一個被忽略學者所留下之不可磨滅印記：漢學詮釋學之重構

The Indelible Mark of an Overlooked Scholar: Toward a Restructuring of Sinological Hermeneutics

10.29816/TARQSS.199803.0005

魏偉森(Thomas Wilson)

美國漢學 ； 儒家思想 ； 焦竑 ； 詮釋學 ； American Sinology ； Confucianism ； Chiao Hung ； Hermeneutics

台灣社會研究季刊

29期（1998 / 03 / 01）

131 - 152

繁體中文

錢新祖教授的著作是具開創性的，它打破了美國儒學研究中人文詮譯學向來具有之影響力。錢氏將西方現象詮釋學引用到儒學研究，強調陸象山及朱熹對漢學之章句訓詁持同樣態度，認為漢學是膚淺，不足以理解道。朱陸兩人主要之差異在「心作為認識主體與理作為認識客體這兩者之間的關係」。陸象山強調閱讀主體與理之一致性。陸象山這種形而上之一元主義，對以後戴震的思想有很大影響，而這命題是美國漢學界向來忽現的。

Professor Edward Ch'ien's book is a vanguard research in America's study of Confucianism which has been under the influence of humanistic hermeneutics. By a comparsion of Neo-Confucian and Western phenomenological hermeneutics, Ch'ien suggests that both Lu Hsiang-shan and Chu Hsi reject the lexical glossing of Han philology as superficial and inadequate to the task of approhending the Tao. They differ only over ”the relationship between mind as the knowing subject and ii or Nature as the object to be known.” By stressing unity between reading subject and Ii, Lu's metaphysical monism leaves a crucial imprint on Tai Chen, an issue which is unexplored in American sinology.

1. (1415)。性理大全。
2. Berling, Judith(1980).The Syncretic Religion of Lin Chao-en.Columbia:
3. Bloom, Irene(1979).Principle and Practicality.Columbia:
4. Bloom, Irene(1987).Knowledge Painfully acquired.New York:Columbia University Press.
5. Ching, Julia(1976).To Acquire Wisdom: The Way of Wang Yang-ming.Columbia:
6. de Bary, Wm. Theodore(1993).The Uses of Neo-Confucianism: A Response to Professor Tillman.Philosophy East and West,43
7. de Bary, Wm. Theodore(1981).Neo-Confucian Orthodoxy and the Learning of the Mind-and-Heart.Columbia:Columbia University Press.
8. de Bary, Wm. Theodore(1989).Neo-Confucian Education: The Formative Stage.California:
9. de Bary, Wm. Theodore(1983).The Liberal Tradition in China.Columbia:Chinese University Press.
10. Debary, William Theodore(1953).Columbia University.
11. Dimberg, Ronald(1974).The Sage and Society: The Life and Thought of Ho Hsin-yin.Hawaii:University Press of Hawaii.
12. Elman, Benjamin(1984).From Philosophy to Philology: Intellectual and Social Aspects of Change in Late Imperial China.Harvard:Harvard University Press.
13. Gardner, Daniel(1991).Learning to Be a Sage: Selections from the Conversations of Master Chu.California:
14. Handlin, Joanna(1983).Action in Late Ming Thought: The Reorientation of Lu K'un and Other Scholar-Officials.California:
15. Henderson, John B.(1984).The Development and Decline of Chinese Cosmology.Columbia University Press.
16. Hymes, Robert(1987).Statesmen and Gentlemen: The Elite of Fu-chou, Chiang-hsi in Northern and Southern Sung.Cambridge:
17. Kuhn, Philip(1970).Rebellion and its Enemies in Late Imperial China: Militarization and Social Structure, 1796-1864.Harvard:
18. Levenson, Joseph R.(1953).Liang Ch'I-ch'ao and the Mind of Modern China.Harvard:
19. Levey, Matthew(1991).Chicago University.
20. Liu, James T. C.(1967).Ou-yang Hsiu: An Eleventh Century Neo-Confucianist.Stanford:
21. Nivison, David(1966).The Life and Thought of Chang Hsueh-ch'eng.Stanford:
22. Nivison, David, Wright, Arthur(1959).Confucian in Action.Stanford:
23. Peterson, Willard(1979).Bitter Gourd: Fang I-chih and the Impetus for Intellectual Change.New York:Yale University Press.
24. Schwartz, Benjamin(1964).Search of Wealth and Power: Yen Fu and the West.Harvard:Harvard University Press.
25. Taylor, Rodney(1978).The Cultivation of Sagehood as a Religious Goal in Neo-Confucianism.American Academy of Religion and Scholars.
26. Tillman, Hoyt(1982).實用的儒家思想：陳亮對朱熹之挑戰 Utilitarian Confucianism: Ch'en Liang's Challenge to Chu Hsi.Cambridge:Council on East Asian Studies, Harvard University.
27. Tillman, Hoyt(1992).A New Direction in Confucian Scholarship: Approaches to Examining the Differences between Neo-Confucianism and Tao-hsueh.Philosophy East and West,42(3)
28. Van Zoeren, Steven(1991).Poetry and Personality: Reading, Exegesis, and Hermeneutics in Traditional China.Stanford:
29. Wakeman, Frederick(1966).Strangers at the Gate: Social Disorder in South China, 1839-1861.California:
30. Wright, Arthur(1960).The Confucian Persuasion.Stanford:
31. Wright, Arthur, Twitchett, Denis(1962).Confucian Personalities.Stanford:
32. Yu, Chun-fang(1981).The Renewal of Buddhism in China: Chu Hung and the Late Ming Synthesis.Columbia:
33. 朱熹。朱子語類。
34. 朱熹(1190)。論語集註。
35. 朱熹 、 呂祖謙(1721)。近思錄集註。
36. 牟宗三。心體與性體，第2冊。
37. 余英時 Yu, Ying-Shih(1988).The Intellectual World of Chiao Hung Revisited: A Review Article.Ming Studies,25
38. 余英時 Yu, Ying-Shih(1975).Some Preliminary Observations on the Rise of Ch'ing Confucian Intellectualism.清華學報 Tsing Hua Journal of Chiese Studies,新11(1/ 2)
39. 杜維明(1976)。Neo-Confucian Thought in Action: Wang Yang-ming's Youth, 1472-1509。Berkeley:University of California Press。
40. 杜維明 、 艾愷 Alitto, Guy S.(1976)。最後的儒者：梁漱溟與現代性困境在中國 The Last Confucian: Liang Shu-ming and the Chinese Dilemma of Modernity。Berkeley:University of California Press。
41. 唐君毅(1966)。中國哲學原論：道論篇。學生書局。
42. 錢新祖 Ch''ien, Edward T.(1975).The Unfolding of Neo-Confucianism.Columbia University Press.
43. 錢新祖 Ch''ien, Edward T.(1978).Colombia University.
44. 錢新祖 Ch''ien, Edward T.(1986).Chiao Hung and the Restructuring of Neo-Confucianism in the Late Ming.New York:Columbia University Press.
45. 錢穆(1970)。朱子新學案，第1冊。三民書局。
46. 錢穆(1970)。朱子新學案，第3冊。三民書局。
47. 魏偉森(1988).Chicago University.
48. 魏偉森(1995).Genealogy of the Way: The Construction and Uses of the Confucian Tradition in Late Imperial China.Stanford: