東亞“世界城市”的不同路徑：漢城與台北

Different Routes towards World City Formation in East Asia: Seoul and Taipei Compared

10.29816/TARQSS.200209.0003

王振寰(Jenn-Hwan Wang)

世界城市 ； 金融體制 ； 金融中心 ； 漢城 ； 台北 ； 束亞 ； world city ； financial institution ； financial center ； Seoul Taipei ； East Asia

台灣社會研究季刊

47期（2002 / 09 / 01）

85 - 139

繁體中文

世界城市地位是東亞主要城市的夢想，但是1997年的金融風暴卻打碎了這樣的在願景。本論文討論漢城和台北在邁向世界城市的過程中，由於不同的發展方式，採取不同的策略，而展現不同的模式，並在1997年東亞金融風暴中，受到不同程度的衝擊。世界城市就是控制中心也是金融中心，而這意味著城市功能的改變和金融體制的轉型到英美資本市場模式。我將指出，漢城與台北的發展，受制於過去體制的影響－經濟發展模式，企業結構，以及金融體制的因素－漢城的模式，是成長擴張，企業追求全球化，以及金融無控制的自由化。這使得漢城的發展高度與世界連結，但是由於高度擴張和企業的負債，而使其世界城市發展陷於高度風險。相對的，台北的發展與台灣的穩定優先模式、中小企業為主、控制下的金融自由化有關。因此，台北的世界城市發展，穩定先於擴張和成長，而使其全球城市策略受到限制。本論文也將討論1997年之後，漢城和台北在政治經濟發展上的差異，漢城在大幅度改革之後，重新站起；而台北則在政治與經濟分離下，逐漸失去競爭能力。

To become a world city has been an ambition for most of the East Asian cities. However, the 1997 financial crisis seriously spoiled this wish. This paper discusses the different approaches that Taipei and Seoul have adopted in transforming into world city status. I argue that a world city is also a commanding center in which the financial sector will play the dominant role in which the sector will also have to be transformed into the Anglo-Saxonian financial market model. This transformation is path dependent, affected by economic development model, corporate governance, and financial sector respectively. It will argue that Seoul's approach was based on big push, Chaebol oriented, high debt-to-equity corporate governance, and liberalization without regulation tactic. This led to the high growth of the city however it also put Seoul into a high-risk environment. In contrast, Taipei's approach was based on prudent method, small and medium-sized enterprises, low debt-to-equity corporate governance, and controlled liberalization. Therefore, Taipei's transformation has not so enormous, and lacking the capacity to become a world city. This paper also discusses the development of both cities after the 1997 crisis and concludes that Seoul has been restructuring to become a competitive world city as its central state has taken ambitious reforms to its economic structure, while Taipei has gradually lost its competitiveness as the state has been entangled with its conservative strategies that has led to the divergence of its polity with its economy.

1. 金家禾 Ching, Chia-Ho(1998)。邁向世界都市之台北都會區產業結構與空間分佈變遷 Taipei Metropolitan Economic Structure and Spatial Distribution Changes While Becoming a World City。都市與計劃 City and Planning，26(2)
   連結：
2. 蔡增家 Tsai, Zheng-Jia(2001)。金大中金融改革與南韓政經體制的轉變 Change in South Korea's Political Economic Institutions: Kim Dajung's Financial Reform。問題與研究 Wenti Yu Yanjiu，40(5)
   連結：
3. 蔡增家 Tsai, Zheng-Jia(1999)。信用分配制度的轉變對政府、企業與銀行關係的影響－日本與南韓之比較 Impact of Credit Allocation Changes on States, Enterprises, and Banks: Japan and South Korea Compared。問題與研究 Wenti Yu Yanjiu，38(8)
   連結：
4. (1995).World Cities in a World-system.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
5. (1999)。亞洲最適合居住城市。亞洲週刊
6. (1997).Emerging World Cities in Pacific Asia.Tokyo:United Nations University Press.
7. (1997)。亞洲最適合居住城市。亞洲週刊
8. (2000)。中華民國證券商同業公會通訊錄。
9. Allen, F., Gale, D.(2001).Comparing Financial Systems.Cambridge, MA:The MIT Press.
10. Amsden, A.(1985).Bringing the State Back In.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
11. Amsden, A.(1990).Asia's Next Giant.NY:Oxford University Press.
12. Banker, Magazine(1999).The Top 200 Asians Banks.Banker, Magazine,Oct.
13. Boyer, R.(2000).Is a Financial-led Growth Regime a Viable Alternative to Fordism? A Preliminary Analysis.Economy and Society,29(1)
14. Brenner, N.(1998).Global Cities, Glocal States: Global City Formation and State Territorial Restructuring in Contemporary Europe.Review of International Political Economy,5(1)
15. Brenner, N.(1999).Globalisation as reterritorialisation: the re-scaling of urban governance in the European Union.Urban Studies,36(3)
16. Castells, M.(1987).The Informational City: the Space of Flows.Oxford:Basil Blackwell.
17. Cho, Myung-Rae(1997).Flexibilization through Metropolis: the Case of Postfordist Seoul, Korea.International Journal of Urban and Regional Research,21
18. Cho, Myung-Rae(2001).A Burst of Globalization: Korea's Euphoric Globalization and the Financial Crisis.Conference of 'East Asian Development Models and Their Crisis: The Regulationist Approach'
19. Cho, Myung-Rae(1997).The Flexible Metropolis: Networks, Sociality and Governance in Seoul.International Journal of Urban Sciences: Journal on Asian-Pacific Urban Studies and Affairs,1(1)
20. Feagin, J., Smith, M.(1987).The Capitalist City: Global Restructuring and Community Politics.Oxford:Basil Blackwell.
21. Fortune Magazine(1999).Best Cites Survey.Fortune Magazine
22. Friedmann, J.(1995).World Cities in a World-system.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
23. Friedmann, J.(1986).The World City Hypothesis.Development and Change,17(1)
24. Friedmann, J., Wolff, G.(1982).World City Formation: an Agenda for Research and Action.International Journal of Urban and Regional Research,6(3)
25. Fujita, K.(2000).Asian Crisis, Financial System and Urban Development.Urban Studies,37(12)
26. Gereffi, G.(1990).Manufacturing Miracles.Princeton, NY:Princeton University Press.
27. Giddens, A.(1985).The Nation-State and Violence: Volume Two of a Contemporary Critique of Historical Materialism.Cambridge:Polity.
28. Haggard, S.(1990).Pathways from the Periphery: The Politics of Growth in the Newly Industrializing Countries.Ithaca, NY:Cornell University Press.
29. Harvey, D.(1989).The Condition of Postmodernity: An Enquiry into the Conditions of Cultural Change.Cambridge, MA:Basil Blackwell.
30. Hill, R. C., Kim, June Woo(2000).Global Cities and Developmental States: New York, Tokyo, and Seoul.Urban Studies,37(12)
31. Hong, Sung Woong(1997).Emerging World Cities in Pacific Asia.Tokyo:United Nations University Press.
32. Jessop, B.(1997).Transforming Cities: Contested Governance and New Spatial Divisions.London:Routledge.
33. Jessop, B.(1998).The Entrepreneurial City: Geographies of Politics, Regime and Representation.NY:John Wiley and Sons.
34. Jessop, B., Sum, N. L.(2000).An entrepreneurial city in action: Hong Kong's emerging strategies in and for (inter) urban competition.Urban Studies,37(12)
35. Kim, H. R.(2000).Korea's Economic Governance in Transition: Governance Crisis and the Future of Korean Capitalism.Korea Observer,31(4)
36. Kim, Joochul, Choe, Sang-Chuel(1997).Seoul: The Making of a Metropolis.NY:John Wiley and Son.
37. Kim, Won-Bae(1998).National Competitiveness and Governance of the Capital Region.Second Inter-City Network Workshop on Urban-Regional Governance,Taipei:
38. Kim, Young-Woong(1999).Industrialization and Urbanization in Korea.Korea Journal,Autumn
39. King, A.(1990).Global Cities: Post-Imperialism and the Internationalization of London.London:Routledge.
40. Luedde-Nuralth, R.(1988).Developmental States in East Asia.NY:St. Martin.
41. Martin, R.(1994).Money, Power And Space.Oxford:Blackwell.
42. Noble, G. W., Ravenhill, J.(2000).The Asian Financial Crisis and the Architecture of Global Finance.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
43. Park, S. O.(1994).Industrial restructuring in the Seoul metropolitan region: major triggers and consequences.Environment and Planning, A,26
44. Park, S. O.(1993).Industrial Restructuring and the Spatial Division of Labor: The Case of the Seoul Metropolitan Region, the Republic of Korea.Environment and Planning A,25
45. Park, Y. S.(2000).The Korean Chaebol's Dash for Globalization: Has it Really Been Driven by Government Policy?.Korean Observer,31(4)
46. Porteous, D.(1999).Money and Space Economy.NY:John Wiley and Sons.
47. Republic of Korea(1999).Korea Statistical Year Book.Seoul:National Statistical Office.
48. Sassen, S.(1999).Global Financial Centers.Foreign Affairs,78(1)
49. Sassen, S.(1990).The Global City: New York, London, Tokyo.Princeton, NJ:Princeton University Press.
50. Sassen, S.(1994).Cities in a World Economy.Thousand Oaks, CA:Pine Forge Press.
51. Seoul Administrative Government(1999).Seoul Statistical Yearbook 1999.Seoul:
52. Short, J. R., Kim, Yeong-Hyun(1999).Globalization and the City.NY:Longman.
53. Song, Naghun, Dutt, A. K., Costa, F. J.(1994).The Asian City: Processes of Development, Characteristics and Planning.Netherlands:Kluwer Academic Publishers.
54. Storper, M.(1997).The Regional World: Territorial Development in a Global Economy.New York:The Guilford Press.
55. Taylor, P.(2000).World Cities and Territorial States under Conditions of Contemporary Globalization.Political Geography,19
56. Thirft, N.(1994).Money, Power, and Space.Oxford:Blackwell.
57. Wade, R.(1990).Governing the Market: Economic Theory and the Role of Government in East Asian Industrialization.Princeton, New Jersey:Princeton University Press.
58. Weiss, L.(2000).Developmental States in Transition: Adapting, Dismantling, Innovating, not 'Normalization'.Pacific Review,13(1)
59. Weiss, L.(1999).State Power and the Asian Crisis.New Political Economy,4(3)
60. Woo-Cumings, M.(1997).Capital Ungoverned: Liberalizing Finance in Interventionist States.Ithaca, NY:Cornell University Press.
61. Zysman, J.(1983).Government, Market, and Growth: Financial Systems and the Politics of Industrial Change.Ithaca, NY:Cornell University Press.
62. 中央銀行 The Central Bank of China(1999)。中央銀行年報。台北:中央銀行經濟研究處。
63. 中央銀行 The Central Bank of China、 財政部(1996)。推動「發展台灣成為亞太金融中心計劃」之執行績效。中央銀行季刊 Central Bank of China Quarterly Bulletin，18(4)
64. 王振寰 Wang, Jenn-Hwan(1997)。跨國界區域經濟形成的統理機制：以台灣資本外移南中國為例 Governance of a Cross-Border Economic Region: Taiwan and Southern China。台灣社會研究季刊 Taiwan: A Radical Quarterly in Social Studies，27
65. 王振寰 Wang, Jenn-Hwan、 黃書緯 Huang, Shu-Wei(2001)。從社會主義城市到世界城市：上海城市調節模式的轉型 From Socialist City to World City: The Transition of Shanghai's Local Mode of Regulation。臺灣社會學刊 Taiwanese Journal of Sociology，26
66. 王振寰 Wang, Jenn-Hwan、 錢永祥 Chien, Sechin Yung-Hsiang(1995)。邁向新國家？民粹威權主義的形成與民主問題。台灣社會研究季刊 Taiwan: A Radical Quarterly in Social Studies，20
67. 朱雲漢 Chu, Yun-Han(1999).The Politics of the Asian Economic Crisis.Ithaca, NY:Cornell University Press.
68. 行政院經濟建設委員會(2000).Taiwan Statistical Data Book.台北:
69. 周添城 Chou, Tein-Chen、 林志誠(1999)。台灣中小企業的發展機制。台北:聯經出版事業公司。
70. 林庭瑤(2000)。東海大學社會學系。
71. 夏鑄九 Hsia, Chu-Joe(1991)。台灣的社會問題。台北:巨流。
72. 孫清山 Sun, Ching-Shan(1997)。臺灣的都市社會。台北:巨流出版社。
73. 徐千雲(1998)。國立中興大學都市計劃研究所。
74. 財政部金融局(2000)。財政部金融局八十九年年報。財政部金融局統計室。
75. 財政部金融局統計提要
76. 許嘉棟 Shea, Jia-Dong(1999)。開放資本自由移動之影響與因應。中央銀行季刊 Central Bank of China Quarterly Bulletin，21(4)
77. 章英華 Chang, Ying-hwa(1995)。台灣都市的內部結構：社會生態的與歷史的探討。台北:巨流圖書公司。
78. 章英華 Chang, Ying-hwa、 蔡勇美 Tsai, Yung-Mei(1997)。台灣的都市社會。台北:巨流。
79. 彭揚凱(1998)。國立台灣大學建築與城鄉研究所。
80. 楊汝萬 Yeung, Yue-Man, Lo, Fu-Chen(1998).Globalization and the World of Large Cities.Tokyo:United Nations University Press.
81. 經濟部(1999)。八十八年中小企業白皮書。台北:經濟部中小企業處。
82. 中華民國歷年核准華僑及外國人投資統計年報
83. 台北市統計要覽
84. 臺北市政府研究發展考核委員會(1999)。台北市政府產業與就業發展策略之研究。台北:台北市政府。
85. 蔡建國(1998)。國立台灣大學地理學研究所。
86. 鄭光 Chung, Kwang S., Wang, Yen Kyun(2001).Corporate Governance and Finance in East Asia. Volume 2: Republic Of Korea.Manila:The Asian Development Bank.
87. 鄭敦仁 Cheng, Tun-Jen(1993).The Political Economy of Financial Revolution in Developing Countries.Cornell University Press.

1. 蔡青蓉、陳俊銘(2012)。國家再尺度化與區域路徑依賴：南韓首爾市與大德科學園區的比較。都市與計劃，39(2)，225-245。
2. 陳台智、周志龍(2014)。新自由主義都市開發策略的多尺度治理挑戰大臺北新都會的案例分析。地理學報，72，31-55。
3. 藍逸之、李建平(2007)。失能的空間治理及其時空再層級化障礙－評析亞太地緣政經中的北臺都市區域與國家。中山人文社會科學期刊，15(1)，71-119。
4. 邱彥彬(2006)。恆常與無常：論朱天心〈古都〉中的空間、身體與政治經濟學。中外文學，35(4)，57-94。
5. 顏聖錝(2021)。雙城都市化：馬來西亞國家空間的政治經濟分析。國家發展研究，20(2)，47-83。
6. 顏聖錝(2021)。族裔政治的交纏：馬來西亞國家空間生產。中國地理學會會刊，67，33-53。
7. 楊勝群(2014)。區域的整合與衝突：京津冀城市區域的治理與矛盾。中國大陸研究，57(1)，1-31。
8. 張國慶,張家銘(2020)。經濟民族主義的全球化：從中東歐台商檢視台灣銀行業的海外布局。社會與區域發展學報，6(1)，43-73。
9. 周素卿,吳幸玲,江尚書(2009).後工業化臺北與新自由主義都市政治.中國地理學會會刊,43,15-32.
10. (2003)。臺北產業結構變遷與其世界城市功能發展的限制。地理學報，34，19-39。
11. (2005)。「臺北信義豪宅」及其生產集團：信義計畫區高級住宅社區之生產者分析。地理學報，40，17-43。
12. (2005)。全球經濟變遷、發展型國家與台灣城鄉規劃之重探都市企業主義適用性的地理探查及其治理危機。地理學報，40，69-97。