創新能力與公司治理程度對多角化公司價值的影響：以台灣電子業為例

Innovation Capability, Corporate Governance, and the Excess Values of Diversified Firms-The Study of Electronic Industry in Taiwan

10.6656/MR.2009.28.2.CHI.51

陳一如(I-Ju Chen)

創新能力 ； 公司治理 ； 多角化 ； Innovation Capability ； orporate Governance ； orporate Diversification

管理評論

28卷2期（2009 / 04 / 01）

51 - 75

繁體中文

多角化經營是企業發展的重要模式之一，文獻上普遍認爲多角化後，若公司價值產生減損，可能是因代理問題變嚴重所致，所以多角化公司與專業經營公司治理程度之差異，常被研究探討是否是造成公司價值減損的原因之一。另一方面，文獻上對多角化公司的創新能力也有不同的看法，有些學者認爲公司多角化與公司創新能力具有抵換關係；但也有研究認爲，公司多角化對研發支出或公司創新能力之間並未有具體的影響關係。所以本研究採用自西元1999年到2005年台灣上市上櫃的電子公司爲研究樣本，探討創新能力與公司治理程度對多角化公司超額價值之影響。本研究主要的發現爲：（一）台灣電子產業中的多角化與專業經營公司，在某些公司治理變數上，有顯著差異，例如：最大股東成員擔任董事席位比率、投票權偏離現金流量權程度、獨立董事比率與關係人交易等。（二）公司的創新能力對台灣電子產業多角化的超額價值，確實有顯著正向的 影響，當公司整體的創新能力愈高，其超額價值也顯著地較高。（三）當一多角化公司整體的公司治理程度相對較高時，特別當公司的股權偏離程度較低、有外部董事的管理型態且大股東介入股市比率低者，多角化公司的超額價值也明顯地較高。（四）當同時考量稅負與資訊揭露程度，我們也發現資訊揭露程度愈高的樣本公司有相對較高的公司價值，且創新能力與治理程度對多角化公司超額價值之影響仍顯著爲正。

Diversification is a one of popular business strategies for corporate expansion. However, literature finds that typical diversified firms are undervalued relatively to the comparable counterparts. Worse agency problem among divisions of diversified firms after firms diversify is viewed as one of the important reasons for the discount. Another issue related to firm diversification is innovation input. Studies on whether diversification may affect a firm' research effect are conflicting and inconclusive. This paper is aimed to clarify the role of governance and innovation ability of diversified firms and link to the value discount. We find there is a significant difference between single- and multi-segment firms for some governance variables, such as the percentage of blockholders as the directors of board, deviation between voting right and cash flow right, the ratio of independent directors and related party transactions. In addition, the research and development expense ratio and the patent income rate of diversified firms are positively associated with the excess values of diversified firms. On average the diversified firms that employ better governance mechanisms experience higher market valuation, especially on the dimensions of firm ownership structure, managerial style and block shareholders' intervention to the stock market. The results are still hold after we control for the effect of tax policy and information transparency which are shown to have the impact on the innovation and governance, respectively.

1. 洪榮華、陳香如、林慧珍(2007)。公司治理機制對創新、多角化策略及公司績效之影響－研發密集產業之實證。中山管理評論，15(1)，37-60。
   連結：
2. Ahn, Seoungpil,David Denis(2004).Internal Capital Markets and Investment Policy: Evidence from Corporate Spinoffs.Journal of Financial Economics,71,489-516.
3. Aksu, Mine,Arman Kosedag(2006).Transparency and Disclosure Scores and their Determinants in the Istanbul Stock Exchange.Corporate Governance: An International Review,14(4),277-296.
4. Anderson, Ronald,Thomas Bates,John Bizjak,Michael Lemmon(2000).Corporate Governance and Firm Diversification.Financial Management,29(1),5-22.
5. Aron, Debra(1991).Using the Capital Market as a Monitor: Corporate Spinoffs in an Agency Framework.Rand Journal of Economics,22,505-518.
6. Working paper
7. Berger, Philip,Eli Ofek(1995).Diversification's Effect on Firm Value.Journal of Financial Economics,37,39-65.
8. Burch, Timothy,Vikram Nanda(2003).Divisional Diversity and the Conglomerate Discount: Evidence from Spinoffs.Journal of Financial Economics,70,69-98.
9. Burkart, Mike,Fausto Panunzi,Andrei Shleifer(2003).Family Firms.Journal of Finance,58,2173-2207.
10. Campa, Jose Manuel,Simi Kedia(2002).Explaining the Diversification Discount.Journal of Finance,57,1731-1762.
11. Cardinal, Laura,Tim C. Opler(1995).Corporate Diversification and Innovative Efficiency: An Empirical Study.Journal of Accounting and Economics,19,365-381.
12. Chan, Louis,Josef Lakonishok,Theodore Sougiannis(2001).The Stock Market Valuation of Research and Development Expenditures.Journal of Finance,56,2431-2456.
13. Chevalier, Judith(2004).What Do We Know About Cross-Subsidization? Evidence from Merging Firms.Advances in Economic Analysis and Policy,4(1),1218-1218.
14. Chiang, Hsiang-Tsai(2005).An Empirical Study of Corporate Governance and Corporate Performance.Journal of American Academy of Business,6(1),95-101.
15. Denis, David,Diane Denis,Atulya Sarin(1997).Agency Problems, Equity Ownership and Corporate Diversification.Journal of Finance,52,135-160.
16. Dittmar, Amy,Anil Shivdasani(2003).Divestitures and Divisional Investment Policies.Journal of Finance,58,2711-2743.
17. Gertner, Robert,Eric Powers,David Scharfstein(2002).Learning about Internal Capital Markets from Corporate Spin-offs.Journal of Finance,57,2479-2506.
18. Graham, John,Michael Lemmon,Jack Wolf(2002).Does Corporate Diversification Destroy Value?.Journal of Finance,58,695-720.
19. Hill, Charles,Scott Snell(1988).External Control, Corporate Strategy and Firm Performance in Research Intensive Industries.Strategic Management Journal,9,577-590.
20. Jovanovic, Boyan(1993).The Diversification of Production.Brookings of Economic Activity: Microeconomics.
21. Klein, April(2002).Economic Determinants of Audit Committee Independence.The Accounting Review,77(2),435-452.
22. Lang, Larry H. P.,Stulz, Rene M.(1994).Tobin's q, Corporate Diversification and Firm Performance.Journal of Political Economy,102,1248-1280.
23. Lins, Karl,Henri Servaes(1999).International Evidence on the Value of Corporate Diversification.Journal of Finance,54,2215-2239.
24. Working paper
25. Mansfield, Edwin(1982).Tax Policy and Innovation.Science,215,1365-1371.
26. Martin, John,Akin Sayrak(2003).Corporate Diversification and Shareholder Value: Survey of Recent Literature.Journal of Corporate Finance,9,37-57.
27. Matsusaka, John(2001).Corporate Diversification, Value Maximization and Organizational Capabilities.Journal of Business,74(3),409-431.
28. Miller, Douglas,Michael J. Fern,Laura B. Cardinal(2007).The Use of Knowledge for Technological Innovation Within Diversified Firms.Academy of Management Journal,50(2),308-326.
29. Rajan, Raghuram,Henri Servaes,Luigi Zingales(2002).The Cost of Diversity: the Diversification Discount and Inefficient Investment.Journal of Finance,55(1),35-80.
30. Scharfstein, David,Jeremy Stein(2000).The Dark Side of Internal Capital Markets: Divisional Rent-Seeking and Inefficient Investment.Journal of Finance,55,2537-3564.
31. Shleifer, Andrei,Robert W. Vishny(1997).A Survey of Corporate Governance.Journal of Finance,52,737-783.
32. Shleifer, Andrei,Robert W. Vishny(1986).Large Shareholders and Corporate Control.Journal of Political Economy,94,461-488.
33. Tirole, Jean(2001).Corporate Governance.Econometrica,69(1),1-35.
34. Villalonga, Belén(2004).Does Diversification Cause the 'Diversification Discount?.Financial Management,33(2),5-27.
35. Villalonga, Belén(2004).Diversification Discount or Premium? New Evidence from the Business Information Tracking Series.Journal of Finance,59(2),475-502.
36. Whited, Toni(2001).Is it Inefficient Investment that Causes the Diversification Discount?.Journal of Finance,56,1667-1692.
37. 吳艾珊(2005)。嘉義大學管理研究所。
38. 吳淑惠(2002)。中正大學會計學研究所。
39. 林欣亭(2004)。政治大學科技管理研究所。
40. 張凱鈞(1998)。政治大學科技管理研究所。
41. 馮君弘(2002)。雲林科技大學企業管理研究所。
42. 楊孟倫(2004)。交通大學管理學院國際經貿學程。
43. 葉銀華、李存修、柯承恩(2002)。公司治理與評等系統。台北:商智文化事業有限公司。
44. 賴威廷(2004)。東海大學企業管理研究所。
45. 簡瑞峰(1994)。臺灣大學商學研究所。
46. 蘇永盛、張眾卓、胡貴仁、林美杏(2005)。公司治理與企業多角化關聯性之研究－以國內上市之電子業爲例。德明學報，25，87-104。

1. 黃柏凱,張淑菁,林玉君(2022)。避險是否能增加家族企業的公司價值？。中山管理評論，30(3)，515-554。
2. 黃寶玉、康唯珍、倪衍森(2011)。公司治理會增強或削弱競爭力與多角化對公司價值影響？。商管科技季刊，12(2)，175-208。
3. 蔣聲雄、歐陽豪(2012)。多角化策略與年報資訊揭露對金融產業公司績效影響─金融控股公司組織型態調節效果之實證研究。台灣金融財務季刊，13(3)，1-42。
4. 賴蓉禾(2011)。公司治理、夥伴選擇與策略聯盟績效─台灣與美國企業之比較。組織與管理，4(2)，1-38。
5. 廖芝嫻、王大維(2015)。再探公司治理對經營績效與財務報導品質之影響：因素分析與類神經網路之應用。中華會計學刊，11(2)，169-201。
6. 劉仲矩,廖淑華(2020)。公司治理美學資本與組織文化、利害關係人認同關聯之研究。輔仁管理評論，27(2)，69-102。
7. 歐陽豪、張震麟(2014)。應募人類型對『資訊揭露與私募股權折價幅度』間關聯調節效果之研究。東吳經濟商學學報，87，53-96。
8. 王睦舜(2015)。從公司治理角度探討執行長涉險決策與個股私有資訊的關聯性。兩岸金融季刊，3(4)，95-132。
9. 魏慧珊、歐仁和、黃志偉、張傳章(2016)。臺灣財務領域研究之回顧與展望。管理學報，33(1)，105-137。
10. 殷向真(2014)。德明學報論文（2000-2013）被引用分析。德明學報，38(1)，41-62。
11. (2012)。多角化策略與年報資訊揭露對金融產業公司績效影響─金融控股公司組織型態調節效果之實證研究。台灣金融財務季刊，13(3)，1-42。
12. (2015)。管理者薪酬、公司治理與私有資訊─以臺灣市場為例。臺灣銀行季刊，66(3)，24-50。