台北都會區大型企業的辦公室區位變遷研究

Office Location Shifts of Large-Scale Enterprises in Taipei Metropolitan Area

10.6656/MR.2005.24.4.CHI.83

黃名義(Ming-Yih Huang)；張金鶚(Chin-Oh Chang)

大型企業的辦公室 ； 區位 ； 遷徙 ； 資訊 ； office of large-scale enterprises ； location ； migration ； and information

管理評論

24卷4期（2005 / 10 / 01）

83 - 102

繁體中文

大型企業的辦公室區位集群與分散，顯著的影響一個地區的發展，惟國內缺乏相關研究。本文以中華徵信所1991-99年資料分析台北都會區大型企業的辦公室區位選擇、遷徙與遷徙後的辦公室區位選擇決策。研究發現大型企業的主要辦公室區位與其產業遷徙區位不一致；服務業辦公室集中在市中心，但製造業辦公室因著惰性與產業特性，並未隨同產業遷徙至郊區，顯示製造業的外移，並未同時影響其主要辦公室的外移，反倒是服務業辦公室擠不進市中心只得郊化。其次，長期經營廠商中，擁有電子資訊能力的科技業，其辦公室往郊區遷徙的機率顯著，其他產業辦公室遷徙仍未見大規模發生。至於有遷徙廠商的新辦公室區位選擇，明顯的資本與營收淨額愈大的廠商，其辦公室遷至市中心新區位的機率愈高，而經營績效佳的廠商，辦公室遷徙後則是選擇郊區的機率較顯著。因此，未來應視企業資訊需求種類，誘導其向市中心或郊區聚集。且在辦公室外移趨勢下，應規劃郊區辦公園區，以符合後勤辦公室所需，並更新商業中心來吸引大型企業進駐。

This study uses the data that collected by China credit Information Service, Ltd. to analyze the location choice and migration of large-scale enterprises. The empirical results show that the location choice of large-scale enterprises differs from the location change of industries. The enterprises of service industry significantly concentrates downtown while the manufacturing industry have no trend to significantly concentrate downtown because of prior occupation advantages and inertia. Additionally, firms requiring face-to-face information significantly concentrate in downtown, and high-tech firms requiring electronic information have significantly chose the location in the suburbs.

1. 金家禾(1999)。邁向世界都市之台北都會區產業結構與空間分佈變遷。1999年中華民國區域科學學會年會發表論文。
   連結：
2. Alonso, W.(1964).Location and Land Use: Toward a General Theory of Land Rent.Harvard University Press:Cambridge.
3. Bodenman, J. E.(2000).Firm Characteristics and Location: The Case of the Institutional Investment Advisory Industry in the United States, 1983-1996.Regional Science,79,33-56.
4. Clapp, J.(1993).Dynamics of Office Markets.Washington, DC:Urban Institute Press.
5. Georgantzas, N.,Shilton, L.(1992).Corporate Creativity and Control: Manhattan Office Demand.Presented at The International System Dynamics Conference.
6. Hansen, E.(1987).Industria` Location Choice in Sao Paulo, Brazil.Regional Science and Urban Economics,17,89-108.
7. Hanson, R(1983).Rethinking Urban Policy Development in Advanced Economies.Washington, DC:National Academy Press.
8. Holloway, S.,Wheeler, J.(1991).Corporate Headquarters Relocation and Changes in Metropolitan Corporate Dominance, 1980-87.Economic Geography,67(1),55-72.
9. Hosmer, D. W.,Lemeshow, S.(1989).Applied Logistic Regression.
10. Housman, J.,McFadden, D.(1984).A Specification Test for the Multinomial Logit Model.Econometrica,52,1219-1240.
11. Ihlanfeldt, K. R.,Raper, M. D.(1990).The Intrametropolitan of New Office Firms.Land Economics,66(2),182-198.
12. Liao, T. F.(1994).Sage University Paper Series on Quantitative Applications in The Social Sciences.Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.
13. Maddala, G. S.(1989).Limited Dependent and Qualitative Variables in Econometrics.
14. Mcfadden, D.(1974).Conditional Logit Analysis of Qualitative Choice Behavior.Frontiers in Econometrics.
15. Mcfadden, D.(1978).Spatial Interaction Theory and Residential Location.
16. McFadden, D.,C. F. Manski,D. Mcfadden(1981).Econometric Models of Probabilistic Choice, in Structural Analysis of Discrete Data with Econometric Applications.
17. Mills, E.(1967).An Aggregative Model of Resource Allocation in A Metropolitan Area.American Economic Review,57(2),197-210.
18. Nicholson, W.(1978).Microeconomic Theory.Hinsdale, IL:Dryden Press.
19. Ota, M.,Fujita, M.(1993).Communication Technologies and Spatial Organization of Multi-Unit Firms in Metropolitan Areas.Regional Science and Urban Economics,23,695-729.
20. Poter, M.(1998).Location, Clusters, and The “New” Micro Economics of Competition.Business Economics,33(1),7-13.
21. Shilton, L.,Stanley, C.(1999).Spatial Patterns of Headquarters.Journal of Real Estate Research,17(3),341-364.
22. Shilton, L.,Webb, J.(1995).Office Employment and Headquarters Location in The New York City Region.Journal of Real Estate Economics and Finance,10,145-159.
23. Shukla, V.,Waddell, P.(1991).Firm Location and Land Use in Discrete Urban Space: A Study of the Spatial Structure of Dallas-Fort Worth.Regional Science and Urban Economics,1,225-253.
24. 陳彥仲(1997)。有關多項logit模型對參數指定方式的議論及比較分析。1997年中華民國區域科學學會年會發表論文。
25. 黃名義(2000)。高科技產業與傳統產業企業總部辦公室區位選擇之研究。2000年第一屆地政學術研討會發表論文
26. 黃名義、張金鶚(2000)。不同產業企業總部辦公室區位選擇之研究。2000年中華民國住宅學會第九屆年會發表論文。
27. 「台北市辦公室市場調查」新聞稿

1. Hsu, Pi-Fang(2010).Applying the ANP Model for Selecting the Optimal Location for an International Business Office Center in China.Asia Pacific Management Review(亞太管理評論),15(1),27-41.
2. 曾瑞鈴、柯瓊芳(2007)。台北市外籍與在地企業之區位聚集的比較研究。調查研究：方法與應用，22，7-37。
3. 黃名義、曾翊瑋、張金鶚(2010)。租戶結構對辦公大樓租金與空置率之影響。都市與計劃，37(4)，481-500。