题名

台灣混凝土變形預測模式B4-TW建置(一):基本潛變、乾燥潛變與總潛變

并列篇名

Establishment of B4-TW Prediction Model for Concrete Deformation in Taiwan (I): Basic Creep, Drying Creep and Total Creep

DOI

10.6849/SE.201809_33(3).0003

作者

劉庭愷(Ting-Kai Liu);陳振川(Jenn-Chuan Chern)

关键词

混凝土 ; 長期變形 ; 潛變 ; 收縮 ; 資料庫 ; Concrete ; Long-term Deformation ; Creep ; Shrinkage ; Database

期刊名称

結構工程

卷期/出版年月

33卷3期(2018 / 09 / 01)

页次

43 - 64

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

台灣目前之混凝土工程設計規範缺乏混凝土潛變之預測公式,工程師設計大多依循美國ACI規範,參考美國AASHTO公路橋梁設計規範;歐洲CEB-FIP、RILEM;或日本JSCE、JCI等作法。基於台灣混凝土材料、配比、施工與環境之地區特性,台灣著實需要發展良好之本土化混凝土潛變預測公式。本文指出運用現有之國內外混凝土潛變模式預測台灣混凝土資料之情形,結果顯示大多現有模式皆呈現低估的現象。本研究評估並選用Bazant 2015年提出之Model B4潛變預測公式為基礎,針對上述之台灣混凝土特性進行本土化修正,分別是在瞬時應變項中考慮因粒料堅實度較為不足造成之混凝土彈性模數折減;在基本潛變項中考慮因高漿體量及粒料性質造成高變形之現象;在乾燥潛變項中考慮台灣常用之砂岩粒料造成之影響。結果顯示,進行本土化修正後之Model B4-TW潛變預測公式與原始Model B4相比,預測台灣混凝土基本潛變資料時,迴歸分析中之決定係數R^2由0.52提升至0.78;預測總潛變資料變形時R^2由0.76提升至0.81。除R^2外,各國學者提出之不同統計指標也顯示Model B4-TW預測台灣潛變資料之表現較佳,建議發展成為適用台灣本土之混凝土潛變預測公式。

英文摘要

At present the concrete design code in Taiwan lacks any predictive model for concrete creep, which is why most engineers in Taiwan follow the models of the American Concrete Institute (ACI) or the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) of the US; the European CEB-FIP and RILEM; or the methods of the JSCE or JCI of Japan. Although the physical and chemical characteristics of concrete are essentially the same all across the world, each location uses its own constituent materials and mix design. In the present study, looking at the establishment of a concrete creep database for concrete in Taiwan, we have seen that the aggregate used in concrete of Taiwan is of lower quality. When formulating a mix design to attain higher strength, the resulting concrete will tend to have a high paste content, high cement content, low water cement ratio, and low aggregate/cement ratio. These local characteristics of concrete in Taiwan may lead to inaccuracies when they are applied to foreign predictive formulas, and in turn influence the structural behavior and safety of the concrete structures. Taiwan therefore has a manifest need for developing better localized predictive models for concrete creep. This study first presents the results from the predictive models for concrete creep (foreign and domestic formulas) applied to concrete in Taiwan. At present, it may be seen that the norms tend to undervalue. Then, it evaluates and actually uses the Model B4 predictive model for concrete creep suggested by Bazant in 2015 as a basis for the correction of characteristics in localized concrete in Taiwan in multiple situations: in instantaneous deformation items the reduction of the elasticity modulus in concrete due to low-quality aggregate was considered; in basic creep items the phenomenon of high levels of deformation due to high paste content and aggregate property were considered; in drying creep items the effect of sandstone aggregate, which is often used in Taiwan, was considered. Our results were as follows: after using the Model B4-TW model, which has been corrected for localized concrete in Taiwan, we may compare the two models (Model B4 and Model B4-TW); when predicting basic creep for Taiwan concrete, the coefficient of determination R^2 rose from 0.52 to 0.78; when predicting the total strain, R^2 rose from 0.76 to 0.81. In addition to R^2, the statistical indicators given by scholars from around the world have shown that the predictive capabilities of the Model B4-TW model for concrete creep data in Taiwan are superior to other models; thus it can be further developed as a predictive model for concrete creep in Taiwan.

主题分类 工程學 > 工程學總論
工程學 > 土木與建築工程
参考文献
  1. 陳振川,廖文正,劉庭愷,秦維邑(2018)。台灣混凝土潛變收縮資料庫建置及特質分析。結構工程,33(1),103-116。
    連結:
  2. (2017)。台灣混凝土學會 2017 年混凝土工程研討會(台灣混凝土潛變收縮資料庫建置及預測模式制定講座)
  3. AASHTO(2014).AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications.Washington DC:American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials=AASHTO.
  4. ACI Committee 209(2008).Guide for Modeling and Calculating Shrinkage and Creep in Hardened Concrete (ACI 209.2R-08).American Concrete Institute.
  5. ACI Committee 209(1982).Prediction of Creep, Shrinkage and Temperature Effects in Concrete Structures.Designing for Creep and Shrinkage in Concrete Structures, A Tribute to Adrian Pauw,Farmington Hills, MI:
  6. Bažant, Z.P.,Baweja, S.(2004).Creep and Shrinkage Prediction Model for Analysis and Design of Concrete Structures: Model B3.Materials and Structures,28,357-365+415-430+488-495.
  7. Bažant, Z.P.,Chern, J. C.(1987).Stress-Induced Thermal and Shrinkage Strains in Concrete.Journal of Engineering Mechanics,113,1493-1511.
  8. Bažant, Z.P.,Chern, J. C.(1985).Concrete Creep at Variable Humidity: Constitutive Law and Mechanism.Materials and Structures,18(103),1-20.
  9. Bažant, Z.P.,Hubler, M.H.,Wendner, R.(2015).RILEM Recommendation TC-242-MDCRILEM Recommendation TC-242-MDC,未出版
  10. Bažant, Z.P.,Panula, L.(1978).Practical prediction of time-dependent deformations of concrete.Materials and Structures,11(5),317-328.
  11. CEB(1999).Structural Concrete-Textbook on Behaviour, Design and Performance. Updated Knowledge of the CEB/FIP Model Code 1990.Lausanne, Switzerland:Federation Internationale du Beton.
  12. Chern, J. C.,Liu, T.C.(2009).Life-Cycle Management of Sustainable Public Infrastructure.International Symposium on Infrastructure and Environment,Japan:
  13. fib(2010).Model Code for Concrete Structures 2010.Lausanne, Switzerland:International Federation for Structural Concrete.
  14. Gardner, N. J.,Lockman, M. J.(2004).Is Superposition of Creep Strains Valid for Concretes Subjected to Drying Creep?.ACI Materials Journal,101(5),409-415.
  15. Müller, H. S.,Hilsdorf, H. K.(1990).General Task Group 9.Paris, France:CEB Comit’e Euro-International du Beton.
  16. Wendner, R.,Hubler, M. H.,Bažant, Z.P.(2015).Statistical Justification of Model B4 for Multi-Decade Concrete Creep Using Laboratory and Bridge Databases and Comparisons to Other Models.Materials and Structures,48,815-833.
  17. 中華民國內政部營建署,2017,混凝土結構設計規範,台內營字第 1060805829 號。
  18. 中華民國交通部,2015,公路橋梁設計規範,交技(104)字第 1045004678 號。
  19. 秦維邑(2017)。台北,國立台灣大學土木工程學研究所。
  20. 陳振川(2013)。積極構架健全工程環境─持續推動優質公共建設。混凝土科技,7(4),3-25。
  21. 陸景文(2001)。台北,國立台灣大學土木工程學研究所。
  22. 廖文正,林致淳,詹穎雯(2016)。台灣混凝土彈性模數建議公式研究。結構工程,31(3),5-31。
  23. 劉庭愷(2017)。台北,國立台灣大學土木工程學研究所。
被引用次数
  1. 陳振川,吳子良(2019)。生命週期考量之鋼管混凝土建築結構合理設計分析法。結構工程,34(1),105-122。
  2. 張國鎮,Marco Bonopera(2021)。ELASTIC MODULUS OF PRESTRESSED AND REINFORCED CONCRETE BEAMS IN TAIWAN UNDER DYNAMIC FLEXURAL LOADING。中國土木水利工程學刊,33(2),83-92。