考量強地動特性之可變勁度隔震系統研發與應用

Development and Application of a Variable Stiffness Isolation System Considering Ground Motion Characteristic

10.6849/SE.201903_34(1).0004

劉政嘉(Zheng-Jia Liu)；林子剛(Tzu-Kang Lin)；盧煉元(Lyan-Ywan Lu)；蕭迦恩(Chia-En Hsiao)

勁度可變 ； 速度能量 ； 隔震系統 ； 半主動控制 ； 最佳動位能比例法 ； Stiffness-variable ； energy of velocity ； isolation system ； semi-active control ； minimum energy weighting

結構工程

34卷1期（2019 / 03 / 01）

77 - 104

繁體中文

近年來，結構物隔減震研究日趨受到重視，過去的研究顯示隔減震效應無法即時判定地震類型，並針對近遠域地震特性改變以達到最佳控制效果。為了使控制效果最佳化，本研究開發一套半主動控制系統「地震能量預測比例法」（Feed-forward Predictive Earthquake Energy Analysis，FPEEA），透過量測地震主波到來前之速度，計算頻率域之能量頻譜，進而區分出近遠域地震；並結合最佳動位能比例法（Minimal Energy Weighting，MEW）決定位能權重，以有效即時控制結構反應。本研究已開發完成此半主動控制理論，搭配槓桿式可變勁度隔震系統（Leverage-type Stiffness Controllable Isolation System，LSCIS），調整槓桿支點位置進而改變隔震層勁度，以達到最佳的隔減震效果。與過去的半主動控制律相比，本研究之控制律可達到與MEW相同之控制效果甚至更佳。實際振動台試驗結果顯示，透過速度能量判定可於主要震波來前區分出近遠域地震，達到即時控制效果。而針對近域地震情況下，更可有效降低隔震層位移，並對上部結構加速度反應有良好的控制成效。

In recent years, the research of isolation and mitigation system has become more and more important. In the traditional isolation and mitigation system, the control effect may be reduced because of unknown earthquake types. To have the best effect of response reduction, the systems have to be adaptive with the earthquake type. To achieve that, an upgraded algorithm, Feed-forward Predictive Earthquake Energy Analysis (FPEEA), is proposed by considering the energy of earthquake velocity to have the optimal response. The new algorithm quickly evaluates the velocity energy to have the optimal weighting of minimum energy weighting (MEW). With the optimal weighting of the potential energy and the kinetic energy, the PFEEA can reduce the structural responses efficiently. In order to demonstrate the performance of the proposed algorithm, a single-degree-of-freedom structure is used as a benchmark in both numerical simulation and experimental verification. With predicting the optimal weighting in advance, the type of earthquake can be defined before the main shock of earthquake comes. The results have shown that the dynamic response of the structure can be effectively alleviated. Comparing to the structural responses of the MEW method, the performance of the proposed algorithm is similar to MEW or even better. The shaking table test also demonstrates the feasibility of applying the proposed algorithm in practical application.

1. Abbas, M.,Izuru, T.(2010).Characterization and modeling of near-fault pulse-like strong ground motion via damage-based critical excitation method.Structural Engineering and Mechanics,34(6),755-778.
2. Alavi, B.,Krawinkler, H.(2004).Behavior of moment-resisting frame structures subjected to near-fault ground motions.Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics,33(6),687-706.
3. Baker, Jack W.(2007).Quantitative Classification of Near-Fault Ground Motions Using Wavelet Analysis.Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America,97(5),1486-1501.
4. Chen, Genda,Chen, Chaoqiang(2004).Semi-active control of the 20-story benchmark building with piezoelectric friction dampers.Journal of Engineering Mechanics,130(4),393-400.
5. Davoodi, M.,Jafari, M. K.,Hadiani, N.(2013).Seismic response of embankment dams under near-fault and far-field ground motion excitation.Journal of Engineering Geology,158,66-76.
6. Kobori, T.,Takahashi, M.,Nasu, T.,Niwa, N.,Ogasawara, K.(1993).Seismic response controlled structure with active variable stiffness system.Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics,22,925-941.
7. Kurata, Narito(2000).Forced vibration test of a building with semi active damper ­system.Earthquake engineering & structural dynamics,29(5),629-645.
8. Leavitt, J. L.,Jabbari, F.,Bobrow, J. E.(2007).Optimal Performance of Variable Stiffness Devices for Structural Control.ASME Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement and Control,129(2),171-177.
9. Ledezma-Ramirez, D. F.,Ferguson, N. S.,Brennan, M. J.(2011).Shock isolation using an isolator with switchable stiffness.Journal of Sound and Vibration,330(5),868-882.
10. Loh, Chin Hsiung,Wu, L. Y.,Lin, P. Y.(2003).Displacement control of isolated structures with semi active control devices.Structural ­Control and Health Monitoring,10(2),77-100.
11. Lu, L. Y.,Chu, S. Y.,Yeh, S. W.,Chung, L. L.(2012).Seismic test of least-input-energy control with ground velocity feedback for variable-stiffness isolation systems.Journal of Sound and Vibration,331(4),767-784.
12. Lu, L. Y.,Chu, S. Y.,Yeh, S. W.,Peng, C. H.(2011).Modeling and experimental verification of a variable-stiffness isolation system using leverage mechanism.Journal of Vibration and Control,17(12),1869-1885.
13. Mavroeidis, GP,Dong, G,Papageorgiou, AS(2004).Near-source ground motions, and the response of elastic and inelastic single-degree-of-freedom(SDOF) systems.Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics,33,1023-1049.
14. Narasimhan, S.,Nagarajaiah, S.(2005).ASTFT semi-active controller for base isolated buildings with variable stiffness isolation systems.Engineering Structures,27(4),514-523.
15. Newmark, N. M.,Blume, J. A.,Kapur, K. K.(1973).Seismic Design Spectra for Nuclear Power Plants.Journal of the Power Division,99(2),287-303.
16. Nishitani, Akira,Nitta, Yoshihiro,Ikeda, Yoshiki(2003).Semiactive structural-control based on variable slip-force level dampers.Journal of Structural Engineering,129(7),933-940.
17. Niwa, N.,Kobori, T.,Takahashi, M.,Midoridawa, H.,Kurata, N.,Mizuno, T.(2000).Dynamic loading test and simulation analysis of full-scale semi-active hydraulic damper for structural control.Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics,29,789-812.
18. Renzi, Emanuele,Serino, Giorgio(2004).Testing and modelling a semi actively ­controlled steel frame structure equipped with MR dampers.Structural Control and Health Monitoring,11(3),189-221.
19. Wang, D. H.,Liao, W. H.(2005).Semi-active controllers for magnetorheological fluid dampers.Journal of intelligent material systems and structures,16(11-12),983-993.
20. Wongprasert, N.,Symans, M. D.(2005).Experimental evaluation of adaptive elastomeric base-isolated structures using variable-orifice fluid dampers.Journal of Structural Engineering,131(6),867-877.
21. Xu, J. Y.,Tang, J.,Li, Q. S.(2005).Semi active ­control devices in structural control implementation.The Structural Design of Tall and Special Buildings,14(2),165-174.
22. Yang, J. N.,Kim, J.,Agrawal, A.(2000).Resetting semi-active stiffness damper for seismic response control.Journal of structural engineering,26,1427-1433.
23. Zhang, J.,Makris, N.(2001).Rocking Response of Free-Standing Blocks under Cycloidal Pulses.Journal of Engineering Mechanics,127(5),473-483.
24. Zhou, N.,Liu, K.(2010).A tunable high-static-low-dynamic stiffness vibration isolator.Journal of Sound and Vibration,329(9),1254-1273.
25. 陳啟仁,林子剛,盧煉元(2015)。考量位能效應之可變勁度減震系統研發與應用。結構工程，30(3)，90-101。
26. 鄭榮杰(2015)。國立高雄第一科技大學營建工程系。
27. 盧煉元,郭子敬,林錦隆(2006)。勁度可控式半主動滑動隔震系統。中國土木水利工程學刊，18(2)

1. 蕭迦恩,盧煉元,林光奕,林子剛(2020)。地動特性預測模組與智慧型隔減震控制系統之研發。結構工程，35(3)，39-62。