智慧財產權侵權警告函正、負向效應與競爭效能關聯：智慧財產權類型的干擾角色

Relationships among Positive, Negative Effect and Competitive Efficiency on the Infringement Notice of Intellectual Property Rights: The Moderating Role of Categories of Intellectual Property Rights

10.6656/MR.2011.30.2.CHI.97

施錦村(Chin-Tsun Shih)

智慧財產權 ； 警告函 ； 競爭效能 ； 競爭效應 ； Intellectual Property Rights ； Infringement Notice ； Competitive Efficiency ； Competitive Effect

管理評論

30卷2期（2011 / 04 / 01）

97 - 116

繁體中文

本研究旨在驗證智慧財產權侵權警告函正、負向效應與競爭效能的關聯，及不同類別對競爭效能的干擾角色，有别於過去智慧財產權及競爭法相關文獻，集中探討二者間之法律關係。本研究177件樣本來自台灣公平會1995年至2009年的案例，該等案例經由相關統計分析工具驗證，實證結果為：（一）實證模型中正向結構係數大於負向結構係數；（二）不同類型有不同的競爭效能，其高低依序為商標權、著作權及專利權。以上實證結果，可供實務界及競爭法主管機關處理類似案件時參考。

This paper aims to validate the relationships among positive, negative effect and competitive efficiency on the infringement notice of intellectual property, and the moderating role of categories to competitive efficiency. The study is different from previous related documents of intellectual property and competitive law, which were concerned only with law relationships. A research sample of 177 cases, from 1995 to 2009, is sourced from the Taiwan Fair Trade Commission, and statistical analysis is conducted for validation. The results confirm that a positive structural coefficient of the empirical model is superior to the negative coefficient. Also, the different categories of property rights tend to produce different competitive efficiencies, namely, a trademark, a copyright, and a patent. The findings can provide references to business and authorities of competition law for handling similar cases.

1. 施錦村(2009)。比較廣告不同類型對衝突性利益與競爭效能關聯的干擾角色。管理與系統，16(1)，99-121。
   連結：
2. 黃銘傑(2003)。智慧財產權侵害警告函與公平交易法之適用─專利權權利行使之意義與界限。台大法學論叢，32(5)，119-169。
   連結：
3. Windsurfing Intel, Inc. v. AMF, Inc. (1986), 782 F. 2d 995, 1001, 1002 (Fed. Cir.).
4. Reddy Commc'ns v. Env't Action Found. (1979), 477 F. Supp. 936 (D.D.C.).
5. Mallinckrodt Inc. v. Medipart Inc. (1992), 976 F. 2d 700, 708 (Fed. Cir.).
6. Adams, Charles W.(2006).A Brief History of Indirect Liability for Patent Infringement.Santa-Clara Computer and High-Technology Law Journal,22(3),369-398.
7. Bagozzi, Richard P.,Yi, Youjae(1988).On the Evaluation of Structural Equation Model.Academic of Marketing Science,16(1),76-94.
8. Balto, David A.,Wolman, Andrew M.(2006).Intellectual Property and Antitrust: General Principle.The Journal of Law and Technology,13,424-435.
9. Bentler, Paul M.,Chou, Ching-Ping(1987).Practical Issues in Structural Modeling.Sociological Methods and Research,16,78-117.
10. Bernstein, Debra,Ganske, Rod(2009).Lessons Learned When the Antitrust and Intellectual Property Laws Collide.Intellectual Property & Technology Law Journal,21(1),21-25.
11. Besen, Stanley M.,Raskind, Leo J.(1991).An Introduction to the Law and Economics of Intellectual Property.Journal of Economic Perspectives,5(1),3-27.
12. Bollen, Kenneth A.(1989).Structural Equation Modeling with Latent Variables.New York:John & Wiley.
13. Brandenburger, Rachel,Cauwelaert, Alicia V.(2008).The Interface between IP Right and European Antitrust Law.The Computer & Internet Lawyer,25(7),21-25.
14. Calkins, Stephen(1988).Development in Antitrust and the First Amendment: The Disaggregation of Noerr.Antitrust Law Journal,57,327-339.
15. Cohen, Julie,Gleason, Thomas(1990).Social Research in Communication and Law.Newbury Park:Sage Publication.
16. Cooper, Donald. R.,Schindler, Pamla S.(2001).Business Research Method.Singapore:McGraw-Hill.
17. Elhauge, Einer(1992).Making Sense of Antitrust Petitioning Immunity.California Law Review,80,1174-1183.
18. First, Harry(2007).Controlling the Intellectual Grab: Protect Innovation, Not Innovators.Rutgers Law Journal,38,358-370.
19. Hair, Joseph F.,Anderson, Rolph E.,Tatham, Ronald L.,Black, William C.(1998).Multivariable data analysis.Upper Saddle River, New Jersey:Prentice Hall.
20. Hoelter, Jon W.(1983).The Analysis of Covariance Structures: Goodness-of-Fit Indices.Sociological Methods and Research,11,325-344.
21. Janis, Mark D.(2002).Transition in IP and Antitrust.Antitrust Bulletin,47(2/3),253-283.
22. Jöreskog, Karl,Sörbom, Dag(1993).LISREL 8: Structural Equation Modeling with the SIMPLIS Command Language.Chicago:SPSS Inc.
23. Kaminski Michael D.(2006).Effective of US Patent Litigation.Intellectual Property & Technology Law Journal,18(1),13-25.
24. Kassarjian, Harold H.,Kassarjian, Waltraud M.(1988).The Impact of Regulation on Advertising: A Content Analysis.Journal of Consumer Policy,11(4),269-285.
25. Klasina, Hara(2003).EC Competition Law and Intellectual Property Right: The Regulation of Innovation.International Journal of Law and Information Technology,11(1),101-102.
26. Krattenmaker, Thomas G.,Salop, Steven C.(1986).Anticompetitive Exclusion: Raising Rivals' Costs to Achieve Power over Price.Yale Law Journal,96,201-222.
27. Kremer, Michael(1998).Patent Buyouts: A Mechanism for Encouraging Innovation.Quarterly Journal of Economics,113,513-533.
28. Lanjouw, Jean O.,Schankerman, Mark(2001).Characteristic of Patent Litigation: A Window on Competition.The Rand Journal of Economics,32(1),129-151.
29. McGowan, David(2008).What Tool Works Tells Us about Tailoring Patent Misuse Remedies.Northwest University Law Review,102(1),421-428.
30. Peritz, Rudolph J. R.(2008).The Roberts Court after Two Year: Antitrust, Intellectual Right, and Competition Policy.Antitrust Bulletin,53(1),153-178.
31. Posner, Richard A.(2005).Intellectual Property: The Law and Economics Approach.The Journal of Economic Perspective,19(2),57-73.
32. Rubin, Jonathan L.(2007).Patent, Antitrust, and Rivalry in Standard Setting.Rutgers Law Journal,33,509-511.
33. Shavell, Steven,Ypersele, Tanguy Van(2001).Reward versus Intellectual Property Right.Journal of Law and Economics,44,525-547.
34. Subhash, Sharma,Durand, Richard M.,Gur-Arie, Oded(1981).Identification and Analysis of Moderate Variable.Journal of Marketing Research,18(3),291-299.
35. Weber, Robert P.(1985).Basic Content Analysis.Beverly Hills, California:Sage Publication.
36. Winter, Sidney G.(1993).Patent and Welfare in an Evolutionary Model.Industrial and Corporate Change,2(2),211-231.
37. 王敏銓(2008)。美國之智慧財產權法與競爭法互動綜觀。全國律師，12(1)，63-70。
38. 行政院公平交易委員會(2007)。認識公平交易法。台北:行政院公平交易委員會。
39. 吳萬益(2008)。企業研究方法。台北:華泰書局。
40. 許忠信(2008)。智慧財產權侵害警告函之比較法觀察─以美國法及德國法之比較為中心。公平交易季刊，16(3)，53-106。
41. 許忠信(2008)。智慧財產權之濫用與限制競爭防止法之適用─由美國法與日本法看我國公平交易法第四十五條。全國律師，12(10)，5-26。
42. 黃惠敏(2008)。智慧財產權之行使與公平交易法之界線。全國律師，12(1)，79-93。
43. 黃銘傑(2006)。競爭法與智慧財產權法之交會─相生與相剋之間。台北:元照出版公司。
44. 熊誦梅(2008)。不當行使專利權之法律效果及救濟途徑─從美國法之專利地痞、專利濫用及智慧財產權授權準則談起。全國律師，12(10)，56-86。
45. 劉國讚(2006)。侵害智慧財產權之警告與不公平競爭─以日本不正競爭防止法為中心。智慧財產權月刊，93，31-47。
46. 盧瑞陽、余朝權、林金郎、張家琳(2006)。台灣不法比較廣告之研究─2004 年案例研析。公平交易季刊，14(3)，27-64。

1. 溫福星(2013)。社會科學研究中使用迴歸分析的五個重要觀念。管理學報，30(2)，169-190。
2. (2016)。專利警告函資訊內容與法律責任之關聯：專利權類型的干擾效果。公平交易季刊，24(3)，135-172。