, Michigan:ACI.
3. Baker, JW,Lin, T,Shahi, SK,Jayaram, N(2011).,Berkeley, California:Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center.
4. Brown, P,Aiken, ID,Jafarzadeh, FJ(2001).Seismic retrofit of the Wallace F. Bennett Federal Building.Modern Steel Construction,August
5. Chuang, MC,Tsai, KC,Lin, PC,Wu, AC(2015).Critical limit states in seismic buckling-restrained brace and connection designs.Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics,44(10),1559-1579.
6. Computers and Structures, Inc., 2017. https://www.csiamerica.com/products/sap2000
7. Dassault Systèmes Simulia Corp., 2017. https://www.3ds.com/products-services/simulia/ products/abaqus.
8. Karsan, ID,Jirsa, JO(1969).Behavior of concrete under compressive loadings.Journal of the Structural Division,95(ST 12),2543-2563.
9. Lin, BZ,Chuang, MC,Tsai, KC(2009).Object-oriented development and application of a nonlinear structural analysis framework.Advances in Engineering Software,40(1),66-82.
10. Mahrenholtz, C,Lin, PC,Wu, AC,Tsai, KC,Hwang, SJ,Lin, RY,Bhayusukma, MY(2015).Retrofit of reinforced concrete frames with buckling-restrained braces.Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics,44(1),59-78.
11. Pan, KY,Wu, AC,Tsai, KC,Li, CH,Khoo, HH(2016).Seismic retrofit of reinforced concrete frames using buckling-restrained braces with bearing block load transfer mechanism.Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics,45(14),2303-2326.
12. Popovics, S(1973).A numerical approach to the complete stress-strain curve of concrete.Cement and Concrete Research,3(5),583-599.
13. Qu, Z,Kishiki, S,Maida, Y,Sakata, H,Wada, A(2015).Seismic responses of reinforced concrete frames with buckling restrained braces in zigzag configuration.Engineering Structures,105,12-21.
14. Qu, Z,Kishiki, S,Sakata, H,Wada, A,Maida, Y(2013).Subassemblage cyclic loading test of RC frame with buckling restrained braces in zigzag configuration.Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics,42(7),1087-1102.
15. Qu, Z,Maida, Y,Kishiki, S,Sakata, H(2012).Shear resistance of reinforced concrete corbels for shear keys.The 9th International Conference on Urban Earthquake Engineering and 4th Asia Conference on Earthquake Engineering,Tokyo, Japan:
16. Richards, J(2011).$48.5 million parking structure at John Wayne Airport is braced for the future.Airport Improvement Magazine,March–April
17. Structural Engineering Institute(2010).Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures (ASCE/SEI 7-10).Reston, Virginia:American Society of Civil Engineers.
18. Takeuchi, T,Yasuda, K,Iwata, M(2006).Studies on Integrated building facade engineering with high-performance structural elements.International Association for Bridge and Structural Engineering Symposium,Budapest, Hungary:
19. Tsai, KC,Wu, AC,Wei, CY,Lin, PC,Chuang, MC,Yu, YJ(2014).Welded end-slot connection and debonding layers for buckling-restrained braces.Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics,43(12),1785-1807.
20. Wada, A,Nakashima, M(2004).From infancy to maturity of buckling restrained braces research.The 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering,Vancouver, B.C., Canada:
21. Wu, AC,Tsai, KC,Yang, HH,Huang, JL,Li, CH,Wang, KJ,Khoo, HH(2017).Hybrid experimental performance of a full-scale two-story buckling-restrained braced RC frame.Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics,46(8),1223-1244.
22. 中國土木水利工程學會(2011).混凝土工程設計規範與解說（土木 401-100）.台北,台灣:科技圖書.
23. 中華民國內政部營建署，2011。建築物耐震設計規範及解說。內政部營建署，台北，台灣。
24. 吳安傑,林保均,莊明介,蔡克銓(2015)。挫屈束制支撐構架設計概要與工程應用。結構工程，30(1)，11-33。
25. 林柏州,許芳瑋,蔡克銓(2007)。物件導向非線性結構分析與圖形檢視軟體之應用。結構工程，22(3)，119-133。
26. 林庭立(2016)。台北，台灣，國立臺灣大學土木工程學系。
27. 楊巽閎,黃潔倫,吳安傑,李昭賢,蔡青宜,王孔君,蔡克銓(2016)。新建含挫屈束制支撐之實尺寸兩層樓鋼筋混凝土構架耐震設計、試驗與分析研究：二、試驗結果與模擬分析。結構工程，31(2)，115-136。
28. 楊巽閎,黃潔倫,吳安傑,李昭賢,蔡青宜,王孔君,蔡克銓(2016)。新建含挫屈束制支撐之實尺寸兩層樓鋼筋混凝土構架耐震設計、試驗與分析研究：一、試體設計與耐震試驗。結構工程，31(2)，91-114。
29. 潘冠宇,吳安傑,李昭賢,蔡克銓(2015)。挫屈束制支撐鋼框補強鋼筋混凝土構架之研究。結構工程，30(4)，41-62。
30. 蔡克銓,吳安傑,林保均,魏志毓(2012)。槽接式挫屈束制支撐與脫層材料性能研究。結構工程，27(3)，29-59。