题名

家族與非家族企業之總經理替換與相對績效的關聯─以台灣上市公司為例

并列篇名

The Relationship between Managerial Successions of Family-controlled and Non-family-controlled Businesses and Relative Performances: An Empirical Study of Taiwan Listed Companies

DOI

10.6656/MR.2011.30.3.CHI.25

作者

林穎芬(Ying-Fen Lin);洪晨桓(Chen-Huan Hong);陳羽甄(Yu-Zhen Chen)

关键词

高階主管替換 ; 相對績效 ; 家族控制型企業 ; CEO Turnover ; Relative Performance Evaluation ; Family-controlled Business

期刊名称

管理評論

卷期/出版年月

30卷3期(2011 / 07 / 01)

页次

25 - 47

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

本研究探討強迫性高階主管替換與公司相對績效之關係,檢視公司績效不佳時,董事會是否會採取強迫高階主管替換的方式來改善公司績效。本研究以家族控制型與非家族控制型企業作為對照,觀察此二類企業在公司績效表現與總經理強迫性替換決策的關聯是否有所差異,以及當高階主管強迫替換後,是否能有效改善家族控制型或非控制型公司的經營績效。本研究採用Logistic迴歸與t檢定進行實證分析,研究結果得知會計基礎相對績效表現與總經理強迫替換有強烈關聯,然家族控制型企業之總經理則較不易因績效表現不佳而遭到替換;此外,非家族控制型企業在強迫總經理替換後公司績效表現逐漸提升,而家族控制型企業則無此顯著效果。

英文摘要

This study explores the relationship between CEO turnover and a company's relative performance and examines whether the board adopts CEO replacement to improve company performance. This study compares family-controlled businesses with non-family-controlled businesses to find out if there a difference in relationship between company performance and CEO turnover. This study also investigates if managing performance of either family-controlled businesses or non-family-controlled businesses improves after going through CEO replacement. This study adopts Logistic regression and t-test to analyze the data. Result shows a strong relationship between accounting based relative performance and CEO turnover. However, CEOs of family-controlled businesses are less likely to be replaced. Also, the performance of non-family-controlled businesses is found progressively improved after going through CEO replacement, whereas such effect is not as significant for family-controlled business.

主题分类 社會科學 > 經濟學
社會科學 > 管理學
参考文献
  1. 楊朝旭、蔡柳卿(2003)。總經理更換與相對績效評估。人力資源管理學報,3(1),63-80。
    連結:
  2. Bennedsen, Morten, Kasper M. Nielsen, Francisco Pérez-González, and Daniel Wolfenzon (2006), “Inside the Family Firm: The Role of Families in Succession Decisions and Performance,” Working Paper, European Corporate Governance Institute (ECGI)
  3. Almazan, Andres,Hartzell, Jay C.,Starks, Laura T.(2005).Active Institutional Shareholders and Cost of Monitoring: Evidence from Executive Compensation.Financial Management,34(Winter),5-34.
  4. Anderson, Ronald C.,Reeb, David M.(2003).Founding Family Ownership and Firm Performance: Evidence from the S&P 500.Journal of Finance,58(3),1301-1327.
  5. Bendeck, Yvette. M.,Waller, Edward R.(1999).The Wealth Effects of Non-senior Management Departures from Investment Banks.Journal of Business Research,46(1),95-105.
  6. Claessens, Stijn,Djankov, Simeon,Lang, Larry H. P.(2000).The Separation of Ownership and Control in East Asian Corporation.Journal of Financial Economics,58(1),81-112.
  7. Coughlan, Anne T.,Schmidt, Ronald M.(1985).Executive Compensation, Management Turnover, and Firm Performance: An Empirical Investigation.Journal of Accounting and Economics,7(1-3),43-66.
  8. Dahay, Jay,McConnell, John J.,Travlos, Nickolaos G.(2002).The Cadbury Committee, Corporate Performance and Top Management Turnover.The Journal of Finance,57(1),461-484.
  9. Defond, Mark L.,Park, Chul W.(1999).The Effect of Competition on CEO Turnover.Journal of Accounting and Economics,27(1),35-56.
  10. Denis, David J.,Denis, Diane K.(1995).Performance Changes Following Top Management Dismissals.The Journal of Finance,50(4),1029-1057.
  11. Denis, David J.,Denis, Diane K.,Sarin, Atulya(1997).Ownership Structure and Top Executive Turnover.Journal of Financial Economics,45(2),193-221.
  12. Dyer, W. Gibb(2006).Examining the "Family Effect" on firm performance.Family Business Review,19(4),253-273.
  13. Engel, Ellen,Hayes, Rachel M.,Wang, Xue(2003).CEO Turnover and Properties of Accounting Information.Journal of Accounting and Economics,36(1-3),197-226.
  14. Fama, Eugene F.(1980).Agency Problems and the Theory of the Firm.Journal of Political Economy,88(2),715-732.
  15. Fama, Eugene F.,Jensen, Michael C.(1983).Separation of Ownership and Control.Journal of Law and Economics,26(2),301-325.
  16. Fan, Po-Hong J.,Wong, Te-Jun(2002).Corporate Ownership Structure and the Informativeness of Accounting Earnings in East Asia.Journal of Accounting and Economics,33(3),401-425.
  17. Farrell, Kathleen A.,Whidbee, David A.(2002).The Impact of Forced CEO Turnover on Committee Structure.Journal of Managerial Issues,14(1),49-67.
  18. Gamson, William. A.,Scoth, Norman A.(1964).Scapegoating in Baseball.American Journal of Sociology,70(1),69-72.
  19. Gibbons, Robert,Murphy, Kevin J.(1990).Relative Performance Evaluation for Chief Executive Officers.Industrial and Labor Relations Review,43(3),30-51.
  20. Gilson, Stuart C.(1989).Management Turnover and Financial Distress.Journal of Financial Economics,25(2),241-262.
  21. Gomez-Mejia, Luis. R.,Larraza-Kintana, Martin,Makri, Marianna(2003).The Determinants of Executive Compensation in Family-controlled Public Corporations.Academy of Management Journal,46(2),226-237.
  22. Gomez-Mejia, Luis. R.,Nunez-Nickel, Manuel,Gutierrez, Isabel(2001).The Role of Family Ties in Agency Contracts.Academy of Management Journal,44(1),81-95.
  23. Goyal, Vidhan. K.,Park, Chul W.(2002).Board Leadership Structure and CEO Turnover.Journal of Corporate Finance,8(1),49-66.
  24. Holmstrom, Bengt(1982).Moral Hazard in Teams.Bell Journal of Economics,13(2),324-340.
  25. Huson, Mark R.,Malatesta, Paul H.,Parrino, Robert(2004).Managerial Succession and Firm Performance.Journal of Financial Economics,74(2),237-275.
  26. Huson, Mark R.,Parrino, Robert,Starks, Laura T.(2001).Internal Monitoring Mechanisms and CEO Turnover: A Long-term Perspective.The Journal of Finance,56(6),2265-2297.
  27. Jensen, Michael C.,Meckling, William H.(1976).Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure.Journal of Financial Economics,3(4),205-260.
  28. Jensen, Michael C.,Murphy, Kevin J.(1990).Performance Pay and Top-Management Incentives.The Journal of Political Economy,98(2),225-264.
  29. Jenter, Dirk,Kanaan, Fadi(2006).working paper, National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER)working paper, National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER),National Bureau of Economic Research=NBER.
  30. Kaplan, Steven N.,Minton, Bernadette A.(2006).working paper, National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER)working paper, National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER),National Bureau of Economic Research=NBER.
  31. La Porta, Rafael,Lopez-de-Silanes, Florencio,Shleifer, Andrei(1999).Corporate Ownership around the World.Journal of Finance,54(2),471-517.
  32. Lausten, Mette(2002).CEO Turnover, Firm Performance and Corporate Governance: Empirical Evidence on Danish Firms.International Journal of Industrial Organization,20(3),391-414.
  33. Leker, Jens,Salomo, Sören(2000).CEO Turnover and Corporate Performance.Scandinavian Journal of Management,16(3),287-303.
  34. Maury, Benjamin(2006).Family Ownership and Firm Performance: Empirical Evidence from Western European Corporations.Journal of Corporate Finance,12(2),321-341.
  35. Morck, Randall,Shleifer, Andrei,Vishny, Robert(1988).Management Ownership and Market Valuation: An Empirical Analysis.Journal of Financial Economics,20(1-2),293-315.
  36. Parrino, Robert,Sias, Richard W.,Starks, Laura T.(2002).Voting with Their Feet: Institutional Ownership Changes around Forced CEO Turnover.Journal of Financial Economics,68(1),3-46.
  37. Shen, Wei,Cannella, Albert A., Jr.(2002).Revisiting the Performance Consequences of CEO Succession: The Impacts of Successor Type, Postsuccession Senior Executive Turnover, and Departing CEO Tenure.Academy of Management Journal,45(4),717-733.
  38. Volpin, Paolo F.(2002).Governance with Poor Investor Protection: Evidence from Top Executive Turnover in Italy.Journal of Financial Economics,64(1),61-90.
  39. Warner, Jerold B.,Watts, Ross L.,Wruck, Karen H.(1988).Stock Price and Top Management Changes.Journal of Financial Economics,20,461-492.
  40. Zajac, Edward J.(1990).CEO Selection, Succession, Compensation and Firm Performance: A Theoretical Integration and Empirical Analysis.Strategic Management Journal,11(3),217-230.
  41. 林明謙(2001)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。輔仁大學金融研究所。
  42. 胡淑雅(2006)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。國立彰化師範大學會計研究所。
  43. 徐淑芳(1999)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。國立東華大學企業管理研究所。
  44. 翁淑育(2000)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。輔仁大學金融研究所。
  45. 郭逸真(2006)。博士論文(博士論文)。國立中山大學企業管理研究所。
  46. 陳靖誼(2005)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。國立彰化師範大學會計研究所。
  47. 廖一成(2005)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。國立東華大學企業管理學系。
  48. 潘鳳文(2005)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。輔仁大學金融研究所。
  49. 鐘喜梅、劉韻僖、葉匡時(2003)。我國上市公司家族控制力與董事會運作關係之探討。中山管理評論,11(2),341-365。
被引用次数
  1. Tai, Yi-Hui(2017).Earnings management in family firms: The role of inside directors.交大管理學報,37(1),77-114.
  2. 戴怡蕙(2017)。控制股東的股權偏離程度與公司績效:持股率與類別的調節效果。會計審計論叢,7(2),85-115。
  3. 戴怡蕙(2020)。董事會特性和財務主管特質之關聯。當代會計,21(1),93-131。
  4. 戴怡蕙,曾智揚(2018)。從私有資訊分享觀點探討內部董事薪酬與公司過去績效之關聯性。證券市場發展季刊,30(3),1-40。
  5. 戴怡蕙,曾智揚(2019)。高階經營團隊的私有資訊分享功能對其當期薪酬與前期績效關聯性影響。管理與系統,26(2),209-239。
  6. 黃柏凱,張淑菁,林玉君(2022)。避險是否能增加家族企業的公司價值?。中山管理評論,30(3),515-554。
  7. 張瑞當,張雅淇,柯文鎧(2023)。薪酬委員會品質是否影響核心代理問題與薪酬績效敏感性間的關聯?。會計評論,77,91-137+i。
  8. (2018)。景氣波動、成員心理不確定感與組織承諾之關聯性:以繼任者來源為干擾效果。中華管理評論,21(1),300-319。
  9. (2023)。The Firm Risk for a Family Firm and the Role of Growth Opportunity and Control-Cash Flow Right Deviation: The Viewpoint of the Risk Effect of the Convergence of Interest Hypothesis。會計學報,9(2),82-123。