「工業4.0」下製造業之轉型政策

Restructuring the Manufacturing Industry during the Industry 4.0 Transition

10.6656/MR.201807_37(3).CNI001

郭楚其(Chu-Chi Kuo)；徐作聖(Joseph Z. Shyu)

工業4.0 ； 政策分析模式 ； 產業轉型升級 ； 產業創新需求要素 ； Industry 4.0 ； Policy Analysis Model ； Industry Revitalization ； Industrial Innovation Resources

管理評論

37卷3期（2018 / 07 / 01）

1 - 13

繁體中文

工業4.0技術的擴散改變了主要產業的結構，成為產業轉型升級和發展的核心主題。德國政府的「工業4.0」計畫(The Industrie 4.0 Working Group 2013)，基於物理資訊系統和物聯網全面部署。美國「先進製造夥伴計畫」(President's Council of Advisors on Science and Technology 2011)、「中國製造2025」(National Manufacturing Strategy Advisory Committee 2015)、臺灣「生產力4.0」（行政院科技辦公室2015）也相繼被提出。本研究以政策分析模式為基礎，建構工業4.0下製造業之轉型競爭策略，以工業4.0下製造業之轉型政策目標與製造業產業領先條件為研究之區隔變數，分析德國、美國、中國及臺灣在工業4.0下製造業之轉型政策目標定位，並根據工業4.0下製造業產業創新需求要素及製造業專家的意見調查，整理分析歸納出工業4.0下製造業的關鍵成功要素及各國目前發展工業4.0下製造業的創新策略，協助政府在發展工業4.0下製造業之政策參考。初步結果顯示，德國政策以經濟發展、科技發展及社會發展為主軸，工業4.0下製造業領先條件為國家層級、產業層級及企業層級；美國政策以經濟發展與科技發展為主，而工業4.0下製造業產業領先條件為產業層級及企業層級；中國政策重點在政治發展、經濟發展、科技發展及社會發展為主，工業4.0下製造業領先條件則重視於國家層級；臺灣政策以經濟發展與科技發展為主，而產業領先條件則為國家層級、產業層級及企業層級。

The proliferation of Industry 4.0 technology has changed the structure of major industries and has become the core tenet of industrial revitalization and improvement. Based on the comprehensive deployment of physical information systems and the Internet of Things, the German government's Industry 4.0 program employs a computerized, digitalized, and intelligence-optimized business operations model. Elsewhere, the Advanced Manufacturing Partner program of the United States, Made in China 2025, and Taiwan Productivity 4.0 are leading-edge manufacturing programs. Based on a policy analysis model, this study constructed a competitive strategy for the manufacturing industry to implement during the Industry 4.0 transition, and analyzed the revitalization policy objectives of the manufacturing industries of Germany, the United States, China, and Taiwan in light of the revitalization policy objectives of the manufacturing industry and locus of industrial leadership. Based on the survey of Industrial Innovation Resources under the Industry 4.0 transition and the views of manufacturing experts, this paper examines and summarizes the key success factors of the manufacturing industry and a country's manufacturing innovation strategy during the Industry 4.0 transition. These key success factors could serve as a reference to aid governments in the development of revitalization policies for the manufacturing industry. The preliminary results indicated that economic, technological, and social development are policy mainstays in Germany with the locus of industrial leadership at the national, industrial, and enterprise levels during the Industry 4.0 transition. Meanwhile, policy in the United States is centered on economic and technological development, and the locus of industrial leadership is at the industry and enterprise levels. China's policy focuses on political, economic, technological, and social development, and the locus of industrial leadership is at the national level. Finally, Taiwan bases its policy on economic and technological development, and the locus of industrial leadership is at the national, industrial, and enterprise levels.

1. 王振寰(2007)。從科技追趕到創新的經濟轉型:南韓、台灣與中國。台灣社會研究季刊，68，177-226。
   連結：
2. (2009).Revitalizing American Manufacuring (2009, December 16)..
3. American Clean Energy and Security Act of 2009 (2009, March 31).
4. (2010).National Export Initiative (2010, September 16)..
5. United States Manufacturing Enhancement Act of 2010 (2010, July 27).
6. (2011).Advanced Manufacturing Partner (AMP) (2011, June 24)..
7. (2012).A National Strategic Plan for Advanced Manufacturing (2012, February 15)..
8. (2012).National Network for Manufacturing Innovation (2012, March 27)..
9. American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (2009, February 17).
10. (2014).Investing in Manufacturing Communities Partnerships (2014, September 18)..
11. Federal Ministry of Education and Research (2010), “High-Tech Strategy 2020 for Germany,”(accessed July 14, 2010), [available at: https://www.manufacturing-policy.eng.cam.ac.uk/documents-folder/policies/germany-ideas-innovation-prosperity-high-tech-strategy-2020-for-germany-bmbf/view].
12. Kotler, Philip,Jatusripitak, Somkid,Maesincee, Suvit(1997).The Marketing of Nations: A Stra- tegic Approach to Building National Wealth.New York:Free Press.
13. Lee, Jay,Bagheri, Behrad,Kao, Hung-An(2015).A Cyber-Physical Systems Architecture for Industry 4.0-Based Manufacturing Systems.Manufacturing Letters,3,18-23.
14. Mowery, David C.,Nelson, Richard R.(1999).Sources of Industrial Leadership-Studies of Seven Industries.N.Y.:Cambridge University Press.
15. National Manufacturing Strategy Advisory Committee (2015), “Made in China 2025, Key Technology Roadmap (2015 Edition)," (accessed September 29, 2015), [available at http://www.cae.cn/cae/ html/files/2015-10/29/20151029105822561730637.pdf].
16. Porter, Michael E.(1990).Competitive Advantage of Nations.N.Y.:Free Press.
17. Porter, Michael E.(1990).Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance.N.Y.:Free Press.
18. President's Council of Advisors on Science and Technology (2011), "Report to the President on Ensuring American Leadership in Advanced Manufacturing," (accessed June 11, 2011), [available at: https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/sites/default/files/microsites/ostp/pcast-ad- vanced- manufacturing-june2011.pdf].
19. Rothwell, Roy, Zegveld, Walter(1981).Industrial Innovation and Public Policy: Preparing for the 1980s and the 1990s.London:Pinter Publishers.
20. The Industrie 4.0 Working Group (2013), “Securing the Future of German Manufacturing Industry: Recommendations for Implementing the Strategic Initiative INDUSTRIE 4.0," (accessed April 8, 2013), [available at: http://www.acatech.de/fileadmin/user_upload/Baumstruktur_nach_Website/ Acatech/root/de/Material fuer Sonderseiten/Industrie 4.0/Final report Industrie 4.0 accessib le.pdf].
21. UNIDO (2013), "Emerging Trends in Global Manufacturing Industries," (accessed June 2, 2013), [available at: https://www.unido.org/sites/default/files/2013-07/Emerging_Trends_UNIDO_2013 0.PDF].
22. Wright, Paul Kenneth,Bourne, David Alan(1988).Manufacturing Intelligence.MA:Addison Wesley.
23. 王怡惠(2015)。從工業 4.0 看我國生產力4.0 之挑戰。臺灣經濟研究月刊，38(8)，111-119。
24. 任宇(2015)。中國與主要發達國家智慧製造的比較研究。工業經濟論壇，2(2)，68-76。
25. 行政院科技辦公室 (2015)，「行政院生產力4.0發展方案」，(取得日期：2015年9月17日)，[available at http://archives.ey.gov.tw/Upload/WebArchive/01ey/20160110/www.ey.gov.tw/News_Contentd725.html]。
26. 宋天虎(1999)。先進製造技術的發展與未來。機器人技術與應用，1，6-8。
27. 林蔵均(2015)。淺談工業4.0 浪潮下的國際製造業政策。經濟前瞻，162，65-72。
28. 金屬工業研究發展中心 (2015)，「美國先進製造夥伴計畫對臺灣傳產的啟示」，(取得日期：2015年8 月7 日)，[available at http://tipo.stars.org.tw/E_paper/EpaperView.aspx?id=96&AspxAutoDetectCookieSupport=1]。
29. 胡運祥(2015)。中興大學高階經理人碩士在職專班。
30. 徐作聖(1995)。科技政策與產業創新之未來發展:論亞太製造中心規則。經濟情勢暨評論季刊創刊號，1，23-39。
31. 楊叔子,吳波(2003)。先進製造技術及其發展趨勢。機械工程學報，39(10)，73-78。
32. 溫芳宜(2015)。解析中國製造2025。經濟前瞻，160，13-19。
33. 熊有倫,王瑜輝,楊文玉,尹周平(2008)。數位製造與數位裝備。航空製造技術，9，26-31。
34. 劉孟俊,吳佳勳(2014)。歐美再工業化策略及對臺灣產業政策意涵。臺灣經濟論衡，12(5)，58-84。

1. 陳律睿,姚佳均(2021)。工業4.0浪潮下之海外直接投資要素分析。商略學報，13(4)，235-252。
2. 楊幼威,陳殷哲(2022)。工業4.0下之人力資源專業職能探究。品質學報，29(4)，267-291。